Laparoscopic diagnosis of ascites in Lesotho

A Single-Center Experience: The Diagnostic Role of Peritoneoscopy in Patients with Exudative Ascites

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The causes of exudative and transudative ascites can be detected through noninvasive methods nowadays. In selected cases, peritoneoscopy could be necessary for definitive diagnosis. In this retrospective study, we aimed to present the peritoneal biopsy results of patients who had exudative ascites with unclear etiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 86 patients who had exudative ascites of unclear etiology. All the patients showed abnormalities of the peritoneum or greater omentum as determined by abdominal ultrasonography and underwent peritoneoscopy between January 2012 and December 2015. Patient data were obtained from hospital records.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (male: 22; 25.6%, mean age ± standard deviation: 57.97 ± 15.97) who had exudative ascites of unclear etiology were included to the study. The success rate of the procedures was 100% (86/86). A specific histopathological diagnosis was made in all patients, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Among the 86 diagnosed patients, 43 (50%) were peritonitis carcinomatosa, 21 (24.4%) were tuberculous peritonitis, 14 (16.3%) were mesothelioma, 4 (4.7%) were chronical inflammation, and 1 (1.2%) was lymphoma. Three (3.5%) patients had normal peritoneal biopsy findings.

DISCUSSION

Peritoneoscopy is a safe and efficient alternative method due to its high diagnostic capacity in selected patients who have exudative ascites of unclear etiology.

A case of inflammatory ascites

CASE BACKGROUND: Ascites appears mainly as a consequence of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, or can be caused by several other causes, such us congestive heart failure, peritoneal malignancy, or tuberculosis. In some cases, ascites can pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and in some patients, despite thorough and extensive work-up, the origin of this ascites remains unknown.

CASE REPORT

In the unusual case hereby reported, a 52-year-old man developed severe ascites in a few weeks, in the absence of known liver disease or congestive hearth failure. We performed laboratory analysis, endoscopic, and imaging investigations, including abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Peritoneal fluid analysis showed exudative fluid without neoplastic cells. A diagnostic laparoscopy with multiple diagnostic biopsies was carried out, but no macroscopic cause of the ascites was found; histopathological examination showed minimal aspects of diffuse and non-specific chronic inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

We decided to empirically treat the patient with steroid therapy (methylprednisolone: 0·5 mg/kg/day). Over a period of 6 weeks, his ascites resolved and at 2 months, he was in remission on low-dose methylprednisolone. Our final hypothesis was reactive inflammatory ascites. The literature on ascites and its management has also been reviewed.

Role of peritoneal ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy of extravisceral masses in the diagnosis of ascites of undetermined origin

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Ascites may be of undetermined origin despite comprehensive study. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and safety of conventional and interventional high-frequency peritoneal ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients with ascites of unclear origin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 62 patients were prospectively enrolled; they underwent conventional (3.5-5MHz) and high-frequency (6-8MHz) transabdominal peritoneal ultrasound to suggest the nature of ascites supplemented by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of ascites and/or core biopsy of the omentum or other extra-visceral masses for final histopathologic diagnosis. Laparoscopy or laparotomy was needed if biopsy was inconclusive.

RESULTS

Ultrasound-guided procedures were diagnostic in 55 (87.7%) patients. Thirty-six (58.1%) were benign, of whom 86% had tuberculous peritonitis, 26 (41.9%) were malignant, of whom 76.9% had peritoneal metastasis. High-frequency ultrasound was able to propose ultrasonographic criteria in a trial to diagnose the nature of ascites. Our proposed ultrasonographic criteria were based on the amount and texture of ascites in addition to the omental and mesenteric features. These were able to suggest the diagnosis with 80.7% sensitivity for malignant ascites and 75% specificity for benign ascites. Moreover, histopathological examination of tissues obtained by ultrasound-guided procedures increased the sensitivity to 88.5% and the specificity to 88.9% in diagnosing malignant and benign disease, respectively, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.6%. These procedures were considered to be safe as only one major (haemoperitoneum) and two minor complications (temporary ascitic fistula) were reported.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency peritoneal ultrasound together with the minimally invasive ultrasound-guided FNAC/biopsy of extra-visceral lesions may be considered an effective and safe tool in the diagnosis of ascites of undetermined origin.

Intra-abdominal and gastrointestinal tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

Reports suggest that the rates of tuberculosis (TB) continue to rise in the UK and throughout the world. The spread of the disease is aided by poverty, overcrowding, co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus and drug resistance. Consistent with the overall trend, intra-abdominal and gastrointestinal (GI) TB rates are rising. Tuberculosis is a treatable disease, whether occurring in the lungs or at extra-pulmonary sites but the nonspecific features of the disease result in difficulty in establishing a diagnosis. In this report, we have concentrated on the benefits and potential pitfalls of diagnostic methods.

METHOD

A literature review was performed using the National Library of Medicine's Pubmed Database using the keywords diagnosis, management, abdominal and GI TB.

RESULTS

Abdominal TB presents a particular challenge, as the diverse features of the disease do not readily suggest a particular diagnosis and diagnostic delays lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A number of investigative methods have been used to aid in the diagnosis of abdominal and GI TB.

CONCLUSION

The nonspecific presentation of abdominal and GI TB present challenges in the diagnosis of this increasingly common disease. A high index of suspicion is an important factor in early diagnosis. After a diagnosis has been established, prompt initiation of treatment helps prevent morbidity and mortality.

Systematic review: tuberculous peritonitis--presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment

The peritoneum is one of the most common extrapulmonary sites of tuberculous infection. Peritoneal tuberculosis remains a significant problem in parts of the world where tuberculosis is prevalent. Increasing population migration, usage of more potent immunosuppressant therapy and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic has contributed to a resurgence of this disease in regions where it had previously been largely controlled. Tuberculous peritonitis frequently complicates patients with underlying end-stage renal or liver disease that further adds to the diagnostic difficulty. The diagnosis of this disease, however, remains a challenge because of its insidious nature, the variability of its presentation and the limitations of available diagnostic tests. A high index of suspicion is needed whenever confronted with unexplained ascites, particularly in high-risk patients. Based on a systematic review of the literature, we recommend: tuberculous peritonitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all patients presenting with unexplained lymphocytic ascites and those with a serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) of <11 g/L; culture growth of Mycobacterium of the ascitic fluid or peritoneal biopsy as the gold standard test; further studies to determine the role of polymerase chain reaction, ascitic adenosine deaminase and the BACTEC radiometric system for acceleration of mycobacterial identification as means of improving the diagnostic yield; increasing utilization of ultrasound and computerized tomographic scan for the diagnosis and as a guidance to obtain peritoneal biopsies; low threshold for diagnostic laparoscopy; treatment for 6 months with the first-line antituberculous drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide) in uncomplicated cases.

Indication for peritoneal biopsy in tuberculous peritonitis

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of effective antituberculous chemotherapy, the clinical outcome of tuberculous peritonitis depends much on the diagnostic accuracy of this disease entity. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art thinking regarding the protean manifestation and diagnostic modalities of this major infectious disease.

DATA SOURCES

This review was compiled after an extensive search of the current and historical literature, comprising 1,070 cases of tuberculous peritonitis. A number of important areas were highlighted, with emphasis on the diagnostic value and clinical impact of peritoneal biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe an aggressive diagnostic approach, particularly with peritoneal biopsy, is warranted for the diagnosis and timely treatment of tuberculous peritonitis.

Malignant ascites

Investigation and treatment of malignant ascites are often in the hands of the general surgeon and can be difficult. This article considers the aetiology and pathophysiology of malignant ascites and explores the best form of management. Established treatment modalities and new therapeutic options are reviewed and a new management regimen based on a knowledge of the tumour of origin is proposed, which aims to balance potential benefit against morbidity.

Ascitic fluid gamma interferon concentrations and adenosine deaminase activity in tuberculous peritonitis

The gamma interferon (gamma-IFN) concentration and the adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity were evaluated in 30 patients with tuberculous peritonitis, 21 patients with ascites due to a malignant disorder, and 41 patients with cirrhosis. The gamma-IFN concentrations were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in tuberculous peritonitis patients (mean: 6.70 U/ml) than in the malignant (mean: 3.10 U/ml) and cirrhotic (mean: 3.08 U/ml) groups. Use of a cut off value of > or = 3.2 U/ml gave the assay a sensitivity of 93% (25 of 27), a specificity of 98% (54 of 55), positive (P+) and negative (P-) predictive values of 96% and a test accuracy of 96%. The ADA activity was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in the tuberculous peritonitis group (mean: 101.84 U/l) than in the control groups (cirrhosis (mean: 13.49 U/l) and malignancy (mean: 19.35 U/l)). A cut off value of > 30 U/l gave the ADA test a sensitivity of 93% (26 of 28) a specificity of 96% (51 of 53), a (P+) value of 93%, a (P-) value of 96%, and a test accuracy of 95%. There was a significant (p < 0.0001) correlation (r = 0.72) between ADA activity and gamma-IFN values in patients with tuberculous peritonitis. These results show that a high concentration of gamma-IFN in ascitic fluid is as valuable as the ADA activity in the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis. Both are rapid non-invasive diagnostic tests for tuberculous peritonitis.

The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of ascites of unknown origin

The role of laparoscopy in the diagnostic evaluation of ascites of unknown origin was studied in 129 patients. Laparoscopic results were as follows: (1) Carcinomatosis peritonei in 78 (60.5%). Peritoneal biopsies in 76 of these cases revealed malignancy in 67 (adenocarcinoma 62, lymphoma 4, mesothelioma 1) and tuberculosis in 5; specimens were inadequate for diagnosis in 4. (2) Tuberculous peritonitis in 26 (20.2%). Peritoneal biopsies in 24 of these cases revealed tuberculosis in 22 and non-specific chronic peritonitis in 2. (3) Cirrhosis in 7 (5.4%). (4) No gross abnormality in 18 (14.0%). Of the latter, causes of ascites had already been identified in 13 (72.2%), including chronic renal failure in 7, systemic lupus erythematosus in 2, constrictive pericarditis in 2, chronic pancreatitis with chylous ascites in 1, and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis with chylous ascites in 1. Thus, laparoscopic observation in combination with biopsy established the cause of ascites of unknown origin in 111 (86.0%) of 129 patients. Most of the 18 patients without gross laparoscopic abnormality had underlying disease identified as a cause of ascites; laparoscopy was indicated in these cases to exclude other processes that may also cause ascites.

Presentation and role of peritoneoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis

This study represents the clinical and laboratory features of 135 tuberculous peritonitis cases in whom peritoneoscopic investigation was used routinely. Disease was more common in women than men (1.5:1) and was most frequently encountered in the third and fourth decades in life. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal distension (96%), abdominal pain (82%), weight loss (80%), weakness (76%), loss of appetite (73%) and fever (69%). The most common physical findings were ascites (96%), fever (75%) and abdominal tenderness (43%). One hundred and twenty-nine cases (95.5%) showed exudative type tuberculous peritonitis with variable amounts of ascites and filmy adhesions. In six patients (4.5%) the disease was of the plastic (dry) type. Peritoneoscopic investigations of 139 patients suggested tuberculous peritonitis but four cases showed histologically proven malignancy (3%). Laparoscopic diagnoses of the remaining cases were confirmed by histology (97%). The laparoscopic appearance of scattered yellowish-white nodules, approximately 1-5 mm in size, on the peritoneal surfaces, and filmy adhesions were suggestive of tuberculous peritonitis. A non-fatal colon perforation occurred as a major complication. After antituberculous therapy patients were followed for at least 1 year. Peritoneoscopy with simultaneous biopsy is the ideal and most accurate diagnostic modality in the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis.

Laparoscopy in Tuberculous Peritonitis

Intra-abdominal tuberculosis remains a significant health hazard in the developing countries. In countries where sophisticated medical facilities are not easily available, laparoscopic examination of intra-abdominal organs is helpful. In this study, 22 patients were found to have peritoneal tuberculosis out of 82 laparoscopic examinations. The major clinical presentation in these patients were abdominal pain, weight loss, fever and ascites. Tuberculin test was not always positive. Direct visualization of the peritoneum and obtaining peritoneal biopsies provide the definitive tissue diagnosis to confirm the clinical diagnosis.

Nonoperative antiinfective treatment of intraabdominal infections

There are many causes of peritonitis. Primary peritonitis is rare, but may complicate cirrhosis of the liver or may, in developing countries, be caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is occasionally iatrogenic, particularly as a complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. It is, however, most frequently the result of perforation of a hollow viscus, caused by either trauma or disease. Its most lethal form follows breakdown of an intestinal anastomosis. Primary and iatrogenic peritonitis should be treated with antibiotics, and localized abscesses can sometimes be cured by percutaneous aspiration. Secondary peritonitis requires resuscitation, antibiotics, and operation. When there is gross microbial invasion, it is wise to avoid suture of the hollow viscus. If there is a strong chance of recurrence of intraabdominal abscesses, nonclosure of the abdomen is theoretically desirable and allows frequent reexploration. This is particularly applicable to pancreatic abscesses.