Persistent phenothiazine dyskinesia treated with tetrabenazine

VMAT2 Inhibitors in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

The basal ganglia and dopaminergic pathways play a central role in hyperkinetic movement disorders. Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, which deplete dopamine at presynaptic striatal nerve terminals, are a class of drugs that have long been used to treat hyperkinetic movement disorders, but have recently gained more attention following their development for specific indications in the United States. At present, there are three commercially available VMAT2 inhibitors: tetrabenazine, deutetrabenazine, and valbenazine. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dosing vary significantly between the three drugs, and likely underlie the more favorable side effect profile of the newer agents (deutetrabenazine and valbenazine). Tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington's disease, including in randomized controlled trials, although direct comparison studies are limited. Both deutetrabenazine and valbenazine have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia, with multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, whereas tetrabenazine has been studied less rigorously. There have been no blinded, prospective trials with tetrabenazine in Tourette's syndrome (TS); however, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in TS are ongoing for both deutetrabenazine and valbenazine. Given the favored side effect profile of newer VMAT2 inhibitors, clinicians should be aware of the distinctions between agents and become familiar with differences in their use, especially as there is potential for their utilization to increase across the range of hyperkinetic movement disorders.

Benzodiazepines for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disfiguring movement disorder, often of the orofacial region, frequently caused by using antipsychotic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage TD, and for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the benzodiazepine group of drugs have been suggested as a useful adjunctive treatment. However, benzodiazepines are very addictive.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of benzodiazepines for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other chronic mental illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

On 17 July 2015 and 26 April 2017, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (including trial registers), inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of each included trial for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) and antipsychotic-induced TD that compared benzodiazepines with placebo, no intervention, or any other intervention for the treatment of TD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from the included studies and ensured that they were reliably selected, and quality assessed. For homogenous dichotomous data, we calculated random effects, risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We synthesised continuous data from valid scales using mean differences (MD). For continuous outcomes, we preferred endpoint data to change data. We assumed that people who left early had no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

The review now includes four trials (total 75 people, one additional trial since 2006, 21 people) randomising inpatients and outpatients in China and the USA. Risk of bias was mostly unclear as reporting was poor. We are uncertain about all the effects as all evidence was graded at very low quality. We found no significant difference between benzodiazepines and placebo for the outcome of 'no clinically important improvement in TD' (2 RCTs, 32 people, RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.09, very low quality evidence). Significantly fewer participants allocated to clonazepam compared with phenobarbital (as active placebo) experienced no clinically important improvement (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.96, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). For the outcome 'deterioration of TD symptoms,' we found no clear difference between benzodiazepines and placebo (2 RCTs, 30 people, RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.22 to 9.82, very low quality evidence). All 10 participants allocated to benzodiazepines experienced any adverse event compared with 7/11 allocated to phenobarbital (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.41, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the incidence of participants leaving the study early for benzodiazepines compared with placebo (3 RCTs, 56 people, RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.15 to 48.04, very low quality evidence) or compared with phenobarbital (as active placebo) (no events, 1 RCT, 21 people, very low quality evidence). No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, which are outcomes designated important by patients. No trials comparing benzodiazepines with placebo or treatment as usual reported on adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is only evidence of very low quality from a few small and poorly reported trials on the effect of benzodiazepines as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotic-induced TD. These inconclusive results mean routine clinical use is not indicated and these treatments remain experimental. New and better trials are indicated in this under-researched area; however, as benzodiazepines are addictive, we feel that other techniques or medications should be adequately evaluated before benzodiazepines are chosen.

Non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling movement disorder associated with the prolonged use of antipsychotic medication. Several strategies have been examined in the treatment of TD. Currently, however, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs in TD and they have been associated with many side effects. One particular strategy would be to use pharmaceutical agents which are known to influence the catecholaminergic system at various junctures.

OBJECTIVES

1. To determine the effects of any of the following drugs for antipsychotic-induced TD in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.i. Drugs which influence the noradrenergic system.ii. Dopamine receptor agonists.iii. Dopamine receptor antagonists.iv. Dopamine-depletor drugs.v. Drugs that increase the production or release of dopamine.2. To examine whether any improvement occurred with short periods of intervention (less than 6 weeks) and, if this did occur, whether this effect was maintained at longer periods of follow-up.3. To examine if there was a differential effect for the various compounds.4. To examine whether the use of non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs are most effective in those with more recent onset TD (less than five years).

SEARCH METHODS

We retrieved 712 references from searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (July 2015 and April 2017). We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected studies if they were randomised controlled trials focusing on people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. We compared the use of catecholaminergic interventions versus placebo, no intervention, or any other intervention for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from these trials and we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assumed that people who left the studies early had no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

There are 10 included trials (N = 261) published between 1973 and 2010; eight are new from the 2015 and 2017 update searches. Forty-eight studies are excluded. Participants were mostly chronically mentally ill inpatients in their 50s, and studies were primarily of short (2 to 6 weeks) duration. The overall risk of bias in these studies was unclear, mainly due to poor reporting of allocation concealment and generation of the sequence. Studies were also not clearly blinded and we are unsure if data are incomplete or selectively reported, or if other biases were operating.One small, three-arm trial found that both alpha-methyldopa (N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80; low-quality evidence) and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.52 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; low-quality evidence) may lead to a clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms compared with placebo after 2 weeks' treatment, but found no evidence of a difference between alpha-methyldopa and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.86; very low quality evidence). Another small trial compared tetrabenazine and haloperidol after 18 weeks' treatment and found no evidence of a difference on clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms (N = 13; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.95; very low quality evidence). No study reported on adverse events.For remaining outcomes there was no evidence of a difference between any of the interventions: alpha-methyldopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; very low quality evidence), celiprolol versus placebo for leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 5.28, 95% CI 0.27 to 102.58; very low quality evidence) and quality of life (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.12; very low quality evidence), alpha-methyldopa versus reserpine for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; not estimable, no reported events; very low quality evidence), reserpine or carbidopa/levodopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (2 RCTs; N = 37; RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.99; very low quality evidence), oxypertine versus placebo for deterioration of mental state (1 RCT; N = 42; RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.22 to 22.45; very low quality evidence), dopaminergic drugs (amantadine, bromocriptine, tiapride, oxypertine, carbidopa/levodopa) versus placebo for leaving the study early (6 RCTs; N = 163; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.54; very low quality evidence), and tetrabenazine versus haloperidol for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 14.92) and leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there has been a large amount of research in this area, many studies were excluded due to inherent problems in the nature of their cross-over designs. Usually data are not reported before the cross-over and the nature of TD and its likely response to treatments make it imprudent to use this data. The review provides little usable information for service users or providers and more well-designed and well-reported studies are indicated.

Tetrabenazine: Spotlight on Drug Review

BACKGROUND

Tetrabenazine (TBZ) is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the treatment of chorea related to Huntington's disease and other hyperkinetic disorders. TBZ was first synthesized in 1950, and was then used for the treatment of psychosis. But later its potential in treating hyperkinetic disorders was proved by its ability to block vesicular monoamine transporters 2 and deplete monoamine stores. There is still lack of awareness about the therapeutic potential of this drug.

SUMMARY

TBZ had been approved only for the treatment of chorea, but several clinical studies have been conducted by different research groups and it was concluded that TBZ is effective in various other conditions such as tardive dyskinesia, dystonia, tics, and Tourette's syndrome, thus, highlighting the need for further clinical trials in these conditions.

KEY MESSAGE

The intention of this review is to sum up the information regarding chemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, interactions, contraindications, adverse effects, and clinical efficacy of TBZ in diseases other than Huntington's chorea.

Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Chlorpromazine, formulated in the 1950s, remains a benchmark treatment for people with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of chlorpromazine compared with placebo, for the treatment of schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (15 May 2012). We also searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chlorpromazine with placebo for people with schizophrenia and non-affective serious/chronic mental illness irrespective of mode of diagnosis. Primary outcomes of interest were death, violent behaviours, overall improvement, relapse and satisfaction with care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and abstracts, ordered papers, re-inspected and quality assessed these. We analysed dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI) around this. We excluded continuous data if more than 50% of participants were lost to follow-up. Where continuous data were included, we analysed this data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval. We used a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We inspected over 1100 electronic records. The review currently includes 315 excluded studies and 55 included studies. The quality of the evidence is very low. We found chlorpromazine reduced the number of participants experiencing a relapse compared with placebo during six months to two years follow-up (n = 512, 3 RCTs, RR 0.65 CI 0.47 to 0.90), but data were heterogeneous. No difference was found in relapse rates in the short, medium or long term over two years, although data were also heterogeneous. We found chlorpromazine provided a global improvement in a person's symptoms and functioning (n = 1164, 14 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.58 to 0.86). Fewer people allocated to chlorpromazine left trials early ( n = 1831, 27 RCTs, RR 0.64 CI 0.53 to 0.78) compared with placebo. There are many adverse effects. Chlorpromazine is clearly sedating (n = 1627, 23 RCTs, RR 2.79 CI 2.25 to 3.45), it increases a person's chances of experiencing acute movement disorders (n = 942, 5 RCTs, RR 3.47 CI 1.50 to 8.03) and parkinsonism (n = 1468, 15 RCTs, RR 2.11 CI 1.59 to 2.80). Akathisia did not occur more often in the chlorpromazine group than placebo. Chlorpromazine clearly causes a lowering of blood pressure with accompanying dizziness (n = 1488, 18 RCTs, RR 2.38 CI 1.74 to 3.25) and considerable weight gain (n = 165, 5 RCTs, RR 4.92 CI 2.32 to 10.43).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know but aim to provide quantification to support clinical impression. Chlorpromazine's global position as a 'benchmark' treatment for psychoses is not threatened by the findings of this review. Chlorpromazine, in common use for half a century, is a well-established but imperfect treatment. Judicious use of this best available evidence should lead to improved evidence-based decision making by clinicians, carers and patients.

Tetrabenazine for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tetrabenazine for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-September 2010) and The Cochrane Library using the terms tetrabenazine, tardive dyskinesia, and movement disorders. In addition, references from publications identified were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language articles identified from the data sources were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Options available for the management of tardive dyskinesia are limited. Tetrabenazine is a central monoamine-depleting agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration for chorea associated with Huntington's disease. Three prospective studies of tetrabenazine in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia were identified, as well as 8 additional trials, 1 case series, and 8 case reports. Tetrabenazine may provide benefit in managing symptoms of tardive dyskinesia unresponsive to other treatment modalities. Treatment of tardive dyskinesia with tetrabenazine may be limited by cost and clinically significant adverse effects such as depression, parkinsonism, and somnolence.

CONCLUSIONS

Small trials indicate tetrabenazine may be effective for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. However, larger, well-conducted trials are needed to confirm these findings. Currently, there is a lack of data coupled with the risk of significant adverse effects to recommend the routine use of tetrabenazine in the management of tardive dyskinesia. Before using tetrabenazine for the management of tardive dyskinesia, all other options should be exhausted and careful monitoring employed.

Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Chlorpromazine, formulated in the 1950s, remains a benchmark treatment for people with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of chlorpromazine for schizophrenia in comparison with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (October 1999), Biological Abstracts (1982-1995), the Cochrane Library (1999, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1995), MEDLINE (1966-1995), PsycLIT (1974-1995), and the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (June 2002), by searching The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (January 2007). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chlorpromazine with placebo for people with schizophrenia and non-affective serious/chronic mental illness irrespective of mode of diagnosis. Primary outcomes of interest were death, violent behaviours, overall improvement, relapse and satisfaction with care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and abstracts, ordered papers, re-inspected and quality assessed these. BT and JR extracted data. CEA and GA independently checked a 10% sample for reliability. We analysed dichotomous data using fixed effects relative risk (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI) around this. Where possible we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm (NNH) statistics. We excluded continuous data if more than 50% of participants were lost to follow up; where continuous data were included, we analysed this data using fixed effects weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval.

MAIN RESULTS

We inspected over 1000 electronic records. The review currently includes 302 excluded studies and 50 included studies. We found chlorpromazine reduces relapse over the short (n=74, 2 RCTs, RR 0.29 CI 0.1 to 0.8) and medium term (n=809, 4 RCTs, RR 0.49 CI 0.4 to 0.6) but data are heterogeneous. Longer term homogeneous data also favoured chlorpromazine (n=512, 3 RCTs, RR 0.57 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 4 CI 3 to 5). We found chlorpromazine provided a global improvement in a person's symptoms and functioning (n=1121, 13 RCTs, RR 'no change/not improved' 0.80 CI 0.8 to 0.9, NNT 6 CI 5 to 8). Fewer people allocated to chlorpromazine left trials early (n=1780, 26 RCTs, RR 0.65 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 15 CI 11 to 24) compared with placebo. There are many adverse effects. Chlorpromazine is clearly sedating (n=1404, 19 RCTs, RR 2.63 CI 2.1 to 3.3, NNH 5 CI 4 to 8), it increases a person's chances of experiencing acute movement disorders (n=942, 5 RCTs, RR 3.5 CI 1.5 to 8.0, NNH 32 CI 11 to 154), parkinsonism (n=1265, 12 RCTs, RR 2.01 CI 1.5 to 2.7, NNH 14 CI 9 to 28). Akathisia did not occur more often in the chlorpromazine group than placebo (n=1164, 9 RCTs, RR 0.78 CI 0.5 to 1.1). Chlorpromazine clearly causes a lowering of blood pressure with accompanying dizziness (n=1394, 16 RCTs, RR 2.37 CI 1.7 to 3.2, NNH 11 CI 7 to 21) and considerable weight gain (n=165, 5 RCTs, RR 4.92 CI 2.3 to 10.4, NNH 2 CI 2 to 3).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know but aim to provide quantification to support clinical impression. Chlorpromazine's global position as a 'benchmark' treatment for psychoses is not threatened by the findings of this review. Chlorpromazine, in common use for half a century, is a well established but imperfect treatment. Judicious use of this best available evidence should lead to improved evidence-based decision making by clinicians, carers and patients.

Benzodiazepines for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disfiguring movement disorder, often of the orofacial region, frequently caused by the use of neuroleptic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage tardive dyskinesia, and for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the benzodiazepine group of drugs have been suggested as a useful adjunctive treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of benzodiazepines for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

1. Electronic searches. For the update of 2006, we searched The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (November 2005). For the previous two updates (1996, 2002) the review authors searched Biological Abstracts (1982-2002), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (February 2002), EMBASE (1980-2002), LILACS (1982-2002), MEDLINE (1966-2002), PsycLIT (1974-2002), SCISEARCH (2002), hand searched references of all included/excluded studies and contacted the first author of each included trial.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical studies focusing on people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) and neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia that compared benzodiazepines with placebo or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from the studies and ensured that they were reliably selected, and quality assessed. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. We synthesised continuous data from valid scales by using a weighted mean difference (WMD). For continuous outcomes we preferred endpoint data to change data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials (total N=56, one additional trial since 2002, n=24). Using benzodiazepines as an adjunctive treatment did not result in any clear changes for a series of tardive dyskinesia medium-term outcomes (n=30, 2 RCTs, RR not improved to clinically important extent 1.08 CI 0.57 to 2.05). One trial (n=24) found end point abnormal movement scores to be better for those receiving adjunct benzodiazepines(WMD AIMS -3.22 CI -4.63 to -1.81 ). Less than 10% in both groups left these studies before completion and none of the studies reported clear adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

One small study reports some preliminary evidence that benzodiazepines may have some effect in neuroleptic induced tardive dyskinesia. Inconclusive results from other studies means routine clinical use is not indicated and these treatments remain experimental.

Benzodiazepines for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially disfiguring movement disorder of the orofacial region often caused by the use of neuroleptic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage tardive dyskinesia and, for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the benzodiazepine group of drugs has been suggested as a useful adjunctive treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of benzodiazepines for people with neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-2002), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (February 2002), EMBASE (1980-2002), LILACS (1982-2002), MEDLINE (1966-2002), PsycLIT (1974-2002), SCISEARCH (2002), hand searching the references of all identified studies and contacting the first author of each included trial.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical studies focusing on people with both schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia and comparing benzodiazepines with placebo or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality assessed and data extracted. Data were excluded where more than 50% of participants in any group were lost to follow up. For binary outcomes a fixed effects risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Where possible, the weighted number needed to treat/harm statistic (NNT/H), and its 95% confidence interval (CI), was also calculated. For continuous outcomes, endpoint data were preferred to change data. Non-skewed data from valid scales were synthesised using a weighted mean difference (WMD). If statistical heterogeneity was found by Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test, random effects models were used.

MAIN RESULTS

Two small trials (total n=32) were included. Using benzodiazepines as adjunctive treatment did not result in any clear changes for a series of tardive dyskinesia medium term outcomes (RR not improved to a clinically important extent 1.08 CI 0.57 to 2.05, n=30, 2 RCTs; RR not improved at all 1.19 CI 0.3 to 5.3, n=30, 2 RCTs; RR deterioration 1.85 CI 0.3 to 10.1, n=30, 2 RCTs). Adverse effects were not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The 2002 update has added almost no extra data. This is clearly not an area of active research. Benzodiazepines may have something to contribute to the care of people with tardive dyskinesia but the use of this group of compounds should be considered experimental. Large definitive studies are indicated.

Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Chlorpromazine, formulated in the 1950s, remains a benchmark treatment for people with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of chlorpromazine for schizophrenia in comparison with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (October 1999), Biological Abstracts (1982-1995), the Cochrane Library (1999, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1995), MEDLINE (1966-1995) and PsycLIT (1974-1995), by searching Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (June 2002). References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations. Pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chlorpromazine with placebo relevant to people with schizophrenia, and non-affective serious/chronic mental illness irrespective of mode of diagnosis. Primary outcomes of interest were death, violent behaviours, overall improvement, relapse and satisfaction with care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Citations and, where possible, abstracts were inspected independently by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were extracted by BT and JR. CA and GA independently checked a 10% sample for reliability. Dichotomous data were analysed using random effects relative risk (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) around this was estimated. Where possible the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistics (NNH) were calculated. Continuous data were excluded if more than 50% of people were lost to follow up, but, where possible, weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 1000 electronic records were inspected. The review currently mentions 302 papers in its Excluded Studies table and 50 studies in its Included Studies table. Four papers are awaiting translation. Chlorpromazine reduces relapse over six months to two years (n=512, 3 RCTs, RR 0.65 CI 0.5 to 0.9, NNT 3 CI 2.5 to 4) and promotes a global improvement in a person's symptoms and functioning (n=1121, 13 RCTs, RR 0.76 CI 0.7 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 5 to 10) although the placebo response is also considerable. Fewer people allocated to chlorpromazine leave trials early (n=1755, 25 RCTs, RR 0.77 CI 0.6 to 1.1) but the difference iss not statistically significant. There are many adverse effects. Chlorpromazine is clearly sedating (n=1242, 18 RCTs, RR 2.3 CI 1.7 to 3.1, NNH 6 CI 5 to 8), it increases a person's chances of experiencing acute movement disorders (n=780, 4 RCTs, RR 3.1 CI 1.3 to 7.7, NNH 24 CI 15 to 57), parkinsonism (n=1265, 12 RCTs, RR 2.6 CI 1.2 to 5.4, NNH 10 CI 8 to 16) and, perhaps, fits (n=695, 3 RCTs, RR 2.4 CI 0.4 to 16). Amongst other things it clearly causes a lowering of blood pressure with accompanying dizziness (n=1232, 15 RCTs, RR 1.9 CI 1.4 to 27, NNH 12 CI 8 to 19) and considerable increases in weight (n=165, 5 RCTs, RR 4.4 CI 2.1 to 9, NNH 3 CI 2 to 5).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review will confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know, but provides quantification to support clinical impression. Chlorpromazine's global position as a 'benchmark' treatment for psychoses is not threatened by this review. Chlorpromazine, in common use for half a century, is a well established but imperfect treatment. Judicious use of this best available evidence should lead to improved evidence-based decision making by clinicians, carers and patients.

Classification and treatment of tardive syndromes

BACKGROUND

Tardive syndromes are a group of delayed-onset abnormal involuntary movement disorders induced by a dopamine receptor blocking agent. There are several phenomenologically distinct types of TS.

REVIEW SUMMARY

The term tardive dyskinesia has been used to refer to the TS that presents with rapid, repetitive, stereotypic movements mostly involving the oral, buccal, and lingual areas. Tardive dystonia can be focal, segmental, or generalized. It commonly affects the face and neck followed by the arms and trunk. It usually results in retrocollis when it involves the neck and trunk arching backwards when it involves the trunk. Tardive akathisia is characterized by a feeling of inner restlessness and jitteriness with an inability to sit or stand still. Other tardive syndromes include tardive tics, myoclonus, tremor, and withdrawal-emergent syndrome. It remains unclear whether tardive parkinsonism truly exists. The only way to prevent TS is to avoid its etiologic agents. Chronic use of dopamine receptor blocking agents should be limited as much as possible to patients with chronic psychoses. In general, for mild TS, reducing the neuroleptic dose, switching to an atypical agent, or discontinuing antipsychotic treatment altogether in the hope of facilitating remission is recommended. For moderate to severe TS, tetrabenazine or reserpine may be the most effective agent. Neuroleptics should be resumed to treat TD in the absence of active psychosis only as a last resort for persistent, disabling, and treatment-resistant TD.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of the TS and the absolute need for antipsychotic therapy often dictate the treatment approach for this disorder.

Tardive Dyskinesia

Although there are many published studies on the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD), relatively few treatments have proven to be consistently useful in clinical practice. Reviewed critically, most treatments have produced only slight to moderate benefit in less than half the patients treated. Emphasis instead is on prevention, prompt detection, and management of early and potentially reversible cases. If a patient develops dyskinesia while taking an antipsychotic drug (APD), ideal management is immediate discontinuation of the APD, if this is psychiatrically feasible. The manifestations of TD should be documented and the patient examined to exclude other possible causes of dyskinesia. APDs should then be withheld in the hope that the dyskinesia will disappear. Although the dyskinesia may fade within several weeks, it has the potential to recur if APD treatment is reintroduced. Psychiatric reevaluation to consider alternative psychiatric diagnoses or treatments is strongly advised. If there is no alternative to reintroducing an APD for psychiatric treatment, then an atypical neuroleptic should be considered. Because dyskinesia is very often not disturbing enough to require treatment, the need for treatment of TD should be carefully assessed. For mild dyskinesia, low doses of a benzodiazepine (eg, clonazepam) may reduce the amount of both dyskinesia and associated anxiety. Anticholinergic drugs are unhelpful and may aggravate TD but, similar to their effect in idiopathic dystonia, may be effective in tardive dystonia. Botulinum toxin injections are of considerable value in managing localized forms of tardive dystonia, such as retrocollis or blepharospasm. Tetrabenazine and reserpine are presynaptic dopamine depletors that may have considerable efficacy in TD, especially tardive dystonia; however, their use is often limited by side effects. Based on the rationale that TD may be due to formation of free radicals, vitamin E has been used for treatment of TD, with mixed results. In some patients with persistent and disabling TD that fails to remit even after the patient is no longer taking an APD, it may be necessary to resume treatment eventually with a typical APD. This approach should be considered only as a last resort to suppress TD, however, because it carries the risk of preventing remission and possibly aggravating TD. In this case, further attempts to taper and discontinue the APD are recommended. At present, there is no evidence that established TD continues to progress in severity with continued APD exposure. This nonprogressive character of TD may provide to be a consolation to the patient and family and is also of potential medical-legal importance.

Benzodiazepines in psychotic States

Benzodiazepines are primarily used for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia and status epilepticus. These drugs can also be useful in hyperaroused states, catatonic stupor, manic episodes, and akathisia. This paper will review indications for their use in various psychotic conditions.

Effects of continuous administration for 12 months of amine-depleting drugs and chlorpromazine on striatal dopamine function in the rat

Rats received either chlorpromazine (33-36 mg/kg/day), oxypertine (6.3-7.3 mg/kg/day), tetrabenazine (6.0-6.7 mg/kg/day) or reserpine (0.28-0.30 mg/kg/day) continuously for up to 12 months. Chlorpromazine and tetrabenazine reduced spontaneous locomotor activity of animals after 1 month of treatment. Thereafter, locomotor activity in animals treated with chlorpromazine returned to control levels, whereas treatment with tetrabenazine increased locomotion. Oxypertine enhanced spontaneous locomotor activity after 9 months of administration only, whereas treatment with reserpine did not alter this activity at any time during the study compared to age-matched controls. Treatment with tetrabenazine enhanced stereotyped behaviour induced by apomorphine (0.063-1.0 mg/kg s.c.) throughout the study. In contrast, stereotypy in animals administered chlorpromazine, oxypertine or reserpine was the same as in control animals throughout the 12 months of treatment. Levels of dopamine in the striatum were reduced after the first month of administration of chlorpromazine, but thereafter returned to control values. Treatment with oxypertine for up to 12 months did not alter concentrations of dopamine in the striatum, whereas administration of tetrabenazine and reserpine caused a decrease. All treatments with drugs consistently reduced the content of homovanillic acid in the striatum during the study. The Bmax for specific binding of [3H]spiperone in the striatum was increased by continuous treatment of animals with chlorpromazine, oxypertine or tetrabenazine, although the effects of oxypertine and tetrabenazine were only transient. Administration of reserpine did not alter the Bmax for specific binding of [3H]spiperone. The Bmax for specific binding of [3H]piflutixol in the striatum was unchanged by any treatment for up to 12 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the acute actions of amine-depleting drugs and dopamine receptor antagonists on dopamine function in the brain in rats

The effects of the monoamine depleting drugs oxypertine, tetrabenazine and reserpine were compared with those of the dopamine receptor antagonists, chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine, on behavioural and biochemical indices of dopamine function in the brain. Oxypertine (0.625-20 mg/kg, i.p.), chlorpromazine (0.625-20 mg/kg i.p.) and trifluoperazine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg i.p.), administered to rats 1 hr previously, inhibited stereotyped behaviour induced by both amphetamine (5.0 mg/kg i.p.) and apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) in a dose-dependent manner. Tetrabenazine (0.625-20 mg/kg i.p., 1 hr previously) inhibited stereotypy induced by amphetamine but not that induced by apomorphine. Reserpine (0.1 10 mg/kg i.p., 6 hr previously) did not inhibit, but in larger doses, tended to enhance the stereotyped responses to both amphetamine and apomorphine. Oxypertine (10 mg/kg, i.p., 1 hr previously), tetrabenazine (5 mg/kg i.p., 1 hr previously) and reserpine (2.5 mg/kg i.p., 6 hr previously) reduced the content of dopamine in the striatum but increased the concentrations of homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC). Chlorpromazine (5 mg/kg i.p.) and trifluoperazine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.), given 1 hr previously, did not alter concentrations of dopamine in the striatum but increased those of HVA and DOPAC. Oxypertine, chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine weakly inhibited dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase in homogenates of the striatum in the rat. Tetrabenazine and reserpine had no effect. Similarly, trifluoperazine and chlorpromazine displaced the specific binding of [3H]piflutixol to membranes from the striatum. Oxypertine also was weakly effective, but tetrabenazine and reserpine were without effect. Trifluoperazine, chlorpromazine and oxypertine displaced specific binding of [3H]spiperone and [3H]N,n-propylnorapomorphine (NPA) to preparations of the striatum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical and biochemical effects of calcium-hopantenate on neuroleptics-induced tardive dyskinesia

Calcium-hopantenate (HOPA), a derivative of GABA, was administered to 9 psychiatric patients with neuroleptics-induced tardive dyskinesia. In a clinical study, involuntary movements have improved significantly after a 4-8-week medication. Although there was no correlation between the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of HOPA, GABA, HVA or clinical response, the CSF HOPA levels significantly correlated with changes in the CSF GABA levels. These results suggest that HOPA alleviates the symptoms of tardive dyskinesia being mediated by the central GABAergic mechanisms.

Tetrabenazine (Nitoman) therapy of chronic spontaneous oral dyskinesia. A video- and EMG-controlled study

Therapeutic results achieved with tetrabenazine in six patients with spontaneous oral dyskinesia were evaluated by clinical rating as well as time-blind video and EMG assessment. Dramatic improvement of symptoms was observed in five of our six patients and good to satisfactory improvement in the remaining patient. The correspondence among clinical findings, EMG data, and video analysis was good. Medication was started at low doses and slowly increased. Adverse reactions (i.e., rigidity, akinesia, vasodepression) were minimal.

Sustained improvement in tardive dyskinesia with diazepam: indirect evidence for corticolimbic involvement

A rater-bind, ABA's design study of 21 cases indicates that diazepam significantly improves tardive dyskinesia and that some of the improvement persists for an extended period after diazepam is withdrawn. Since benzodiazepine receptors and sites of action seem to be mainly in the neocortex (especially frontal), limbic cortex, and deep limbs nuclei, and these structures provide most of the input into the nigrostriatopallidal system that probably regulates its role in voluntary movement, it may be suggested that impaired corticolimbic control of basal ganglia may be a factor in the pathogenesis of tardive dyskinesia.

Management of tardive dyskinesia: current update

Tardive dyskinesia is now widely recognised as a neurological side effect produced in susceptible individuals by ingestion of neuroleptics. In general, the disorder tends to be late in onset, but has also been reported in a small number of individuals who have received neuroleptics for only brief periods. Much effort has been spent searching for predisposing factors, but the only consistent findings are that subjects are usually elderly (and elderly females in particular), in addition to having been exposed to neuroleptic agents. More recently, the increased finding of the presence of buccolingual facial movements in elderly populations never exposed to neuroleptics may bring out a re-evaluation of the role of these agents in the aetiology of tardive dyskinesia. Although much information on tardive dyskinesia has accrued in recent years, the precise definition, subtypes and pathophysiology remain unclear. With the development and availability of standardised rating scales, the clinical description of tardive dyskinesia has expanded from the initial buccolingual masticatory syndrome to include various abnormal movements of the fingers, arms, legs etc. Efforts have been made to distinguish withdrawal tardive dyskinesia from persistent tardive dyskinesia, but, irrespective of the classification, the disorder is in many instances reversible. However, it is impossible at present to predict the reversibility of each patient: therefore early detection of tardive dyskinesia remains an important clinical goal. Pharmacological treatments are based on the currently accepted hypothesis of dopamine receptor hypersensitivity. Selective dopamine blockers (D2) which suppress tardive dyskinesia without causing an increase in Parkinsonian symptoms are at various stages of development. Acetylcholine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) also appear to play a reciprocal role with dopamine as seen by moderate success using cholinergics and 'GABAergics'. However, there is no completely satisfactory treatment at present, indicating that prevention must be the primary aim. Above all, clinicians should carefully evaluate the indication for neuroleptic drugs, and avoid their use in conditions which may be treated with more benign drugs. A strategy for management of tardive dyskinesia is presented, and indications for withdrawing or continuing neuroleptics, the treatment of withdrawal dyskinesias and the role of experimental therapies are discussed.

Orofacial dyskinesia. Clinical features, mechanisms and drug therapy

Orofacial or tardive dyskinesias are involuntary repetitive movements of the mouth and face. In most cases, they occur in older psychotic patients who are in institutions and in whom long-term treatment with antipsychotic drugs of the phenothiazine and butyrophenone groups is being carried out. These dyskinesias are frequent in occurrence and characteristically are irreversible. Several biochemical mechanisms have been proposed as causes, including hypersensitivity or partially deneverated brain dopamine receptors and low affinity of the offending drugs for brain muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Clinical therapy has been attempted primarily with drugs that antagonize dopamine receptors or deplete brain dopamine. The benefits of drug treatment have been variable and lack of consistent improvement has been discouraging. Early recognition of dyskinesia should be attempted, and the dose reduced or the drug omitted at the first sign.

Tardive dyskinesia treated with pimozide

We have investigated the action of pimozide in tardive dyskinesia induced by prolonged administration of phenothiazines. Improvement was recorded in a double blind study of 18 patients treated with maximum tolerated dosage (mean 18.8 mg/day) for 6 weeks. There was no deterioration in the therapeutic action of pimozide over this time. Parkinsonism and sedation were the main adverse effects. They were corrected by reduction of the dose of pimozide, but often recurred so that further adjustments of dosage were necessary. Our findings support the view that tardive dyskinesia is produced by a disturbance in the balance of central transmitters such that dopaminergic transmission is increased.

The suppression of involuntary movements with tetrabenazine

Thirty-one patients with a variety of extrapyramidal disorders were treated with tetrabenazine in doses of 25 to 250 mg. daily for periods varying from 2 weeks to 15 months. Clinical assessment of the patients' disability before and after treatment has confirmed that tetrabenazine effectively suppresses choreiform and ballistic involuntary movements, particularly those associated with Huntington's chorea and cerebrovascular disease. Side effects were encountered frequently and a controlled study in which tetrabenazine is compared with other active drugs is now desirable.