The association of the 'additional height index' with atopic diseases, non-atopic asthma, ischaemic heart disease and mortality: a population-based study

Incidence of cancer after asthma development: 2 independent population-based cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the risk of cancer development after asthma diagnosis is controversial and inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine whether asthma is associated with an increased risk for incident cancer.

METHODS

Two independent, population-based, longitudinal cohorts were examined, and estimated hazard ratios were determined using Cox regression. One group consisted of an unmatched cohort of 475,197 participants and a propensity score-matched cohort of 75,307 participants from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC; claims-based data from 2003 to 2015). The other group consisted of 5,440 participants from the Ansan-Ansung cohort (interview-based data from 2001 to 2014).

RESULTS

The NHIS-NSC matched cohort had 572,740 person-years of follow-up, 6,885 people with new asthma diagnoses, and 68,422 people without asthma diagnoses. Adults with asthma had a 75% greater risk of incident cancer overall. The excess risk for incident cancer was greatest during the first 2 years after asthma diagnosis, and this risk remained elevated throughout follow-up. Patients with nonatopic asthma had a greater risk of overall cancer than those with atopic asthma. A high cumulative dose of inhaled corticosteroids among asthma patients was associated with a 56% reduced risk of lung cancer, but had no effect on the risk of overall cancer. The results from the NHIS-NSC unmatched cohort and the Ansan-Ansung cohort were similar to the primary results from the NHIS-NSC matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma development was associated with an increased risk of subsequent cancer in 2 different Korean cohorts. Our findings provide an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of asthma and its relationship with carcinogenesis and suggest that clinicians should be aware of the higher risk of incident cancer among patients with asthma.

Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population

Bone turnover markers are used for monitoring osteoporosis treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the agreement between different assays for CTX and PINP and established reference intervals in a cohort of 2300 individuals. We found poor agreement between assays and different reference intervals. This highlights the importance of harmonization of the assays.

INTRODUCTION

Two reference markers for bone turnover have been proposed: CTX bone resorption and P1NP for bone formation. The purpose of the current study was to establish reference intervals for the two markers in a Danish cohort and to determine the agreement on the two platforms.

METHODS

Fasting sera from 2308 individuals (1250 males and 1058 females, age range 24-76 years) participating in the Health2006 study were analyzed for CTX and P1NP using the automated IDS-iSYS analyzer and the automated Cobas e411 analyzer. Participants in anti-osteoporotic treatment were excluded, while subjects on hormonal contraceptives were included.

RESULTS

There was significant disagreement between both the two P1NP assays with a mean difference of -3 μg/L (LoA -19 to 14) (p < 0.001) and the two CTX assays with a mean difference of 13 ng/L (LoA-187 to 214) (p < 0.001). For CTX, there was a systematic bias: at low values, Cobas measured a higher value than iSYS and at higher concentrations, iSYS measured increasingly higher values than Cobas. Based on the results, we propose three reference intervals for each sex: 25-29, 30-39, and 40-80 years for men, and 25-29, >30 (pre-menopausal), and >30 years (post-menopausal) for women.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant disagreement between the IDS-iSYS and Roche Cobas assays for both reference markers. Consequently, the reference intervals for an adult, healthy population are different depending on the analysis method used. Therefore, repeated measurements of patient samples used for monitoring of treatment should be done on the same assay. Moreover, assay-specific reference intervals should be used. Harmonization of assays for BTM is highly warranted.