Comparing cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy and psychoeducation for non-specific symptoms associated with indoor air: a randomised control trial protocol

Psychosocial treatments for employees with non-specific and persistent physical symptoms associated with indoor air: A randomised controlled trial with a one-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Persistent physical symptoms (PPS) associated with indoor air without an adequate pathophysiological- or environmental-related explanation may lead to work disability and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We attempted to assess the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for PPS and also psychoeducation (PE) on these symptoms involving disability.

METHOD

The intention-to-treat (ITT) sample included 52 employees recruited from an occupational healthcare service randomised as either controls undergoing treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU enhanced with CBT or PE. The primary outcome was HRQoL measuring the severity of symptoms and restrictions in everyday life caused by them. Secondary outcomes included depressive, anxiety and insomnia symptoms, and intolerance to environmental factors, assessed at baseline and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up assessment point, no statistically significant differences between treatments emerged following adjustment for gender, age, and HRQoL before the waiting period in the ITT analysis [F(2,46)=2.89, p=.07]. The secondary analysis revealed a significant improvement in HRQoL in the combined intervention group as compared with controls [F(1,47)=5.06, p=.03, g=0.41]. In total, 15% of participants dropped out during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that CBT for PPS or PE might not have a robust effect on HRQoL in PPS associated with indoor air, but the study did not achieve the planned power. Despite difficulties during the recruitment process, the final dropout rates remained low, and participants positively evaluated CBT, suggesting that it represents an acceptable treatment to them. Trial status This study was registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT02069002).

Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity: comparison of three Nordic dosimetric methods

Clinical testing of bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) provides valuable information in asthma diagnostics. Nevertheless, the test results depend to a great extent on the testing procedure: test substance, apparatus and protocol. In Nordic countries, three protocols predominate in the testing field: Per Malmberg, Nieminen and Sovijärvi methods. However, knowledge of their equivalence is limited. We aimed to find equivalent provocative doses (PD) to obtain similar bronchoconstrictive responses for the three protocols. We recruited 31 patients with suspected asthma and health care workers and performed BHR testing with methacholine according to Malmberg and Nieminen methods, and with histamine according to Sovijärvi. We obtained the individual response-dose slopes for each method and predicted equivalent PD values. Applying a mixed-model, we found significant differences in the mean (standard error of mean) response-dose (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁)%/mg): Sovijärvi 7.2 (1.5), Nieminen 13.8 (4.2) and Malmberg 26 (7.3). We found that the earlier reported cut-point values for moderate BHR and marked BHR between the Sovijärvi (PD₁₅) and Nieminen (PD₂₀) methods were similar, but with the Malmberg method a significant bronchoconstrictive reaction was measured with lower PD₂₀ values. We obtained a relationship between slope values and PD (mg) between different methods, useful in epidemiological research and clinical practice.

Health-related quality among life of employees with persistent nonspecific indoor-air-associated health complaints

OBJECTIVE

Nonspecific health complaints associated with indoor air are common in work environments. In some individuals, symptoms become persistent without an adequate explanation. The aim was to study factors that associate with the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of employees with persistent, nonspecific indoor-air-related symptomatology.

METHODS

We present baseline results of a randomized controlled trial of interventions targeted on the HRQoL of the employees with indoor-air-associated nonspecific symptoms. The main participant-inclusion criterion was the presence of persistent indoor-air-related multiorgan symptoms with no known pathophysiological or environment-related explanation. As a comparison for participants´ HRQoL (n = 52) we used data from the general-population Health 2011 study (BRIF8901) including information on subjects matched to the participants´ working status and age and subjects with asthma, anxiety or depressive disorder, or other chronic conditions with work disability.

RESULTS

The participants showed greater and a clinically significant impairment of HRQoL [M = 0.83, SE = 0.013] than individuals from the general population [M = 0.95, SE = 0.001, p < .001, Hedges´ g = 2.33] and those with asthma [M = 0.93, SE = 0.005, p < .001, Hedges´ g = 1.46], anxiety and depressive disorder [M = 0.89, SE = 0.006, p < .001, Hedges´ g = 0.73], or a chronic condition with work disability [M = 0.91, SE = 0.003, p < .001, Hedges´ g = 1.11]. Prevalent symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia and poor recovery from work were associated with a poor HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with nonspecific indoor-air-associated symptoms have a poorer HRQoL than individuals in the general population with a globally burdensome disease. Psychological distress associated with a poor HRQoL should be considered in the making of decisions about the treatment of these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02069002.

Severe Sequelae to Mold-Related Illness as Demonstrated in Two Finnish Cohorts

The presence of toxic indoor molds with accompanying bacterial growth is clearly detrimental to human health. The pathophysiological and toxicological effects of toxins and structural components of molds and bacteria have been clarified in experiments conducted in tissue culture and animals, and there is convincing epidemiologic evidence; nonetheless their implications for human health are either ignored or denied, at least in Finland. In this communication, we describe two cohorts suffering severe sequelae to mold-related illness. One cohort is a nine-member family with pets that moved into a new house, which soon proved to be infested with pathogenic molds. The other cohort consists of 30 teachers and 50 students from a mold-infested school building. The first cohort experienced a plethora of mucosal irritation, neurological, skin, allergic, and other symptoms, with all family members ultimately developing a multiple chemical syndrome. In the second cohort, we detected a greatly elevated prevalence of autoimmune conditions and malignancies. We claim that mold-related illness exists in multiple facets; if not simply a transient mucosal irritation or even an increased risk of asthma onset or its exacerbation. We propose a scheme to explain the natural course of the mold-related illness. We recommend that future studies should combine data from, e.g., cancer, autoimmune, and endocrine disorder registers and neurological and mental health or neuropsychological registers with mold-exposed individuals being monitored for prolonged follow-up times.