Intravenous magnesium in suspected acute myocardial infarction

The importance of effect mechanism in the design and interpretation of clinical trials: the role of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction

The design and interpretation of randomized clinical trials and of meta-analyses of trials should be informed by a biologically plausible hypothesis of treatment effect. Without some insight on likely mechanism, trial conditions may not be optimum to allow a true treatment effect to be detected. Judgments on mechanism underpin decisions on the appropriateness of pooling studies in meta-analysis. Where statistical heterogeneity of trial results is found, the possibility of true biological effect modification can only be assessed by considering potential treatment mechanisms. These can then be tested in carefully designed laboratory models. Meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials of intravenous Mg(2+) in acute myocardial infarction gives a null effect (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.08) with a fixed effects model, but with strong evidence of heterogeneity (P <.0001) due to a single large study in which Mg(2+) was generally given late and after fibrinolytic treatment. A random effects model gives a pooled odds ratio 0.61 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.87, P = 0.006). Laboratory models show that timing of Mg(2+) administration before or after reperfusion critically determines whether myocardial protection occurs.

Adjunctive magnesium infusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Intravenous magnesium therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been shown to be beneficial in many studies. However, these effects are not consistent from one trial to another, and their clinical significance is often questionable. A total of 78 consecutive patients were included in a prospective placebo controlled, randomized study of the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion in acute MI. Of these, 52 (66%) received intravenous streptokinase and the rest belonged to a non-thrombolysed group. These patients were randomized to receive magnesium sulfate infusion (8 mmol over 5 min followed by 65 mmol over 24 h) or placebo. The end points were serious arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and death during hospital stay and at the end of 28 days. LVEF measured by radionuclide ventriculography at discharge (9 +/- 5 days) was similar in two groups (41 +/- 11 vs. 39 +/- 10; magnesium vs. placebo respectively, P = 0.40). However, the LVEF of the placebo-treated thrombolysed group was higher than the non-thrombolysed group (42 +/- 10 vs. 37 +/- 0, P = 0.02). Incidence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was higher with placebo than with magnesium (50% vs. 23% respectively, P < 0.02, odds ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.1-0.85). Mortality during hospital stay and at the end of 28 days was also similar in both the groups. Thus, the administration of magnesium infusion as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy remains to be of questionable benefit.

Specific heparin preparations interfere with the simultaneous measurement of ionized magnesium and ionized calcium

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether heparin anticoagulants used for analysis of whole blood ionized calcium would influence the measurement of ionized magnesium.

METHODS

The effects of zinc heparin, lithium heparin, and electrolyte-balanced heparin on the simultaneous measurement of ionized magnesium and ionized calcium in serum were determined using ion selective electrodes.

RESULTS

Time-dependent biases in ionized magnesium and calcium concentrations were apparent with zinc heparin but not with lithium or electrolyte-balanced heparin. Ionized magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significantly influenced by volume-dependent changes in zinc heparin potency than with lithium or electrolyte-balanced heparin.

CONCLUSION

Zinc heparin produces a significant positive bias in the simultaneous determination of ionized magnesium and ionized calcium concentrations.

New whole blood analyzers and their impact on cardiac and critical care

Miniaturized whole blood biosensors, patient-focused hospitals, and rising expectations of patients and physicians are shifting laboratory diagnostics to the point of care. Expanding transplantation and intensive care are increasing the need for rapid test results. Whole blood analysis improves accuracy, eliminates centrifugation, reduces response time, and conserves blood volume. Several hand-held, and over 20 portable or transportable whole blood instruments are now available. Criteria for instrument evaluation include test menus, point-of-care features, analysis time, on-site performance, and information integration. Whole blood analyzers measure several vital indicators (pO2, pCO2, pH, hematocrit, K+, Ca2+, Na+, Cl-, glucose, and lactate) simultaneously in less than 2 min with less than 200 microliters of whole blood. Other in vitro tests are available (Mg2+, osmolality, CO2 content, urea nitrogen, beta-hydroxybutyrate, hemoglobin, coagulation) or under development (HCO3- phosphorus). Some can be monitored in vivo (O2 saturation, pO2, pCO2, pH, glucose) or ex vivo. The clinical impact is demonstrated by ionized calcium, now established in importance for cardiac and neurologic problems, and ionized magnesium, a promising new measurement. The hybrid laboratory (a composite of conventional clinical laboratory and patient-focused testing), performance maps, and quality paths facilitate implementation of new whole blood analyzers for optimal support of cardiac and critical care, and improved patient outcomes (prospects).

Intravenous magnesium sulphate in suspected acute myocardial infarction: results of the second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2)

The cardiovascular actions of the magnesium ion at pharmacological concentrations include coronary and systemic vasodilatation, platelet inhibition, and antiarrhythmic effects. Magnesium has also been reported to protect myocardial tissue in experimental models of ischaemia and reperfusion. Several small clinical trials in suspected acute myocardial infarction have suggested that early mortality can be reduced by intravenous infusion of magnesium salts in the acute phase, but none has been of sufficient size to be conclusive. We therefore conducted a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study in 2316 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction who received either intravenous magnesium sulphate (8 mmol over 5 min followed by 65 mmol over 24 h) or physiological saline. The primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality, which was ascertained in 99.3% of patients. The groups were well balanced for prognostic factors. By intention-to-treat analysis mortality from all causes was 7.8% in the magnesium group and 10.3% in the placebo group (2p = 0.04), a relative reduction of 24% (95% confidence interval 1-43%). Within the coronary care unit the incidence of left ventricular failure was reduced by 25% (7-39%) in the magnesium group (2p = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of heart block or the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, direct-current cardioversion, or temporary pacing. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 65% of each group, with closely similar rises in cardiac enzymes. The side-effects of magnesium treatment were transient flushing, related to speed of injection of the loading dose, and an increased incidence of sinus bradycardia (2p = 0.02). Exploratory subgroup analyses of 28-day mortality did not indicate any effect modification by thrombolysis or aspirin, or by previous treatment with beta blockers, calcium antagonists, or diuretics. Intravenous magnesium sulphate is a simple, safe, and widely applicable treatment. Its efficacy in reducing early mortality of myocardial infarction is comparable to, but independent of, that of thrombolytic or antiplatelet therapy.