Postoperative feeding

Nutritional support for head-injured patients

BACKGROUND

Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (for example, early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect on mortality and morbidity of alternative strategies of providing nutritional support following head injury.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Injuries Group specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Research Register, Web of Science and other electronic trials registers. Reference lists of trials and review articles were checked. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of timing or route of nutritional support following acute traumatic brain injury.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Information was collected on death, disability, and incidence of infection. If trial quality was unclear, or if there were missing outcome data, trialists were contacted in an attempt to get further information.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 11 trials were included. Seven trials addressed the timing of support (early versus delayed), data on mortality were obtained for all seven trials (284 participants). The relative risk (RR) for death with early nutritional support was 0.67 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.07). Data on disability were available for three trials. The RR for death or disability at the end of follow-up was 0.75 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.11). Seven trials compared parenteral versus enteral nutrition. Because early support often involves parenteral nutrition, three of the trials are also included in the previous analyses. Five trials (207 participants) reported mortality. The RR for mortality at the end of follow-up period was 0.66 (0.41 to 1.07). Two trials provided data on death and disability. The RR was 0.69 (95% Cl 0.40 to 1.19). One trial compared gastric versus jejunal enteral nutrition, there were no deaths and the RR was not estimable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that early feeding may be associated with a trend towards better outcomes in terms of survival and disability. Further trials are required. These trials should report not only nutritional outcomes but also the effect on death and disability.

Nutritional support for head-injured patients

BACKGROUND

Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (e.g early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect on mortality and morbidity of alternative strategies of providing nutritional support following head injury.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Injuries Group specialised register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIDS Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings, and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of timing or route of nutritional support following acute traumatic brain injury.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Information was collected on death, disability, and incidence of infection. If trial quality was unclear, or if there were missing outcome data, trialists were contacted in an attempt to get further information.

MAIN RESULTS

The timing of support: early versus delayed Of the seven trials addressing the timing of support, data on mortality were obtained for all seven trials (284 participants). The relative risk (RR) for death with early nutritional support was 0.67 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.07). Data on disability were available for three trials. The RR for death or disability at the end of follow-up was 0.75 (0.50 to 1.11). The route of feeding: parenteral versus enteral Seven trials compared parenteral versus enteral nutrition. Because early support often involves parenteral nutrition, three of the trials are also included in the previous analyses. Five trials (207 participants) reported mortality. The RR for mortality at the end of follow-up period was 0.66 (0.41 to 1.07). Two trials provided data on death and disability. The RR was 0.69 (95%Cl 0.40 to 1.19). 3. Enteral nutrition: jejunal versus gastric. There was one trial with no deaths and the RR is not estimable.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that early feeding may be associated with a trend towards better outcomes in terms of survival and disability. Further trials are required. These trials should report not only nutritional outcomes but also the effect on death and disability.

Malnutrition in critically ill patients in intensive care units

The provision of artificial nutrition for critically ill patients is of great importance as many are unable to maintain their own nutritional needs. The administration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutrition (EN) has become a daily practice in intensive care units. Despite this, many patients remain undernourished or even malnourished and it is estimated that the incidence of malnutrition in intensive care patients could be as high as 50% (McCain, 1993). The reasons by which patients become or remain undernourished are multifactorial and range from physiological to iatrogenic. In order to lessen the catabolic state which results from the hypermetabolism associated with critical illness, prompt and adequate nutritional support must be delivered. It is essential that members of the multidisciplinary team caring for critically ill patients are aware of the importance of nutrition and the deleterious effects of malnutrition to achieve the best possible outcome for patients.

Malnutrition in hospital patients: where does it come from?

This article provides a comprehensive overview of malnutrition in hospital patients. It explores the issues surrounding nutrition and investigates factors that contribute to the malnutrition seen in patients within the community and to the malnutrition that develops while patients are in hospital. It proposes that although patients are at risk of malnutrition in the community, malnutrition can develop while the patient is in hospital, as the result of changes in diet, nutrition not being seen as a high priority, common hospital practices, and lack of knowledge of patients' previous nutritional state.

Nutrition and its importance to intensive care patients

The purpose in this paper is to consider the importance of early nutrition for critically ill patients, briefly reviewing the effects of malnutrition, and the metabolic response to starvation and sepsis. Discussion includes assessment of nutritional status and nutritional requirements, with a suggested enteral feeding regime; and also the combined effect of enteral nutrition and glutamine on gut integrity and its relevance to nosocomial pneumonia, and the ability of the gut to accept food during critical illness.

Preoperative total parenteral nutrition is not associated with mucosal atrophy or bacterial translocation in humans

Concerns have recently been expressed at suggestions that postoperative sepsis may be more common in patients who have received preoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The mechanism suggested for this is that TPN causes intestinal mucosal atrophy leading to increased bacterial translocation from the gut as a source of systemic sepsis. This hypothesis was examined in 203 patients who had an elective laparotomy, 28 of whom required at least 10 days of preoperative TPN. Neither mucosal atrophy nor bacterial translocation was more common in parenterally fed patients than in enterally fed controls. In humans theoretical concerns about the adverse effects of TPN on intestinal integrity are unfounded.

The prevalence of gut translocation in humans

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gut translocation of enteric organisms across the intact intestinal mucosa has been postulated as a potential source of sepsis in susceptible patients. However, little is known of its occurrence or significance in humans. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of gut translocation of bacteria in humans and attempt to identify any predisposing factors to its occurrence.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 267 general surgical patients were examined for evidence of bacterial translocation by bacterial analysis of intestinal serosa and mesenteric lymph nodes taken at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

Translocation occurred in 10.3% of patients overall. Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria translocated. Excluding patients with distal intestinal obstruction and those with inflammatory bowel disease in whom translocation was more common, the prevalence was 5%. Neither jaundice, nutritional status, nor total parenteral nutrition predisposed to translocation. Similarly, mucosal atrophy did not predispose to this phenomenon. The development of postoperative septic complications was twice as common in patients with translocation as in those without, but mortality was unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Translocation occurs as a spontaneous event in humans, but its clinical significance remains to be defined.

Acute neuromuscular respiratory paralysis

Images

Caring for patients with enterocutaneous fistulae

Fistulae are distressing for both patients and staff. The management of fistulae presents a challenge to the nurse in terms of providing care for the psychological and physiological needs of the patient. This article describes the causes of fistulae and examines the nursing priorities and how to achieve them.

Intravenous nutritional support and the surgeon: where next?

Over the past twenty five years the development of total parenteral nutrition has in many ways revolutionised the practice of surgery. It has enhanced survival in otherwise high mortality operations such as oesophageal surgery, especially with anastomotic complications. It has changed significantly the management of fistulae, either post operative or associated with diseases such as Crohn's enteritis. Here a basic general principle is applied--that a fistula will close if there is no distal obstruction and the throughput can be diminished. This can be achieved by withholding oral feeding and using the parenteral route. It has allowed survival in the short gut syndrome from whatever cause and it is interesting to see the degree of "intestinal adaptation" that occurs once the first critical year is survived with the help of intravenous nutrition. The assessment of nutritional status is difficult and while the level of serum albumin may be taken as a clinical standard, it is obvious that many patients survive extensive surgery with low albumin levels and also that there appears to be a lag period to the restoration of albumin levels, even with otherwise successful nutritional support and with other parameters being satisfactory. Even complex formulae using a combination of laboratory and antropometric parameters is not fully satisfactory as an absolute assessment of nutritional status. It is now interesting to see that nutrition can affect both immune competence and even carcinogenesis. The lipid element in intravenous nutrition may cause dysfunction of immunity and vitamin status, gastric and platelet function with impaired oxygen diffusion leading to increased wedge pressures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)