Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen

Application of a clinical score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 197 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to validate a clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively applied a clinical scoring system on 197 consecutive pediatric patients operated on for acute appendicitis. They therefore looked for a correlation between the management suggested by the scoring system and pathologic diagnosis on surgical specimens.

RESULTS

Based on final pathologic specimen, surgery has been performed unnecessarily in 23% of cases. The proposed scoring system could have reduced unnecessary surgery to 2%. Only 8% of patients with acute appendicitis would have been discharged home. Sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system used in this study was 87% and 86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical scoring system proposed in this study could be of help in early clinical diagnosis of appendicitis to reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgery.

Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain of uncertain aetiology (non-specific abdominal pain; NSAP) is the commonest reason for emergency surgical admission. The aim of this study was to examine the role of early laparoscopy in the management of NSAP.

METHODS

Some 120 patients, admitted between November 1995 and October 1998 with acute abdominal pain of uncertain aetiology, were randomized into two groups: group 1 had laparoscopy during the first 18 h of admission and group 2 had close observation, conventional investigation and surgical intervention if signs of peritonism developed. Outcome measures were diagnosis, operative procedures, duration of hospital stay, readmission rate, morbidity and death, patient satisfaction and total number of investigations performed.

RESULTS

Median hospital stay was 2 (range 1-13) days in both groups (P = 0.87). A diagnosis was established in 48 (81 per cent) of 59 patients in group 1 compared with 22 (36 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P < 0.0001). The morbidity rate was 14 (24 per cent) of 59 in group 1 and 19 (31 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P = 0.3629). The readmission rate at a median follow-up of 21 (range 1-35) months was 17 (29 per cent) of 59 in group 1 compared with 20 (33 per cent) of 61 in group 2 (P = 0. 6375). Well-being scores improved from 134 on admission to 149 of 177 6 weeks later in group 1 (P = 0.007) and from 132 to 143 of 177 in group 2 (P = 0.089).

CONCLUSION

Early laparoscopy provided a higher diagnostic accuracy and improved quality of life in patients with NSAP.

A rare laparoscopic diagnosis in acute abdominal pain: torsion of epiploic appendix

Torsion of an epiploic appendix is seldom diagnosed preoperatively because of the difficult differential diagnosis with other diseases causing acute abdominal pain, particularly appendicitis. The classic McBurney approach overlooks many infarcted epiploic appendixes. The use of diagnostic laparoscopy in acute abdominal pain can show an infarcted epiploic appendix to be at the origin of pain. Four patients were admitted for acute abdominal pain and moderate tenderness in lower quadrants and were operated on for suspected acute appendicitis. In all cases laparoscopy found the torsion of an epiploic appendix, which was resected, and a normal cecal appendix. Postoperative course was uneventful. In case of acute abdominal pain in the lower quadrants of suspected appendiceal origin, laparoscopy should be routinely performed not only in women but also in men to avoid overlooking other intraperitoneal diseases that can be the cause of symptoms.

A computer-based flowcharting system for clinical protocols

In medicine, scientific and technological developments for investigation and treatment are proceeding at an ever increasing rate. Protocols for patient management are becoming ever more complicated. Rational design and scientific evaluation of protocols requires precise documentation. We propose a notation based on a series of simple flowcharts which describe procedures in increasing detail. Each step in a flowchart is justified by a reasoned argument, possibly including reference to published articles. General correctness requirements of a protocol include, for example, conformity with known indications and contraindications for investigations and treatments. These correctness requirements can be specified declaratively in mathematical logic and justified by reasoned argument. This makes the correspondence between a protocol and its scientific foundation even more explicit. Flowcharts of this nature are more easily created and modified using a personal computer. Furthermore, use of the computer enables a protocol to be checked automatically against its specification for more rapid identification of errors during development and maintenance of the protocol. We present the structured design of our flowcharting system in the 'Z' specification language, and we examine the practicality of our approach by means of a case study; the management of infertility. Our flowcharting system may also have application outside medicine where it is necessary to describe formal protocols for complex procedures.

Peritoneal cytology for suspected acute appendicitis: an economic evaluation

Suspected acute appendicitis is a common reason for surgery. Unfortunately, diagnosis is not always simple and, in recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to developing better diagnostic techniques. Peritoneal cytology is one such technique. It is simple, minimally invasive, and has been established as clinically effective. This paper reports on an economic evaluation of peritoneal cytology, carried out at Wellington Hospital, New Zealand. The analysis is based on two trials totalling 192 patients. The perspective taken initially is that of a hospital financial manager, seeking to minimise costs. In the first trial, there was a marginal increase in overall cost per person presenting with suspected acute appendicitis, from using the test. In the second, there was a reduction. In both trials there were significant health benefits--unnecessary operations were avoided, and necessary operations done more quickly. Also, the practice developed, in the second trial, of sending patients home immediately following a negative test result. This further increased savings. We then discuss the results from a broader perspective. We conclude that the additional personal benefits--less time convalescing, and lower mortality, on average--ensure that the benefits outweigh the costs of the test.

Emergency laparoscopic surgery

The acute abdomen continues to demand a large proportion of the general surgeon's workload. Recent studies have demonstrated that management errors can be significantly reduced using selective laparoscopy and this should now become routine practice. The continuing advances in laparoscopic surgery that permit many emergency procedures to be performed by this route provide increased impetus for a combined approach using diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for the management of the acute abdomen. Results of current studies must be awaited before the exact role of emergency laparoscopic surgery can be defined, but early reports suggest several advantages in using laparoscopy to manage conditions such as acute appendicitis, perforated peptic ulcer and gynaecological emergencies.