1
|
Cleary F, Prieto-Merino D, Nitsch D. A systematic review of statistical methodology used to evaluate progression of chronic kidney disease using electronic healthcare records. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264167. [PMID: 35905096 PMCID: PMC9337679 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are a useful resource to study chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression prior to starting dialysis, but pose methodological challenges as kidney function tests are not done on everybody, nor are tests evenly spaced. We sought to review previous research of CKD progression using renal function tests in EHRs, investigating methodology used and investigators' recognition of data quality issues. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched for studies investigating CKD progression using EHRs in 4 databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health and Web of Science) available as of August 2021. Of 80 articles eligible for review, 59 (74%) were published in the last 5.5 years, mostly using EHRs from the UK, USA and East Asian countries. 33 articles (41%) studied rates of change in eGFR, 23 (29%) studied changes in eGFR from baseline and 15 (19%) studied progression to binary eGFR thresholds. Sample completeness data was available in 44 studies (55%) with analysis populations including less than 75% of the target population in 26 studies (33%). Losses to follow-up went unreported in 62 studies (78%) and 11 studies (14%) defined their cohort based on complete data during follow up. Methods capable of handling data quality issues and other methodological challenges were used in a minority of studies. CONCLUSIONS Studies based on renal function tests in EHRs may have overstated reliability of findings in the presence of informative missingness. Future renal research requires more explicit statements of data completeness and consideration of i) selection bias and representativeness of sample to the intended target population, ii) ascertainment bias where follow-up depends on risk, and iii) the impact of competing mortality. We recommend that renal progression studies should use statistical methods that take into account variability in renal function, informative censoring and population heterogeneity as appropriate to the study question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faye Cleary
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Prieto-Merino
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dorothea Nitsch
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Szeto CC, Sugano K, Wang JG, Fujimoto K, Whittle S, Modi GK, Chen CH, Park JB, Tam LS, Vareesangthip K, Tsoi KKF, Chan FKL. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy in patients with hypertension, cardiovascular, renal or gastrointestinal comorbidities: joint APAGE/APLAR/APSDE/APSH/APSN/PoA recommendations. Gut 2020; 69:617-629. [PMID: 31937550 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications, but they are associated with a number of serious adverse effects, including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, kidney injury and GI complications. OBJECTIVE To develop a set of multidisciplinary recommendations for the safe prescription of NSAIDs. METHODS Randomised control trials and observational studies published before January 2018 were reviewed, with 329 papers included for the synthesis of evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS Whenever possible, a NSAID should be avoided in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, high risk of cardiovascular disease and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Before treatment with a NSAID is started, blood pressure should be measured, unrecognised CKD should be screened in high risk cases, and unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia should be investigated. For patients with high cardiovascular risk, and if NSAID treatment cannot be avoided, naproxen or celecoxib are preferred. For patients with a moderate risk of peptic ulcer disease, monotherapy with a non-selective NSAID plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), or a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor should be used; for those with a high risk of peptic ulcer disease, a selective COX-2 inhibitor plus PPI are needed. For patients with pre-existing hypertension receiving renin-angiotensin system blockers, empirical addition (or increase in the dose) of an antihypertensive agent of a different class should be considered. Blood pressure and renal function should be monitored in most cases. CONCLUSION NSAIDs are a valuable armamentarium in clinical medicine, but appropriate recognition of high-risk cases, selection of a specific agent, choice of ulcer prophylaxis and monitoring after therapy are necessary to minimise the risk of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheuk-Chun Szeto
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.,Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology (APSN), Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kentaro Sugano
- Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.,Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE), Tochigi, Japan
| | - Ji-Guang Wang
- Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Asia Pacific Society of Hypertension (APSH), Shanghai, China
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Saga University, Saga, Japan.,Asia-Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE), Saga, Japan
| | - Samuel Whittle
- The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gopesh K Modi
- Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology (APSN), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Samarpan Kidney Institute and Research Center, Bhopal, India
| | - Chen-Huen Chen
- National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Pulse of Asia (PoA), Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jeong-Bae Park
- Pulse of Asia (PoA), Taipei, Taiwan.,JB Lab and Clinic and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lai-Shan Tam
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.,Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kriengsak Vareesangthip
- Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology (APSN), Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|