Recent advances: hepatology

Hepatitis C crónica: aspectos clínicos, serológicos y de tratamiento en dos centros de atención en Bogotá, Colombia

Introducción: el virus de la hepatitis C afecta a cerca de 170 millones de personas en el mundo. La organización mundial de la salud (OMS) estima una prevalencia mundial del 2%. La respuesta global al tratamiento en la era de la terapia dual para genotipo 1 es del orden de 40%. En Colombia hay datos limitados que confirmen un comportamiento similar y que describan las características clínicas de los pacientes con esta infección. Metodología: se revisaron retrospectivamente las historias clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico de hepatitis C crónica que asistieron a consulta externa del servicio de Hepatología en la Clínica Universitaria Colombia y de la consulta externa del servicio de Hepatología de uno de los autores durante el periodo comprendido entre el 1 de enero del 2010 y el 30 de mayo de 2013, se describen las características clínicas, serológicas y de respuesta al tratamiento. Resultados: se evaluaron las historias clínicas de 163 pacientes, 62% mujeres y 38% hombres, con una edad promedio de 58,2 años. El principal factor de riesgo para la adquisición de la hepatitis C fue historia de transfusiones antes de 1992 en 62% de los pacientes. La decisión de iniciar tratamiento se tomó en 77 pacientes (47,2%) y en 86 (52,8%) no se inició por diferentes razones dentro de las cuales la edad avanzada y cirrosis avanzada suman más de 50%; otras razones para no iniciar el tratamiento fueron: enfermedad mínima (4,7%), enfermedad mínima más edad avanzada (10,5%), curación espontánea (14%), poca probabilidad de respuesta (3,3%) y otras (14%). De 62 pacientes de los que se contaba con información acerca de tratamientos previos o tratados recientemente 30,6% presentaron respuesta viral sostenida (RVS), 29,0% fueron clasificados como reincidentes o relapser, 8,1% como respondedores parciales, 19,4% no tuvieron respuesta y 12,9% suspendieron el tratamiento por intolerancia. Conclusiones: el antecedente más frecuente para la adquisición del VHC en el grupo de pacientes estudiado fue la historia de transfusiones antes de 1992 asociada con cirugía ginecológica. Cerca de la mitad de los pacientes se diagnostican tardíamente. Se muestra una mayor tendencia al tratamiento de la hepatitis con tasas de RVS similares a las encontradas en otras series. Este estudio abre puertas a la realización de otros que permitan definir de forma más amplia la prevalencia, factores de riesgo y variables de respuesta al tratamiento de esta entidad en nuestro país.

Hepatic Injury Correlates With Apoptosis, Regeneration, and Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Canine Chronic Liver Disease

Assessment of the clinical severity, pathogenesis, and prognosis of canine chronic liver disease poses significant challenges to clinicians and pathologists, relating in part to a lack of standardized terminology and assessment methods and also to a lack of understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease in the dog. This study graded the severity of necroinflammatory activity in chronic liver disease in dogs using a modification of Ishak’s grading scheme for human chronic liver disease and examined the association of grade score with hepatocellular apoptosis, regeneration, nitric oxide synthase isoform expression, copper and iron accumulation, and indicators of oxidative stress. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded hematoxylin and eosin (HE)–stained liver biopsies from 45 dogs with chronic liver disease and 55 healthy control dogs were graded for various morphologic components of liver injury and response. The cumulative score for grade of necroinflammatory activity was strongly and significantly correlated with immunoreactive labels for hepatocellular proliferation (Ki-67); apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3); inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in lobular, portal, and septal stromal cells; endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in hepatocytes and lobular, portal, and septal stromal cells; and total stainable hepatic iron. A weaker significant correlation was found between grade and accumulation of hepatocellular copper. No significant correlation was found between grade and immunoreactivity for malondialdehyde-protein adducts. These results document a method for grading of the severity of necroinflammatory disease in canine liver biopsies and show an association with increased iNOS and eNOS expression.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy is ribavirin plus pegylated interferon to achieve undetectable level of virus in the blood, but the effect on clinical outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained loss of hepatitis C virus, liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses of patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. All outcomes were analysed with the random-effects model. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR). We used trial sequential analyses to examine the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 randomised trials with 12,707 patients. Most trials had unclear or high risk of bias. We did not find any significant influence of bias on our results but cannot exclude outcome measure reporting bias as many trials did not report on the primary outcomes of this review. Compared with interferon, ribavirin plus interferon had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.75), relapsers (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93), and in all patients (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality in all patients (Peto OR, 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of haematological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnoea, fatigue) adverse reactions. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation and dose reductions. Trial sequential analyses confirmed our findings regarding virological effects, but not regarding liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. A high proportion of patients never experience symptoms. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C. However, ribavirin monotherapy may be considered for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained virological response (loss of hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months after treatment), liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response (transaminase activity), and histological response. Randomisation methods, blinding, data handling, and funding were extracted as measures of bias control. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We only present the results of the fixed-effect model if both models provide the same result regarding statistical significance. We present data as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials with 657 patients. The majority of trials had unclear control of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on the sustained virological response (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RD 0% 95% CI -3% to 3%, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, 11 trials). Ribavirin significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions, including anaemia. Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not the sustained biochemical response. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical responses (five trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin seems without beneficial effects on serum virological response and liver-related morbidity or mortality, and significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions. Ribavirin monotherapy seems significantly inferior to interferon monotherapy. The total number of included patients is small, and more trials are perhaps needed. The use of ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C cannot be recommended outside randomised trials.

Hypoxia/reoxygenation up-regulates death receptor expression and enhances apoptosis in human biliary epithelial cells

AIMS

To investigate whether ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced apoptosis in the bile duct epithelium could be mediated by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors in biliary epithelial cells, we examined the effects of hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) on TRAIL cytotoxicity.

MAIN METHODS

Using an H/R model, normal primary human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells were exposed to hypoxia for 1 h, and then reoxygenated. Expressions of death receptor 4 (DR4) and DR5 mRNA and protein were measured. After 1 h of hypoxia, biliary epithelial cells were treated with TRAIL in different concentrations for 4 h. The death of biliary epithelial cells was confirmed by analysis of apoptosis and methylthiazolyl tetrazolium. The activities of caspase-3 and caspase-8 were determined by fluorometric assay.

KEY FINDINGS

Compared with normoxic-cultured cells, the mRNA expressions of DR4 and DR5 were up-regulated from 0 min after reoxygenation, reaching a peak value at 60 min after reoxygenation. The protein expression of DR4 was most intense at 90 min after reoxygenation; the most intense expression of DR5 came at 120 min after reoxygenation. The apoptosis rate increased in the TRAIL treatment group and further increased in the TRAIL plus H/R group, and the effect of concentration-dependent TRAIL-mediated cell killing was more pronounced. Caspase-3 and caspase-8 enzymatic activities after H/R also increased with increased TRAIL concentration.

SIGNIFICANCE

H/R up-regulated the expression of DR4 and DR5, and enhanced TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in normal human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells.

WITHDRAWN: Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Ribavirin plus interferon combination therapy is presently considered the optimal treatment of interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, but its role in relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon therapy is not established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin alone or in combination with alpha interferon in interferon naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches on electronic databases: The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (August 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001, MEDLINE (1966 - August 2001), and EMBASE (1985 - August 2001). Manual searches of bibliographies and journals were done as well as authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies producing ribavirin or interferon were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials comparing ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo, or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the 'sustained' (six months after treatment) virological response, and morbidity plus mortality. The secondary outcome measures were the 'end of treatment' and 'sustained' biochemical response, the 'end of treatment' virologic response, histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials in which 271 patients were randomised to ribavirin versus placebo or no intervention and 48 trials in which 6585 patients were randomised to interferon with or without ribavirin. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin monotherapy had no significant effect on the virological response or histology and only a transient effect on the biochemical response. Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response by 26% in naive patients (relative risk (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.78), 33% in relapsers (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78), and 11% in non-responders (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96). There was no significant effect on morbidity plus mortality (Peto odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.19-1.06). Irrespective of previous therapy, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained biochemical response (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) or improved histology (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.81). Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52) and several types of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy increased the number of naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with a sustained virological, biochemical, or histological response, but also the occurrence of adverse events.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades. Ribavirin monotherapy may represent a treatment for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effect of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until May 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the six months sustained loss of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood after end of treatment and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response, histological response, and adverse events. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality and relative risks (RR) for the remaining outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 13 randomised trials including 594 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Most trials had low methodological quality. Compared with placebo/no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on sustained (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.07, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.20 to 19.0, eleven trials). Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not sustained biochemical response. Further, ribavirin significantly increased the risk of anaemia. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical response (four trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that ribavirin versus placebo/no intervention had no significant beneficial effect on virological response and liver morbidity, but may improve biochemical and histological response transiently. Ribavirin increased the risk of anaemia. Therefore, we cannot recommend ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C outside randomised trials.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades and most patients are diagnosed based on the presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid and elevated transaminases.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies, until May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the sustained loss of hepatitis C virus and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. We separately analysed patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 randomised trials with 9991 patients. Most trials had low methodological quality but we did not find any significant influence of quality on our results. Compared with interferon, combination therapy had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.75) and in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76), relapsers (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.73), and non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) individually. Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy also had a significant beneficial effect on the histological response. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of anaemia (RR 10.48, 95% CI 5.34 to 20.55), which occurred in 22% of patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnea, fatigue) adverse events. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus and improving liver histology. This may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. However, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of several adverse events.

Chronic hepatitis in dogs: a review of current understanding of the aetiology, progression, and treatment

Chronic hepatitis is common in dogs in primary and referral practice but the cause is usually unknown. This paper reviews the literature on potential causes of chronic hepatitis in dogs (infectious, autoimmune, metabolic, toxic, and breed-associated) together with the literature on the progression of the disease and on treatments. This is compared with the current understanding of aetiology, progression, and treatment of chronic hepatitis in man. Unfortunately, little is known about the aetiology and progression of the canine disease and very few therapies have been subjected to critical trials. It is difficult therefore to draw conclusions about causes and effective treatment in dogs. Even the histological description for canine chronic hepatitis has yet to be standardised. Much research remains to be done and this review suggests some potential areas for future investigation.

Hepatorenal problems presented in an urban high dependancy unit in a user of ecstasy and cocaine

A case is presented of a young man aged 25 years who had an episode of jaundice and renal failure after using a small amount of ecstasy and cocaine. There is a discussion of the issues raised by the case as well as some points of interest for research and health education.