Resuscitation witnessed by relatives. Has proved acceptable to doctors in paediatric cases

The impact of a father's presence during newborn resuscitation: a qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE

To explore healthcare professionals' experiences around the time of newborn resuscitation in the delivery room, when the baby's father was present.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive, retrospective design using the critical incident approach. Tape-recorded semistructured interviews were undertaken with healthcare professionals involved in newborn resuscitation. Participants recalled resuscitation events when the baby's father was present. They described what happened and how those present, including the father, responded. They also reflected upon the impact of the resuscitation and the father's presence on themselves. Participant responses were analysed using thematic analysis.

SETTING

A large teaching hospital in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive sampling was utilised. It was anticipated that 35-40 participants would be recruited. Forty-nine potential participants were invited to take part. The final sample consisted of 37 participants including midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists, neonatal nurse practitioners, neonatal nurses and paediatricians.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: 'whose role?' 'saying and doing' 'teamwork' and 'impact on me'. While no-one was delegated to support the father during the resuscitation, midwives and anaesthetists most commonly took on this role. Participants felt the midwife was the most appropriate person to support fathers. All healthcare professional groups said they often did not know what to say to fathers during prolonged resuscitation. Teamwork was felt to be of benefit to all concerned, including the father. Some paediatricians described their discomfort when fathers came to the resuscitaire. None of the participants had received education and training specifically on supporting fathers during newborn resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first known study to specifically explore the experiences of healthcare professionals of the father's presence during newborn resuscitation. The findings suggest the need for more focused training about supporting fathers. There is also scope for service providers to consider ways in which fathers can be supported more readily during newborn resuscitation.

Witnessed resuscitation: beneficial or detrimental?

This article explores the existing literature and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of witnessed resuscitation for health professionals, relatives, and patients themselves. Keywords "witnessed resuscitation," "patient perspective," "health professionals," and "resuscitation room" were entered into MEDLINE, Medscape, and Science Direct databases. The issue of witnessed resuscitation, along with the benefits and disadvantages of its implementation, is discussed widely with increasing controversy among health professionals. Many authors accept the existence of benefits of witnessed resuscitation, but they each have reservations on certain aspects of the practice. Although witnessed resuscitation has demonstrable benefits, the dearth of research literature on the subject makes it difficult to come to a concrete conclusion about its value in practice. More studies are needed focusing on the impact of witnessed resuscitation on staff, family members, and patients. Larger sample sizes are needed in future studies, and studies are needed in which geographical, cultural, religious, and sociological factors are taken into consideration.

Physician experience with family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children

OBJECTIVE

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children is an emerging practice. Although many hospitals allow this practice, there is scant research on physician attitudes and opinions and on physician views about training for resident physicians.

DESIGN

Survey method.

SETTING

University and community settings.

PATIENTS

We randomly selected 1,200 pediatric critical care and emergency medicine providers from professional association mailing lists.

INTERVENTION

The providers were mailed up to two written surveys and two reminder cards. The survey consisted of 40 multiple-choice and short-answer questions about demographics, past experiences, and opinions on pediatric family presence.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of 1,200 surveys mailed, 521 were completed (43.4%) and 73 (6.1%) respondents returned the form declining to participate. More than 99% of respondents were physicians. Four hundred and thirty-three respondents (83%) reported participation in pediatric resuscitation with family members present, with a mean of 15 episodes ever and three episodes within the last year. Of those who had ever participated, more than half thought it was helpful for the family, and two thirds believed that parents wanted the option. Ninety-three percent would allow family presence in some situations. Seventy-four percent believed family presence would be stressful for a resident physician, but nearly 80% believed that residents working with children should be educated in this area.

CONCLUSIONS

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children is not an uncommon experience for health care providers. Most respondents had resuscitated a child with family members present. The majority thought that presence was helpful to parents and that residents should be trained in this practice.

"The worst journey of our lives": parents' experiences of a specialised paediatric retrieval service

In this retrospective study, a sample of 233 parents were surveyed, by means of a postal questionnaire, about their experience of a specialised paediatric retrieval service (median time interval after child's retrieval=10 months). Although all parents were routinely provided with written information about the retrieval service, only 46% remember receiving it. Also, although generally high, satisfaction ratings relating to the period of the child's transit were significantly lower (P<0.005) than those relating to the other stages of the transfer. Two main reasons were given by parents for their dissatisfaction: distress at being separated from their critically ill child and logistic problems locating and parking at the new hospital. Implications for future service provision are considered.

Acceptance of family member presence during pediatric resuscitations in the emergency department: effects of personal experience

OBJECTIVE

Opinions remain polarized on allowing family member presence during pediatric resuscitations (FMP). Reluctance to adopt FMP may stem from preconceived notions on this practice. This study evaluates the effect of prior experience with FMP and on its acceptance by emergency department personnel (EDP).

METHODS

EDP from three different EDs were surveyed concerning FMP. Study facilities included an urban teaching community ED with routine FMP (R-ED), a suburban community ED with occasional FMP (O-ED) and an urban university pediatric ED with virtually no FMP (N-ED) during pediatric resuscitations. Survey information included hospital of practice, position in ED, years in practice, opinions on FMP and personal experience with FMP for five clinical scenarios: laceration repair (LAC), intravenous access (IV), lumbar puncture (LP), endotracheal intubation (ETI), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and critical resuscitation (CR). Statistical analysis was through chi square and regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-five emergency department personnel participated in the survey, 57 (67%) nurses, 22 (25%) physicians, 4 technicians (5%), and 2 nurses aids (2%). There was a significant correlation between a favorable opinion concerning family member presence during LP, ETI, CPR and CR and the type of Emergency Department in which the individual practiced (P<0.002). Regression analysis demonstrated a similar relation between personal experience with LAC, IV, ETI, CR, and CPR and a favorable opinion on FMP during that activity (P<0.03).

CONCLUSION

Opinions on FMP are strongly influenced by experience with this practice. Emergency department personnel with prior exposure to family member presence during resuscitations favor this activity. Biases by EDP lacking experience with FMP may limit its introduction into unfamiliar institutions.

Witnessed resuscitation by relatives

Witnessed resuscitation is the process of active 'medical' resuscitation in the presence of family members. Witnessed resuscitation though not as yet wide spread in practice is becoming established. Early reports of programs designed to promote such a process first appeared in the early 1980s. More recent work appears to show both public support and a desire for inclusion in the resuscitation process. Some research has been produced that indicates both satisfaction and psychological benefit for those relatives enabled to witness. Limited work only, exists pertaining to the effects on health care providers and these reports currently do not show any significant deleterious effects. Approval of witnessed resuscitation programs is not universal amongst all groups of health care workers. Concerns about the ethics of witnessed resuscitation and its medico-legal implications have been raised. The quality of the initial witnessed resuscitation reports is however variable and there is a great need for further work to validate the initial findings particularly in the areas of psychological stressors in staff and risk management implications.