Infantile spasms and vigabatrin. Study will compare effects of drugs

Ocular complications of neurological therapy

Treatments used for several neurological conditions may adversely affect the eye. Vigabatrin-related retinal toxicity leads to a visual field defect. Optic neuropathy may result from ethambutol and isoniazid, and from radiation therapy. Posterior subcapsular cataract is associated with systemic corticosteroids. Transient refractive error changes may follow treatment with acetazolamide or topiramate, and corneal deposits and keratitis with amandatine. Intraocular pressure can be elevated in susceptible individuals by anticholinergic drugs, including oxybutynin, tolterodine, benzhexol, propantheline, atropine and amitriptyline, and also by systemic corticosteroids and by topiramate. Nystagmus, diplopia and extraocular muscle palsies can occur with antiepileptic drugs, particularly phenytoin and carbamazepine. Ocular neuromyotonia can follow parasellar radiation. Congenital ocular malformations can result from in utero exposure to maternally prescribed sodium valproate, phenytoin and carbamazepine. Neurologists must be aware of potential ocular toxicity of these drugs, and appropriately monitor for potential adverse events.

Treatment of infantile spasms: an evidence-based approach

The object of this work was to subject established empirical medical treatment regimens for infantile spasms to evidence-based medicine analysis in order to determine the current best practice for the treatment of infantile spasms in children. Clinical studies of infantile spasms reported during the presteroid era were reviewed critically to define the natural history of the disorder. Treatment trials of infantile spasms conducted since 1958 were rigorously assessed using MEDLINE and hand searches of the English language literature. Inclusion criteria were the documented presence of infantile spasms and hypsarrhythmia. Outcome measures included complete cessation of spasms, resolution of hypsarrhythmia, relapse rate, developmental outcome, the presence or absence of epilepsy, and/or an epileptiform electroencephalogram. Evidence was defined as class I, II, or III, and practice parameter recommendations were made using the framework devised by the American Academy of Neurology. Class I and III evidence support a standard of practice recommendation for the use of vigabatrin in the treatment of infantile spasms in children with tuberous sclerosis. Class I and III evidence support a guidelines recommendation for the use of either ACTH or vigabatrin in infantile spasms in nontuberous sclerosis patients. There is no strong evidence that successful treatment of infantile spasms improves the long-term prognosis for cognitive outcome or decreases the incidence of later epilepsy. A practice option recommendation for the use of oral corticosteroids in the treatment of infantile spasms is supported by limited and inconclusive class I and III data. Based on the evidence, no recommendation can be made for the use of pyridoxine, benzodiazepines, or the newer antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of infantile spasms. ACTH and vigabatrin are the most effective agents in the treatment of infantile spasms, but concerns remain about the risk/benefit profiles of these drugs.

Visual field defects with vigabatrin: epidemiology and therapeutic implications

Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that acts as a selective irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase. In 1997, 3 cases of severe symptomatic and persistent visual field constriction associated with vigabatrin treatment were described. During 1997 to 1998, similar concentric visual field constrictions were described in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were receiving vigabatrin concurrently with other AEDs. However, a study of patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy alone showed that there was a causal relationship between vigabatrin treatment and the specific bilateral concentric visual field constriction. The Marketing Authorisation Holders survey (involving 335 vigabatrin recipients aged >14 years) indicated that 31% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 26 to 36%] had a visual field defect attributable to vigabatrin, compared with a 0% incidence of visual field defects (upper 95% CI 3%) in an unexposed control group. Other studies in adults have given similar overall prevalences, with a total of 169 of 528 patients diagnosed with vigabatrin-associated field defects (32%, 95% CI 28 to 36%). Male gender seems to be associated with an increase in the relative risk of visual field loss of approximately 2-fold. The pattern of defect is typically a bilateral, absolute concentric constriction of the visual field, the severity of which varies from mild to severe. Data gathered so far suggest that the cumulative incidence increases rapidly during the first 2 years of treatment and within the first 2 kg of vigabatrin intake, stabilising at 3 years and after a total vigabatrin dose of 3 kg. The prevalence of vigabatrin-associated field defects seems to be lower in children, but there are also methodological problems and greater variability in the assessment of visual fields in children. There is particular concern that the increased risk of the visual field defects will outweigh the benefit of the drug in patients who could be controlled with other AEDs. Vigabatrin should currently be used only in combination with other AEDs for patients with resistant partial epilepsy when all other appropriate drug combinations have proved inadequate or have not been tolerated. Regular visual field testing should be performed before the start of treatment and at regular intervals during treatment. Patients with pre-existent visual field defects due to other causes should not be treated with vigabatrin. Currently, the benefits of treating infantile spasms with vigabatrin monotherapy seem to outweigh the risks, but further prospective studies and follow-up of children receiving treatment are needed to evaluate the place of vigabatrin in this indication.

Vigabatrin-associated visual field defects in children

PURPOSE

Vigabatrin (Sabril), a drug that blocks GABA transaminase, has been used in the treatment of epilepsy since 1989. There have been reports of irreversible constriction of the visual field in adult patients related to vigabatrin (VGB) therapy, resulting in reduced VGB usage in adults. Although used as a second or third line agent in adults, in children it is often considered as a first line treatment for several subgroups of seizures in spite of there being no way, in the majority of cases, to monitor visual fields. Some of these children have a pre-existing visual field defect as part of their primary disorder. We aimed to identify whether visual field loss due to VGB was occurring in our hospital.

METHODS

We have studied the results of ophthalmic examination in 14 children on VGB at Great Ormond Street Hospital who were able to perform Goldmann visual fields.

RESULTS

Ten of the 14 patients had constriction of their visual fields attributed to VGB. In addition there were 2 patients with suspicious visual field defects thought to be due to VGB. There was pre-existing visual pathway damage in 4 cases and in 2 of these optic disc pallor increased in association with constricted visual fields. However, the optic discs were normal in 7 patients in spite of visual field constriction. Visual acuity was generally normal in spite of gross visual field constriction.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that VGB should be used with great caution where there is pre-existing visual pathway damage. In other cases the benefits should be considered in relation to the risks, which include irreversible visual field damage. At present visual fields can only be monitored by perimetry, which is often not possible in children with epilepsy.