Treating head injuries

Post-mTBI Pain Interference in a U.S. Military Population: A Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain is a significant problem for service members and veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). While the root cause of pain is not clearly understood, comorbidities may contribute to how their pain disrupts their functional status, a construct termed "pain interference." The purpose of this study is to examine the associations between mTBI, other comorbidities, and pain interference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised participants with mTBI(s) from The Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium multicenter observational study. Potential concussive events were identified using a modified Ohio State University traumatic brain injury (TBI) Identification interview and then further with a structured interview. Pain interference was measured with the TBI quality-of-life pain interference score, which was categorized into insignificant, moderate, and high pain interference. Comorbidities of interest included anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, and arthritis. Multivariable relationships were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The analysis sample included 346 participants with mTBI(s). In adjusted analysis, those with high pain interference were more likely to have history of ≥ 3 TBIs (odds ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 6.9) and to have clinical levels of post-traumatic stress disorder (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9, 15.7), depression (OR 2.5, 95% CI, 1.0, 6.1), anxiety (OR 4.9, 95% CI, 2.0, 11.7), and sleep disturbances (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.0, 19.0) versus those with insignificant pain interference.

CONCLUSION

These results identify clinical features of veterans and service members with mTBI(s) who are at highest risk for pain-related disability. These findings also demonstrate the need to consider mental health and sleep problems in their pain evaluation and treatment approach.

Assault predicts time away from work after claims for work-related mild traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Workplace violence carries a substantial economic loss burden. Up to 10% of all traumatic brain injury (TBI) admissions result from physical assault. There remains a paucity of research on assault as a mechanism of injury, taking into account sex, and its association with work re-entry.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterise, by sex, the sample of workers who had sustained a work-related mild TBI (wr-mTBI) and to assess the independent influence of assault, as a mechanism of injury, on time away from work.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort of workers' compensation claimants in Australia (n=3129) who had sustained a wr-mTBI was used for this study. A multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed whether workers who had sustained wr-mTBI as a result of assault (wr-mTBI-assault) were more likely to claim time off work compared with workers who had sustained a wr-mTBI due to other mechanisms.

RESULTS

Among claimants who sustained a wr-mTBI, 9% were as a result of assault. The distribution of demographic and vocational variables differed between the wr-mTBI-assault, and not due to assault, both in the full sample, and separately for men and women. After controlling for potential confounding factors, workers who sustained wr-mTBI-assault, compared with other mechanisms, were more likely to take days off work (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.99) within a 3-month timeframe.

CONCLUSION

The results have policy-related implications. Sex-specific and workplace-specific prevention strategies need to be considered and provisions to support return-to-work and well-being within this vulnerable cohort should be examined.

Influence of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on Pain Intensity Levels in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans

OBJECTIVE

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common among US veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND). We postulated that these injuries may modulate pain processing in these individuals and affect their subjective pain levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SUBJECTS

310 deployed service members of OEF/OIF/OND without a lifetime history of moderate or severe TBI were included in this study.

METHODS

All participants completed a comprehensive evaluation for Blast Exposure, mTBI, PTSD, and Pain Levels. The Boston Assessment of TBI-Lifetime Version (BAT-L) was used to assess blast exposure and potential brain injury during military service. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) characterized presence and severity of PTSD. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity over the previous month before the interview, with higher scores indicative of worse pain. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and results were adjusted for co-morbidities, clinical characteristics and demographic data.

RESULTS

In comparison to control participants (veterans without mTBI or current PTSD), veterans with both current PTSD and mTBI reported the highest pain intensity levels, followed by veterans with PTSD only (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005, respectively). Pain levels in veterans with mTBI only were comparable to control participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid PTSD and mTBI is associated with increased self-reported pain intensity. mTBI alone was not associated with increased pain.

Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department

Background

Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department (ED), variations in practice exist. Interventions designed to implement recommended behaviours can reduce this variation. Using theory to inform intervention development is advocated; however, there is no consensus on how to select or apply theory. Integrative theoretical frameworks, based on syntheses of theories and theoretical constructs relevant to implementation, have the potential to assist in the intervention development process. This paper describes the process of applying two theoretical frameworks to investigate the factors influencing recommended behaviours and the choice of behaviour change techniques and modes of delivery for an implementation intervention.

Methods

A stepped approach was followed: (i) identification of locally applicable and actionable evidence-based recommendations as targets for change, (ii) selection and use of two theoretical frameworks for identifying barriers to and enablers of change (Theoretical Domains Framework and Model of Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations) and (iii) identification and operationalisation of intervention components (behaviour change techniques and modes of delivery) to address the barriers and enhance the enablers, informed by theory, evidence and feasibility/acceptability considerations. We illustrate this process in relation to one recommendation, prospective assessment of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) by ED staff using a validated tool.

Results

Four recommendations for managing mild traumatic brain injury were targeted with the intervention. The intervention targeting the PTA recommendation consisted of 14 behaviour change techniques and addressed 6 theoretical domains and 5 organisational domains. The mode of delivery was informed by six Cochrane reviews. It was delivered via five intervention components : (i) local stakeholder meetings, (ii) identification of local opinion leader teams, (iii) a train-the-trainer workshop for appointed local opinion leaders, (iv) local training workshops for delivery by trained local opinion leaders and (v) provision of tools and materials to prompt recommended behaviours.

Conclusions

Two theoretical frameworks were used in a complementary manner to inform intervention development in managing mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the developed intervention is being evaluated in a cluster randomised trial, part of the Neurotrauma Evidence Translation (NET) program.

Can trauma surgeons manage mild traumatic brain injuries?

BACKGROUND

Current practices suggest that patients with mild traumatic brain injuries (MTBI) receive neurosurgical consultations, while less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention. We implemented a policy of selective neurosurgical consultation with the hypothesis that trauma surgeons alone may manage such patients with no impact on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Data from a level I trauma registry were analyzed. Patients with MTBI resulting in an intracranial hemorrhage of 1 cm or less and a Glasgow Coma Score of 13 or greater were included. Patients with additional intracranial injuries were excluded. Multivariate regression was used to determine the relationship between neurosurgical management and good neurologic outcomes, while controlling for injury severity, demographics, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Implementation of the neurosurgical policy significantly reduced the number of such consults (94% before vs 65% after, P < .002). Multivariate analysis revealed that neurosurgical consultation was not associated with neurologic outcomes of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a selective neurosurgical consultation policy for patients with MTBI reduced neurosurgical consultations without any impact on patient outcomes, suggesting that trauma surgeons can effectively manage these patients.

Paediatric head injuries treated in a children's emergency department from Cluj-Napoca, Romania

The aim of the study was to describe paediatric head injuries and identify factors that led to advanced care. Incident cases of head injuries that sought care from December 2008 to October 2010 at Children's Emergency Hospital Cluj-Napoca were evaluated. The main outcome was transfer or admission to advanced care. From a total of 3053 children treated for an injury, 1541 (50.4%) presented with head injury. A total of 960 (62.3%) of the children with a head injury required advanced care treatment. Young children were more likely to suffer a head injury than older children, but a higher proportion of older children required advanced care (70.3%). Children who suffered a head injury as a consequence of road traffic were almost five times more likely to require advanced care (OR: 4.97; 3.09-8.06) than being released. Our results suggest that data on injuries provide evidence-based information on the nature of injuries children are prone to, and what activity, type, and mechanism of injury impact Romanian children.

Complicating factors associated with mild traumatic brain injury: impact on pain and posttraumatic stress disorder treatment

The nature of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan has resulted in high rates of comorbidity among chronic pain, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in Veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF). Although separate evidence-based psychological treatments have been developed for chronic pain and PTSD, far less is known about how to approach treatment when these conditions co-occur, and especially when they co-occur with mTBI. To provide the best care possible for OEF/OIF Veterans, clinicians need to have a clearer understanding of how to identify these conditions, ways in which these conditions may interact with one another, and ways in which existing evidence-based treatments can be modified to meet the needs of individuals with mTBI. The purpose of the present paper is to review the comorbidity of pain, PTSD, and mTBI in OEF/OIF Veterans, and provide recommendations to clinicians who provide care to Veterans with these conditions. First, we will begin with an overview of the presentation, symptomatology, and treatment of chronic pain and PTSD. The challenges associated with mTBI in OEF/OIF Veterans will be reported and data will be presented on the comorbidity among all three of these conditions in OEF/OIF Veterans. Second, we will present recommendations for providing psychological treatment for chronic pain and PTSD when comorbid with mTBI. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion of the need for a multidisciplinary treatment approach, as well as a call for continued research to further refine existing treatments for these conditions.

Long-term outcome in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is common; up to 37% of adult men have a history of MTBI. Complaints after MTBI are persistent headaches, memory impairment, depressive mood disorders, and disability. The reported short- and long-term outcomes of patients with MTBI have been inconsistent. We have now investigated long-term clinical and neurocognitive outcomes in patients with MTBI (at admission, and after 1 and 10 years).

METHODS

Patients of a previous study investigating MTBI short-term outcome were prospectively reassessed after ±10 year using the same standardized data entry form and validated questionnaire (Beltztest with Beltz Score [BeSc]) for evaluation of Quality of life (QoL) and neurocognitive outcome (higher scores indicate lower QoL).

RESULTS

Eighty-six of 176 patients (49%) could be reassessed (n = 75 lost to follow-up; n = 8 second brain trauma; n = 7 death), 10.4 ± 2 years after initial evaluation. Over time, overall BeSc was significantly increased (5.92 ± 10.3 [admission] vs. 10.7 ± 12.8 [1 year] vs. 20.86 ± 17.1 [10 year]; p < 0.0001); only 54 of 86 patients (62.8%) presented with a normal BeSc. Long-term complaints were fatigue, insomnia, and exhaustion. Ten of eighty-six patients (11.6%) had intracranial injury (ICI) and initial BeSc was almost twofold higher in patients with ICI than in patients without ICI (10.0 ± 8.4 vs. 5.3 ± 9.6; p = 0.007). This difference was not seen after 1 year or after 10 years (10.3 ± 11.6 vs. 10.3 ± 10.1 and 21.4 ± 17.3 vs. 16.1 ± 16.4, respectively). Eight of eighty-six patients (9.3%) lost their jobs because of persistent complaints after MTBI.

CONCLUSION

BeSc deteriorates over time; our data suggest a decline in general health and QoL in a substantial proportion of patients (37.2%) 10 years after MTBI. Patients without ICI appear to have a better long-term outcome with regard to subjective complaints and QoL.

Quality and consistency of guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to provide an overview of the recommendations and quality of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the emergency management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), with a view to informing best practice and improving the consistency of recommendations.

METHODS

Electronic searches of health databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO), CPG clearinghouse websites, CPG developer websites, and Internet search engines up to January 2010 were conducted. CPGs were included if 1) they were published in English and freely accessible, 2) their scope included the management of mTBI in the emergency department (ED), 3) the date of last search was within the past 10 years (2000 onward), 4) systematic methods were used to search for evidence, and 5) there was an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence. Four authors independently assessed the quality of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. The authors extracted and categorized recommendations according to initial clinical assessment, imaging, management, observation, discharge planning, and patient information and follow-up.

RESULTS

The search identified 18 potential CPGs, of which six met the inclusion criteria. The included CPGs varied in scope, target population, size, and guideline development processes. Four CPGs were assessed as "strongly recommended." The majority of CPGs did not provide information about the level of stakeholder involvement (mean AGREE standardized domain score = 57%, range = 25% to 81%), nor did they address the organizational/cost implications of applying the recommendations or provide criteria for monitoring and review of recommendations in practice (mean AGREE standardized domain score = 46.6%, range = 19% to 94%). Recommendations were mostly consistent in terms of the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (adult and pediatric) to assess the level of consciousness, initial assessment criteria, the use of computed tomography (CT) scanning as imaging investigation of choice, and the provision of patient information. The CPGs defined mTBI in a variety of ways and described different rules to determine the need for CT scanning and therefore used different criteria to identify high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher-quality CPGs for mTBI are consistent in their recommendations about assessment, imaging, and provision of patient information. There is not, however, an agreed definition of mTBI, and the quality of future CPGs could be improved with better reporting of stakeholder involvement, procedures for updating, and greater consideration of the applicability of the recommendations (cost implications, monitoring procedures). Nevertheless, guideline developers may benefit from adapting existing CPGs to their local context rather than investing in developing CPGs de novo.

Cutting edge neurosurgery

Neurosurgery and the neurosurgeons who deliver it assumed a temporarily raised profile when the series The Brain Hospital was shown on UK television last year. An editorial in The Lancet (2006), commented on the passion and humanity of the surgeons portrayed, as well as their skill and care for their patients. Patients telling their stories following neurosurgery in the guise of entertainment may seem perverse, but the public has always been fascinated by medicine in both fact and fiction, remembering such TV series as Doctor Kildare and Your Life in Their Hands from the 1960s. This article will examine recent developments and aspects of current practice in neurosurgery and neurological investigation, through a review of recent literature.

The Galasko report implemented: the role of emergency medicine in the management of head injuries

INTRODUCTION

The objectives were to demonstrate the extra workload for emergency medicine of inpatient management of mild/moderate head injuries and to determine the effectiveness of current computed tomography guidelines.

METHOD

A retrospective study of head injuries presenting to St James's Hospital Dublin, where the Galasko report has been implemented since 2001. We studied injuries presented from January 2001 to January 2002. Length of stay, mechanism of injury, follow-up, indication for admission and computed tomography scan were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 2281 patients presented with head injury as their first or second triage complaint. One hundred and twenty-three patients were admitted to the emergency ward, of which 34 had computed tomography investigation. Ten computed tomography scans demonstrated intracranial injury. Intracranial injury was associated with vomiting, Glasgow coma score 14 (confusion), deterioration of Glasgow coma score, clinical basilar skull fracture and alcohol-related falls. The average length of stay for patients admitted to observation ward was 2.3 days and 5 days for those who had a brain injury on computed tomography scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the Galasko report has resource, manpower and training implications for emergency medicine. The current computed tomography guidelines should be modified to include Glasgow coma score<15 and neurological symptoms for example, vomiting and alcohol-related falls.

Emergency Department Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Prediction of Post-Concussion Symptoms at One Month Post Injury

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common injury and a significant proportion of those affected report chronic symptoms. This study investigated prediction of post-concussion symptoms using an Emergency Department (ED) assessment that examined neuropsychological and balance deficits and pain severity of 29 concussed individuals. Thirty participants with minor orthopedic injuries and 30 ED visitors were recruited as control subjects. Concussed and orthopedically injured participants were followed up by telephone at one month to assess symptom severity. In the ED, concussed subjects performed worse on some neuropsychological tests and had impaired balance compared to controls. They also reported significantly more post-concussive symptoms at follow-up. Neurocognitive impairment, pain and balance deficits were all significantly correlated with severity of post-concussion symptoms. The findings suggest that a combination of variables assessable in the ED may be useful in predicting which individuals will suffer persistent post-concussion problems.

Elderly patients with severe head injury in coma from the outset--has anything changed?

Advancing age is known to be a determinant of outcome in head injury. We have sought to discover whether there has been any change in the outcome of elderly patients with severe head injury in Newcastle, where these patients have continued to be treated with maximum intervention. A review of prospectively collected data from the Newcastle Head Injury Database for the period 1990 to 2000 was carried out. All patients aged 70 years and above who had sustained a severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Score of 8 or less from the outset) were included. The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was determined at 6 months. Seventy-one patients were identified. Fifty-seven (80%) died and 2 (3%) were in a vegetative state, 11 (16%) had severe disability, 1 (1%) had moderate disability and no patients made a good recovery. The natural history of this condition remains unchanged and due consideration should be given to this when evaluating interventions for elderly patients with a severe head injury.

Epiduralh�matom nach Entlastung eines akuten Subduralh�matoms

Subdural haematomas as a consequence of severe head injury often constitute the indication for operative evacuation. Despite intensive care management postoperative computed tomography scans are essential. This is illustrated by an unusual case report of a patient suffering from an epidural haematoma after operation of an subdural haematoma. In addition, the importance of the skull X-ray in the emergency setting and intracranial pressure monitoring are discussed.

Use of atypical anti-psychotics in the management of post-traumatic confusional states in traumatic brain injury

The use of atypical anti-psychotics (AAP) in the treatment of organic neuropsychiatric syndromes is little reported. We present a case of post-traumatic delirium with delusions treated with Risperidone and discuss the use of AAP's in this situation.

Critical decision making in severe head injury management

The management of severe head injury (SHI) remains a major challenge not only for neurosurgeons but also for all other health professionals involved in the care of trauma patients. Any trauma patient with SHI is at risk of further neurological deterioration if appropriate measures are not instituted from the start of his or her treatment. Secondary insults due to ischaemic, hypotensive, and metabolic or other causes are still common, even in the most advanced neurocritical care settings. Management controversies are widespread and few decision options can be supported by Class I evidence. This article attempts to provide an up-to-date review of the published recommendations that could help health professionals in their management of SHI.