Laterality of lower limb amputation in diabetic patients

Foot deformation analysis with different load-bearing conditions to enhance diabetic footwear designs

In-depth analyses of foot surface measurements upon weight bearing are crucial to understand how the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the foot deform during motion to enhance the fit of footwear, which is particularly important for diabetic patients with stringent fit requirements to redistribute the plantar weight forces. This study analyzes diabetic foot deformations under 3 different weight bearing conditions (no weight bearing, half weight bearing, and 80% weight bearing) by using a novel foot scanning method that enables efficient scanning of the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the foot simultaneously. The feet of 48 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are scanned. With increased load on the feet, the width of the forefoot increases by 9.7%-10.4%, height of the midfoot decreases by 15.1%-18.2%, forefoot and midfoot rotate to the medial side by 16.9%-23.9% while the rearfoot rotates to the lateral side by 15.2% simultaneously, and the plantar of the foot increases contact with the floor by 11.4%-23.0%. Gender differences in foot shape are also found between males and females, males have a broader foot than females for the same foot length. Precise anthropometric information of foot changes and deformation therefore enables adequate foot protection, fit and comfort when designing footwear. This research contributes to shoe design considerations that focus on the deformation of the foot under different loads.

Leg dominance as a determinant in laterality of lower extremity amputation in diabetic patients: retrospective study and literature review

Background/Aims

Diabetic patients with peripheral vascular manifestations often develop foot ulcers and sometimes have to undergo lower extremity amputation. This retrospective study investigated leg dominance and laterality of lower extremity amputation in diabetic, dysvascular amputees.

Methods

All patients who met the inclusion criteria had their medical records reviewed for their dominant side and a correlation with a side of amputation was analysed. This information is routinely obtained as part of the admission history. For the literature review, PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library were searched with no date restriction until February 2018. Relevant studies were included and analysed.

Results

Of all the patients (n=27), 16 had diabetes and of these, 12 (75%) had their dominant leg amputated.

Conclusions

The data and literature analysis suggest that diabetic, dysvascular patients' dominant legs may be at higher risk for amputation than the non-dominant side. Larger studies are needed to clarify the relationship between leg dominance and laterality of lower extremity amputation.

The laterality of the surgical correction of forefoot pathology

Lateral prevalence has not been traditionally attributed to the development and presentation of pathologic forefoot complaints. The objective of this study was to determine if a laterality prevalence exists for surgically corrected forefoot deformities. All cases performed at the Inova Fairfax Hospital Ambulatory Surgery Center over a 76-month period were reviewed and classified into the following categories: hallux abductovalgus deformity correction, hallux limitus deformity correction, specific digital deformity correction, neuroma surgery, and combinations of these categories (n = 1821). Our analyses indicated no laterality difference in the surgical correction of most common forefoot pathologies. A measure of all examined surgical corrections (hallux abductovalgus, hallux limitus, digital deformity, and/or neuroma) did not demonstrate a difference between the surgical correction of the right and left extremities (chi(2) = 0.003; P = .94). There was also no significant difference in the surgical correction of the right and left extremities when studying the individual categories of any hallux abductovalgus correction (chi(2) = 0.416; P = .52), any hallux limitus correction (chi(2) = 2.050; P = .15), any digital deformity correction (chi(2) = 1.251; P = .26), or any neuroma surgery (chi(2) = 0.784; P = .38). Only the surgical correction of hallux limitus deformity without surgical correction of digital deformity or neuroma demonstrated a significant laterality with surgical correction of the right lower extremity being more common (chi(2) = 4.600; P = .03).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.