Comparison of three regimens for malaria prophylaxis in travellers to east, central, and southern Africa

Rolling back malaria: how well is Europe doing?

Background. The Roll Back Malaria (RBM) initiative has committed itself to halving the worlds's malaria burden by 2010, having adopted five operationally focused 'critical concepts' to guide this task. The focus of RBM's efforts is in the developing world where external support is often required. Malaria was only recently eradicated from Europe, and the continent remains under continual threat of reintroduction. The extent of this threat is examined, and the European response benchmarked against RBM's critical concepts. Methods. The following sources were searched for references using the phrase "imported malaria": RBM, WHO, European Union including Eurosurveillance, and MedLine websites. Links to related articles were followed. Citations were independently assessed by the authors for relevance and inclusion. Results. Only in application of the critical concept "disease surveillance" does the European response seem adequate. Conclusions. Europe should be making greater efforts and considering additional strategies to combat imported malaria.

Malaria Prophylaxis: A Comprehensive Review

The flow of international travellers to and from malaria-endemic areas, especially Africa, has increased in recent years. Apart from the very high morbidity and mortality burden imposed on malaria-endemic areas, imported malaria is the main cause of fever possibly causing severe disease and death in travellers coming from tropical and subtropical areas, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa. The importance of behavioural preventive measures (bed nets, repellents, etc.), adequate chemoprophylaxis and, in selected circumstances, stand-by emergency treatment may not be overemphasized. However, no prophylactic regimen may offer complete protection. Expert advice is needed to tailor prophylactic advice according to traveller (age, baseline clinical conditions, etc.) and travel (destination, season, etc.) characteristics in order to reduce malaria risk.

Malaria: prevention in travellers

INTRODUCTION

Malaria transmission occurs most frequently in environments with humidity greater than 60% and ambient temperature of 25 °C to 30 °C. Risks increase with longer visits and depend on activity. Infection can follow a single mosquito bite. Incubation is usually 10 to 14 days but can be up to 18 months depending on the strain of parasite.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-drug preventive interventions in non-pregnant adult travellers? What are the effects of drug prophylaxis in non-pregnant adult travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria vaccines in adult and child travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria interventions in child travellers, pregnant travellers, and in airline pilots? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to November 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 79 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: aerosol insecticides, amodiaquine, air conditioning and electric fans, atovaquone-proguanil, biological control measures, chloroquine (alone or with proguanil), diethyltoluamide (DEET), dietary supplementation, doxycycline, electronic mosquito repellents, full-length and light-coloured clothing, insecticide-treated clothing/nets, mefloquine, mosquito coils and vapourising mats, primaquine, pyrimethamine-dapsone, pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine, smoke, topical (skin-applied) insect repellents, and vaccines.

Malaria: prevention in travellers

INTRODUCTION

Malaria transmission occurs most frequently in environments with humidity over 60% and ambient temperature of 25-30 degrees C. Risks increase with longer visits and depend on activity. Infection can follow a single mosquito bite. Incubation is usually 10-14 days but can be up to 18 months depending on the strain of parasite.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-drug preventive interventions in adult travellers? What are the effects of drug prophylaxis in adult travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria vaccines in travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria interventions in child travellers, pregnant travellers, and in airline pilots? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to February 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 69 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: acoustic buzzers, aerosol insecticides, amodiaquine, air conditioning and electric fans, atovaquone-proguanil, biological control measures, chloroquine (alone or with proguanil), diethyltoluamide (DEET), doxycycline, full-length and light-coloured clothing, insecticide-treated clothing/nets, mefloquine, mosquito coils and vaporising mats, primaquine, pyrimethamine-dapsone, pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine, smoke, topical (skin-applied) insect repellents, and vaccines.

Problem pathogens: prevention of malaria in travellers

Human infection with Plasmodium spp leading to clinical episodes of malaria probably began very early in the history of humankind and has persistently inflicted disease among human populations. Malaria is currently considered the world's most important parasitic infection. The global impact of malaria is incalculable and appears to be worsening over the past decades. Although most of this burden of disease is carried by developing tropical countries, cases of imported malaria acquired by international travel are increasingly reported. These numbers are growing because of increased travel to malaria-endemic areas and also due to increased risk of transmission in these areas. Indeed, travel has contributed to the global spread of malaria during the history of humankind. Travellers visiting malaria risk areas should use both personal protective measures and chemoprophylaxis. Non-adherence to chemoprophylactic regimens is frequently secondary to drug side-effects. Therefore, a careful risk-benefit analysis on the use of antimalarial prophylaxis should be carried out in every individual travelling to malaria risk areas. Standby malaria self-treatment represents an alternative in some travellers. However, carefully selected and geographically specific antimalarial drug regimens should be recommended to non-immune people travelling to high-risk areas.

Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys

BACKGROUND

Several reviews of published cluster randomised trials have reported that about half did not take clustering into account in the analysis, which was thus incorrect and potentially misleading. In this paper I ask whether cluster randomised trials are increasing in both number and quality of reporting.

METHODS

Computer search for papers on cluster randomised trials since 1980, hand search of trial reports published in selected volumes of the British Medical Journal over 20 years.

RESULTS

There has been a large increase in the numbers of methodological papers and of trial reports using the term 'cluster random' in recent years, with about equal numbers of each type of paper. The British Medical Journal contained more such reports than any other journal. In this journal there was a corresponding increase over time in the number of trials where subjects were randomised in clusters. In 2003 all reports showed awareness of the need to allow for clustering in the analysis. In 1993 and before clustering was ignored in most such trials.

CONCLUSION

Cluster trials are becoming more frequent and reporting is of higher quality. Perhaps statistician pressure works.

Use of medical chemoprophylaxis and antimosquito precautions in Danish malaria patients and their traveling companions

BACKGROUND

The number of malaria cases imported to Denmark has been increasing for some years. To analyze the background for this we assessed the use of protective measures in Danish travelers visiting malarious areas.

METHOD

Post-travel questionnaires were given during hospitalization to malaria patients, and sent by mail to their traveling companions.

RESULTS

In total, 142 persons participated. Only 32% of the travelers used chemoprophylaxis correctly, according to Danish recommendations. Twelve percent of the travelers did not use chemoprophylaxis. Average compliance was 52%. Insufficient drug dosage was reported by 13%, and use of nonrecommended drugs by 7% of the travelers. Thirty-seven percent used insufficient antimosquito precautions, a problem which often coincided with irregular use of chemoprophylaxis. Malaria patients, sole travelers, and travelers with other ethnical background than Danish, were subgroups using insufficient malaria prophylaxis more frequently than healthy traveling companions.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient use of the available antimalaria precautions by Danish travelers contributes greatly to maintaining a high incidence of imported malaria. Increased attention from physicians in educating travelers is important for optimizing malaria prophylaxis.

Extracts from "Clinical Evidence". Malaria: prevention in travellers

DEFINITION

Malaria is caused by a protozoan infection of red blood cells with one of four species of the genus plasmodium: P falciparum, P vivax, P ovale, or P malariae. Clinically, malaria may present in different ways, but it is usually characterised by fever (which may be swinging), tachycardia, rigors, and sweating. Anaemia, hepatosplenomegaly, cerebral involvement, renal failure, and shock may occur. INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE: Each year there are 300-500 million clinical cases of malaria. About 40% of the world's population is at risk of acquiring the disease. Each year 25-30 million people from non-tropical countries visit areas in which malaria is endemic, of whom between 10,000 and 30,000 contract malaria. AETIOLOGY/RISK FACTORS: Malaria is mainly a rural disease, requiring standing water nearby. It is transmitted by bites from infected female anopheline mosquitoes, mainly at dusk and during the night. In cities, mosquito bites are usually from female culicene mosquitoes, which are not vectors of malaria. Malaria is resurgent in most tropical countries and the risk to travellers is increasing.

PROGNOSIS

Ninety per cent of travellers who contract malaria do not become ill until after they return home. "Imported malaria" is easily treated if diagnosed promptly, and it follows a serious course in only about 12% of people. The most severe form of the disease is cerebral malaria, with a case fatality rate in adult travellers of 2-6%, mainly because of delays in diagnosis.

AIMS

To reduce the risk of infection; to prevent illness and death.

OUTCOMES

Rates of malarial illness and death, and adverse effects of treatment. Proxy measures include number of mosquito bites and number of mosquitoes in indoor areas. We found limited evidence linking number of mosquito bites and risk of malaria.

METHODS

Clinical Evidence search and appraisal in November 1999. We reviewed all identified systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

The pharmacokinetics of three multiple dose regimens of chloroquine: implications for malaria chemoprophylaxis

The pharmacokinetics of chloroquine were studied in healthy volunteers who received one of three different multiple-dose regimens for 3 weeks: once weekly 300 mg, twice weekly 200 mg and once daily 50 mg chloroquine. Plasma concentrations of chloroquine and metabolites were determined by h.p.l.c. with fluorescence detection. The concentration-time course was fitted to a multiple-dose pharmacokinetic model. Volume of distribution, elimination half-life and clearance were not different for the three regimens, ranging from 250-302 l kg-1, 374-479 h and 0.44-0.58 l h-1 kg-1 respectively. After the first week of all dosage regimens, peak and trough concentrations of chloroquine were above 16 micrograms l-1, sufficiently suppressive for chloroquine-sensitive P. falciparum strains. These data suggest that once daily chloroquine could be combined with proguanil in a single tablet and should improve compliance when given for malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Health problems and self-medication among Swedish travellers

500 consecutive travellers seeking pre-travel health advice were issued a questionnaire before leaving Sweden to continuously record health problems and use of medication during travel. Of 442 subjects who turned in assessable questionnaires (232 male and 210 female, mean age 37 years), 81% travelled to areas at high risk for the acquisition of diarrhea. The mean duration of travel was 4 weeks. During travel 218 (49% at 95% CI 44.3 to 53.7%) of the travellers experienced some illness and 61 (14%) had symptoms of more than one illness. The mean duration of illness was 4.5 days, and 65 subjects (30% of ill travellers) were confined to bed for a mean duration of 2 days. The incidence of illness was significantly (p < 0.01) higher among travellers to high risk than to low risk areas (55% vs 26%), among young travellers than among elderly (65% vs 33%), and among those going on adventure tours compared with recreational tourists (74% vs 41%). Diarrhea was reported by 36% (95% CI 31.6 to 40.5%), and respiratory tract infection by 21% (95% CI 17.2 to 24.8%). Self-medication with one or several drugs was initiated by 163 (75%) travellers experiencing illness during travel. Thus, every second Swedish traveller to tropical and subtropical areas experienced some kind of travel-related, often incapacitating, health problem.