1
|
Bavbek S, Kepil Özdemir S, Bonadonna P, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Brockow K, Laguna Martinez J, Nakonechna A, Pagani M, Arcolacı A, Lombardo C, Torres MJ. Hypersensitivity reactions to proton pump inhibitors. An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2024; 79:552-564. [PMID: 38013608 DOI: 10.1111/all.15961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are invaluable therapeutic options in a variety of dyspeptic diseases. In addition to their well-known risk profile, PPI consumption is related to food and environmental allergies, dysbiosis, osteoporosis, as well as immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The latter, although a rare event, around 1%-3%, due to the extraordinarily high rate of prescription and consumption of PPIs are related to a substantial risk. In this Position Paper, we provide clinicians with practical evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of HSRs to PPIs. Furthermore, the unmet needs proposed in the document aim to stimulate more in-depth investigations in the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevim Bavbek
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Seçil Kepil Özdemir
- Department of Chest Diseases, Allergy and Immunology Unit, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, İzmir, Turkey
| | | | - Marina Atanaskovic-Markovic
- Department of Allergology and Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, University Children's Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Annick Barbaud
- Département de dermatologie et allergologie, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jose Laguna Martinez
- Allergy Unit, Allergo-Anaesthesia Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alla Nakonechna
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, University of Liverpool, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mauro Pagani
- Medicine Department, Medicine Ward Mantova Hospital, ASST di Mantova, Mantova, Italy
| | | | - Carla Lombardo
- Division of Dermatology and Allergy, APSS - Trento Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Maria J Torres
- Allergy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, IBIMA-UMA-ARADyAL, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villarreal-González RV, Canel-Paredes A, Arias-Cruz A, Fraga-Olvera A, Delgado-Bañuelos A, Rico-Solís GA, Ochoa-García IV, Jiménez-Sandoval JO, Ramírez-Heredia J, Flores-González JV, Cortés-Grimaldo RM, Zecua-Nájera Y, Ortega-Cisneros M. [Drug allergy: Fundamental aspects in diagnosis and treatment.]. REVISTA ALERGIA MÉXICO 2023; 69:195-213. [PMID: 37218047 DOI: 10.29262/ram.v69i4.1181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Any substance used as a treatment for any disease can produce harmful or unpleasant events called adverse drug reactions (ADRs). They are due to inherent biological effects of the drug and are caused by immunological and non-immunological mechanisms. OBJECTIVES To describe the immunological mechanisms of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to drugs, their epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. METHODS A review of the most current literature in English and Spanish was carried out, in the main databases, related to the HSR of various drug groups. RESULTS This study describes the terms used to define ADRs and HSRs, their classification and clinical manifestations, current diagnostic tools, treatment algorithms and prognosis of the most frequently used medications and with the highest prevalence of reported adverse events. CONCLUSION ADRs are a challenging entity, with a complex pathophysiology that has not been fully understood. Its approach requires a careful consideration since not all drugs have validated tests for their diagnosis nor a specific treatment. When indicating the use of any drug, the severity of the disease, the availability of other treatments and the potential risks of developing future adverse events should always be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalaura Virginia Villarreal-González
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina, Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Nuevo León, México
| | - Alejandra Canel-Paredes
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina, Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Nuevo León, México
| | - Alfredo Arias-Cruz
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina, Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Nuevo León, México
| | - Alira Fraga-Olvera
- Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México; Hospital Amerimed, Quintana Roo, México
| | - Angélica Delgado-Bañuelos
- Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital General Regional 58, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guanajuato, México
| | | | - Itzel Vianey Ochoa-García
- Departamento de Inmunología clínica y Alergia, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Jalisco, México
| | - Jaime Omar Jiménez-Sandoval
- Departamento de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México; Hospital Regional Río Blanco, SESVER, Veracruz, México
| | - Jennifer Ramírez-Heredia
- Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México; Hospital MAC, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
| | | | - Rosa María Cortés-Grimaldo
- Departamento de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Pediatría del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Jalisco, México
| | - Yahvéh Zecua-Nájera
- Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México; Centro Médico San Carlos, Tlaxcala, México
| | - Margarita Ortega-Cisneros
- Departamento de Inmunología Clínica y Alergia, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giurin MS, Trojniak MP, Arbo A, Carrozzi M, Abbracciavento G, Monasta L, Zanus C. Safety of Off-Label Pharmacological Treatment in Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Global Perspective From an Observational Study at an Italian Third Level Children’s Hospital. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:837692. [PMID: 35496268 PMCID: PMC9039008 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.837692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The acquisition of proper and relevant pediatric clinical data is essential to ensure tolerable and effective pediatric drug therapies. In the field of pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, the lack of sufficient high quality scientific evidence for pediatric age results in the frequent need to prescribe off-label drugs. With the aim of improving knowledge about safety profile of off-label drug prescription in children and adolescent with neurological and/or psychiatric disorders, we realized a multidisciplinary pharmacovigilance study. Materials and methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety of off-label pharmacological therapies in patients aged 0–18 years, admitted to the Neuropsychiatry Unit of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” between January 2016 and December 2018. Prescription patterns and adverse drug reactions were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Results: Overall, 230 patients were enrolled, 48% boys (N = 111), 52% girls (N = 119), average age of 10 years, and a total of 534 prescriptions was analyzed. 54.5% (N = 125) of patients had epilepsy, 37.5% (N = 86) suffered from psychiatric disorders, 8% (N = 19) had other neurological disorders. The prevalence of off-label prescriptions was 32% and 50% of the study population received at least one off-label drug. A total of 106 ADRs was detected: 57% of ADRs were due to drug-drug interactions, 30% were due to off-label prescriptions, 10% were due to overdose and 3% were due to improper use. No significant association between emerged ADRs and off label prescriptions was found (Fisher’s exact two-tailed test, p = 1.000). There was significant association between increasing number of administrated drugs and risk of ADRs (OR 1.99; IC95% 1.58–2.5; p = 0.000). Psychiatric disorders were associated with at least three times higher risk to be treated with an off-label drug (OR 3.30; IC95% 2.26–4.83; p = 0.000). Conclusions: This study shows that off-label prescribing in neuropsychiatric disorders does not pose a greater risk of ADRs than on-label prescribing and highlights unmet clinical needs in pediatric neuropsychopharmacology. The multidisciplinary approach can provide important contributions to improve therapeutic path of these already complex pathologies by careful monitoring of therapeutic appropriateness and drug interactions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pagani M, Bavbek S, Alvarez‐Cuesta E, Berna Dursun A, Bonadonna P, Castells M, Cernadas J, Chiriac A, Sahar H, Madrigal‐Burgaleta R, Sanchez Sanchez S. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: an EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2022; 77:388-403. [PMID: 34587281 DOI: 10.1111/all.15113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapeutic drugs have been widely used in the treatment of cancer disease for about 70 years. The development of new treatments has not hindered their use, and oncologists still prescribe them routinely, alone or in combination with other antineoplastic agents. However, all chemotherapeutic agents can induce hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), with different incidences depending on the culprit drug. These reactions are the third leading cause of fatal drug-induced anaphylaxis in the United States. In Europe, deaths related to chemotherapy have also been reported. In particular, most reactions are caused by platinum compounds, taxanes, epipodophyllotoxins and asparaginase. Despite their prevalence and relevance, the ideal pathways for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of these reactions are still unclear, and practice remains considerably heterogeneous with vast differences from center to center. Thus, the European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology organized a task force to provide data and recommendations regarding the allergological work-up in this field of drug hypersensitivity reactions. This position paper aims to provide consensus on the investigation of HSRs to chemotherapeutic drugs and give practical recommendations for clinicians that treat these patients, such as oncologists, allergologists and internists. Key sections cover risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, the role of skin tests, in vitro tests, indications and contraindications of drug provocation tests and desensitization of neoplastic patients with allergic reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs. Statements, recommendations and unmet needs were discussed and proposed at the end of each section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Pagani
- Department of Medicine Medicine Ward C. Poma Mantova HospitalASST Mantova Mantova Italy
| | - Sevim Bavbek
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Department of Chest Diseases Ankara University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
| | | | - Adile Berna Dursun
- Department of Immunology and Allergic Diseases Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Rize Turkey
| | | | - Mariana Castells
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Josefina Cernadas
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Medical University, H. S. Joao Porto Portugal
| | - Anca Chiriac
- Division of Allergy Department of Pulmonology Hôpital Arnaud de VilleneuveUniversity Hospital of Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Hamadi Sahar
- The Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Ricardo Madrigal‐Burgaleta
- Allergy & Severe Asthma Service St Bartholomew's Hospital'sBarts Health NHS Trust London UK
- Drug Desensitisation Centre Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Bellvitge University Hospital Barcelona Spain
| | - Soledad Sanchez Sanchez
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Department of Medicine University Hospital Complex of A Coruna A Coruna Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bavbek S, Pagani M, Alvarez‐Cuesta E, Castells M, Dursun AB, Hamadi S, Madrigal‐Burgaleta R, Sanchez‐Sanchez S, Vultaggio A. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologicals: An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2022; 77:39-54. [PMID: 34157134 DOI: 10.1111/all.14984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Biologicals are crucial targeted therapeutic agents in oncological, immunological, and inflammatory diseases, and their use in clinical practice is broadening. In recent years, the spread of Personalized Precision Medicine has facilitated a proliferation of new treatment options, especially biologicals. Consequently, biologicals are now among the drugs that most frequently cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Patients can develop HSRs to these agents during the first-lifetime exposure or after repeated exposure, and these HSRs can be potentially life-threatening or limit therapeutic options. Despite the relatively high prevalence, the underlying mechanisms of these HSRs remain obscure, and the optimal management pathways are still a matter of discussion. In this Position Paper, the authors will provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing HSRs to biologicals. Additionally, the document defines unmet needs as an opportunity to shape future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevim Bavbek
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Department of Chest Diseases School of Medicine Ankara University Ankara Turkey
| | - Mauro Pagani
- Medical Department Medicine Ward ASST di Mantova Mantova Italy
| | | | - Mariana Castells
- Division of Allergy and Immunology Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Adile Berna Dursun
- Department of Immunology and Allergic Diseases Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Rize Turkey
| | - Sahar Hamadi
- Division of Allergy and Immunology Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Ricardo Madrigal‐Burgaleta
- Allergy & Severe Asthma Service St Bartholomew's Hospital Barts Health NHS Trust London UK
- Drug Desensitisation Centre Catalan Institute of Oncology Barcelona Spain
| | | | - Alessandra Vultaggio
- Department of Biomedicine Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Florence Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leung J, Leong J, Au Yeung K, Hao BZ, McCluskey A, Kayani Y, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Can you trust clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery. Updates Surg 2021; 74:391-401. [PMID: 34519972 PMCID: PMC8995291 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01168-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines aim to support clinicians in providing clinical care and should be supported by evidence. There is currently no information on whether clinical practice guidelines in laparoscopic surgery are supported by evidence. METHODS We performed a systematic review and identified clinical practice guidelines of laparoscopic surgery published in PubMed and Embase between March 2016 and February 2019. We performed an independent assessment of the strength of recommendation based on the evidence provided by the guideline authors. We used the 'Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II' (AGREE-II) Tool's 'rigour of development', 'clarity of presentation', and 'editorial independence' domains to assess the quality of the guidelines. We performed a mixed-effects generalised linear regression modelling. RESULTS We retrieved 63 guidelines containing 1905 guideline statements. The median proportion of 'difference in rating' of strength of recommendation between the guideline authors and independent assessment was 33.3% (quartiles: 18.3%, 55.8%). The 'rigour of development' domain score (odds ratio 0.06; 95% confidence intervals 0.01-0.48 per unit increase in rigour score; P value = 0.0071) and whether the strength of recommendation was 'strong' by independent evaluation (odds ratio 0.09 (95% confidence intervals 0.06-0.13; P value < 0.001) were the only determinants of difference in rating between the guideline authors and independent evaluation. CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of guideline statements in clinical practice guidelines in laparoscopic surgery are not supported by evidence. Guideline authors systematically overrated the strength of the recommendation (i.e., even when the evidence points to weak recommendation, guideline authors made strong recommendations).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Leung
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - Jonathan Leong
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Kenneth Au Yeung
- Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B296QU, UK
| | - Bo Zhen Hao
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Aled McCluskey
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Yusuf Kayani
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Kurinchi S Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.,Department of Therapy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hacard F, Giraudeau B, d'Acremont G, Jegou MH, Jonville-Bera AP, Munck S, Pham BN, Mavoungou S, Cornillier H, Guillot B, Beylot-Barry M, Chosidow O, Maruani A. Guidelines for the management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: recommendations supported by the Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:658-660. [PMID: 33913519 PMCID: PMC8457139 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F Hacard
- Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital of Lyon, 69495, Lyon, France
| | - B Giraudeau
- Universities of Tours and Nantes, 37000, Tours, France
| | | | - M-H Jegou
- Dermatology Office, 33290, Blanquefort, France
| | - A-P Jonville-Bera
- Universities of Tours and Nantes, 37000, Tours, France.,University Hospital of Tours, 37000, Tours, France
| | - S Munck
- Department of Teaching and Research in General Practice, University Nice Sophia Antipolis, 06000, Nice, France
| | - B-N Pham
- University Hospital of Reims, 51000, Reims, France
| | - S Mavoungou
- Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology, 75009, Paris, France
| | - H Cornillier
- University Hospital Centre of Tours, 37044, Tours CEDEX 9, France
| | - B Guillot
- University of Montpellier, 34000, Montpellier, France
| | - M Beylot-Barry
- University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - O Chosidow
- Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology, 75009, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris-Est University, 94010, Créteil, France
| | - A Maruani
- Universities of Tours and Nantes, 37000, Tours, France.,University Hospital Centre of Tours, 37044, Tours CEDEX 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Löhrs L, Handrack M, Kopp I, Jessen F, Wagner E, Falkai P, Röh A, Strube W, Hasan A. Evaluation of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:503. [PMID: 33046040 PMCID: PMC7552557 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02897-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information regarding the distribution of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines is lacking. Based on the German evidence- and consensus- based (S3) psychiatry and psychotherapy and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) treatment guidelines, we aimed to specify how guideline recommendations are composed and to what extent recommendations are evidence-based. METHODS Data was collected from all published evidence- and consensus-based S3-classified psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines. As control conditions, data from German neurology S3-classified guidelines as well as data from recent SIGN guidelines of mental health were extracted. Two investigators reviewed the selected guidelines independently, extracted and analysed the numbers and levels of recommendations. RESULTS On average, 45.1% of all recommendations are not based on strong scientific evidence in German guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy. A related pattern can be confirmed for SIGN guidelines, where the mean average of recommendations with lacking evidence is 33.9%. By contrast, in the German guidelines of neurology the average of such recommendations is 16.5%. A total of 24.5% of all recommendations in the guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy are classified as level A recommendations, compared to 31.6% in the field of neurology and 31.1% in the SIGN guidelines. Related patterns were observed for B and 0 level recommendations. CONCLUSION Guidelines should be practical tools to simplify the decision-making process based on scientific evidence. Up to 45% of all recommendations in the investigated guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy are not based on strong scientific evidence. The reasons for this high number remain unclear. Possibly, only a limited number of studies answer clinically relevant questions. Our findings thereby question whether guidelines should include non-evidence-based recommendations to be methodologically stringent and whether specific processes to develop expert-opinion statements must be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Löhrs
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, München, Germany.
| | - Mirjam Handrack
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Ina Kopp
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, c/o Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elias Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Astrid Röh
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Strube
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany ,grid.7307.30000 0001 2108 9006Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Dr.-Mack-Straße 1, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Differences in the recommendation of laparoscopic clinical practice guidelines according to the recommendation system—Re-evaluation using GRADE. Eur Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-019-00622-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Summary
Background
Guidelines are essential for safe and effective treatment. They usually have multiple statements. Since the supporting information for the guidelines varies widely, the degree to which these statements are recommended also differ. We rely on recommendation systems for grading the recommendations for different statements. All recommendation systems have different grading criteria and they could potentially cause confusion and affect the quality of recommendations. Therefore, there is a need to determine the extent of variation and explore the potential reasons behind it.
Methods
A purposive sampling on PubMed was conducted to find four different laparoscopic guidelines using different methods to grade the recommendations. Each statement was then re-evaluated using the GRADE recommendation system.
Results
The guidelines used GRADE, Oxford Methodology, SIGN, and ‘bespoke’ systems. The number of statements with similar strength for the different statements as the re-evaluated strengths in the four guidelines were 24.1, 62.2, 35.8 and 50.0% respectively.
Conclusion
There were a wide variety of recommendation systems for laparoscopic guidelines and there were differences between the recommendations from the guidelines using GRADE, Oxford Methodology, SIGN and the ‘Bespoke’ system when re-evaluated by GRADE. A systematic review of recent laparoscopic guidelines might provide the extent and the main reasons of the problem.
Collapse
|
10
|
Spanemberg JC, Cardoso JA, Slob EMGB, López-López J. Quality of life related to oral health and its impact in adults. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2019; 120:234-239. [PMID: 30763780 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Oral health is part of general health, and is recognized as an essential component of quality of life (QoL). For years, oral health was determined solely by the clinic, which did not allow an evaluation of the true impact of oral diseases on the patients' daily lives. The development of instruments for assessing QoL related to oral health has occurred due to the urgency of determining the effects of changes in the oral cavity of individuals. This study aims, through a bibliographical survey, to describe issues involving the relationship between QoL and oral health focusing on methodological and conceptual aspects as well as considering how oral health of adult individuals affects their QoL in a general way. Research in this area has developed the concept of "quality of life related to oral health", which comprises four categories: functional factors, psychological factors, social factors and existence of discomfort or pain. The negative impacts that poor oral health of the population have on their QoL makes this issue a relevant problem for public health. Although most oral problems do not represent an immediate risk of death, they are responsible for decreasing the QoL of individuals as they prolong states of pain and suffering, and cause functional, aesthetic, nutritional and psychological problems. Actions focused on health education with emphasis on self-perception, self-protection and self-care should be explored. Programs based on equity seeking to reduce inequalities and their negative effects on people's QoL should also be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Spanemberg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona, Spain.
| | - J A Cardoso
- College of Agrarian Sciences and Health, Brazil
| | - E M G B Slob
- UNINTER International University Center, Brazil. Nursing Degree Federal University of Parana, Brazil
| | - J López-López
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute), IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cassol-Spanemberg J, Rodríguez-de Rivera-Campillo ME, Otero-Rey EM, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jané-Salas E, López-López J. Oral lichen planus and its relationship with systemic diseases. A review of evidence. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10:e938-e944. [PMID: 30386529 PMCID: PMC6203921 DOI: 10.4317/jced.55145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral lichen planus (OLP) is one of the most common dermatological diseases which are present in the oral cavity. It is a chronic autoimmune, mucocutaneous disease that affects the oral mucosa as well as the skin, genital mucosa and other sites. OBJECTIVE Review the relevant information to OLP and its relationship with systemic diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS Searches were carried out in the Medline/PubMed, Lilacs, Bireme, BVS, and SciELO databases by using key-words. After an initial search that provided us with 243 papers, this number was reduced to 78 from the last seven years. One of the first criteria adopted was a selective reading of the abstracts of articles for the elimination of publications that presented less information regarding the subject proposed for this work. All the selected articles were read in their entirety by all of the authors, who came to a consensus about their level of evidence. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria were used as the criteria of methodological validation. RESULTS Only 9 articles showed an evidence level of 1+, 2+, 3 or 4, as well as a recommendation level of A, B, C or D. Three of them were non-systematic reviews, one was a cohort study and only one was a controlled clinical trial. Three of the studies were case series, with respective sample sizes of 45, 171 and 633 patients. CONCLUSIONS Several factors have been associated with OLP. Patients with OLP are carriers of a disease with systemic implications and may need the care of a multidisciplinary team. The correct diagnosis of any pathology is critical to making effective treatment and minimizes iatrogenic harm. For OLP is no different, taking into account its association with numerous systemic diseases that require special attention from health professionals. Periodic follow-up of all patients with OLP is recommended. Key words:Oral lichen planus, etiopathogenesis, systemic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Cassol-Spanemberg
- PhD. Postdoctoral Research Fellow. Specialist in Stomatology and Public Health. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - María-Eugenia Rodríguez-de Rivera-Campillo
- MD, DDS, PhD, Dermatologist and Dentist. Professor of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona / Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva-María Otero-Rey
- DDS, PhD, Odontology. Professor of Master of Daily Practice Dentistry. Department of Stomatology. School of Dentistry. University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Albert Estrugo-Devesa
- MD, DDS, PhD. Doctor, Specialist in Stomatology. Professor of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona / Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Jané-Salas
- MD, DDS, PhD. Doctor, Specialist in Stomatology. Professor of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona / Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - José López-López
- MD, DDS, PhD. Doctor, Specialist in Stomatology. Professor of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (School of Dentistry), University of Barcelona - Head of the Medical Surgical Area and Medical Director of Dentistry Hospital Barcelona University / Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mena KDR, Espitia OLP, Vergara JAD. Management of Ready-to-Use Parenteral Nutrition in Newborns: Systematic Review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2018; 42:1123-1132. [DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
13
|
Emile SH, Elfeki HA, Elbanna HG, Youssef M, Thabet W, Abd El-Hamed TM, Said B, Lotfy A. Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in treatment of anismus: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7:453-462. [PMID: 27602248 PMCID: PMC4986396 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i3.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the management of patients with anismus.
METHODS: An organized search of published literature was conducted using electronic databases including: PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, also an internet-based search using “Google Scholar” service was conducted. Both comparative and observational studies were included. We excluded irrelevant articles, editorials, case reports, reviews, and meta-analyses. The studies that followed the patients less than 6 mo were excluded. Variables collected were demographic data of the patients, technique of BTX-A injection and number of sessions, short-term and long-term clinical improvement, post-injection changes in electromyography (EMG), defecography, manometry, and balloon expulsion test, and complications recorded after BTX-A injection.
RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 189 patients were included in the review. The median age of the patients was 41.2 years and female-to-male ratio was 1.3:1. The median dose of BTX-A injected per procedure was 100 IU (range, 20-100 IU). Lateral injection was done in five trails and combined lateral and posterior injections in two trials. Three studies used endorectal ultrasonography-guided technique, one study used EMG-guided technique, whereas the remaining three studies used manual palpation with the index finger. The median percentage of patients who reported initial improvement of symptoms was 77.4% (range 37.5%-86.7%), this percentage declined to a median of 46% (range 25%-100%) at 4 mo after injection of BTX-A. Rates of improvement evaluated by balloon expulsion test, EMG, and defecography ranged between (37.5%-80%), (54%-86.7%), and (25%-86.6%), respectively. Fourteen (7.4%) patients developed complications after injection of BTX-A. Complication rates across the studies ranged from 0% to 22.6%.
CONCLUSION: Initial satisfactory improvement of symptoms after BTX-A injection remarkably deteriorated after 3 mo of the procedure. However, repeated injection may provide better sustained results with no additional morbidities. Further analysis of more patients is necessary to conclude the safety of BTX-A for the treatment of anismus.
Collapse
|
14
|
Is general practice in the wrong PLACE? Br J Gen Pract 2016; 66:424. [PMID: 27481970 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x686329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|
15
|
Werneke U, Jamshidi F, Taylor DM, Ott M. Conundrums in neurology: diagnosing serotonin syndrome - a meta-analysis of cases. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:97. [PMID: 27406219 PMCID: PMC4941011 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0616-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Serotonin syndrome is a toxic state, caused by serotonin (5HT) excess in the central nervous system. Serotonin syndrome’s main feature is neuro-muscular hyperexcitability, which in many cases is mild but in some cases can become life-threatening. The diagnosis of serotonin syndrome remains challenging since it can only be made on clinical grounds. Three diagnostic criteria systems, Sternbach, Radomski and Hunter classifications, are available. Here we test the validity of four assumptions that have become widely accepted: (1) The Hunter classification performs clinically better than the Sternbach and Radomski criteria; (2) in contrast to neuroleptic malignant syndrome, the onset of serotonin syndrome is usually rapid; (3) hyperthermia is a hallmark of severe serotonin syndrome; and (4) serotonin syndrome can readily be distinguished from neuroleptic malignant syndrome on clinical grounds and on the basis of medication history. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of all cases of serotonin syndrome and toxicity published between 2004 and 2014, using PubMed and Web of Science. Results Two of the four assumptions (1 and 2) are based on only one published study each and have not been independently validated. There is little agreement between current criteria systems for the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome. Although frequently thought to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of the serotonin syndrome, the Hunter criteria did not perform better than the Sternbach and Radomski criteria. Not all cases seem to be of rapid onset and only relatively few cases may present with hyperthermia. The 0 differential diagnosis between serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome is not always clear-cut. Conclusions Our findings challenge four commonly made assumptions about serotonin syndrome. We propose our meta-analysis of cases (MAC) method as a new way to systematically pool and interpret anecdotal but important clinical information concerning uncommon or emergent phenomena that cannot be captured in any other way but through case reports. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0616-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ursula Werneke
- Sunderby Research Unit - Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. .,Sunderby Hospital, 97180, Luleå, Sweden.
| | | | - David M Taylor
- Maudsley Hospital, Pharmacy Department Denmark Hill, King's College London Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, UK
| | - Michael Ott
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine - Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
MacKenzie R. Potential Conflict of Interest and Bias in the RACGP's Smoking Cessation Guidelines: Are GPs Provided with the Best Advice on Smoking Cessation for their Patients? Public Health Ethics 2015; 8:319-331. [PMID: 26566398 PMCID: PMC4638060 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phv010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient visits are an important opportunity for general practitioners (GPs) to discuss the risks of smoking and cessation strategies. In Australia, the guidelines on cessation published by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (the Guidelines) represent a key resource for GPs in this regard. The predominant message of the Guidelines is that pharmacotherapy should be recommended as first-line therapy for smokers expressing an interest in quitting. This, however, ignores established evidence about the success of unassisted quitting. Our analysis of the Guidelines identifies a number of potential conflicts of interest which may have affected the advice provided. These include extensive funding by the pharmaceutical industry of sources cited to support the recommendations, and relations between members of the Guidelines Content Advisory Group and the pharmaceutical industry. Recommendations issued by professional bodies have enormous potential impact upon public health and there is a need for the highest levels of scrutiny and transparency in their development. Information about research cited in guidelines should include funding sources, and developers should be free of obvious conflicts of interest. Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of global mortality. Concerns related to pharmaceutical industry funding of research, scientific integrity and recommendations on smoking cessation by medical advisory groups clearly have implications beyond Australia.
Collapse
|
17
|
Galvez C, Bolufer S, Navarro-Martinez J, Lirio F, Corcoles JM, Rodriguez-Paniagua JM. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2015; 3:104. [PMID: 26046045 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.04.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is serious entity, usually due to underlying disease, mainly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Its morbidity and mortality is high due to the pulmonary compromised status of these patients, and the recurrence rate is almost 50%, increasing mortality with each episode. For persistent or recurrent SSP, surgery under general anesthesia (GA) and mechanical ventilation (MV) with lung isolation is the gold standard, but ventilator-induced damages and dependency, and postoperative pulmonary complications are frequent. In the last two decades, several groups have reported successful results with non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NI-VATS) with thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and/or local anesthesia under spontaneous breathing. Main benefits reported are operative time, operation room time and hospital stay reduction, and postoperative respiratory complications decrease when comparing to GA, thus encouraging for further research in these moderate to high risk patients many times rejected for the standard regimen. There are also reports of special situations with satisfactory results, as in contralateral pneumonectomy and lung transplantation. The aim of this review is to collect, analyze and discuss all the available evidence, and seek for future lines of investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Galvez
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| | - Sergio Bolufer
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose Navarro-Martinez
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| | - Francisco Lirio
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Corcoles
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Paniagua
- 1 Thoracic Surgery Service, 2 Anethesiologist and Surgical Critical Care Service, University General Hospital of Alicante, C/Pintor Baeza 12, 03010, Alicante, Spain ; 3 Thoracic Surgery Service, Vinalopo Hospital, C/Tonico Sansano Mora 14, 03293 Elche, Alicante, Spain ; 4 Thoracic Surgery, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|