Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation

Defining Self-Management for Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients: A Mixed Method Study

Patients with Solid Organ Transplantations (SOTx) face long-term lifestyle adaptations, psychological and social adjustments, and complex self-care regimes to maintain health post-transplant. Self-management (SM) skills represent important aspects of nursing communication with SOTx patients; however, there is potential for SM to be defined narrowly in terms of medication adherence. The study presented here collated the existing definitions in a mixed method review in order to identify SM attributes for this group (including those unique to this population). Secondary analysis of a dataset and bibliographic analysis and an expert panel were used to develop a comprehensive working definition of SOTx patients. The analysis comprised critical interpretation of the evolving definition content, concepts, and contexts of application in current usages and over time. We identified eight definitions and 63 cited definition sources from bibliographic analysis. Findings identified limitations of the existing definitions. Population-specific attributes included optimisation of transplant outcomes, active engagement in healthy behaviours, control, structure, and discipline characteristics, and moderating factors of patient motivation, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. A critical appraisal of definitions indicated inadequately defined aspects such as setting, temporal dimension, concept interaction, interventions, and measurable outcomes. The bibliographic analysis highlighted the influence of broader chronic illness constructions of SM, underpinning the generalisable SM attributes in current definitions. Further research may advance the development of a definition in exploring the relevance of SOTx-specific attributes of the definition.

Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of point-of-care devices for the management of patients on oral anticoagulation allows self-testing by the patient at home. Patients who self-test can either adjust their medication according to a pre-determined dose-INR (international normalized ratio) schedule (self-management), or they can call a clinic to be told the appropriate dose adjustment (self-monitoring). Increasing evidence suggests self-testing of oral anticoagulant therapy is equal to or better than standard monitoring. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects on thrombotic events, major haemorrhages, and all-cause mortality of self-monitoring or self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy compared to standard monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update, we re-ran the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2015, Issue 6, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to June week 4 2015), Embase (Ovid, 1980 to 2015 week 27) on 1 July 2015. We checked bibliographies and contacted manufacturers and authors of relevant studies. We did not apply any language restrictions .

SELECTION CRITERIA

Outcomes analysed were thromboembolic events, mortality, major haemorrhage, minor haemorrhage, tests in therapeutic range, frequency of testing, and feasibility of self-monitoring and self-management.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently extracted data and we used a fixed-effect model with the Mantzel-Haenzel method to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and Peto's method to verify the results for uncommon outcomes. We examined heterogeneity amongst studies with the Chi(2) and I(2) statistics and used GRADE methodology to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 28 randomised trials including 8950 participants (newly incorporated in this update: 10 trials including 4227 participants). The overall quality of the evidence was generally low to moderate. Pooled estimates showed a reduction in thromboembolic events (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75; participants = 7594; studies = 18; moderate quality of evidence). Both, trials of self-management or self-monitoring showed reductions in thromboembolic events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.70; participants = 3497; studies = 11) and (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.97; participants = 4097; studies = 7), respectively; the quality of evidence for both interventions was moderate. No reduction in all-cause mortality was found (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; participants = 6358; studies = 11; moderate quality of evidence). While self-management caused a reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.84; participants = 3058; studies = 8); self-monitoring did not (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; participants = 3300; studies = 3); the quality of evidence for both interventions was moderate. In 20 trials (8018 participants) self-monitoring or self-management did not reduce major haemorrhage (RR 0.95, 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12; moderate quality of evidence). There was no significant difference found for minor haemorrhage (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.41; participants = 5365; studies = 13). The quality of evidence was graded as low because of serious risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 82%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Participants who self-monitor or self-manage can improve the quality of their oral anticoagulation therapy. Thromboembolic events were reduced, for both those self-monitoring or self-managing oral anticoagulation therapy. A reduction in all-cause mortality was observed in trials of self-management but not in self-monitoring, with no effects on major haemorrhage.

Supporting patients to self-monitor their oral anticoagulation therapy: recommendations based on a qualitative study of patients' experiences

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials suggest that oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) self-monitoring is safe and effective, however little is known about the patient experience of this process. There is a lack of understanding about how best to train and support patients embarking on OAT self-monitoring.

AIM

To collect in-depth information about patients' experiences of OAT self-monitoring outside of clinical trial conditions and to produce a set of recommendations on how best to support such patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients who self-monitor and live in England.

METHOD

In total, 26 of the 267 (9.7%) who participated in the Cohort study of Anticoagulation Self-Monitoring (CASM) and were still self-monitoring after 12 months' follow-up were interviewed. Topics discussed included experiences of OAT self-monitoring, healthcare support, training, and decision making. Framework analysis was used.

RESULTS

Following initial problems using the monitoring device, interviewees described a mostly positive experience. Although less effort was expended attending monitoring appointments with health professionals, effort was required to conduct self-monitoring tests and to interpret and act on the results. Desire to self-manage was variable, especially when dosing advice systems worked promptly and reliably. Interviewees overcame patchy healthcare system knowledge and support of self-monitoring by educating themselves. Family and friends provided support with learning to use the monitor and managing OAT dosage adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Better, more-consistent training and health-service support would have alleviated a number of problems encountered by these patients who were self-monitoring. This training and support will become even more important if self-monitoring becomes more accessible to the general population of people on OAT.

Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in everyday practice: efficacy and safety in a nationwide long-term prospective cohort study

Patient self-management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation is under discussion, because evidence from real-life settings is missing. Using data from a nationwide, prospective cohort study in Switzerland, we assessed overall long-term efficacy and safety of PSM and examined subgroups. Data of 1140 patients (5818.9 patient-years) were analysed and no patient were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0.2-12.8 years). Median age at the time of training was 54.2 years (range 18.2-85.2) and 34.6% were women. All-cause mortality was 1.4 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 1.1-1.7) with a higher rate in patients with atrial fibrillation (2.5; 1.6-3.7; p<0.001), patients>50 years of age (2.0; 1.6-2.6; p<0.001), and men (1.6; 1.2-2.1; p = 0.036). The rate of thromboembolic events was 0.4 (0.2-0.6) and independent from indications, sex and age. Major bleeding were observed in 1.1 (0.9-1.5) per 100 patient-years. Efficacy was comparable to standard care and new oral anticoagulants in a network meta-analysis. PSM of properly trained patients is effective and safe in a long-term real-life setting and robust across clinical subgroups. Adoption in various clinical settings, including those with limited access to medical care or rural areas is warranted.

Patient understanding of warfarin therapy: A review of education strategies

Significant research has been directed into defining best-practice anticoagulant management of thromboembolic events and optimal strategies for determining the safety and efficacy of therapy. Similarly, improved patient outcomes have been realised through the development of novel management strategies such as self-monitoring and self-management. Considerably, less energy has been directed towards developing and evaluating the best mechanisms for delivery of patient education. This is in spite of the fact that numerous confounders to stable therapy confront warfarinised patients on a daily basis. That patients requiring warfarin therapy should be educated with respect to that therapy has never been questioned. However, relatively little attention appears to have been paid to the development of robust models of patient education in the setting of oral anticoagulant therapy. This paper reviews the current literature with respect to warfarin education interventions before recommending strategies that may facilitate determination of the impact educating patients about warfarin therapy has upon clinical outcomes.

Educational intervention improves anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation patients: the TREAT randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), most commonly with warfarin, requires maintenance of a narrow therapeutic target (INR 2.0 to 3.0) and is often poorly controlled in practice. Poor patient-understanding surrounding AF and its treatment may contribute to the patient's willingness to adhere to recommendations.

METHOD

A theory-driven intervention, developed using patient interviews and focus groups, consisting of a one-off group session (1-6 patients) utilising an "expert-patient" focussed DVD, educational booklet, self-monitoring diary and worksheet, was compared in a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN93952605) against usual care, with patient postal follow-ups at 1, 2, 6, and 12-months. Ninety-seven warfarin-naïve AF patients were randomised to intervention (n=46, mean age (SD) 72.0 (8.2), 67.4% men), or usual care (n=51, mean age (SD) 73.7 (8.1), 62.7% men), stratified by age, sex, and recruitment centre. Primary endpoint was time within therapeutic range (TTR); secondary endpoints included knowledge, quality of life, anxiety/depression, beliefs about medication, and illness perceptions.

MAIN FINDINGS

Intervention patients had significantly higher TTR than usual care at 6-months (76.2% vs. 71.3%; p=0.035); at 12-months these differences were not significant (76.0% vs. 70.0%; p=0.44). Knowledge increased significantly across time (F (3, 47) = 6.4; p<0.01), but there were no differences between groups (F (1, 47) = 3.3; p = 0.07). At 6-months, knowledge scores predicted TTR (r=0.245; p=0.04). Patients' scores on subscales representing their perception of the general harm and overuse of medication, as well as the perceived necessity of their AF specific medications predicted TTR at 6- and 12-months.

CONCLUSIONS

A theory-driven educational intervention significantly improves TTR in AF patients initiating warfarin during the first 6-months. Adverse clinical outcomes may potentially be reduced by improving patients' understanding of the necessity of warfarin and reducing their perception of treatment harm. Improving education provision for AF patients is essential to ensure efficacious and safe treatment. The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN93952605, and details are available at www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN93952605.

Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is used as an oral anticoagulant. However, there is wide variation in patient response to warfarin dose. This variation, as well as the necessity of keeping within a narrow therapeutic range, means that selection of the correct warfarin dose at the outset of treatment is not straightforward.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of different initiation doses of warfarin in terms of time in-range, time to INR in-range and effect on serious adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, DARE and the NHS Health economics database on The Cochrane Library (2012, Issue 4); MEDLINE (1950 to April 2012) and EMBASE (1974 to April 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials which compared different initiation regimens of warfarin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Authors also assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 studies of patients commencing warfarin for inclusion in the review. The overall risk of bias was found to be variable, with most studies reporting adequate methods for randomisation but only two studies reporting adequate data on allocation concealment. Four studies (355 patients) compared 5 mg versus 10 mg loading doses. All four studies reported INR in-range by day five. Although there was notable heterogeneity, pooling of these four studies showed no overall difference between 5 mg versus 10 mg loading doses (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.77, P = 0.46, I(2) = 83%). Two of these studies used two consecutive INRs in-range as the outcome and showed no difference between a 5 mg and 10 mg dose by day five (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.19, P = 0.37, I(2 )= 22%); two other studies used a single INR in-range as the outcome and showed a benefit for the 10 mg initiation dose by day 5 (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.21, P = 0.05, I(2 )= 72%). Two studies compared a 5 mg dose to other doses: a 2.5 mg initiation dose took longer to achieve the therapeutic range (2.7 versus 2.0 days; P < 0.0001), but those receiving a calculated initiation dose achieved a target range quicker (4.2 days versus 5 days, P = 0.007). Two studies compared age adjusted doses to 10 mg initiation doses. More elderly patients receiving an age adjusted dose achieved a stable INR compared to those receiving a 10 mg initial dose (and Fennerty regimen). Four studies used genotype guided dosing in one arm of each trial. Three studies reported no overall differences; the fourth study, which reported that the genotype group spent significantly more time in-range (P < 0.001), had a control group whose INRs were significantly lower than expected. No clear impacts from adverse events were found in either arm to make an overall conclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The studies in this review compared loading doses in several different situations. There is still considerable uncertainty between the use of a 5 mg and a 10 mg loading dose for the initiation of warfarin. In the elderly, there is some evidence that lower initiation doses or age adjusted doses are more appropriate, leading to fewer high INRs. However, there is insufficient evidence to warrant genotype guided initiation.

Effects of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy

BACKGROUND

Computer-assistance and self-monitoring lower the cost and may improve the quality of anticoagulation therapy. The main purpose of this clinical investigation was to use computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy to improve the time to reach and the time spent within the therapeutic target range compared to traditional oral anticoagulant therapy by physicians.

METHODS

54 patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Patients in two groups used CoaguChek® systems to measure international normalized ratio (INR) values and had dosages of anticoagulation treatment calculated in a computer system by an algorithm specific to each group. The third group received traditional anticoagulation treatment by physicians. The obtained INR values were compared regarding the time to reach, and the time spent within, the therapeutic target range, corresponding to INR values from 2 to 3.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to computer-assisted anticoagulation and the CoaguChek® system reached the therapeutic target range after 8 days compared to 14 days by prescriptions from physicians (p = 0.04). Time spent in the therapeutic target range did not differ between groups. The median INR value measured throughout the study from all patients by CoaguChek® at 2.5 (2.42-2.62) was lower than measured by a hospital-based Clinical and Biochemical Laboratory at 2.6 (2.45-2.76), (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic target range was reached faster by the use of computer-assisted anticoagulation treatment than prescribed by physicians, and the total time spent within the therapeutic target range was similar. Thus computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy may reduce the cost of anticoagulation therapy without lowering the quality. INR values measured by CoaguChek® were reliable compared to measurements by a clinical and biochemical laboratory.

Precision and accuracy of point-of-care testing coagulometers used for self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation therapy is monitored by the use of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Patients who perform self-testing or self-management use a point-of-care testing (POCT) coagulometer (INR monitor) to estimate their INRs. A precondition for a correct dosage of coumarins is a correct INR estimation, and the method and apparatus used for providing the INR measurements are crucial in this context. Several studies have been published regarding the precision and accuracy of these POCT coagulometers, and have led to diverse conclusions. It is difficult and challenging to perform an overview of the literature, owing to the vast amount of papers, with differences in design, statistical analysis, etc.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature, especially regarding the precision and accuracy of the POCT coagulometers, to provide recommendations for clinical use and quality control, and to point out areas for future research.

METHODS

We included a total of 22 studies, of which four were characterized as high-quality studies.

RESULTS

The precision of the POCT coagulometers was generally adequate for clinical use. Their performance in terms of accuracy has to be viewed in the context of the inherent inaccuracies of INR measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of POCT coagulometers seems, in this respect, to be generally acceptable, and they can be used in a clinical setting.

Patients' perspectives on self-testing of oral anticoagulation therapy: content analysis of patients' internet blogs

BACKGROUND

Patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) require regular testing of the prothrombin time (PT) and the international normalised ratio (INR) to monitor their blood coagulation level to avoid complications of either over or under coagulation. PT/INR can be tested by a healthcare professional or by the patient. The latter mode of the testing is known as patient self-testing or home testing. The objective of this study was to elicit patients' perspectives and experiences regarding PT/INR self-testing using portable coagulometer devices.

METHODS

Internet blog text mining was used to collect 246 blog postings by 108 patients, mainly from the USA and the UK. The content of these qualitative data were analysed using XSight and NVivo software packages.

RESULTS

The key themes in relation to self-testing of OAT identified were as follows: Patient benefits reported were time saved, personal control, choice, travel reduction, cheaper testing, and peace of mind. Equipment issues included high costs, reliability, quality, and learning how to use the device. PT/INR issues focused on the frequency of testing, INR fluctuations and individual target (therapeutic) INR level. Other themes noted were INR testing at laboratories, the interactions with healthcare professionals in managing and testing OAT and insurance companies' involvement in acquiring the self-testing equipment. Social issues included the pain and stress of taking and testing for OAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' blogs on PT/INR testing provide insightful information that can help in understanding the nature of the experiences and perspectives of patients on self-testing of OAT. The themes identified in this paper highlight the substantial complexities involved in self-testing programmes in the healthcare system. Thus, the issues elicited in this study are very valuable for all stakeholders involved in developing effective self-testing strategies in healthcare that are gaining considerable current momentum particularly for patients with chronic illness.

What are the basic self-monitoring components for cardiovascular risk management?

BACKGROUND

Self-monitoring is increasingly recommended as a method of managing cardiovascular disease. However, the design, implementation and reproducibility of the self-monitoring interventions appear to vary considerably. We examined the interventions included in systematic reviews of self-monitoring for four clinical problems that increase cardiovascular disease risk.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Cochrane databases for systematic reviews of self-monitoring for: heart failure, oral anticoagulation therapy, hypertension and type 2 diabetes. We extracted data using a pre-specified template for the identifiable components of the interventions for each disease. Data was also extracted on the theoretical basis of the education provided, the rationale given for the self-monitoring regime adopted and the compliance with the self-monitoring regime by the patients.

RESULTS

From 52 randomized controlled trials (10,388 patients) we identified four main components in self-monitoring interventions: education, self-measurement, adjustment/adherence and contact with health professionals. Considerable variation in these components occurred across trials and conditions, and often components were poorly described. Few trials gave evidence-based rationales for the components included and self-measurement regimes adopted.

CONCLUSIONS

The components of self-monitoring interventions are not well defined despite current guidelines for self-monitoring in cardiovascular disease management. Few trials gave evidence-based rationales for the components included and self-measurement regimes adopted. We propose a checklist of factors to be considered in the design of self-monitoring interventions which may aid in the provision of an evidence-based rationale for each component as well as increase the reproducibility of effective interventions for clinicians and researchers.

The Evidence to Support Point-of-Care Testing

Point-of-care testing (PoCT) is now possible in many areas of clinical medicine. This review examines the evidence for its application in four areas: self-monitoring; community testing primarily in the pharmacy; general practice; and the emergency department. In all of these areas except pharmacy, randomised controlled trials of PoCT versus central laboratory testing have been performed, with the results of some of these trials supporting the use of PoCT. Aside from providing evidence, these trials and other observational studies have provided valuable information about how PoCT should be conducted. In particular they have shown that adoption of the technology is often insufficient to achieve a benefit and in some cases a change of care process is also required.

Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of portable monitors (point-of-care devices) for the management of patients on oral anticoagulation allows self-testing by the patient at home. Patients who self-test can either adjust their medication according to a pre-determined dose-INR schedule (self-management) or they can call a clinic to be told the appropriate dose adjustment (self-monitoring). Several trials of self-monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy suggest this may be equal to or better than standard monitoring.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of self-monitoring or self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy compared to standard monitoring.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (to November 2007). We checked bibliographies and contacted manufacturers and authors of relevant studies. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Outcomes analysed were thromboembolic events, mortality, major haemorrhage, minor haemorrhage, tests in therapeutic range, frequency of testing, and feasibility of self-monitoring and self-management.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently extracted data. We used a fixed-effect model with the Mantzel-Haenzel method to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and Peto's method to verify the results for uncommon outcomes. We examined heterogeneity amongst studies with the Chi(2) and I(2) statistics.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 18 randomized trials (4723 participants). Pooled estimates showed significant reductions in both thromboembolic events (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.89). This reduction in mortality remained significant after the removal of low-quality studies (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.90). Trials of self-management alone showed significant reductions in thromboembolic events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.70) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.84); self-monitoring did not (thrombotic events RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.00; mortality RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.41). Self-monitoring significantly reduced major haemorrhages (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.91) whilst self-management did not (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.61). Twelve trials reported improvements in the percentage of mean INR measurements in the therapeutic range. No heterogeneity was identified in any of these comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to standard monitoring, patients who self-monitor or self-manage can improve the quality of their oral anticoagulation therapy. The number of thromboembolic events and mortality were decreased without increases in harms. However, self-monitoring or self-management were not feasible for up to half of the patients requiring anticoagulant therapy. Reasons included patient refusal, exclusion by their general practitioner, and inability to complete training.

Potentially avoidable inpatient nights among warfarin receiving patients; an audit of a single university teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant (OAT) that needs active management to ensure therapeutic range. Initial management is often carried out as an inpatient, though not requiring inpatient facilities. This mismatch results in financial costs which could be directed more efficaciously. The extent of this has previously been unknown. Here we aim to calculate the potential number of bed nights which may be saved among those being dose optimized as inpatients and examine associated factors.

METHODS

A 6 week prospective audit of inpatients receiving OAT, at Cork University Hospital, was carried out. The study period was from 11th June 2007 to 20th July 2007. Data was collected from patient's medications prescription charts, medical record files, and computerised haematology laboratory records. The indications for OAT, the patient laboratory coagulation results and therapeutic intervals along with patient demographics were analysed. The level of potentially avoidable inpatient nights in those receiving OAT in hospital was calculated and the potential cost savings quantified. Potential avoidable bed nights were defined as patients remaining in hospital for the purpose of optimizing OAT dosage, while receiving subtherapeutic or therapeutic OAT (being titred up to therapeutic levels) and co-administered covering low molecular weight heparin, and requiring no other active care. The average cost of euro638 was taken as the per night hospital stay cost for a non-Intensive Care bed. Ethical approval was granted from the Ethical Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals, Cork, Ireland.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included in the audit. There was 94 men (59.4%) and 64 women (40.6%). The mean age was 67.8 years, with a median age of 70 years.Atrial Fibrillation (43%, n = 70), followed by aortic valve replacement (15%, n = 23) and pulmonary emboli (11%, n = 18) were the commonest reasons for prescribing OAT. 54% had previously been prescribed OAT prior to current admission.It was confirmed that, there are potentially avoidable nights in patients receiving OAT. The majority of this group were those being commenced on OAT for the first time (p = 0.00002), in the specialities of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic surgery and Care of the Elderly. The potential number of bed nights to be saved is 13 per week for the hospital or 1.1 bed nights per 10,000 general hospital admissions. These were predominantly weekday nights. The estimated cost of avoidable inpatient OAT dose optimization was approximately euro8300 per week.

CONCLUSION

With rising costs and the increasing demands for acute hospital beds, alterations to inpatient management for this group of patients should be considered. Alternatives include increasing the size of current anticoagulation clinics, introduction of POCT (point of care testing) devices and increased GP management. POCT can be justified based upon the publication by Gardiner et al, who showed that 87% of patients find self testing straightforward, 87% were confident in the result they obtained using the devices and 77% preferred self testing.

Point-of-care INR measurement in children requiring warfarin: what has been evaluated and future directions

Many children are surviving primary illnesses and now require thromboprophylaxis as a result of advances in management. Vitamin K antagonists are commonly prescribed to prevent or treat thrombosis. These agents are far more challenging to effectively manage in children. As a result of these challenges, frequent blood monitoring to measure international normalized ratio (INR) values is required. Point-of-care (POC) INR monitors use a capillary blood sample that has been expressed as a solution to improve effective management of vitamin K antagonist therapy. POC INR meters have been demonstrated to be accurate and precise in measuring INRs. Implementation of a standardized education program prior to patient use of POC meters results in differences between measured laboratory INRs and POC INR comparisons that meet criteria for clinical relevance. This indicates that POC INR meters are safe and effective for use in children.

Quality assurance for oral anticoagulation self management: a cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

External quality assessment (EQA) should be an inherent component of patient self management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods of EQA for patients within a cluster randomized trial.

METHOD

After development of methods, general practises were randomly allocated to a formal EQA scheme of patients performing the test independently at home or at their practise with supervision. The supervised group of practises was further sub divided to test two other EQA methods: (i) venous sample compared with patients' point of care (POC) device; and (ii) patients POC compared with reference POC. Primary trial outcome measure was reliability of results from the formal scheme taking into account adherence and test errors.

RESULTS

Proportion of EQA scheme tests in range was 633/836 (75.7%). Proportion in range was significantly higher in group performing independently compared with supervised group, 80.1% vs. 71.5% respectively, P = 0.02. Sixty-six percent of tests were in range with venous compared with patients POC, and 88% in patients POC compared with reference POC.

CONCLUSION

Patients are able to undertake a formal EQA scheme and perform more reliably at home independently. There are satisfactory alternatives if a formal scheme is not acceptable.

Anticoagulation in Ambulatory Care

PURPOSE OF THE MANUSCRIPT: Anticoagulation is warranted for the treatment of various disorders including cardiac, vascular, and postsurgical causes. Many centers have nurse case managers to coordinate care for patients on anticoagulation. This increases the demand for specific guidelines to assist nurse case managers to ensure quality of care. This review will address guidelines for nurse case managers and providers regarding initiating anticoagulation treatment and monitoring prothrombin time and international normalized ratio. Information will also be provided regarding when the nurse case manager should notify the providers to establish target international normalized ratio. This review will also provide educational tools to serve as standards for patient teaching, including drug and food interactions.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING(S)

This article applies to adult ambulatory practice that includes primary care, cardiology, and vascular and surgical settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

The complexity of managing anticoagulation in ambulatory practice warrants case management. The nurse case manager will establish a rapport with patients to improve compliance, providing patient education about diet, dosages, and drug interactions to reduce medication errors and bleeding complications. This review on anticoagulation management will assist nurse case managers and providers to provide better quality of care.

Patient self management of oral anticoagulation in routine care in the UK

BACKGROUND

Self management of anticoagulation: a randomised trial (SMART) was the first large scale UK trial to assess clinical and cost effectiveness of patient self management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation therapy compared to routine care. SMART showed that while PSM was as clinically effective as routine care, it was not as cost effective. SMART adds to the growing body of trial data to support PSM; however there are no data on clinical effectiveness and cost of PSM in routine care.

AIM

To evaluate clinical effectiveness of PSM compared to routine care outside trial conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre matched control study. 63 PSM patients from primary care in the West Midlands were matched by age and international normalised ratio (INR) target with controls. INR results were collected for the period 1 July 2003-30 June 2004. The primary outcome measure was INR control.

RESULTS

38 PSM and 40 control patients were recruited. INR percentage time in range was 70% PSM vs 64% controls. 60% PSM were having a regular clinical review, 45% were performing an internal quality control (IQC) test and 82% were performing external quality assurance (EQA) on a regular basis.

CONCLUSION

PSM outside trial conditions is as clinically effective as routine UK care.

INR comparison between the CoaguChek® S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

Portable coagulation monitors have been developed to measure International Normalised Ratio (INR) in orally anticoagulated patients using capillary whole blood from a finger stick. Because of unsatisfactory precision of some of the monitors in comparison with laboratory methods new devices are being developed. In the present study we compared INR determination with the CoaguChek S device with a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation (OAC).

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-two patients performing self-management of OAC were enrolled into this study. Parallel INR measurements were performed within one hour. Capillary INR measurements (INRcap) were done by the patients with the CoaguChek S and venous INR (INRven) by qualified medical staff using a standard laboratory method.

RESULTS

We found a correlation coefficient (r(S)) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.88) among the 242 patients between INRven and INRcap. In 84.4% of the INR parallel measurements the difference between the two values was below 0.5 INR units. In only 2 of 242 cases the difference was >1 INR unit (1.1 and 1.3). The slope of the Passing Bablok regression line was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-1.0) and the y-intercept 0.06 (95% CI: -0.20-0.25). Agreement between both methods was 90.5% (95% CI: 86.8-94.2) and standard-agreement even 97.1% (95% CI: 95-99.2).

CONCLUSIONS

INR measurement with CoaguChek S device by trained patients revealed reliable results in comparison to the values obtained with a standard laboratory method.

Devices for ambulatory and home monitoring of blood pressure, lipids, coagulation, and weight management, part 2

PURPOSE

The equipment and methods used for ambulatory and home monitoring of blood pressure, lipids, coagulation, and weight management are discussed.

SUMMARY

Over 100 million people in the United States have one or more chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma. With the goal to improve health while reducing costs and the overall health care burden, ambulatory and home monitoring by pharmacists and patients are receiving more attention. Ambulatory and home monitoring of blood pressure, cholesterol, coagulation, and weight management (including devices for assessing overweight and obese patients, heart rate monitors, and pedometers) are convenient for clinicians and patients. Such monitoring provides pharmacists with an opportunity to differentiate their practices. Studies suggest that patients who are involved in ambulatory and home monitoring take a more active role in their health and may have better adherence to a prescribed diet and medication regimens. Studies also show that ambulatory and home monitoring, if done correctly, provide clinicians with a large quantity of reliable readings for future therapeutic decisions. Devices are also a means for pharmacists to increase their provision of pharmacy services. Ambulatory monitoring is billable in many clinic settings, and the devices can be a profitable addition to prescription services.

CONCLUSION

Many devices are available to assist patients and clinicians in monitoring blood pressure, lipids, coagulation, and weight management. Familiarity with the devices will help in their proper selection and use.

Nurses’ responses to expert patients: The rhetoric and reality of self-management in long-term conditions: A grounded theory study

BACKGROUND

Against the backdrop in the western world of increasing prevalence of chronic disease, active and informed patients and a policy emphasis on self-management, this English study explored health professionals' responses to expert patients.

OBJECTIVES

To:

DESIGN

A grounded theory approach was utilised with two concurrent data strands.

SETTING

A relatively affluent English county including community, primary and secondary care settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Via purposeful and theoretical sampling 100 health professionals (nurses, doctors, physiotherapists) and 100 adults affected by chronic disease participated.

METHODS

Focus groups, interviews and observation.

RESULTS

Nurses were found to be most anxious about expert patients when compared to other professionals, which appeared to be linked with a lack of professional confidence and unfounded fears regarding litigation. However, nurse specialists often provided a negative case for this. As a whole, nurses were most able to meet the emotional needs of patients, but apart from nurse specialists did not articulate this as a skill.

CONCLUSION

Apart from nurse specialists the majority of nurses appeared limited in appropriately facilitating self-management. It is suggested that this is linked to an ongoing nursing culture of patient as passive, an over-emphasis on empirical knowledge and a feeling of vulnerability on the nurses' part towards expert patients. The findings also indicate a rhetoric rather than reality of autonomous nursing roles within the chronic disease management agenda.

Quality Evaluation of the Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy (OAT): The Awareness of Treating Physicians and the Education of Patients Needs to Be Improved

The adverse effects of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) are the main cause of hospitalization for drug accidents, and most of them could be avoided by more rigorous management. We conducted a prospective study based on the analysis of individuals under OAT recruited among the patients admitted to our hospital. The aim was to evaluate the legitimacy of OAT and the quality of its management by referring to general recommendations. Eighty-six patients were included. In 10, the disease justifying OAT was not included in the French recommendations. Contraindications to OAT were observed in 5 patients. Six drug associations were dangerous. The day of admission, the INR value was beyond the therapeutic range in 27 patients and under in 27 patients. Nine patients had been admitted to the hospital for an adverse effect of OAT (hemorrhage or thrombotic event). The risk of adverse effects was higher when the indications of OAT were outside the recommendations, when a contraindication to OAT existed, or when OAT had been prescribed beyond the necessary duration. A low number of patients knew their INR target, the risks of over- and under-anticoagulation, and the dangers of consuming certain drugs and foods. The overall risk linked to OAT would be diminished if the treatment was prescribed within the legitimate indications and the necessary duration, and taking greater account of the contraindications. The awareness of physicians prescribing OAT needs improvement. The lack of knowledge of the treatment by the patient him- or herself, which may be due to a lack of information or to a misunderstanding, should be counterbalanced by a reinforced education, even if it is time-consuming for the physician.

A randomised control trial of patient self-management of oral anticoagulation compared with patient self-testing

Several studies suggest that patient self-management (PSM) may improve the quality of oral anticoagulation therapy as measured by time spent within the international normalised ratio (INR) target range. We performed a prospective randomised control trial to determine whether the improvement in quality of treatment afforded by PSM is greater than that achieved by patient self-testing (PST) alone. A total of 104 of 800 eligible patients aged 22-88 years (median = 59.8), attending our hospital anticoagulant clinic and receiving long-term warfarin for >8 months agreed to participate. Patients were randomised to PSM (n = 55) or PST (n = 49). Both groups measured their INR using the CoaguChek S every 2 weeks or more frequently if required, for a period of 6 months. Seventy-seven of 104 (74%) patients completed the study (PSM = 41 and PST = 36). The 'drop out' rates for both groups were similar. There was no significant difference between the percentage time in target therapeutic range for PSM (69.9%) and PST (71.8%). Both groups combined showed a significant improvement over the previous 6 months (71.0% vs. 62.5%; P = 0.04). Changes in time within the therapeutic range in individual patients (+5.86) also showed a significant difference. The quality of warfarin control in both PST and PSM may be superior to that achieved by conventional management in a specialised hospital anticoagulation clinic.

Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Near-patient testing has made self-monitoring of anticoagulation with warfarin feasible, and several trials have suggested that such monitoring might be equal to or better than standard monitoring. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials that assessed the effects of self-monitoring or self-management (self-testing and self-dosage) of anticoagulation compared with standard monitoring.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE to April 2005, and contacted manufacturers and authors of relevant studies. Outcomes analysed were: major haemorrhage, thromboembolic events, death, tests in range, minor haemorrhage, frequency of testing, and feasibility of self-monitoring.

FINDINGS

We identified 14 randomised trials of self-monitoring: pooled estimates showed significant reductions in thromboembolic events (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.68), all-cause mortality (0.61, 0.38-0.98), and major haemorrhage (0.65, 0.42-0.99). Trials of combined self-monitoring and self-adjusted therapy showed significant reductions in thromboembolic events (0.27, 0.12-0.59) and death (0.37, 0.16-0.85), but not major haemorrhage (0.93, 0.42-2.05). No difference was noted in minor haemorrhage. 11 trials reported improvements in the mean proportion of international normalisation ratios in range.

INTERPRETATION

Self-management improves the quality of oral anticoagulation. Patients capable of self-monitoring and self-adjusting therapy have fewer thromboembolic events and lower mortality than those who self-monitor alone. However, self-monitoring is not feasible for all patients, and requires identification and education of suitable candidates.

Home INR monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in children using the CoaguChek™ S point-of-care monitor and a robust education program

INTRODUCTION

Management strategies such as self-monitoring of anticoagulant therapy have been reported with increased frequency. Whilst patient education is frequently mentioned, details regarding the educational interventions employed are scarce. This study aimed to improve the outcomes of home monitoring of warfarin therapy in children through the development and implementation of a robust intervention, based upon the PRECEDE model of education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participating parents had to complete an intensive education and training program. After demonstrating practical and theoretical competency, parents commenced home monitoring. Every second scheduled home INR (H-INR) required a paired INR on the same day, obtained by a trained pathology collector (C-INR). Demographic and statistical outcome data was collected.

RESULTS

Parental understanding of warfarin therapy improved significantly following the educational intervention (p<0.0001). 65.5% of H-INRs and 64.4% of C-INRs were within the target range (ns). Lin's correlation coefficient between H-INRs and C-INRs was 0.949. There were no warfarin-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a significant improvement in parental knowledge following participation in a robust educational intervention. Furthermore, compared to previous reports in children, a greater level of correlation between home and hospital-based INRs was achieved by participating parents. The use of similar educational interventions may serve to improve the outcomes of similar management strategies.

Anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: an evaluation of stability and early factors that predict longer-term stability on warfarin in a large UK population

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated with warfarin that achieved a 6-month period within the target INR range (stability). To then evaluate any associations between stability and outcome and to determine whether stability can be predicted by clinical factors at an early stage in warfarin treatment.

METHODS

This study was a record linkage study in 1513 patients with NVAF treated with warfarin for a minimum of 6-months, carried out in a large UK population. The main outcome measures were stability (defined as six months within the target INR range [2.0-3.0]), thromboembolic and bleeding event rates and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were the predictive value of baseline characteristics and other treatment variables.

RESULTS

Stability was achieved in 52% of the study group. Standardised mean survival was significantly higher in the group who achieved stability (Delta = 16.91 months, p < 0.001) with a hazard ratio of 4.36 (p < 0.001). The stable group had a lower rate of both thromboembolic events (0.8% vs. 2.3% per patient year) and bleeds recorded on inpatient diagnoses (0.4% vs. 1.2% per patient year). Failure to achieve stable control was associated with age (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.011 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.001-1.021)) and morbidity at baseline (OR 1.015; 95% CI 1.007-1.022). An increase in mean time between visits (OR 0.939; 95% CI 0.926-0.952) and the percentage time in range (OR 0.889; 95% CI 0.879-0.900) was associated with a decrease in the chance of instability. Greater variability in INR was also associated with a failure to achieve stability (OR 1.518; 95% CI 1.427-1.615). Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis using data from the first three months of treatment demonstrated good discrimination of stability using age and morbidity at baseline and percentage time in range and frequency of visits during the first three months of treatment (area under curve [AUC] 0.780; standard error [SE] 0.012; 95% CI 0.757-0.803).

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients never achieved a period of 6-months stability and were at increased risk of thromboembolic events and bleeds. Age, morbidity at baseline and variability of INR control in the first three months could be used to predict instability using warfarin. This study infers that patients should be treated more intensively in the early stages of warfarinisation in order to improve outcome.

An evidence-based review and guidelines for patient self-testing and management of oral anticoagulation

There is a limited evidence base for self-testing and -management for oral anticoagulation management. Available data suggest that these are credible models for a significant minority of patients if underpinned by structured training and follow-up. The guidelines presented are necessarily consensual and outline procedures for patient selection, training, product procurement, product maintenance, quality assurance procedures, dosage adjustment and clinical supervision. The cost-effectiveness of these models remains to be elucidated within the UK. Further data on both health economic and clinical outcomes are required from UK based studies before widespread implementation of self-testing and management can be recommended on a wider scale.

Self management of oral anticoagulation: randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical effectiveness of self management compared with routine care in patients on long term oral anticoagulants.

DESIGN

Multicentre open randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Midlands region of the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

617 patients aged over 18 and receiving warfarin randomised to intervention (n = 337) and routine care (n = from 2470 invited; 193/337 (57%) completed the 12 month intervention.

INTERVENTION

Intervention patients used a point of care device to measure international normalised ratio twice a week and a simple dosing chart to interpret their dose of warfarin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of time spent within the therapeutic range of international normalised ratio.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in percentage of time in the therapeutic range between self management and routine care (70% v 68%). Self managed patients with poor control before the study showed an improvement in control that was not seen in the routine care group. Nine patients (2.8/100 patient years) had serious adverse events in the self managed group, compared with seven (2.7/100 patient years) in the routine care arm (chi2(df = 1) = 0.02, P = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

With appropriate training, self management is safe and reliable for a sizeable proportion of patients receiving oral anticoagulation treatment. It may improve the time spent the therapeutic range for patients with initially poor control. Trial registration ISRCTN 19313375.

Recommendations for the management of patients after heart valve surgery

Approximately 50,000 valve replacement operations take place in Europe annually and almost as many valve repair procedures. Previous European guidelines on management of patients after valve surgery were last published in 1995 and were limited to recommendations about antithrombotic prophylaxis. American guidelines covering the broader topic of the investigation and treatment of patients with valve disease were published in 1998 but devoted relatively little space to post-surgical management. This document represents the consensus view of a committee drawn from three European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Groups (WG): the WG on Valvular Heart Disease, the WG on Thrombosis, and the WG on Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. In almost all areas of patient management after valve surgery, randomized trials and meta-analyses do not exist. Such randomized trials as do exist are very few in number, are narrowly focused with small numbers, have limited general applicability, and do not lend themselves to meta-analysis because of widely divergent methodologies and different patient characteristics. Recommendations are therefore almost entirely based on non-randomized studies and relevant basic science.

Evaluation of the pattern of treatment, level of anticoagulation control, and outcome of treatment with warfarin in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation: a record linkage study in a large British population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how well patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were maintained within the recommended international normalised ratio (INR) target of 2.0-3.0 and to explore the relation between achieved INR control and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Record linkage study of routine activity records and INR measurements.

SETTING

Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

2223 patients with NVAF, no history of heart valve replacement, and with at least five INR measurements.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, ischaemic stroke, all thromboembolic events, bleeding events, hospitalisation, and patterns of INR monitoring.

RESULTS

Patients treated with warfarin were outside the INR target range 32.1% of the time, with 15.4% INR values > 3.0 and 16.7% INR values < 2.0. However, the quartile with worst control spent 71.6% of their time out of target range compared with only 16.3% out of range in the best controlled quartile. The median period between INR tests was 16 days. Time spent outside the target range decreased as the duration of INR monitoring increased, from 52% in the first three months of monitoring to 30% after two years. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that a 10% increase in time out of range was associated with an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.29, p < 0.001) and of an ischaemic stroke (OR 1.10, p = 0.006) and other thromboembolic events (OR 1.12, p < 0.001). The rate of hospitalisation was higher when INR was outside the target range.

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal anticoagulation was associated with poor clinical outcomes, even in a well controlled population. However, good control was difficult to achieve and maintain. New measures are needed to improve maintenance anticoagulation in patients with NVAF.

Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring

SAn ageing population and the continuing expansion of clinical indications for coumadin therapy have increased pressure on hospital anticoagulant clinics. One solution is patient self-testing (PST) of the international normalized ratio (INR) using capillary blood samples on point-of-care coagulation monitors at home. We conducted a prospective study to determine whether patients can achieve accurate INR values through PST, using the CoaguChek S (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). The main outcome measurements were: comparability of INR values obtained by PST and the hospital laboratory, patient acceptability as assessed by a questionnaire and anticoagulant control. Eighty-four patients [53 men, 31 women; median age 59 years (range 26-83)], receiving long-term oral anticoagulation (warfarin), were recruited from our Anticoagulation Clinic. Patients were randomized to weekly self-testing or continuing 4-weekly hospital laboratory monitoring of INR. Comparison of INRs (n = 234) showed no significant differences between the CoaguChek (median INR 3.02) and laboratory testing (median INR 3.07). There was excellent correlation between the two methods (r = 0.95), with 85% of CoaguChek results within 0.5 INR units of the laboratory method. On four occasions, differences of >1 unit INR were obtained, but in each case the patient's anticoagulation was unstable (INR >4.5 by both methods) and the differences in INR would not have altered patient management. 87% of patients found self-testing straightforward, 87% were confident in the result they obtained and 77% preferred self-testing. We conclude that PST is a reliable alternative to hospital clinic attendance and is acceptable to the majority of suitably trained patients.

Audit of community-based anticoagulant monitoring in patients with thromboembolic disease: is frequent testing necessary?

Oral anticoagulant monitoring is managed by general practitioners in Auckland. An audit of this service in 452 patients demonstrated that anticoagulant control was in line with recommended international guidelines, with 58.3% of international normalized ratio (INR) measurements in the therapeutic range. However, the frequency of testing was high, with the majority of patients (68%), including those on long-term treatment, having INR measurements at weekly intervals. We question the need for such frequent INR testing.

Home prothrombin time monitoring: a literature analysis

The anticoagulant activity of warfarin sodium is monitored by the prothrombin time (PT) using the international normalized ratio (INR). Standard oral anticoagulant therapy monitoring requires frequent patient visits to physicians' offices and/or laboratories to optimize warfarin dosage. Home PT monitoring by patients can increase testing frequency and may thus decrease complications associated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Clinical studies suggest that home PT monitoring is more effective than uncoordinated management and is as effective as care through specialized anticoagulation clinics for keeping INRs within a therapeutic range. There are accurate and reliable instruments available, but paramount to the success of home PT monitoring is sound patient selection, appropriate patient training, and consistent quality control.

Point of care testing for INR monitoring: where are we now?

Point of care (POC, or near patient) testing for measurement of the international normalized ratio (INR) has facilitated the devolution of service delivery from the traditional hospital outpatient setting. However it must be undertaken within the confines of safe practice involving quality control procedures. The evaluation of INR POC tests should be closely related to the clinical issues of management and, specifically, improving the quality of care. One benefit of POC testing is in the increased motivation that some practitioners feel, being able to perform diagnostic tests without sending samples to a laboratory. POC for INR testing within primary care eliminates the delay in waiting for the result to be processed by the hospital laboratory, and the subsequent delay in informing the patient of their dosing advice. This review describes the utilization of POC testing outside the laboratory setting to develop models of care for oral anticoagulation management.

How much warfarin is enough in APS related thrombosis?

Warfarin is the best available, most effective treatment for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients. However, warfarin is cumbersome for both patients and physicians because of risk for bleeding and the need for frequent monitoring. Much detail regarding optimal management of APS patients still lacks an evidence-based approach. Asymptomatic patients should not receive warfarin. An optimal treatment for patients with livedo, cardiac valve disease, leg ulcers or microangiopathic nephropathy is unknown; it is likely that warfarin is ineffective for these manifestations of the APS. In low risk patients who have not previously failed warfarin, moderate intensity anticoagulation (target international normalized ratio [INR] 2.5) is as effective as, and safer than, high intensity anticoagulation (INR 3.5), at least for patients with venous thrombosis. Current recommendations, based on the opinion rather than on documentation, state that warfarin should be prescribed for the APS patient's life; studies that challenge this conclusion for carefully defined low risk patients whose thromboses occurred with trigger events will be welcome, as will be studies examining alternatives to warfarin, including antiplatelet drugs.

Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation and external quality assessment procedures

The role of external quality assessment (EQA) is a contentious issue for patient self-management (PSM) of oral anticoagulation. Patients from general practices in the West Midlands undertaking PSM were recruited to compare efficacy of patients' and health professionals' EQA procedure using the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS). Patients using Coaguchek (Roche Diagnostics) were trained to perform EQA as part of their PSM training. They undertook PSM for 26 weeks and were asked to perform EQA using material provided by the UK NEQAS twice at home without supervision and twice at the practice with supervision. Patients' results were compared with health care professional users of Coaguchek S. Twenty-three PSM patients were compared with 75 health care professional users of the NEQAS scheme. The PSM group international normalized ratio (INR) percentage time in range was 74%. There was no significant difference in the median results on NEQAS samples obtained by the patients and those obtained by professionals. Three patients were outwith consensus (results > 15% from the median INR) on more than one occasion. Patients were able to perform the EQA tests competently. The data show that good agreement can be achieved between patients analysing the same EQA samples, with coefficients of variation ranging from 22.3% to as low as 5.4%. Further study is required to determine how precision within these EQA schemes relates to the stability of treatment in patients' management of their own anticoagulation.

External quality assessment for warfarin dosing using computerised decision support software

AIM

To establish and evaluate an external quality assessment scheme for warfarin dosing for users of a computerised decision support system, BAP-PC.

DESIGN

Analysis of 12 months of clinical data from 10 primary care centres using BAP-PC within an oral anticoagulation clinic. Data were analysed for individual centres and compared with aggregated data for all practices. Individual feedback forms were provided to participating centres.

RESULTS

A total patient population of 367 (range, 17-65/centre) was analysed. On average, patients spent 69% of time in the therapeutic range (range, 60-76%). Patients were seen on average every 27 days (range, 24-30). The average point prevalence was 86% (range, 76-100%). In total, 33 adverse events were reported (0-13/practice). Serious adverse events ranged from 0 to 1 for each practice. This translates into a serious adverse event rate of 1.6/100 patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

Practices were successful in maintaining good therapeutic international normalised ratio control, with centres achieving 60% or higher time in range. There are some doubts about the quality of data collection at a practice level because there were no reported events in half of the participating centres. The observed event rates do concur with previously reported data, however. Further cycles of the scheme are necessary to establish it as a useful research and benchmarking tool.

The expert patient: issues and implications for community nurses

First highlighted in "Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation" (Department of Health, 1999), the Expert Patient programme is now being piloted throughout England and Wales. The programme is focused on helping individuals to self-manage their long-term condition more effectively. While acknowledging the expertise an individual brings to the management of their condition, the programme seeks to further develop these skills with the aim of reducing incapacitation and increasing symptom control and self-esteem. As this is a lay-led programme it is unlikely that community nurses will have an explicit role within the initiative. However, all community nurses have significant input with individuals with long-term conditions and will know clients whom they would term as expert. Following an outline of the initiative, this article presents a number of case scenarios and seeks to explore some of the issues that patients, families and practitioners face when dealing with the concept of "expert patient".

Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation

Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation is now widely practised in Germany and the USA. There are three different home-testing monitors available in the UK which are all reliable in terms of accuracy and reproducibility of results. Selected patients can be trained to perform their own International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing and dosing, with outcomes as good if not better than those from specialized anticoagulant clinics. Consensus on the frequency of testing and what quality control should be deployed is lacking. The cost-effectiveness in the UK is unproven.