Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: a single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre

Minimum 10-Year Results of Modular Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: this study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of (a minimum of 10-years) total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal acetabular prosthesis. Methods: Eighty-nine primary total hip arthroplasties (82 patients) were performed using a Pinnacle modular metal-on-metal acetabular prosthesis. Clinical hip function outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Radiological analysis was performed at the final follow-up and magnetic resonance imaging in all hips postoperatively. Results: Out of 82 patients, 17 were excluded who were followed up for <10 years. Of the remaining 65 patients (70 hips), 19 (20 hips) developed pseudotumors during 2−10 years postoperatively. After 10 and 13 years, the survival rates of revision endpoint were 93.6% and 90.4%, respectively. Clinical hip function outcomes had improved significantly at the final follow-up. In the radiological analysis, the mean cup angle of inclination and mean ratio of femoral offset on the operated hip to the contralateral hip was highest in patients with revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris. Conclusions: This study showed a 29.0% prevalence of pseudotumors. Some cases required revisions even after 10 years following surgery. Regular clinical surveillance is recommended for the early detection of adverse reactions to metal debris.

Implant factors that might influence components' survival in primary total hip arthroplasty

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an invaluable surgical procedure that has revolutionised the treatment of various end-stage hip pathologies. Aseptic loosening of either acetabular cup and/or femoral stem as well as components' dislocation are well-known post-operative complications due to so many factors: environmental, surgeon, patient related, disease related or implant design. The aim of this literature review is to look at some relevant implant designs that might influence acetabular and femoral components' survival for primary cementless THA using revision for aseptic loosening and dislocation as criteria for failure. This may also assist the surgeon in making an informed choice of using appropriate implants to match the demographic and disease-specific need of the patients undergoing the surgical procedure. This review article was performed using an online literature search on relevant publications.

Predictive Factors for Revision and Survivorship Analysis of a Prevalent 36-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement System: A Large Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center cohort of the 36-mm Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal total hip replacements system, aiming to determine 10-year survivorship and identify predictors of revision. We further assessed year of implantation given reports of manufacturing variations affecting shells made after 2006 predisposing these components to increasing wear.

METHODS

All Corail-Pinnacle 36-mm metal-on-metal hips implanted in a single center (2005-2012). The effect of patient and implant-related variables, and year of implantation on revision risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and interrupted time series analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 1212 metal-on-metal total hip replacements were implanted with a 10-year survival rate of 83.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 81.3-85.5). Mean follow-up duration was 7.3 years with 61% of patients reaching a minimum of 7 years of follow-up. One hundred nineteen patients required revision surgery (9.8%). Univariate analysis identified female gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.608, CI = 1.093-2.364, P = .016), age at implantation (HR = 0.982, CI = 0.968-0.997, P = .019), smaller 50-mm to 54-mm cup diameter (HR = 1.527, CI = 1.026-2.274, P = .037), and high-offset stems (HR = 2.573, CI = 1.619-4.089, P < .001) as predictors of revision. Multivariate modeling confirmed female gender and high-offset stems as significant predictors of revision. For components implanted after 2007, the number of revisions showed no statistically significant step increase compared to pre-2007 implantation.

CONCLUSION

We observed a high 10-year failure rate (16.6%) with this implant, mostly due to adverse reaction to metal debris. Female gender and high femoral offset stems were significant predictors for all-cause revision. Year of implantation was not significantly associated with an increasing number of revisions from 2007 onwards, although further studies to validate the impact of manufacturing discrepancies are recommended.

Reasons for Revision: Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Mechanisms of Failure

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the major reasons for total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure and temporal patterns in THA revisions.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 535 revisions performed on 444 THAs from January 2010 to May 2019 at our institution.

RESULTS

The average time to revision THA was 8.51 ± 8.38 years, with 136 cases (30.9%) occurring within 2 years after primary THA. The major mechanisms of failure that resulted in revision surgery were mechanical failure (162, 36.5%), metallosis (95, 21.4%), dislocation or instability (65, 14.6%), periprosthetic fracture (46, 10.4%), infection (44, 9.9%), hematoma or poor wound healing (15, 3.4%), and pain or other (17, 3.8%).

CONCLUSION

Based on our institutional experience over the past decade, mechanical failure without dislocation, metallosis, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and infection are typical reasons patients present for primary THA revision. Revisions within 2 years after primary THA are more likely to be the result of infection and periprosthetic fracture. Mechanical failure is the most common reason for revision THA overall, and mechanical failure and metallosis are more likely to be the reason revision is necessary 2 or more years after primary THA.

Is there a relation between clinical scores and serum ion levels after MoM-THA? One year results in 383 implants

Background and aim of the work:

Adverse reaction to metal debris is the major cause of the high revision rates of metal on metal hip implants with femoral head size ≥ 36mm. Health authorities recommend regular surveillance even for asymptomatic individuals. The main investigations used are Co+ and Cr+ serum levels, x-rays and, eventually, ultrasound and MARS-MRI. Clinic is also assessed. The aim of this study is to identify if there is a relation between ion levels and the clinical scores in order to evaluate the outcome and plan the correct management after this type of implant.

Methods:

383 subjects were included and divided in 3 groups (serum ion levels >, < and >60 µg/L). Co+, Cr+, HHS and OHS results of 1 year (2017) were analysed in order to show a correlation between ion levels and clinical scores.

Results:

Clinical scores were similar in group 1 and 2. Differences were observed comparing the group 1 and 2 with group 3 for both variables.

Discussion and Conclusions:

Surveillance algorithms have been introduced by health authorities. Nevertheless, the indication to revision surgery is not simple especially in those cases in which a discrepancy between clinic and investigations is present. In this study clinical scores seem to be less important than ion levels in the evaluation of outcomes and in order to plan the correct management in the majority of cases. Larger studies are needed to highlight the real importance of clinical scores in the decision making after these type of implants.

15-year follow-up of MoM 36-mm THA: clinical, laboratory, and radiological (CT and MRI) prospective assessment

INTRODUCTION

There is limited knowledge of the long-term results of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA), particularly concerning adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR), Co/Cr ions level and revision rate. Even if MoM bearing surfaces are no longer used, long-term data could help in defining the course and best management for these patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes, describe radiological findings including CT metal artefact reduction algorithm for orthopaedic implants (O-MAR) and MRI multi acquisition variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) in 36-mm MoM THA.

METHODS

In this long-term prospective study, 46 consecutive patients with primary MoM THA (mono- or bilateral) were enrolled between 2004 and 2005. Pinnacle acetabular cup, Summit cementless stem with 36-mm metal head and Ultamet CoCr alloy liner (Depuy Inc.) were implanted, in the same centre by the same senior surgeon. Patients were reviewed at 5-, 10- and 15-years, including Co/Cr levels and standard radiographs at every follow-up, whilst the 15-year follow-up included hip sonography, MRI MAVRIC and CT O-MAR.

RESULTS

At 15 years, the overall survival rate of the implants (both stems and cups) was 83% (30/36). Revisions were performed in 9% (4/46) because of ALTR, 2% (1/46) septic loosening and 2% periprosthetic fracture. Both Cr and Co concentration increased over time, even though remaining at low level risk at 15 years: Co from 0.11 (+/- 0.18) to 4.29 (+/- 3.26) and Cr from 0.38 (+/- 0.32) to 1.37 (+/- 1.15). Functional scores in non-revised patients showed good to excellent results in more than 90%. Engh-score correlated with time from surgery (p = 0.017) and with sonographic, CT and RM findings (p < 0.05). Concordance has been found between CT and MRI findings (sign-rank test, p = 0.241; Intraclass Correlation Coefficients 0.987); however, no specific MRI or CT lesion patterns could be recognised among symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients.

DISCUSSION

The long-term rate of ALTR after 36-mm MoM THA was comparable with previous studies; a regular follow-up for those implants is mandatory. During follow-up Co-Cr levels increased over time and radiography was a suitable screening technique; the Engh score in particular, proved to be a reliable assessment tool. CT O-MAR and MRI with MAVRIC protocols may add valuable data in clinical practice, although MRI is significantly more efficient than CT in the identification of ALTR lesions, peri-articular effusion and in the evaluation of soft tissues.

Does diametrical clearance influence the wear of Pinnacle hip implants?

Aims

The optimum clearance between the bearing surfaces of hip arthroplasties is unknown. Theoretically, to minimize wear, it is understood that clearances must be low enough to maintain optimal contact pressure and fluid film lubrication, while being large enough to allow lubricant recovery and reduce contact patch size. This study aimed to identify the relationship between diametrical clearance and volumetric wear, through the analysis of retrieved components.

Methods

A total of 81 metal-on-metal Pinnacle hips paired with 12/14 stems were included in this study. Geometrical analysis was performed on each component, using coordinate and roundness measuring machines. The relationship between their as-manufactured diametrical clearance and volumetric wear was investigated. The Mann-Whitney U test and unpaired t-test were used, in addition to calculating the non-parametric Spearman's correlation coefficient, to statistically evaluate the acquired data.

Results

The hips in this study were found to have had a median unworn diametrical clearance of 90.31 μm (interquartile range (IQR) 77.59 to 97.40); 32% (n = 26) were found to have been below the manufacturing tolerance. There was no correlation found between clearance and bearing (r_s = -0.0004, p = 0.997) or taper (r_s = 0.0048, p = 0.966) wear rates. The wear performance of hips manufactured within and below these specifications was not significantly different (bearing: p = 0.395; taper: p = 0.653). Pinnacles manufactured from 2007 onwards had a greater prevalence of bearing clearance below tolerance (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

The diametrical clearance of Pinnacle hips did not influence their wear performance, even when below the manufacturing tolerance. The optimum clearance for minimizing hip implant wear remains unclear.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(8):515-523.

Low Revision Rates at 10 years for Metal on Metal Hip Implants in a Military Population

INTRODUCTION

Prior to being largely abandoned due to unacceptably high failure rates and the adverse physiologic reactions to metal ions, metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing (HR) were in widespread use throughout the USA, and the potential benefit of decreased volumetric wear rates made it of particular interest to those who serve a young active population, such as military surgeons. The aim of our study was to determine the revision rate of metal on metal hip implants performed at our military institution and obtain current patient reported outcomes from this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing (HR) at our institution from 2006 to 2012. Revision status and component type were determined, and patients were contacted to obtain current HOOS JR scores.

RESULTS

We identified 103 THAs in 88 patients and 38 HRs in 33 patients, with mean follow up of 10.2 years. Average age at time of surgery was 48 years, and 85% of the patients were male. The mean HOOS JR score in the THA and HR groups were 84.9 ± 17.6 and 75.8 ± 24.9, respectively (p = 0.38), and were not significantly lower in those who were revised. Two THA revisions occurred for metallosis and one for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. One HR revision occurred for breach of the anterior femoral neck, and one occurred for heterotopicossification.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision rates of MoM THA and HR in this young, predominantly male population were 2.9% and 5.3%, respectively, and patients maintained generally good hip-specific outcomes.

Revision of Failed Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Midterm Outcomes of 203 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Metal-on-metal (MoM) revisions have shown high rates of complications from aseptic loosening, deep infection, and dislocation. The purpose of this study is to report on outcomes and complications of a large consecutive series of patients who were revised for failed MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We evaluated 188 patients (203 hips) who underwent revisions of failed MoM THA. Mean age at the revision was 60 years old. Gender was female in 112 hips (55%) and male in 91 hips (45%). Mean interval to failure after primary THA was 4.9 years (range, 0-18 years). The acetabular component was revised in 183 cases (92%). Clinical outcomes assessed included pain score and Harris hip score.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up from revision was 4.2 years. Harris hip score improved from 53.6 pre-revision to 73.5 at most recent follow-up (P < .001). Pain level significantly improved from 17.2 pre-revision to 32.8 post-revision (P < .001). Reoperations occurred in 28 (14%) hips. Re-revision was required in 16 hips (7.9%). The most common reasons for re-revision were aseptic loosening (5), dislocation (3), infection (2), and iliopsoas tendonitis (2). Re-revision was significantly higher in cases of pseudotumor. There was no difference in survival with ultraporous cups. Three hips required re-revision to custom triflange components. All-cause survival was 90.5% at 4.2 years. Metal ion levels significantly declined after revision.

CONCLUSION

Revisions of failed MoM THA showed improvements in clinical outcomes, but present significant surgical challenges and complications especially in cases with soft tissue damage and pseudotumor.

Mid-term progressive loosening of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems paired with a metal-on-metal bearing

Background

Several hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated femoral stems from a single manufacturer were identified to have aseptically loosened at mid-term follow-up despite prior radiographic appearance of osseointegration. Possible causes and associated risk factors for stem loosening were explored through radiographic review and implant retrieval analysis.

Methods

Forty-six retrieved hip stems (Corail, DePuy-Synthes) were identified and grouped by bearing type: metal-on-metal (MoM), metal-on-polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic. Stem lucency was graded on post-operative radiographs up to the time of revision. Stems were examined for stripping of the HA coating, taper corrosion, and bearing wear in metal-on-metal cases. Patient demographics, implant design features, and perioperative data were collected from electronic databases and patient charts.

Results

Aseptic loosening occurred in 37% of cases examined. MoM bearings were associated with 7.25 times greater risk of loosening compared to other bearing types. Stem radiolucency was more prevalent for MoM cases and, although not statistically significant, demonstrated progressive lucency. Taper corrosion appeared more severe for MoM cases and correlated with proximal stem radiolucency. Removal of the HA coating from the stems was associated with both taper corrosion and MoM bearing wear. Length of implantation was a confounding factor for the MoM cases.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated a high risk of mid-term loosening of previously osseointegrated HA-coated femoral stems when paired with a MoM bearing. The mechanism of loosening appears progressive in nature and related to the MoM bearing, possibly interacting with the HA coating. If such loosening is recognized early, rapid revision may allow for retention of the femoral stem.

Wear performance of retrieved metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip arthroplasties implanted before and after 2007

Objectives

Previous studies have suggested that metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) hip arthroplasties implanted after 2006 exhibit higher failure rates. This was attributed to the production of implants with reduced diametrical clearances between their bearing surfaces, which, it was speculated, were outside manufacturing tolerances. This study aimed to better understand the performance of Pinnacle Systems manufactured before and after this event.

Methods

A total of 92 retrieved MoM Pinnacle hips were analyzed, of which 45 were implanted before 2007, and 47 from 2007 onwards. The ‘pre-2007’ group contained 45 implants retrieved from 21 male and 24 female patients, with a median age of 61.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57.1 to 65.5); the ‘2007 onwards’ group contained 47 implants retrieved from 19 male and 28 female patients, with a median age of 61.8 years (IQR 58.5 to 67.8). The volume of material lost from their bearing and taper surfaces was measured using coordinate and roundness measuring machines. These outcomes were then compared statistically using linear regression models, adjusting for potentially confounding factors.

Results

There was no significant difference between the taper and bearing wear rates of the ‘pre-2007’ and ‘2007 onwards’ groups (p = 0.67 and p = 0.39, respectively). Pinnacles implanted from 2007 onwards were revised after a mean time of 50 months, which was significantly earlier than the ‘pre-2007’ hips (96 months) (p < 0.001). A reduction in the time to revision was present year on year from 2003 to 2011.

Conclusion

We found no difference in the wear rate of these implants based on the year of implantation. The ‘pre-2007’ hips had a two-fold greater time to revision than those implanted after 2007; this may be due to the increased surveillance of MoM hips following UK regulatory advice and several high-profile failures. Interestingly, we observed a decreasing trend in the mean time to revision every year from 2003 onwards.

Cite this article: S. Bergiers, H. S. Hothi, J. Henckel, A. Eskelinen, J. Skinner, A. Hart. Wear performance of retrieved metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip arthroplasties implanted before and after 2007. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:595–600. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0143.R1.

Long-term results of the M2A-38-mm metal-on-metal articulation

Background

Large-diameter head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are associated with increased whole blood levels of chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co), adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) and poor survival rates. The prevalence of high metals concentrations, ARMD and the risk of revision surgery may vary significantly among different prostheses and long-term studies are few. This single-center study reports the long-term results of the 38-mm MoM bearing system.

Materials and methods

Between 2003 and 2009, 80 patients received primary cementless THA using the large head metal-on-metal articulating surface M²A-38 cup (Biomet, Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) at a single institution. Forty-five patients (53 hips) were retrospectively reviewed for a mean follow-up of 127 months.

Results

Two cups were revised. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98% at 10 years and 74% at 13 years. In the whole sample, the median Co and Cr concentrations were 4.8 µg/L (IQR 1.2–4.9 µg/L) and 2.5 µg/L (IQR 0.6–3.0 µg/L), respectively. The incidence of Co or Cr levels > 7 μg/L was 15.5% and the incidence of ARMD was 3.8%. Co and Cr levels showed no correlation with cup inclination, Harris Hip Score, or total Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that the problems of release of metal ions with the possible increase of metal circulating levels and of adverse reactions may also occur in the long term with this brand of MoM large head, and that a structured follow-up program is mandatory.

Levels of evidence

Level 4.

Material loss at the femoral head taper: a comparison study of the Exeter metal-on-polyethylene and contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

There are limited published data detailing the volumetric material loss from tapers of conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Our aim was to address this by comparing the taper wear rates measured in an explanted cohort of the widely used Exeter THA with those measured in a group of metal-on-metal (MoM) THAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined an existing retrieval database to identify all Exeter V40 and Universal MoP THAs. Volumetric wear analysis of the taper surfaces was conducted using previously validated methodology. These values were compared with those obtained from a series of MoM THAs using non-parametric statistical methodology. A number of patient and device variables were accounted for using multiple regression modelling.

RESULTS

A total of 95 Exeter MoP and 249 MoM THAs were examined. The median volumetric loss from the MoM cohort was over four times larger than that from the MoP cohort (1.01 mm³ vs 0.23 mm³, p < 0.001), despite a significantly shorter median period in vivo for the MoM group (48 months vs 90 months, p < 0.001). Multiple regression modelling indicated that the dominant variables leading to greater female taper material loss were bearing diameter (p < 0.001), larger female taper angles (p < 0.001), and male titanium stem tapers (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the long-term clinical success of the device, the volumetric material loss from Exeter femoral head tapers was, in general, small compared with that from larger-diameter MoM head tapers. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1310-9.

Long-term results of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients (<55yrs)

Introduction

Metal on Metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty saw a new era of popularity with development of its second generation bearing surfaces, in the first decade of this century. However, by the end of that decade, concerns had been raised due to metal debris related complications.We aimed to determine the survival of MoM stemmed hip replacement in younger population. We also studied the rate of revision related to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) along with reviewing the clinical and radiological progress of MoM hip arthroplasty in younger age (<55 yrs) group.

Patients & Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients 55 yrs old or younger, who had metal on metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. We had 109 procedures performed on 90 patients with a mean follow up of 10 years. All patients were reviewed as per MHRA guidelines in planned follow-up clinics. Data analyses were performed using SPSS.

Results

Survival of implant in our younger cohort was 88.1% at a mean age if 10 years, with revision for any cause as an endpoint. Most of the patients were happy with the outcome of their hip replacement as they were able to perform activities of daily living and work without compromise. Mean Oxford hip score was 43.Altogether, there were 12 revisions, 7 of these were for metallosis and associated symptoms. Average time to revision was 7 years. Other analysis revealed mean acetabular cup inclination angle to be 49 degrees but no significant correlation was found between this angle and serum metal ion levels. Serum Chromium and Cobalt levels were significantly higher in revision group.

Discussion

Metal on metal hip arthroplasty prime popularity time has gone. In younger population, although revision rates are higher, the surviving implants give a very good outcome in terms of patient satisfaction. Most of the patients report a desired outcome of 'forgotten hip'.

Retrieval Analysis of Large-Head Modular Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design

BACKGROUND

There are limited publications examining modular metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip implants in which a comprehensive analysis of retrieved components is performed. This study examines 24 retrieved modular MoM implants from a single manufacturer and compares retrieval analytics; bearing surface damage, wear, and modular taper corrosion against patient, surgical and implant characteristics to elucidate significant associations.

METHODS

Clinical, patient, and surgical data were collected including age, body mass index, blood metal ion levels, and cup inclination. Damage assessment was performed visually in addition to surface profilometry. Acetabular liners and femoral heads were measured for volumetric wear. Femoral head taper bores were similarly measured for material removal due to corrosion and fretting.

RESULTS

Patients with MoM-related reasons for revision showed significantly higher levels of blood metal ion levels. Bearing wear was strongly associated with blood metal ion levels and was significantly increased in cups placed more vertically. Younger patients tended to have higher body mass indices as well as poorer cup placement.

CONCLUSION

This work details a broad range of analyses on a series of modular MoM total hip implants from a single manufacturer of which there are few published studies. Acetabular cup inclination angle was deemed a primary cause of revision surgery through increased MoM wear, high metal ion levels in the blood, and subsequent adverse local tissue reactions. Heavy patients can increase the surgical difficulty which was shown to be related to poor cup placement in this cohort.

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

The unexpected high revision rates of large-diameter (femoral head sizes of 36 mm or greater) metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) have led to worldwide regulatory authorities recommending regular surveillance, even for asymptomatic individuals. However, these recommendations are not evidence-based and are very costly. The rapidly evolving evidence base requires an update regarding the investigation and management of MoMHA patients. This article is the first of 2 (the second article in this series will consider the threshold for performing revision, and the outcomes following ARMD revision surgery: Matharu et al., Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris: A clinical update. Acta Orthop 2018; in press), and considers the various investigative modalities used during surveillance, with specific focus on blood metal ion sampling and cross-sectional imaging. No single investigation can universally be used during MoMHA patient surveillance. Recent studies have now provided important information on interpreting blood metal ions (effective in identifying patients at low risk of problems), clarifying the roles of cross-sectional imaging (reserve combined ultrasound and MARS-MRI for complex cases), and providing parameters to safely exclude many asymptomatic patients from regular surveillance. This information will be useful when designing future surveillance protocols for MoMHA patients.

Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine whether the rates of revision for metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with Pinnacle components varied according to the year of the initial operation, and compare these with the rates of revision for other designs of MoM THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales included 36 mm MoM THAs with Pinnacle acetabular components which were undertaken between 2003 and 2012 with follow-up for at least five years (n = 10 776) and a control group of other MoM THAs (n = 13 817). The effect of the year of the primary operation on all-cause rates of revision was assessed using Cox regression and interrupted time-series analysis.

RESULTS

For MoM THAs involving Pinnacle components, those undertaken between 2007 and 2012 had higher rates of revision compared with those undertaken between 2004 and 2006 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 2.57; p < 0.001). For THAs undertaken during and after 2007, the number of revisions per 1000 implant-years at risk significantly increased by 5.20 (95% CI 0.52 to 9.89; p = 0.033) compared with those undertaken before this time. In the control group, THAs undertaken between 2007 and 2012 also had higher rates of revision (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.49 to 2.10; p < 0.001), with revisions per 1000 implant-years for those undertaken during and after 2007 significantly increasing by 6.13 (95% CI 1.42 to 10.83; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The five-year revision rates were significantly increased for all primary MoM THAs undertaken from 2007 onwards. Contrary to recent reports, this finding was not specific to those involving Pinnacle acetabular components and may be explained by increased surveillance and recent lowering of the threshold for revision. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:33-41.

Analysis of Explanted Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods From Seven UK Spinal Centers

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of explanted MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) growing rods.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze explanted MAGEC rods used in management of early onset scoliosis and identify the mode of failure in such cases.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Magnetically controlled growing rods are increasingly used as the option of choice for early onset scoliosis. However, being more complex than conventional growing rods they are perhaps more likely to succumb to multifarious failure modes. In addition, metallosis has been reported around failed MAGEC rods.

METHODS

Explanted MAGEC rods from seven UK spinal centers were obtained for independent analysis. Thirty-four MAGEC rods, from 18 children, explanted for reasons including failure of rod lengthening and maximum rod distraction reached, were cut open to allow internal components to be evaluated and assessed.

RESULTS

Externally, all MAGEC rods showed localized marks, which were termed "growth marks" as they indicated growth of the rod in vivo, on the extending bar component. After cutting open, titanium wear debris was found inside all 34 (100%) MAGEC rods. Ninety-one percent (31/34) of MAGEC rods showed measurable wear of the extending bar, towards the magnet end. Substantial damage to the radial bearing was seen inside 74% (25/34) of MAGEC rods while O-ring seal failure was seen in 53% (18/34) of cases. In 44% (15/34) of MAGEC rods the drive pin was fractured but this was felt to be an effect of rod failure, not a cause.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high volumes of titanium wear debris alongside O-ring seal damage likely accounts for the metallosis reported clinically around some MAGEC rods. Based on this explant data, a failure mechanism in MAGEC rods due to the natural off axis loading in the spine was proposed. This is the largest data set reporting a complete analysis of explanted MAGEC rods to date.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Evidence based recommendations for reducing head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion in hip replacement prostheses

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review seeks to summarise the published studies investigating prosthetic design, manufacture and surgical technique's effect on fretting corrosion at the head-neck taper connection, and provide clinical recommendations to reduce its occurrence.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases were searched using the terms taper, trunnion, cone and head-neck junction. Articles investigating prosthetic design, manufacture and surgical technique's effect on fretting corrosion were retrieved, reviewed and graded according to OCEBM levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1,224 unique articles, and 91 were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is fair evidence to recommend against the use of high offset femoral heads, larger diameter femoral heads, and to pay particular consideration to fretting corrosion's progression with time and risk with heavier or more active patients. Particular to metal-on-metal hip prostheses, there is fair evidence to recommend positioning the acetabular component to minimise edge loading. Particular to metal-on-polyethylene hip prostheses, there is fair evidence to recommend the use of ceramic femoral heads, against use of cast cobalt alloy femoral heads, and against use of low flexural rigidity femoral stems. Evidence related to taper connection design is largely conflicting or inconclusive. Head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion is a multifactorial problem. Strict adherence to the guidelines presented herein does not eliminate the risk. Prosthesis selection is critical, and well-controlled studies to identify each design parameter's relative contribution to head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion are required.

A comparison study of stem taper material loss at similar and mixed metal head-neck taper junctions

Aims

We sought to determine whether cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr) femoral stem tapers (trunnions) wear more than titanium (Ti) alloy stem tapers (trunnions) when used in a large diameter (LD) metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty system.

Patients and Methods

We performed explant analysis using validated methodology to determine the volumetric material loss at the taper surfaces of explanted LD CoCr MoM hip arthroplasties used with either a Ti alloy (n = 28) or CoCr femoral stem (n = 21). Only 12/14 taper constructs with a rough male taper surface and a nominal included angle close to 5.666° were included. Multiple regression modelling was undertaken using taper angle, taper roughness, bearing diameter (horizontal lever arm) as independent variables. Material loss was mapped using a coordinate measuring machine, profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.

Results

After adjustment for other factors, CoCr stem tapers were found to have significantly greater volumetric material loss than the equivalent Ti stem tapers.

Conclusion

When taper junction damage is identified during revision of a LD MoM hip, it should be suspected that a male taper composed of a standard CoCr alloy has sustained significant changes to the taper cone geometry which are likely to be more extensive than those affecting a Ti alloy stem. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1304–12.

Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants

BACKGROUND

The authors of recent studies have reported newly devised implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds to predict adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) in patients who have undergone unilateral or bilateral metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty. These thresholds were most effective for identifying patients at low risk of ARMD. We investigated whether these newly devised blood metal ion thresholds could effectively identify patients at risk of ARMD after MoM hip arthroplasty in an external cohort of patients.

METHODS

We performed a validation study involving 803 MoM hip arthroplasties (323 unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing [BHR], 93 bilateral BHR, and 294 unilateral Corail-Pinnacle implants) performed in 710 patients at 3 European centers. All patients underwent whole-blood metal ion sampling, and were divided into 2 groups: those with ARMD (leading to revision or identified on imaging; n = 75) and those without ARMD (n = 635). Previously devised implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds (2.15 μg/L of cobalt for unilateral BHR; 5.5 μg/L for the maximum of either cobalt or chromium for bilateral BHR; and 3.57 μg/L of cobalt for unilateral Corail-Pinnacle implants) were applied to the validation cohort, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to establish the discriminatory characteristics of each threshold.

RESULTS

The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the ability of each implant-specific threshold to distinguish between patients with and without ARMD were, respectively, 89.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.8% to 96.0%), 78.9%, 86.7%, 44.1%, and 96.9% for unilateral BHR; 89.2% (CI = 81.3% to 97.1%), 70.6%, 86.8%, 54.5%, and 93.0% for bilateral BHR; and 76.9% (CI = 63.9% to 90.0%), 65.0%, 85.4%, 24.5%, and 97.1% for unilateral Corail-Pinnacle implants. Using the implant-specific thresholds, we missed 20 patients with ARMD (2.8% of the patients in this series). We missed more patients with ARMD when we used the fixed thresholds proposed by regulatory authorities: 35 (4.9%) when we used the U.K. threshold of 7 μg/L for both cobalt and chromium (p = 0.0003), 21 (3.0%) when we used the U.S. threshold of 3 μg/L for both cobalt and chromium (p = 1.0), and 46 (6.5%) when we used the U.S. threshold of 10 μg/L for both cobalt and chromium (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This external multicenter validation study confirmed that patients with blood metal ion levels below new implant-specific thresholds have a low risk of ARMD after MoM hip arthroplasty. Using these implant-specific thresholds, we missed fewer patients with ARMD compared with when the thresholds currently proposed by regulatory authorities were used. We therefore recommend using implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds when managing patients who have undergone MoM hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: medium- to long-term follow-up

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires components that meet a variety of patient factors and needs. This investigation evaluated survivorship of the PINNACLE Acetabular Cup System in primary total hip arthroplasty at 5-10 years.

Methods

In total, 1592 hips (1473 subjects) were enrolled in a multi-center, non-comparative, open-label study of the PINNACLE system: N = 896 metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), N = 667 metal-on-metal (MOM), N = 27 ceramic-on-polyethylene, and N = 2 unknown articulation. Harris Hip Score, Short Form 36, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and radiographs were collected through 10 years. Kaplan-Meier device survivorship was estimated.

Results

There were 41 revisions (23 MOP, 17 MOM, 1 ceramic-on-polyethylene) through 10 years: 56.5% of MOP revisions were for instability and 41.2% of MOM revisions were for adverse local tissue reaction. Kaplan-Meier device survivorship (N with further follow-up) was 97.0% (N = 720) at 5 years and 94.7% (N = 77) at 10 years.

Conclusions

Medium- to long-term survivorship estimates were similar or better than other studies and registries for the PINNACLE system.

Level of Evidence

III.

Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study

Aims

To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors of failure.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary 36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012 according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.

Results

Failure occurred in 97 hips (17.0%). The ten-year cumulative failure rate was 27.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.6 to 33.7). Primary implantation from 2006 onwards (hazard ratio (HR) 4.30; 95% CI 1.82 to 10.1; p = 0.001) and bilateral MoM hip arthroplasty (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.46; p = 0.037) predicted failure. The effect of implantation year on failure varied over time. From four years onwards following surgery, hips implanted since 2006 had significantly higher failure rates (eight years 28.3%; 95% CI 23.1 to 34.5) compared with hips implanted before 2006 (eight years 6.3%; 95% CI 2.4 to 15.8) (HR 15.2; 95% CI 2.11 to 110.4; p = 0.007).

Conclusion

We observed that 36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs have an unacceptably high ten-year failure rate, especially if implanted from 2006 onwards or in bilateral MoM hip patients. Our findings regarding implantation year and failure support recent concerns about the device manufacturing process. We recommend all patients undergoing implantation since 2006 and those with bilateral MoM hips undergo regular investigation, regardless of symptoms.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:592–600.

Meta-Review of the Quantity and Quality of Evidence for Knee Arthroplasty Devices

INTRODUCTION

Some cardiovascular devices are licensed based on limited evidence, potentially exposing patients to devices that are not safe or effective. Research is needed to ascertain if the same is true of other types of medical devices. Knee arthroplasty is a widely-used surgical procedure yet implant failures are not uncommon. The purpose of this study was to characterize available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of knee implants.

METHODS

A review of primary studies included in health technology assessments (HTA) on total (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Biotechnology & BioEngineering Abstracts were searched from 2005 to 2014, plus journal tables of contents and 32 HTA web sites. Patients were aged 18 and older who underwent primary TKA or UKA assessed in cohort or randomized controlled studies. Summary statistics were used to report study characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 265 eligible primary studies published between 1986 and 2014 involving 59,217 patients were identified in 10 HTAs (2 low, 7 moderate, 1 high risk of bias). Most evaluated TKA (198, 74.5%). The quality of evidence in primary studies was limited. Most studies were industry-funded (23.8%) or offered no declaration of funding or conflict of interest (44.9%); based on uncontrolled single cohorts (58.5%), enrolled fewer than 100 patients (66.4%), and followed patients for 2 years or less (UKA: single cohort 29.8%, comparative cohort 16.7%, randomized trial 25.0%; TKA: single cohort 25.0%, comparative cohort 31.4%, randomized trial 48.6%). Furthermore, most devices were evaluated in only one study (55.3% TKA implants, 61.1% UKA implants).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients, physicians, hospitals and payers rely on poor-quality evidence to support decisions about knee implants. Further research is needed to explore how decisions about the use of devices are currently made, and how the evidence base for device safety and effectiveness can be strengthened.