1
|
Howell-Jones R, Gold N, Bowen S, Bunten A, Tan K, Saei A, Jones S, MacDonald P, Watson R, Bennett KF, Chadborn T. Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:143. [PMID: 36670376 PMCID: PMC9854224 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK is rolling out a national childhood influenza immunisation programme for children, delivered through primary care and schools. Behaviourally-informed letters and reminders have been successful at increasing uptake of other public health interventions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of a behaviourally-informed letter on uptake of the vaccine at GP practices, and of a letter and a reminder (SMS/ email) on uptake at schools. METHODS AND RESULTS Study 1 was a cluster-randomised parallel trial of 21,786 two- and three-year olds in 250 GP practices, conducted during flu season (September to January inclusive) 2016/7. The intervention was a centrally-sent behaviourally-informed invitation letter, control was usual care. The proportion of two- and three-year olds in each practice who received a vaccination by 31st January 2017 was 23.4% in the control group compared to 37.1% in the intervention group (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.82, 2.05, p < 0.001). Study 2 was a 2 (behavioural letter vs standard letter) × 2 (reminder vs no reminder) factorial trial of 1108 primary schools which included 3010 school years 1-3. Letters were sent to parents from providers, and reminders sent to parents from the schools. In the standard-letter-no-reminder arm, an average of 61.6% of eligible children in each school year were vaccinated, compared to 61.9% in the behavioural-letter-no-reminder arm, 63.5% in the standard-letter-plus-reminder arm, and 62.9% in the behavioural-letter-plus reminder condition, F(3, 2990) = 2.68, p = 0.046. In a multi-level model, with demographic variables as fixed effects, the proportion of eligible students in the school year who were vaccinated increased with the reminder, β = 0.086 (0.041), p < 0.036, but there was no effect of the letter nor any interaction effect. CONCLUSION Sending a behaviourally informed invitation letter can increase uptake of childhood influenza vaccines at the GP surgery compared to usual practice. A reminder SMS or email can increase uptake of the influenza vaccine in schools, but the effect size was minimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION Study 1: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921633. Study 2: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02883972.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Howell-Jones
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| | - Natalie Gold
- Public Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, UK. .,Behavioural Practice, KPUK, 4 Millbank, Westminster, London, SW1P 3JA, UK. .,Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
| | - Sarah Bowen
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK ,Behavioural Practice, KPUK, 4 Millbank, Westminster, London, SW1P 3JA UK ,School of Economics, Sir Clive Granger Building University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK
| | - Amanda Bunten
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| | - Karen Tan
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| | - Ayoub Saei
- grid.515304.60000 0005 0421 4601UK Health Security Agency, Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, 61 Colindale Ave, London, NW9 5EQ UK
| | - Sarah Jones
- grid.451052.70000 0004 0581 2008NHS England, Childhood Flu Immunisation Taskforce Programme Manager (Public Health Commissioning Central Team), London, UK
| | - Pauline MacDonald
- grid.451052.70000 0004 0581 2008NHS England, Programme Director, National Child Flu Immunisation Taskforce (Public Health Commissioning Central Team), London, UK ,Independent Nurse Consultant, Infection Matters Limited, London, UK
| | - Robin Watson
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK ,grid.8250.f0000 0000 8700 0572Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE UK ,grid.7372.10000 0000 8809 1613Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Kirsty F. Bennett
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK ,grid.7372.10000 0000 8809 1613Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK ,grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Cancer Communication and Screening Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Chadborn
- grid.271308.f0000 0004 5909 016XPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peckham A, Wright JG, Marani H, Abdelhalim R, Laxer D, Allin S, Alam N, Marchildon G. Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada. Healthc Policy 2021; 16:46-69. [PMID: 34129478 PMCID: PMC8200834 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-centred care is a key priority for governments, providers and stakeholders, yet little is known about the care preferences of patient groups. We completed a scoping review that yielded 193 articles for analysis. Five health states were used to account for the diversity of possible preferences based on health needs. Five broad themes were identified and expressed differently across the health states, including personalized care, navigation, choice, holistic care and care continuity. Patients' perspectives must be considered to meet the diverse needs of targeted patient groups, which can inform health system planning, quality improvement initiatives and targeting of investments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allie Peckham
- Assistant Professor, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ; North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - James G Wright
- Chief, Economics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Husayn Marani
- Research Assistant, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Reham Abdelhalim
- Research Assistant, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Dara Laxer
- Executive Director, Health Policy and Promotion, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, ON
| | - Sara Allin
- Director of Operations, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Nadia Alam
- Past President, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, ON
| | - Greg Marchildon
- Director, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Offeddu V, Low MSF, Surendran S, Kembhavi G, Tam CC. Acceptance and feasibility of school-based seasonal influenza vaccination in Singapore: A qualitative study. Vaccine 2020; 38:1834-1841. [PMID: 31862193 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Influenza is a major cause of disease in children. School-based seasonal influenza vaccination can be a cost-effective tool to improve vaccine uptake among children, and can bring substantial health and economic benefits to the broader community. The acceptance and feasibility of school-based influenza vaccination are likely to be highly context-specific, but limited data exist from tropical settings with year-round influenza transmission. We conducted a qualitative study to assess acceptability and feasibility of a school-based seasonal influenza vaccination programme in Singapore. METHODS We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, representatives of relevant ministries, preschool principals and parents to understand their perspectives on a proposed school-based seasonal influenza vaccination programme. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS We conducted 40 interviews. Although preschool-aged children are currently the recommended age group for vaccination, stakeholders suggested introducing the programme in primary and/or secondary schools, where existing vaccination infrastructure would facilitate delivery. However, more comprehensive evidence on the local influenza burden and transmission patterns among children is required to develop an evidence-based, locally relevant rationale for a school-based vaccination programme and effectively engage policy-makers, school staff, and parents. Extensive, age-appropriate public education and awareness campaigns would increase the acceptability of the programme among stakeholders. Stakeholders indicated that an opt-out programme with free or subsidised vaccination would be the most likely to achieve high vaccine coverage and make access to vaccination more equitable. CONCLUSIONS Overall, participants were supportive of a free or subsidised school-based influenza vaccination programme in primary and/or secondary schools, although children in this age group are not currently a recommended group for vaccination. However, a better informed, evidence-based rationale to estimate the programme's impact in Singapore is currently lacking. Extensive, age-appropriate public education and awareness campaigns will help ensure full support across key stakeholder groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Offeddu
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 117549 Singapore.
| | - Mabel Sheau Fong Low
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, MA 02138 Cambridge, USA
| | - Shilpa Surendran
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 117549 Singapore.
| | - Gayatri Kembhavi
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 117549 Singapore
| | - Clarence C Tam
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 117549 Singapore; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, WC1E 7HT London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greyson D, Rafferty E, Slater L, MacDonald N, Bettinger JA, Dubé È, MacDonald SE. Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:153. [PMID: 30717742 PMCID: PMC6362565 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6275-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
A high quality systematic review search has three core attributes; it is systematic, comprehensive, and transparent. The current over-emphasis on the primacy of systematic reviews over other forms of literature review in health research, however, runs the risk of encouraging publication of reviews whose searches do not meet these three criteria under the guise of being systematic reviews. This correspondence comes in response to Perman S, Turner S, Ramsay AIG, Baim-Lance A, Utley M, Fulop NJ. School-based vaccination programmes: a systematic review of the evidence on organization and delivery in high income countries. 2017; BMC Public Health 17:252, which we assert did not meet these three important quality criteria for systematic reviews, thereby leading to potentially unreliable conclusions. Our aims herein are to emphasize the importance of maintaining a high degree of rigour in the conduct and publication of systematic reviews that may be used by clinicians and policy-makers to guide or alter practice or policy, and to highlight and discuss key evidence omitted in the published review in order to contextualize the findings for readers. By consulting a research librarian, we identified limitations in the search terms, the number and type of databases, and the screening methods used by Perman et al. Using a revised Ovid MEDLINE search strategy, we identified an additional 1016 records in that source alone, and highlighted relevant literature on the organization and delivery of school-based immunization program that was omitted as a result. We argue that a number of the literature gaps noted by Perman et al. may well be addressed by existing literature found through a more systematic and comprehensive search and screening strategy. We commend both the journal and the authors, however, for their transparency in supplying information about the search strategy and providing open access to peer reviewer and editor's comments, which enabled us to understand the reasons for the limitations of that review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon Greyson
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute & Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ellen Rafferty
- 5-308 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Linda Slater
- John W. Scott Health Science Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Noni MacDonald
- Department Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute & Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ève Dubé
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, QC, Québec, Canada
| | - Shannon E MacDonald
- 5-308 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kwong JC, Pereira JA, Quach S, Pellizzari R, Dusome E, Russell ML, Hamid JS, Feinberg Y, Winter AL, Gubbay JB, Sirtonski B, Moher D, Sider D, Finkelstein M, Loeb M. Randomized evaluation of live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines in schools (RELATIVES) pilot study: A cluster randomized trial. Vaccine 2015; 33:535-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 11/11/2014] [Accepted: 11/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|