Community-based doulas for migrant and refugee women: a mixed-method systematic review and narrative synthesis

Multicultural doula support and obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a multi-centre comparative study in Norway

BACKGROUND

Migrant women face an increased risk of poor obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Norway implemented a multicultural doula (MCD) program in 2018, which was designed to improve pregnancy care for this group in vulnerable circumstances. This study aimed to assess the impact of MCD support, provided in addition to standard care, on obstetric and neonatal outcomes for selected newly arrived migrants.

METHODS

This was a multi-centre case-control study involving all nine hospitals actively running the MCD program, which covers four of Norway's five regions. Women who received MCD support at the time of childbirth (n = 339), from 2018-2023, were compared to similar newly arrived immigrant women who did not receive MCD support (n = 339) and gave birth within the same timeframe. Hospital records were reviewed, and outcomes were analysed using binary logistic regression. The results are expressed as crude and adjusted associations with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Women receiving MCD support exhibited a 41% lower likelihood of undergoing emergency caesarean sections (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.59, 95% Cl 0.34-0.98) and those giving birth vaginally had a 75% lower risk of estimated blood loss ≥1000 ml (aOR 0.25, 95% Cl 0.12-0.52) compared with women without MCD support. Additionally, MCD support was associated with more use of pain-relief (aOR 2.88, 95% Cl 1.93-4.30) in labour and increased rates of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (aOR 2.26, 95% Cl 1.53-3.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that MCD support may contribute to improved outcomes for migrants in vulnerable circumstances, potentially impacting their future reproductive health and children's well-being.

Return-on-Investment Analysis of an Enhanced Community Doula Program: Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Considerations

BACKGROUND

Community doulas are perinatal health workers who provide peer education, resource navigation, and support during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Evidence suggests that doulas improve the experience of care, reduce cesarean birth, and improve breastfeeding outcomes. However, people with low incomes cannot access affordable community doula support in most states due to lack of insurance reimbursement. To determine the affordability of Medicaid reimbursement for doula services, there is a need to fill a gap in research that employs real-world data and a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis approach.

METHODS

We conducted a ROI analysis from the healthcare perspective of an enhanced community doula intervention, Best Beginnings for Babies (BBB). Healthcare and program cost data were collected alongside clinical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of routine maternity care at Boston Medical Center with and without BBB. ROI was calculated as the net healthcare savings divided by the investment costs. Post-COVID-19 program costing estimates were also performed.

RESULTS

Average healthcare costs per patient were $18,969 for the BBB group compared with $20,121 for routine care, a savings of $1,152. BBB program costs were an average of $971 per person. There was an 18% ROI. Lower costs for the birth hospitalization and NICU stays accounted for the largest areas of savings. Per-person program costs using proposed MassHealth fees produced a positive return on investment, although 2023 hospital doula program wages and salaries did not.

DISCUSSION

The BBB-enhanced community doula program was cost-saving to payers and increased access to doula support for low-income people. Even with post-COVID-19 increases in program costs, analysis demonstrated doula support was still financially feasible. This study should reassure budget-conscious Medicaid payers that doula services are affordable.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of models of maternity care for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds in high-income countries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Different models of care may be appropriate for various groups of women during their perinatal period, depending on their risk level, location, and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and facilities. Evaluating these models' effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is critical to allocating resources and offering sustained care to women from refugee backgrounds. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of maternity care models among women from migrant and refugee backgrounds living in high-income countries.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of major databases for studies published in English between 2000 and 2023 was developed to identify literature using defined keywords and inclusion criteria. Two authors independently screened the search findings and the full texts of eligible studies. The quality of the included studies was appraised, and qualitative and quantitative results were synthesised narratively and presented in tabular form. The review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-seven research papers from six countries were included in the review. The review highlighted the positive impact of community and stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of models of maternity care for women from migrant and refugee backgrounds. The review summarised the models of care in terms of their effectiveness in improving perinatal health outcomes and minimising medical interventions, continuum of care in maternity services, enhancing health literacy, maternity service use and navigating the healthcare system, social support, and sense of belongingness, and addressing cultural and linguistic barriers. Notably, only one study conducted a partial economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of the model.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

While the reviewed models demonstrated effectiveness in improving perinatal health outcomes, there was considerable variation in outcome measures and assessment tools across the models. Thus, reaching a consensus on prioritised perinatal outcomes and measurement tools is crucial. Researchers and policymakers should collaborate to enhance the quality and quantity of economic evaluations to support evidence-based decision-making. This includes thoroughly comparing costs and outcomes across various health models to determine the most efficient interventions. By emphasizing the importance of comprehensive economic evaluations, healthcare systems can better allocate resources, ultimately leading to more effective and efficient healthcare delivery.

The role of doulas and community birth workers in abortion and contraception care: An international scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Equitable and safe access to abortion and contraception is essential to protecting reproductive autonomy. Despite this, barriers to access remain. Nonclinical support people, may be able to facilitate access to abortion and contraception services and care, but evidence on the scope and efficacy of doulas in abortion and contraception care is lacking. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize what is known about the role of doulas in abortion and contraception care.

STUDY DESIGN

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A clinical librarian performed an initial search of all relevant databases. Three reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for assessment against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations of interest included doulas, and/or untrained birth attendants and birth companions, and patients who use doula services. The concept of interest was the doula and the context was access to abortion or contraception.

RESULTS

Our review identified relevant studies conducted in different countries, published between 1976 and 2023. Studies broadly focused on three key themes: doulas performing procedural abortions, doulas supporting abortion care, and doulas supporting contraception. Outcomes of interest included client outcomes, barriers to access, doula training, and attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Doulas have the potential to improve client satisfaction and mitigate barriers to accessing abortion and contraception services. Further research is needed to identify the training needs of doulas, the potential for their integration into interdisciplinary care teams, and the role in supporting medication abortion.

Refugee women's and providers' perceptions of person-centered maternity care: a qualitative study in two refugee camps in Chad

BACKGROUND

Globally, mistreatment of women during labor and delivery is a common human rights violation. Person-centered maternity care (PCMC), a critical component of quality of care, is respectful and responsive to an individual's needs and preferences. Factors related to poor PCMC are often exacerbated in humanitarian settings.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study to understand Sudanese refugee women's experiences, including their perceptions of quality of care, during labor and delivery at the maternities in two refugee camps in eastern Chad, as well as maternity health workers' perceptions of PCMC and how they could be better supported to provide this. In-depth interviews were conducted individually with 22 women who delivered in the camp maternities and five trained midwives working in the two maternities; and in six dyads with a total of 11 Sudanese refugee traditional birth attendants and one assistant midwife. In addition, facility assessments were conducted at each maternity to determine their capacity to provide PCMC.

RESULTS

Overall, women reported positive experiences in the camp maternities during labor and delivery. Providers overwhelmingly defined respectful care as patient-centered and respect as being something fundamental to their role as health workers. While very few reported incidents of disrespect between providers and patients in the maternity, resource constraints, including overwork of the providers and overcrowding, resulted in some women feeling neglected.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite providers' commitment to offering person-centered care and women's generally positive experiences in this study, one of few that explored PCMC in a refugee camp, conflict and displacement exacerbates the conditions that contribute to mistreatment during labor and delivery. Good PCMC requires organizational emphasis and support, including adequate working conditions and ensuring suitable resources so health workers can effectively perform.

Increasing U.S. Maternal Health Equity Among Immigrant Populations Through Community Engagement

Immigrant women in the United States are at an elevated risk of poor maternal health outcomes due to cultural, linguistic, or socioeconomic barriers that may lead to critical delays in obtaining adequate health care. Ensuring access to high-quality, culturally appropriate perinatal health care is crucial to improve the health and well-being of immigrant mothers and their children. Various aspects of perinatal health care for immigrant women can be improved through community engagement strategies. Barriers can be addressed by involving community members in designing and delivering culturally appropriate maternal health services. Some strategies discussed in this commentary include working with community health workers, encouraging telehealth through community health workers, providing breastfeeding and mental health support within cultural norms, and involving community-based doulas and midwives.

The impacts of climate migration on perinatal health and opportunities to safeguard perinatal well-being

The disparate health consequences of climate change and migration have been separately explored, and the gendered impacts of climate change have been previously established. Nonetheless, there is limited research on the specific nexus of climate change-migration-sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This chapter reviews specific vulnerabilities faced by women and infants throughout the perinatal period, and how these are affected by climate change-induced migration in different migratory contexts. The available literature refers to antenatal and postnatal care utilization, access to water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities, childbirth and delivery challenges, and infant feeding barriers, amongst other concerns. The discussion explored in this chapter highlights the need to develop disaster frameworks that reflect the heterogeneity of outcomes related to specific and unique climate migration contexts.

Collaborative relationships between doulas and maternity care providers when supporting migrant women during labour and birth

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives and experiences of community-based doulas and maternity care providers working with each other in Australia; and to identify the facilitators and barriers to working relationships when supporting migrant women during labour and birth.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A qualitative interpretive phenomenological study using in-depth semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic approach and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) framework were used in data analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

10 doulas from Birth for Humankind (a community-based doula service), and 13 maternity care providers from a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia were included.

FINDINGS

We identified how collaborative working relationships between community-based doulas and maternity care providers may be enhanced by adopting facilitators across all three COM-B domains and by removing identified barriers. Factors facilitating collaborative working relationships included: knowledge and value of doula roles, establishment of rapport and trust between doulas and providers; doulas enhancing respectful care, communication and relationships between migrant women and providers; and community-based doulas differentiated from private practising doulas. Barriers included: limited understanding of doula roles and service; limiting behaviours impacting collaborative relationships; and limited opportunities for doulas and providers to establish rapport.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Findings are relevant to other models of doula care including private practice doulas and hospital-based doula services. Positive, collaborative doula-provider working relationships are integral for ensuring that the benefits of doula care continue to reach underserved populations such as migrant women and improve their maternity care experiences and outcomes within hospitals settings.

A qualitative study on community-based doulas' roles in providing culturally-responsive care to migrant women in Australia

BACKGROUND

There is limited exploration into how culturally-responsive care may be provided to migrant women through community-based doulas.

AIM

We aim to explore the roles of community-based doulas in providing culturally-responsive care to migrant women in Australian maternity settings, from the perspectives of maternity care providers and doulas.

METHODS

We used an interpretive phenomenological qualitative approach with in-depth interviews with 30 maternity care providers and Birth for Humankind doulas, in Victoria, Australia. All interviews were conducted over video-call and inductive thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software.

FINDINGS

Doulas were seen to support and enhance migrant women's maternity care experiences through numerous ways, strengthening cultural-responsive care provision. There were three domains which described the role of doulas in providing migrant women with culturally-responsive care: 1) enhanced care; 2) respectful care; and 3) supportive relationships with providers. The three domains included seven themes: 1) continuous individualised support; 2) social connectedness; 3) creating safe spaces; 4) cultural facilitator; 5) non-judgemental support; 6) enhancing communication and rapport with providers; and 7) making connections.

DISCUSSION

Doulas appeared to counter negative factors that impact migrant women's maternity care experiences. Doulas with previous professional birth support qualifications and trauma-informed care training were equipped to create safe spaces and increase emotional safety for migrant women. Doulas may also have more responsibilities expected of them by providers when connecting migrant women with additional services in situations that may be missed through hospital care.

CONCLUSION

Birth for Humankind doulas in Victoria play an important role in providing culturally-responsive care to migrant women. Employment models may be the next steps in acknowledging their valuable contribution as a complementary service to maternity settings.

Preconception and perinatal hospitalizations as indicators of risk for severe maternal morbidity in primiparas

BACKGROUND

Severe maternal morbidity includes unexpected outcomes of labor and delivery that result in significant short- or long-term consequences to a woman's health. A statewide longitudinally linked database was used to examine hospitalization during and before pregnancy for birthing people with severe maternal morbidity at delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between hospital visits during pregnancy and 1 to 5 years before pregnancy and severe maternal morbidity at delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective, population-based cohort analysis of the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal database between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018. Nonbirth hospital visits, including emergency department visits, observational stays, and hospital admissions during pregnancy and 5 years before pregnancy, were identified. The diagnoses for hospitalizations were categorized. We compared medical conditions leading to antecedent, nonbirth hospital visits among primiparous birthing individuals with singleton births with and without severe maternal morbidity, excluding transfusions.

RESULTS

Of 235,398 birthing individuals, 2120 had severe maternal morbidity, a rate of 90.1 cases per 10,000 deliveries, and 233,278 did not have severe maternal morbidity. Compared with 4.3% of patients without severe maternal morbidity, 10.4% of patients with severe maternal morbidity were hospitalized during pregnancy. In multivariable analysis, there was a 31% increased risk of hospital admission during the prenatal period, a 60% increased risk of hospital admission in the year before pregnancy, and a 41% increased risk of hospital admission in 2 to 5 years before pregnancy. Compared with 9.8% of non-Hispanic White birthing people, 14.9% of non-Hispanic Black birthing people with severe maternal morbidity experienced a hospital admission during pregnancy. For those with severe maternal morbidity, prenatal hospitalization was most common for those with endocrine (3.6%) or hematologic (3.3%) conditions, with the largest differences between those with and without severe maternal morbidity for musculoskeletal (relative risk, 9.82; 95% confidence interval, 7.06-13.64) and cardiovascular (relative risk, 9.73; 95% confidence interval, 7.26-13.03) conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study found a strong association between previous nonbirth hospitalizations and the likelihood of severe maternal morbidity at delivery.