Comparison of spontaneous ascites filtration and reinfusion with total paracentesis with intravenous albumin infusion in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites

Use of human albumin infusion in cirrhotic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Human albumin infusion is effective for controlling systemic inflammation, thereby probably managing some liver cirrhosis-related complications, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and hepatorenal syndrome. However, its clinical benefits remain controversial.

METHODS

EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding use of human albumin infusion in cirrhotic patients were eligible. Mortality and incidence of liver cirrhosis-related complications were pooled. Effect of human albumin infusion on mortality was also evaluated by subgroup analyses primarily according to target population and duration of human albumin infusion treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-two RCTs were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that human albumin infusion could significantly decrease the mortality of cirrhotic patients (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03). Subgroup analyses showed that human albumin infusion could significantly decrease the mortality of cirrhotic patients with SBP (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.20-0.64, p = 0.0005) and HE (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.22-0.85, p = 0.02), but not those with ascites or non-SBP infections or undergoing large-volume paracentesis. Short-term human albumin infusion treatment could significantly decrease short-term mortality (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.89, p = 0.005), but not long-term mortality. Long-term human albumin infusion treatment could not significantly decrease long-term mortality (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.48-1.08, p = 0.11). In addition, human albumin infusion could significantly decrease the incidence of renal impairment (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45-0.88, p = 0.007) and ascites (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25-0.81, p = 0.007), but not infections or gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Human albumin infusion may improve the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. However, its indications for different complications and infusion strategy in liver cirrhosis should be further explored.

Feasibility of a fast-track randomized controlled trial of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy for patients with refractory malignant ascites

Background

Malignant ascites often causes discomfort in advanced cancer patients. Paracentesis is the most common treatment modality, but it requires frequently repeated treatment. Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) may prolong the paracentesis interval, but controlled trials are lacking. We assessed the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of CART vs. paracentesis alone for patients with refractory malignant ascites.

Methods

This study was an open-label, fast-track, randomized controlled, feasibility trial. Patients admitted to four designated cancer hospitals who received no further anticancer treatments were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a CART arm or control (simple paracentesis) arm. The feasibility endpoint was the percentage of patients who completed the study intervention. Secondary endpoints included paracentesis-free survival, patient’s request on the questionnaire for paracentesis (PRO-paracentesis)-free survival (the period until the patients first reported that they would want paracentesis if indicated), and adverse events.

Results

We screened 953 patients for eligibility. Of 61 patients with refractory malignant ascites, 21 patients were determined as eligible. Finally, 20 patients consented and were allocated; 18 patients (90%, 95% CI: 68.3–98.8) completed the study intervention. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 3 or 4. The median drained ascites volume was 3,200 mL in the CART arm and 2,500 mL in the control arm. In the CART arm, the median reinfused albumin volume was 12.6 g. Median paracentesis-free survivals were 5 days (95% CI: 2–6) in the CART arm, and 6 days (3–9) in the control arm. Median PRO-paracentesis-free survivals were 4 days (2–5) and 5 days (1–9), respectively. A total of 73% of patients received paracentesis within 2 days from their first request for the next paracentesis. One patient in the CART arm developed Grade 1 fever.

Conclusions

A fast-track randomized controlled trial of CART for patients with malignant ascites is feasible. The efficacy and safety of CART should be assessed in future trials. PRO-paracentesis-free survival may be a complementary outcome measure with paracentesis-free survival in future trials.

Trial registration

Registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry as UMIN000031029. Registered on 28/01/2018.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09336-3.

Safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy against cirrhotic ascites in comparison with malignancy-related ascites

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) has been performed against cirrhotic ascites, one of the most common complications seen in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The aim of this study is to investigate its safety and efficacy, and differences in clinical profiles from CART against malignancy-related ascites with different pathological background.

METHODS

The present investigation involved a sub-analysis of data obtained from a prospective observational study of CART performed at 22 centers. The condition of each procedure, therapeutic options, laboratory data, performance status, dietary intake, and abdominal circumference of participants were analyzed. Clinical parameters were compared between before and after CART, with or without albumin infusion, and also primary diseases including cirrhosis and malignant disease.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and January 2015, a total of 48 and 275 CART procedures were performed in patients with cirrhosis and malignancies. In cirrhotic patients, serum albumin concentration increased significantly in groups both with and without concomitant albumin infusion (P = 0.002 and P = 0.023), and no significant difference in CART interval was seen between these groups (P = 0.393). CART interval was not significantly different between cirrhosis and malignancy groups (P = 0.334). Dietary intake significantly improved after CART in both groups (P = 0.043 and P < 0.001). Adverse events were with no clinical significance as observed in patients with malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy was performed safely and effectively in patients with ascites related to decompensated cirrhosis and offers the potential efficacy to maintain plasma colloid osmotic pressure after paracentesis as well as in patients with malignancy.

Albumin Administration is Efficacious in the Management of Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis has been extensively discussed over recent years. Current treatment approaches depend on targeting related complications, aiming to treat and/or prevent circulatory dysfunction, bacterial infections and multi-organ failure. Albumin has been shown to prolong survival and reduce complications in patients with cirrhosis. This review aims to ascertain whether the use of albumin is justified in patients with cirrhosis. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses evaluating albumin use in patients with cirrhosis published between 1985 and February 2020 was conducted; the quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed. In total, 45 RCTs and 10 meta-analyses were included. Based on the included evidence, albumin is superior at preventing and controlling the incidence of cirrhosis complications vs other plasma expanders. Recent studies reported that long-term albumin administration to patients with decompensated cirrhosis improves survival with a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio compared with standard medical treatment alone. Albumin infusions are justified for routine use in patients with cirrhosis, and the use of albumin either alone or in combination with other treatments leads to clinical benefits. Long-term administration of albumin should be considered in some patients.

Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of people with cirrhosis develop ascites. Several different treatments are available; including, among others, paracentesis plus fluid replacement, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, aldosterone antagonists, and loop diuretics. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their relative efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for ascites according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until May 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and ascites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and ascites. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 49 randomised clinical trials (3521 participants) in the review. Forty-two trials (2870 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies, without other features of decompensation, having mainly grade 3 (severe), recurrent, or refractory ascites. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 0.1 to 84 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias, and the overall certainty of evidence was low or very low. Approximately 36.8% of participants who received paracentesis plus fluid replacement (reference group, the current standard treatment) died within 11 months. There was no evidence of differences in mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation in people receiving different interventions compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Resolution of ascites at maximal follow-up was higher with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (HR 9.44; 95% CrI 1.93 to 62.68) and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (HR 30.63; 95% CrI 5.06 to 692.98) compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (very low-certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics had a higher rate of other decompensation events such as hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and variceal bleeding compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement (rate ratio 2.04; 95% CrI 1.37 to 3.10) (very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials using paracentesis plus fluid replacement reported health-related quality of life or symptomatic recovery from ascites.

FUNDING

the source of funding for four trials were industries which would benefit from the results of the study; 24 trials received no additional funding or were funded by neutral organisations; and the source of funding for the remaining 21 trials was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on very low-certainty evidence, there is considerable uncertainty about whether interventions for ascites in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis decrease mortality, adverse events, or liver transplantation compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis and ascites. Based on very low-certainty evidence, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and adding aldosterone antagonists to paracentesis plus fluid replacement may increase the resolution of ascites compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement. Based on very low-certainty evidence, aldosterone antagonists plus loop diuretics may increase the decompensation rate compared to paracentesis plus fluid replacement.

Verification of serum albumin elevating effect of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy for ascites patients: a retrospective controlled cohort study

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is frequently used to treat refractory ascites in Japan. However, its efficacy remains unclear. This controlled cohort study verified the serum albumin elevating effect of CART by comparisons with simple paracentesis. Ascites patients receiving CART (N = 88) or paracentesis (N = 108) at our hospital were assessed for the primary outcome of change in serum albumin level within 3 days before and after treatment. A significantly larger volume of ascites was drained in the CART group. The change in serum albumin level was +0.08 ± 0.25 g/dL in the CART group and −0.10 ± 0.30 g/dL in the paracentesis group (P < 0.001). The CART – paracentesis difference was +0.26 g/dL (95%CI +0.18 to +0.33, P < 0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders by multivariate analysis. The adjusted difference increased with drainage volume. In the CART group, serum total protein, dietary intake, and urine volume were significantly increased, while hemoglobin and body weight was significantly decreased, versus paracentesis. More frequent adverse events, particularly fever, were recorded for CART, although the period until re-drainage was significantly longer. This study is the first demonstrating that CART can significantly increase serum albumin level as compared with simple paracentesis. CART represents a useful strategy to manage patients requiring ascites drainage.

Plasma expanders for people with cirrhosis and large ascites treated with abdominal paracentesis

BACKGROUND

Plasma volume expanders are used in connection to paracentesis in people with cirrhosis to prevent reduction of effective plasma volume, which may trigger deleterious effect on haemodynamic balance, and increase morbidity and mortality. Albumin is considered the standard product against which no plasma expansion or other plasma expanders, e.g. other colloids (polygeline , dextrans, hydroxyethyl starch solutions, fresh frozen plasma), intravenous infusion of ascitic fluid, crystalloids, or mannitol have been compared. However, the benefits and harms of these plasma expanders are not fully clear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of any plasma volume expanders such as albumin, other colloids (polygeline, dextrans, hydroxyethyl starch solutions, fresh frozen plasma), intravenous infusion of ascitic fluid, crystalloids, or mannitol versus no plasma volume expander or versus another plasma volume expander for paracentesis in people with cirrhosis and large ascites.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index until January 2019. Furthermore, we searched FDA, EMA, WHO (last search January 2019), www.clinicaltrials.gov/, and www.controlled-trials.com/ for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials, no matter their design or year of publication, publication status, and language, assessing the use of any type of plasma expander versus placebo, no intervention, or a different plasma expander in connection with paracentesis for ascites in people with cirrhosis. We considered quasi-randomised, retrieved with the searches for randomised clinical trials only, for reports on harms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) using the fixed-effect model and the random-effects model meta-analyses, based on the intention-to-treat principle, whenever possible. If the fixed-effect and random-effects models showed different results, then we made our conclusions based on the analysis with the highest P value (the more conservative result). We assessed risks of bias of the individual trials using predefined bias risk domains. We assessed the certainty of the evidence at an outcome level, using GRADE, and constructed 'Summary of Findings' tables for seven of our review outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 27 randomised clinical trials for inclusion in this review (24 published as full-text articles and 3 as abstracts). Five of the trials, with 271 participants, assessed plasma expanders (albumin in four trials and ascitic fluid in one trial) versus no plasma expander. The remaining 22 trials, with 1321 participants, assessed one type of plasma expander, i.e. dextran, hydroxyethyl starch, polygeline, intravenous infusion of ascitic fluid, crystalloids, or mannitol versus another type of plasma expander, i.e. albumin in 20 of these trials and polygeline in one trial. Twenty-five trials provided data for quantitative meta-analysis. According to the Child-Pugh classification, most participants were at an intermediate to advanced stage of liver disease in the absence of hepatocellular carcinoma, recent gastrointestinal bleeding, infections, and hepatic encephalopathy. All trials were assessed as at overall high risk of bias. Ten trials seemed not to have been funded by industry; twelve trials were considered unclear about funding; and five trials were considered funded by industry or a for-profit institution.We found no evidence of a difference in effect between plasma expansion versus no plasma expansion on mortality (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.06 to 4.83; 248 participants; 4 trials; very low certainty); renal impairment (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.02 to 5.88; 181 participants; 4 trials; very low certainty); other liver-related complications (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.27; 248 participants; 4 trials; very low certainty); and non-serious adverse events (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.40; 158 participants; 3 trials; very low certainty). Two of the trials stated that no serious adverse events occurred while the remaining trials did not report on this outcome. No trial reported data on health-related quality of life.We found no evidence of a difference in effect between experimental plasma expanders versus albumin on mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; 1014 participants; 14 trials; very low certainty); serious adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.10 to 8.30; 118 participants; 2 trials; very low certainty); renal impairment (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.91; 1107 participants; 17 trials; very low certainty); other liver-related complications (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.48; 1083 participants; 16 trials; very low certainty); and non-serious adverse events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.85; 977 participants; 14 trials; very low certainty). We found no data on heath-related quality of life and refractory ascites.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis did not find any benefits or harms of plasma expanders versus no plasma expander or of one plasma expander such as polygeline, dextrans, hydroxyethyl starch, intravenous infusion of ascitic fluid, crystalloids, or mannitol versus albumin on primary or secondary outcomes. The data originated from few, small, mostly short-term trials at high risks of systematic errors (bias) and high risks of random errors (play of chance). GRADE assessments concluded that the evidence was of very low certainty. Therefore, we can neither demonstrate or discard any benefit of plasma expansion versus no plasma expansion, and differences between one plasma expander versus another plasma expander.Larger trials at low risks of bias are needed to assess the role of plasma expanders in connection with paracentesis. Such trials should be conducted according to the SPIRIT guidelines and reported according to the CONSORT guidelines.

CART: Cell-free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy against malignancy-related ascites

A standard strategy against ascites, a common symptom observed in cirrhotic and cancer patients, includes restriction of sodium intake and use of a diuretic. Paracentesis is a widely applied method against refractory ascites that do not react to such treatment. However, emerging fatigue and hemodynamic instability are possibly attributable to a loss of protein included in ascites. Cell-free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy (CART) is also applied against refractory ascites. CART comprises three processes. After ascites is first filtered to remove cell components, it is concentrated to reduce its volume. Fluid obtained through these processes, including useful proteins such as albumin and globulin, is finally reinfused intravenously. CART was reported first in the 1970s. Since then, it has been applied mainly against cirrhotic ascites with a thinner cell component. Now, its indication is expanding to include malignancy-related ascites. Additionally, CART can be applied safely against malignancy-related ascites. Its favorable effects on control of patients' symptoms are anticipated, especially on fatigue. Although related evidence has not been established, CART can be anticipated for use as a strategy against refractory ascites.

Single center experience of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy in malignancy related ascites

Cell-Free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy (CART) is expected to improve patients' symptoms related to ascites. Use of a patient's own proteins in ascites might reduce the risk of infection. However, several reports have described that reinfusion of concentrated ascites might elevate body temperature. The aim of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of the CART system performed exclusively on patients with malignancies. In this retrospective cohort observational study, we examined 81 CART processes performed on 24 patients with malignancies. Data were collected from medical records and records during processing of ascites. We investigated the effectiveness and adverse events during the procedures. The amount of ascites processed was 2.6 ± 1.4 L on average. The concentration ratio was 9.31 ± 5.45 on average. We found an increase in the urine volume after the procedure, which was significantly related to the amount of reinfused protein. The body temperature increased by 0.44°C. Systolic blood pressure decreased by 4 mm Hg after paracentesis, but no significant difference was found between the pressure before paracentesis and after reinfusion. In platelet counts, no significant change was observed. After all, no clinically significant adverse event was confirmed during CART procedures. Results show that CART can be performed safely even on patients with malignancy-related ascites and that the procedure might improve diuresis.

Reinfusion of ascites during hemodialysis as a treatment of massive refractory ascites and acute renal failure

Refractory ascites can occur in patients with various conditions. Although several procedures based on the reinfusion of ascitic fluid have been reported after the failure of bed rest, salt and water restriction, diuretics, intravenous administration of albumin, and repeated paracentesis, these procedures are performed for ascitic fluid removal without dialytic effect. In this study, a flow control reinfusion of ascites during hemodialysis (HD) was performed to demonstrate the efficacy of this method in a lupus patient with massive refractory ascites and respiratory and acute renal failure (ARF). The alleviation of ascites and ARF attests to the success of the flow control reinfusion of ascites during HD. This procedure can control the rate of ascites and body fluid removal simultaneously during HD using the roller pump. In conclusion, with a normal coagulation profile, the procedure of flow control reinfusion of ascites during HD is an effective alternative treatment for the alleviation of refractory ascites with renal failure.

TIPS versus paracentesis for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites

BACKGROUND

Refractory ascites (ie, ascites that cannot be mobilized despite sodium restriction and diuretic treatment) occurs in 10 per cent of patients with cirrhosis. It is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality with a one-year survival rate of less than 50 per cent. Few therapeutic options currently exist for the management of refractory ascites.

OBJECTIVES

To compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunts (TIPS) versus paracentesis for the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (January 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2006), EMBASE (1980 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to August 2004), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1945 to January 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing TIPS and paracentesis with or without volume expanders for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We evaluated the methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials by the generation of the allocation section, allocation concealment, and follow-up. Two authors independently extracted data from each trial. We contacted trial authors for additional information. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Five randomised clinical trials, including 330 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials had adequate allocation concealment, but only one employed blinded outcome assessment. Mortality at 30-days (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.10 to 10.06, P = 1.0) and 24-months (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.56, P = 0.5) did not differ significantly between TIPS and paracentesis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunts significantly reduced the re-accumulation of ascites at 3-months (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.18, P < 0.01) and 12-months (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.28, P < 0.01). Hepatic encephalopathy occurred significantly more often in the TIPS group (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.6, P < 0.01), but gastrointestinal bleeding, infection, and acute renal failure did not differ significantly between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis supports that TIPS was more effective at removing ascites as compared with paracentesis without a significant difference in mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, infection, and acute renal failure. However, TIPS patients develop hepatic encephalopathy significantly more often.

Current research of hepatic cirrhosis in China

Hepatic cirrhosis is a common disease that poses a serious threat to public health, and is characterized by chronic, progressive and diffuse hepatic lesions preceded by hepatic fibrosis regardless of the exact etiologies. In recent years, considerable achievements have been made in China in research of the etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and especially the treatment of hepatic fibrosis, resulting in much improved prognosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. In this paper, the authors review the current status of research in hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis and their major complications.

TIPS versus paracentesis for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites

BACKGROUND

Ten per cent of cirrhotic patients develop refractory ascites, which carries substantial morbidity and has a one-year survival of less than 50 per cent. Patients with refractory ascites may benefit from transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunts (TIPS).

OBJECTIVES

To compare TIPS versus paracentesis standard treatment in patients with refractory ascites due to cirrhosis with regard to overall short- and long-term mortality, treatment efficacy, and complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (July 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2003), EMBASE (1980 to July 2003), and CINAHL (1982 to July 2003). We supplemented the searches with reading through scientific citations, review of citations in relevant primary articles, and hand-searched abstracts from national meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing TIPS and paracentesis with or without volume expanders for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We evaluated the methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials by the generation of the allocation section, allocation concealment, and follow-up. Two independent observers extracted data from each trial. We contacted trial authors for additional information. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised clinical trials, including 264 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was moderate. Thirty-day mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.10 to 10.06, P = 1.0) and 24-month mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.66, P = 0.70) did not differ significantly between TIPS and paracentesis treatment. TIPS significantly reduced ascites re-accumulation at three months (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.18, P < 0.00001) and at 12 months follow-up (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.28, P < 0.00001). Hepatic encephalopathy occurred significantly more often in the TIPS group (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.66, P = 0.008). Gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.84, P = 0.63), acute renal failure (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.72, P = 0.55), septicemia/infection (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.94, P = 0.96), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.84, P = 0.63) did not differ significantly between groups.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

TIPS removed ascites more effectively than paracentesis. After 12 months, the beneficial effects of TIPS on ascites was still present. Mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, septicemia/infection, acute renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation did not differ significantly between the two groups. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred significantly more often in the TIPS group.

Management of Refractory Ascites by Using a Peritoneal Dialysis System with Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration by Hemodialysis Dialyzer

Background

The treatment of refractory ascites remains a challenge in cirrhosis with ascites and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Successful experiences with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for treatment of ESRD patients with ascites secondary to liver cirrhosis have been reported, but the CAPD modality has the drawback of protein loss and was observed to cause patients to become severely malnourished. We devised a CAPD method for treatment of ascites without protein loss. We use a peritoneal dialysis (PD) system to drain ascitic fluid and to reinject concentrated ascites into the abdomen after extracorporeal ultrafiltration of the ascitic fluid using a hemodialysis dialyzer and pump. Here, we report our experience with 2 cirrhotic patients with ascites treated by this method.

Patients and Method

Ascites are collected by gravity through a Y transfer set into a 3-L plastic bag for intravenous hyperalimentation. The ascitic fluid drained is removed by a pump at a rate of 200 mL/min (AK-90: Gambro Lundia, Lund, Sweden) and passed through a hollow-fiber dialyzer with triacetate membrane (FB-210G: Nipro, Osaka, Japan). Heparin (5 000 U) is infused into the inflow line at the start of the session only. At the end of treatment, about 500 mL concentrated ascitic fluid is returned to the peritoneal cavity by gravity through the Y transfer set. Case 1: A 77-year-old female was referred to us because of massive ascites from hepatic cirrhosis associated with hepatitis B infection and renal insufficiency. Abdominal paracentesis was required once weekly for recurrence of massive ascites. As a result, the patient was obliged to stay in the bed almost all day, and her nutritional condition deteriorated because of poor appetite and respiratory compromise. Using the Y transfer set, we commenced using our method, and performed it thrice or twice weekly. After 9 months of treatment, the patient's body weight was being maintained at 52 kg, and her serum albumin level had risen from 2.4 g/dL to 3.4 g/dL without albumin administration. Case 2: A 61-year-old male with diabetes from the age of 51 was diagnosed with hepatitis C at age 53. At age 60, his renal function deteriorated, requiring hemodialysis (HD). After 3 months, abdominal distention was noted, and HD was frequently complicated by low blood pressure, large weight gains between HD treatments, and interruption of HD sessions. Albumin administration was required to treat the low blood pressure. Ascites was poorly controlled using HD, and tense ascites developed, requiring repeated paracentesis for comfort. At first during application of our method, ascitic fluid volume was 6 L per thrice-weekly HD session. After 5 months, ascitic fluid volume had diminished to about 2 – 3 L per HD session, and we decreased the frequency of our method to once weekly. Protein levels in the ascitic fluid were 6 g/dL at the start of treatment and decreased to 2 – 3 g/dL after 6 months. Hemodynamic instability during HD was reduced.

Conclusion

We conclude that management of refractory ascites by using a PD system with extracorporeal ultrafiltration by an HD dialyzer is useful. The technique compensates for the drawbacks of PD management of ESRD patients with ascites, although further experience with the technique is necessary.

TIPS for management of refractory ascites: response and survival are both unpredictable

Refractory ascites is a serious complication of advanced cirrhosis with a 1-year transplant-free survival of 20-50%. The aim of our study was to investigate the short- and long-term effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of refractory ascites. In all 65 patients (39 M, 26 F; Child B 55%, Child C 45%, mean MELD score 14.8 +/- 6.6) with liver disease (alcoholic 40%, cryptogenic 20%, HCV 14%, others 26%) and refractory ascites were included in this study. Forty-eight (74%) patients had no signs of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), 16 (24%) had mild and 1 (2%) had moderate HE before TIPS; 28 (43%) had mild (> 1.2 and < 2.4 mg/dl) and 6 patients (9%) had moderate (> 2.4 mg/dl) renal dysfunction. Mean follow-up was 55.5 +/- 70.2 weeks. Treatment success, defined as complete response, partial response, and no response, and survival was determined at 3 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after TIPS. TIPS was successful in all patients. Mean portal venous pressure gradient improved significantly after TIPS (24 +/- 8 to 10 +/- 4). During follow-up, 40 (58%) patients died and 17 (27%) patients had liver transplantation (OLT); 20 (31%) patients had 38 shunt revisions due to lack of initial response or recurrence of ascites. The response was assessed in patients who were alive, without OLT, at each time point. Complete response was seen in 10%, 23%, 17%, 11%, 22% and 33%; partial response was seen in 46%, 46%, 40%, 44%, 28%, and 8%; and no response was seen in 44%, 31%, 43%, 41 %, 39%, and 50% at 3 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. There were no pre-TIPS variables that could predict the response at 3 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Mild HE was seen in 8 (12%) patients and severe HE was seen in 16 (25%) immediately after TIPS. The mortality at 3 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 26%, 38%, 46%, 51%, 57%, and 58%, respectively. Three-week (P = 0.01) and 3-month (P = 0.04) mortality was higher in Child C patients compared to Child B. However, there were no independent predictors of survival on multivariate analysis at 3 or 6 months. Child-Pugh score 3 weeks after TIPS was a strong predictor of mortality. In conclusion, in patients with refractory ascites, TIPS was associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The response and the mortality were both unpredictable on the basis of pretransplant variables.

Hepatorenal syndrome. Definition, pathophysiology, and intervention

Hepatorenal syndrome is a well characterized entity in which vasodilation of splanchnic vessels and intense constriction of the renal cortical vasculature occur in concert. The condition is often fatal unless orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is performed. Many extracorporeal blood purification techniques exist which can be offered to patients awaiting OLT. Continuous hemofiltration, with or without other modalities such as therapeutic plasma exchange and hemoperfusion, may be helpful in improving the level of consciousness of these patients. Unfortunately, mortality and hepatic regeneration do not appear to be affected by such interventions. The development of a hybrid bioartifical liver support system and pharmacologic manipulation of the hemodynamic perturbations that occur in HRS provide particularly appealing prospects as a means of providing a bridge to liver transplantation in the future.

Clinical efficacy of peritoneovenous shunting for the treatment of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

We investigated prospectively the clinical efficacy of a newly developed continuous autotransfusion system of ascites (CATSA) without protein supplement in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Peritoneovenous shunting was used to recirculate ascites. The CATSA was performed for 5 h at a rate of 100-200 ml/h once a day. Eighteen patients were treated with the CATSA (CATSA group) and 36 were treated with an intravenous 37.5 g/day of albumin supplement (albumin group). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the CATSA group than in the albumin group (10.0 +/- 5.7 versus 13.9 +/- 6.2 days, P < 0.01). Haematocrit value reached <40% significantly earlier in the CATSA group (on hospital days 3.9 +/- 3.2 versus 5.9 +/- 2.5, P < 0.01). Using a single procedure, haemoconcentration, urinary output and pulse pressure were markedly improved in the CATSA group compared with the albumin group. Discomfort due to massive ascites diminished promptly and did not recur in nine of 18 CATSA group patients, whereas it persisted in all 36 patients in the albumin group. The serum concentration of protein was maintained in the CATSA group, whereas it did not increase in the albumin group despite daily supplementation with 37. 5 g of albumin. Apparent adverse effects of each procedure were not observed in either group. The mean values of several parameters in the serum pertinent to the coagulation-fibrinolysis system did not change significantly in either group after the procedure. It was concluded that the CATSA procedure expanded circulating plasma volume without exogenous albumin and appeared to lead to a prompt recovery from severe conditions of OHSS.

Management of ascites in cirrhosis

Ascites is one of the earliest and most common complications of patients with cirrhosis. A typical circulatory dysfunction characterized by arterial vasodilation, high cardiac output and stimulation of vasoactive systems is commonly present in these patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. The treatment of ascites has been based on the combination of a low-sodium diet and the administration of diuretics. The reintroduction of paracentesis and the recent introduction of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are the most relevant innovations in the treatment of ascites during the past two decades, although controlled trials in large series of patients are needed to delineate whether TIPS is a safe and useful treatment for these patients.

Reinfusion of concentrated ascitic fluid versus total paracentesis. A randomized prospective trial

We compared the efficacy and safety of apheresis and reinfusion of concentrated ascites (ARCA) versus total paracentesis plus intravenous albumin (PARA) in a prospective trial on cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Twenty-four patients were randomized to either ARCA (N = 12) or PARA (N = 12), and followed for two years. Sex, age, Child's class, and renal and liver function were similar in the two groups. The times the procedures were 2.7 +/- 1.0 (ARCA) vs 2.2 +/- 1.1 (PARA) hr, with removal of 8.8 +/- 3.5 (ARCA) and 6.9 +/- 3.4 (PARA) liters of ascites and intravenous infusion of 59.8 +/- 35.2 (ARCA) and 42.5 +/- 20.5 (PARA) g of albumin. Both procedures were safe. Biochemical signs of coagulative disturbances having no clinical relevance were observed after ARCA, with an increase in prothrombin time (P = 0.005) and serum FSP (P = 0.02). No significant changes in renal function, serum albumin, or plasma and urinary electrocytes were shown. Plasma renin activity increased after PARA (P = 0.02) and plasma atrial natriuretic factor increased after ARCA (P = 0.008), although no differences were observed in diuresis in the immediate follow-up. During the long-term follow-up, patient survival and recurrence of tense ascites were the same in both groups. We conclude that apheresis and reinfusion of concentrated ascites are as safe and effective as total paracentesis with albumin infusion for the treatment of tense ascites in cirrhotic patients.

Concentrated ascitic fluid reinfusion in cirrhotic patients: a simplified method

A new method for ascites filtration and reinfusion, which uses a single Cuprophan filter and is performed in the dialysis unit, is reported. Thirty-one procedures were performed in 17 patients with cirrhosis and massive ascites. A mean volume of 8.6 L of ascitic fluid was removed; from this volume, 5 L were ultrafiltered and a concentrated ascitic fluid was reinfused (x = 359.8 mL). The whole procedure was completed in a mean time of 248 minutes. No relevant method-related complications were detected. Moreover, no significant changes in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, plasma and urinary electrolytes, or platelet count were found, even in the case of repeated procedures (two to nine times). The reinfused fluid contained a mean value of albumin of 4.7 g/dL and significant amounts of globulins and complement. The overall cost of the materials used in the procedure ($49.46) offered competitive advantages with respect to other types of frequently used methods. In conclusion, we present a safe, effective, and time- and cost-saving technique for ascites reinfusion that represents an advantageous alternative to more complicated and expensive methods or to the currently used medical therapy.

Hemodialysis alternative with ascites ultrafiltration for an end-stage renal failure patient associated with tense ascites secondary to decompensated liver cirrhosis

Patients with end-stage renal disease combined with tense ascites caused by decompensated liver cirrhosis are sometimes encountered in a hemodialysis center. A big problem for the management of these patients is the tendency of hypotension during ultrafiltration. Subsequent fluid accumulation, especially in the abdominal cavity, causes breathing difficulty and abdominal discomfort. We present a new technique, ascites ultrafiltration, to solve this problem. Using the same equipment as for ordinary hemodialysis, and incurring the same cost, we removed directly approximately 8 L of ascites fluid during each nearly 4-hour session. No hemodynamic instability was noted. We proved this technique to be an effective and safe alternative method for this group of patients.

Large-volume paracentesis in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. The role of postparacentesis plasma volume expansion

Ascites is a common complication of cirrhosis and has a major clinical impact on the patient's general well-being. Approximately 10% of patients with cirrhosis can develop diuretic-resistant, tense ascites that requires other therapeutic interventions. In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in large-volume paracentesis (LVP) as a safe, simple, and inexpensive method to substitute for other more complicated and costly therapeutic interventions for refractory ascites. In this article, we review the latest literature supporting the use of LVP for the treatment of refractory, tense ascites. We also address the role of intravascular volume expansion after LVP, note that usually no postparacentesis volume expansion is necessary, and compare, when used, the different plasma volume expanders in terms of efficacy, safety, and cost.

[Indications and role of albumin, plasma volume expansion excluded, in the preoperative or postoperative management of portal hypertension]

Low serum albumin levels are common in patients with cirrhosis and liver failure. Decreased synthesis is the main but not the only mechanism leading to decreased serum levels. The consequences of low albumin concentrations are a decreased plasma colloid osmotic pressure and a decreased binding of liposoluble xenobiotics and endogenous substances. Besides the fluid accumulation in pleura and peritoneum, the complications directly related to low serum albumin levels have been only poorly assessed. An increase in serum albumin levels (by a few g.L-1) for a few days can be achieved by the infusion of large amounts of human albumin (approximately 120 g over 3 days). The efficacy of this treatment has been only tested in association with large paracentesis: albumin infusion, which induces volume expansion, reduced the incidence of hyponatremia and functional renal failure. No significant effect on ascites production rate or survival has been observed. Similar results were achieved through polygelin or dextran-70 infusions. No well-conducted controlled study on the value of albumin infusion in other circumstances apart from cirrhotic patients is available. In conclusion, albumin infusion should be reserved to the treatment of hyponatraemia or functional renal failure complicating cirrhosis with severe liver failure and marked hypoalbuminaemia, when the infusion of colloids failed to correct these anomalies.

Temporary use of peritoneovenous shunting for treatment of tense ascites following a Whipple procedure

Tense, nonchylous ascites following a Whipple procedure has not been reported to date. We describe the course of such a patient successfully treated by a peritoneovenous shunt. A 49-year-old male developed tense ascites following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Despite conservative measures, abdominal distension developed to the point of dyspnea and orthopnea for over a six-month period. Because the physicochemical characteristic of the ascitic fluid was consistent with that of hepatic lymph, ascites was considered due to injury to the lymphatics around the porta hepatis. A peritoneovenous shunt was established for the treatment of ascites and was removed when the ascites had resolved at nine months after shunting. Our experience suggests that, in case conservative measures fail in the control of ascites, either direct repair of the lymphatic leak by laparotomy or the temporary use of peritoneovenous shunting may be considered.

Continuous ascitic recirculation in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Massive ascites, hydrothorax, acute renal failure and thromboembolism are clinical manifestations of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which may complicate the induction of ovulation with exogenous gonadotrophins. We report a case of severe OHSS with ascites formation in excess of five litres per day. Massive ascites and bilateral pleural effusions resulted in respiratory failure. Continuous ascitic recirculation (AR) was commenced after repeated paracentesis and i.v. fluid therapy failed to improve the patient's condition. The procedure was undertaken for a total of 15 days and rapidly resulted in marked improvement of impaired respiratory function. Febrile episodes occurred on 3 occasions, but we did not observe coagulation disturbances or adverse haemodynamic effects. Continuous AR is a safe and effective treatment of complicated severe OHSS.

A simple method for ascites concentration and reinfusion

A rapid and simple method for ascites concentration and reinfusion was utilized to treat 103 episodes of tense ascites in 57 patients (38 men and 19 women, mean age 63 +/- 11 years). After a bedside total paracentesis, 6.06 +/- 2.87 liters of ascites were separately ultrafiltrated using a mechanical device during a mean interval of 134 +/- 88 min, and 430 +/- 368 ml of concentrate containing 39 +/- 42 g of albumin were restituted at bedside either intravenously (44 cases) or intraperitoneally (59 cases). Ultrafiltration was successfully and easily completed in all cases. Ascites concentration and reinfusion either intravenously or intraperitoneally did not adversely modify hemodynamic or renal parameters except for a transient decrease in mean arterial pressure (P < 0.05). Transitory hyponatremia and renal failure occurred in two patients. A transient decrease in platelet count and serum fibrinogen levels (P < 0.05) and pyrexia (12%) were observed only in patients reinfused intravenously. In conclusion, this new method for ascites concentration and reinfusion was effective, safe, and, with respect to traditional methods, simpler, faster and more comfortable. Therefore it is proposed for the routine management of tense ascites.

Fulminant hepatic failure: summary of a workshop

Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is defined by the appearance of severe liver injury with hepatic encephalopathy in a previously healthy person. There are an estimated 2,000 cases of FHF in the United States yearly, representing 0.1% of all deaths and, perhaps, 6% of liver-related deaths. The causes of FHF are many, the chief ones in the United States being hepatitis A; B; non-A, non-B and drug induced liver disease. There are no specific therapies for FHF, however, liver transplantation is recommended for situations in which spontaneous recovery appears unlikely. Factors that are valuable in assessing the likelihood of spontaneous recovery are static features such as patient age and etiology of FHF and dynamic features including encephalopathy grade, prothrombin time, and serum bilirubin. Presently, approximately 7% of all liver transplants are done for FHF and the 1-year patient survival rates average 63%, somewhat less than survival rates for nonfulminant liver disease, averaging 78%. The management of patients with FHF is challenging, particularly important being monitoring and early treatment of infections, hemodynamic abnormalities, and brain edema. Innovative approaches to management and therapy include use of cytoprotective or antiviral medications, hepatic support systems, extracorporeal liver support, hepatocyte transplantation, auxiliary liver transplantation, and xenotransplantation. None of these are of proven benefit, but many are promising as a means to support the patient with FHF until spontaneous recovery occurs or a suitable liver graft is available for transplantation.