Quantitation of transplacental haemorrhage

Quantitation of residual D positive red cells in D negative recipients of D positive solid organ transplants

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplants (SOT) from D positive donors are potentially sensitising events for D negative recipients. For this reason, it is important to quantify the presence of residual D positive red blood cells (RBCs) in the recipient's circulation and calculate the correct dose of prophylactic anti-D (PAD) required to prevent sensitisation. This is especially important in females of child-bearing potential where the presence of allo anti-D can, at worst, cause the death of the fetus in future pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics of D positive SOT cases referred to Red Cell Immunohaematology, NHSBT for flow cytometry investigation. This information could indicate improvements required in the current testing methodology, as well as to the calculations used to prescribe PAD for this patient group.

METHODS

Samples were investigated using a Beckman Coulter Navios Flow Cytometer using BRAD3-FITC (anti-D), AEVZ5.3-FITC (isotype matched negative control) and BIRMA17C-PE (granulocyte exclusion reagent). Mollison's calculation was used to estimate the dose of PAD required to prevent sensitisation in the D negative recipients. The calculation was adapted to consider the presence of organ donor D positive adult RBCs in the circulation of recipients instead of, larger, fetal RBCs.

RESULTS

Samples from 20 patients, all female, aged 14-53 years (one 2-year-old outlier) were referred from 2016 to September 2020. The transplants were-liver (n = 6), kidney (n = 6) and lung (n = 8). D positive cell populations were identified in 11 cases (0.1-8.0 ml); and required PAD (500-1500 IU). From these 20 patients, 10 sent a follow-up sample, where 8 required PAD top-up due to the detection of residual D positive cells (0.1-2 ml)-liver (n = 1), kidney (n = 1) and lung transplant (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

All patients in the study were D negative females, in which 18 were considered by guidelines to be of childbearing potential (2-42 years old) and 2 were >50 years old. Referrals demonstrate an awareness for the correct calculation of PAD to prevent D sensitisation. The sample size is small, but top up requirement in 8/20 of cases demonstrates accurate quantification is clearly needed to ensure the appropriate dose of PAD is provided.

Detecting fetomaternal hemorrhage by flow cytometry

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent developments in the area of detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage by flow cytometry.

RECENT FINDINGS

Maternal red blood cell chimerism is readily detectable by flow cytometry. Fetal and maternal red blood cells differ in their content of fetal hemoglobin (alpha2gamma2). Fetal red blood cells contain fetal hemoglobin, and normal maternal red blood cells contain some percentage of fetal hemoglobin in a background of normal adult hemoglobin. All blood group systems with allelic differences between mother and fetus are readily applicable for detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage by fetal hemoglobin.

SUMMARY

Fetal hemoglobin for detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage is an accurate clinical diagnostic procedure for investigation of anemia in fetus and newborn.

Massive antenatal fetomaternal hemorrhage: evidence for long-term survival of fetal red blood cells

BACKGROUND

Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) can lead to life-threatening anemia. Quantification based on flow cytometry with anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) is applicable in all cases but underestimation of large fetal bleeds has been reported. A large FMH from an ABO-compatible fetus allows an estimation of the life span of fetal red blood cells (RBCs) in the maternal circulation.

CASE REPORT

The mother went to the obstetrician twice antepartum owing to symptoms assumed to be preeclampsia; that, however, was not found. She later delivered by cesarean section owing to diminished fetal movements. No fetal weight gain was observed during the last 2 weeks of pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fetal RBCs were quantified by flow cytometry with anti-HbF, anti-Fy(a), anti-s, and anti-Jk(b) on a regular basis.

RESULTS

The infant had anemia at delivery and an FMH was determined to be 314 +/- 17 mL (+/- SD) of whole blood. It is assumed that the two antenatal visits were associated with the FMH. Postpartum follow-up showed that fetal RBCs in the maternal circulation were detectable with anti-HbF up to 119 days. Quantification by flow cytometry based on anti-HbF was in agreement with quantification based on anti-Fy(a), anti-s, and anti-Jk(b), although they were less sensitive.

CONCLUSION

ABO-compatible fetal RBCs from an FMH had a life span in the maternal circulation close to that of adult RBCs.

Analysis of factors affecting quantification of fetomaternal hemorrhage by flow cytometry

BACKGROUND

An analysis was carried out to determine the sources and extent of errors encountered in the quantitation of the volume of fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) by flow cytometry. Different assay conditions were compared, to define the simplest, most accurate protocol.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

D-, D+, and artificial FMH (mixtures of D+ and D- RBCs) were stained either by a direct method (using FITC-conjugated IgG3 D MoAb [BRAD-3]), with or without dual labeling with PE-conjugated anti-GPA, or by indirect methods (using polyclonal anti-D followed by FITC- or biotin-conjugated anti-IgG reagents). Cells were selected for flow cytometric analysis on the basis of either forward or side scatter (log FSC/log SSC) characteristics or of GPA+ labeling or were unselected. The numbers of events labeled with anti-D were determined from histograms. For some samples, 10 replicates of 500,000 events each were analyzed.

RESULTS

Background fluorescent events in 10 directly labeled gated D- samples ranged from 0.007 to 0.023 percent, equivalent to 0.15- to 0.51-mL FMH. Both the use of a gate on log FSC/SSC or the selection of GPA+ events only resulted in a reduction in FMH of 0.3 mL or less. The intra-assay variation in FMH, or sampling error, was found to be approximately 10 percent at low artificial FMH (<10 mL) but greater (< or =50% with a CV of 15%) with D- samples. Direct staining was quicker and produced a lower background than indirect staining.

CONCLUSION

The inherent sampling error that is due to the random distribution of rare events throughout the blood sample contributed greatly to the variation in the volume of FMH calculated by flow cytometry. The FMH should not be underestimated. For a routine assay, a simplified protocol and calculation will be sufficiently accurate to determine the dose of prophylactic anti-D that should be given to the patient.