Nutritional route in oesophageal resection trial II (NUTRIENT II): study protocol for a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial

Long-Term Survival Associated with Direct Oral Feeding Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial (NUTRIENT II)

Advancements in perioperative care have improved postoperative morbidity and recovery after esophagectomy. The direct start of oral intake can also enhance short-term outcomes following minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL). Subsequently, short-term outcomes may affect long-term survival. This planned sub-study of the NUTRIENT II trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, investigated the long-term survival of direct versus delayed oral feeding following MIE-IL. The outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the influence of complications and caloric intake on OS. After excluding cases of 90-day mortality, 145 participants were analyzed. Of these, 63 patients (43.4%) received direct oral feeding. At 3 years, OS was significantly better in the direct oral feeding group (p = 0.027), but not at 5 years (p = 0.115). Moreover, 5-year DFS was significantly better in the direct oral feeding group (p = 0.047) and a trend towards improved DFS was shown at 3 years (p = 0.079). Postoperative complications and caloric intake on day 5 did not impact OS. The results of this study show a tendency of improved 3-year OS and 5-year DFS, suggesting a potential long-term survival benefit in patients receiving direct oral feeding after esophagectomy. However, the findings should be further explored in larger future trials.

Preoperative sarcopenia is a negative predictor for enhanced postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia is common in pancreatic cancer patients. Considering the growing adoption of standardized protocols for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), we examined the clinical impact of sarcopenia in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients in a 5-day accelerated ERAS program, termed the Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing PD from 2017 through 2020 on the ERAS pathway. Preoperative computerized tomographic scans taken within 45 days before surgery were analyzed to determine psoas muscle cross-sectional area (PMA) at the third lumbar vertebral body. Sarcopenia was defined as the lowest quartile of PMA respective to gender. Outcome measures were compared between patients with or without sarcopenia.

RESULTS

In this 333-patient cohort, 252 (75.7%) patients had final pathology revealing pancreatic or periampullary cancer. The median age was 66.7 years (16.4-88.4 years) with a 161:172 male to female ratio. Sarcopenia correlated with delayed tolerance of oral intake (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.1-4.3, P = 0.03), increased complication rates (OR 4.3; 95%CI 2.2-8.5, P < 0.01), and longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.05). Preoperative albumin levels, BMI, and history of pancreatitis were also found to correlate with LOS (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis found low PMA, BMI, and male gender to be independent predictors of increased LOS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia correlated with increased LOS and postoperative complications in ERAS patients after PD. Sarcopenia can be used to predict poor candidates for ERAS protocols who may require an alternative recovery protocol, promoting a clinical tier-based approach to ERAS for pancreatic surgery.

Early oral intake and early removal of nasogastric tube post-esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early oral intake (EOI: initiated within 1 day) and early nasogastric tube removal (ENR: removed ≤2 days) post-esophagectomy is controversial and subject to significant variation.

AIM

Our aim is to provide the most up-to-date evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing both topics.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase (1946-06/2019) for RCTs that investigated the effect of EOI and/or ENR post-esophagectomy with gastric conduit for reconstruction. Our main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, aspiration pneumonia, mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Pooled mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) estimates were obtained using a DerSimonian random effects model.

RESULTS

Two reviewers screened 613 abstracts and identified 6 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 2 regarding EOI and 4 for ENR. For EOI (2 studies, n = 389), was not associated with differences in risk of: anastomotic leak (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.407, 2.500; I2 : 0%), aspiration pneumonia (RR: 1.018; 95% CI: 0.407, 2.500), mortality (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.020, 50.0). The LOS was significantly shorter in the EOI group: LOS (MD: -2.509; 95% CI: -3.489, -1.529; I2 : 90.44%). For ENR (4 studies, n = 295), ENR (removed at POD0-2 vs. 5-8 days) was not associated with differences in risk of: anastomotic leak (RR: 1.11; 95% CI 0.336, 3.697; I2 : 25.75%) and pneumonia group (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.336, 3.697; I2 : 25.75%), mortality (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.328, 2.308; I2 : 0%)or LOS (MD: 1.618; 95% CI: -1.447, 4.683; I2 : 73.03%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed that EOI as well as ENR post-esophagectomy do not significantly increase the risk of anastomotic leak, pneumonia, and mortality. The LOS was significantly shorter in the EOI group, and there was no significant difference in the ENR group. A paucity of RCTs has evaluated this question, highlighting the need for further high-quality evidence to address these vital aspects to post-esophagectomy care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42019138600.

State of the art in esophagectomy: robotic assistance in the abdominal phase

Over the years, robot-assisted esophagectomy gained popularity. The current literature focused mainly on robotic assistance in the thoracic phase, whereas the implementation of robotic assistance in the abdominal phase is lagging behind. Advantages of adding a robotic system to the abdominal phase include robotic stapling and the increased surgeon's independency. In terms of short-term outcomes and lymphadenectomy, robotic assistance is at least equal to laparoscopy. Yet high quality evidence to conclude on this topic remains scarce. This review focuses on the evidence of robotic assistance in the abdominal phase of esophagectomy.

Direct Oral Feeding After a Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this single-center cohort study was to compare direct oral feeding (DOF) to standard of care after a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) performed in a center with a stable and acceptable postoperative complication rate.

BACKGROUND

A recent multicenter, international randomized controlled trial showed that DOF following a MIE is comparable to standard of care (nil-by-mouth). However, the effect of DOF was potentially influenced by postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients in this single-center prospective cohort study received either DOF (intervention) or nil-by-mouth for 5 days postoperative and tube feeding (standard of care, control group) following a MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis. Primary outcome was time to functional recovery and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, and other surgical complications.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in the intervention (n = 85) and control (n = 111) group. Median time to functional recovery was 7 and 9 days in the intervention and control group (P < 0.001), respectively. Length of hospital stay was 8 versus 10 days (P < 0.001), respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complication rate was significantly reduced in the intervention group (57.6% vs 73.0%, P = 0.024). Chyle leakage only occurred in the control group (18.9%, P < 0.001). Anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, and other postoperative complications did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Direct oral feeding following a MIE results in a faster time to functional recovery and lower 30-day postoperative complication rate compared to patients that were orally fasted.

Impact on Short-Term Complications of Early Oral Feeding in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy

To evaluate early oral feeding (EOF) in short-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy. 179 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between January 2016 and February 2018 were enrolled for this study. 87 patients with EOF without nasogastric tube or nasogastric tube was removed within 24 h, were selected as the experimental group, whereas 92 patients who received nasojejunal tube feeding were set as the control group. All laboratory testing, clinical features, and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups. No statistical significance was observed between the two groups in hemoglobin, albumin, and prealbumin levels after esophagectomy. Notably, there was no significant difference in the incidence of severe pneumonia and anastomotic leakage between the two groups. Admittance period, postoperative defecation time, and medical expenses were significantly decreased among patients with EOF (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox multiple-factor regression analysis revealed that there was no correlation between EOF and the risk of anastomotic leakage. EOF might not be a risk factor for increasing the incidence of severe pneumonia and anastomotic leakage in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy, and it could reduce the hospitalization period as well as control medical expenses.

Safety and efficacy of early oral feeding for enhanced recovery following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Early oral feeding (EOF) is believed to be a crucial item of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. Though this is widely accepted for colorectal surgery, evidence for early oral feeding after gastrectomy is scarce. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence of safety and benefits of early oral feeding after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane was performed for eligible studies published till September 2018. Studies were analyzed and selected by predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

After having assessed 23 eligible articles, a total of four randomized controlled trials (RCT) remained who fully met all requirements to be included in this review. All four RCTs compared early oral feeding (n = 320) with conventional care (n = 334) after gastrectomy. In all four studies, EOF was associated with a decreased length of hospital stay ranging from -1.3 to -2.5 days when compared to conventional care. A faster time to first flatus was recorded in all four studies in the EOF group, ranging from -6.5 hours to -1.5 days. Furthermore, EOF does not increase postoperative complication risk when compared to conventional care.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence for early oral feeding after gastrectomy is promising, proving its safety, feasibility and benefits. However, most studies have been conducted amongst an Asian population. Well powered and larger randomized controlled trials performed amongst a Western population is needed.

Delay in Oral Feeding is Associated With a Decrease in Anastomotic Leak Following Transhiatal Esophagectomy

The cervical anastomotic leak is a major complication of transhiatal esophagectomy and results in chronic strictures in up to half of patients. A change in postoperative protocol to delaying initiation of oral intake was made with the goal of reducing anastomotic leak rate and associated sequelae. A postoperative protocol change was applied to all patients undergoing elective transhiatal esophagectomy. Rate of anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture, defined as defect in the esophagogastric anastomosis and narrowing of the anastomosis, respectively, were compared between pre- and post-change groups. Between 2004 and 2013, 203 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Historically, oral intake was resumed on postoperative day 3, and during the course of the study, a change was made to the protocol to delay oral intake until 15 days postoperatively. Eighty-three patients were in the early oral feeding group (postoperative day 3), and 120 were in the delayed oral intake group (postoperative day 15). There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of anastomotic leak from 14.5% to 4.2% between the early and delayed intake groups, respectively (P = 0.0089). There was also a trend (P = 0.05) towards a lower rate of anastomotic stricture in all patients in the delayed intake group (15.8%) compared with those in the early feeding group (27.7%). By increasing the time to postoperative oral feeding, we have noted an associated improvement in both immediate and long-term outcomes of elective transhiatal esophagectomy patients.

The long-term effects of early oral feeding following minimal invasive esophagectomy

A nil-by-mouth regime with enteral nutrition via an artificial route is frequently applied following esophagectomy. However, early initiation of oral feeding could potentially improve recovery and has shown to be beneficial in many types of abdominal surgery. Although short-term nutritional safety of oral intake after an esophagectomy has been documented, long-term effects of this feeding regimen are unknown. In this cohort study, data from patients undergoing minimal invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between 04-2012 and 09-2015 in three centers in Netherlands were collected. Patients in the oral feeding group were retrieved from a previous prospective study and compared with a cohort of patients with early enteral jejunostomy feeding but delayed oral intake. Body mass index (BMI) measurements, complications, and nutritional re-interventions (re- or start of artificial feeding, start of total parenteral nutrition) were gathered over the course of one year after surgery. One year after surgery the median BMI was 22.8 kg/m2 and weight loss was 7.0 kg (9.5%) in 114 patients. Patients in the early oral feeding group lost more weight during the first postoperative month (P = 0.004). However, in the months thereafter this difference was not observed anymore. In the early oral feeding group, 28 patients (56%) required a nutritional re-intervention, compared to 46 patients (72%) in the delayed oral feeding group (P = 0.078). During admission, more re-interventions were performed in the delayed oral feeding group (17 vs. 46 patients P < 0.001). Esophagectomy reduces BMI in the first year after surgery regardless of the feeding regimen. Direct start of oral intake following esophagectomy has no impact on early nutritional re-interventions and long-term weight loss.

Nutritional aspects of enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) aims to accelerate recovery by a set of multimodality management strategies. For esophagectomy, several nutritional elements of ERAS can be safely introduced and are advised in routine practice, including preadmission counseling to screen and treat for potential malnutrition, shortened preoperative fasting, and carbohydrate loading. However, the timing of oral intake and the use of routine nasogastric decompression remain matter of debate after esophagectomy. Furthermore, more research is needed on future developments such as perioperative immunonutrition.

Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is an important problem following esophagectomy. A surgically placed jejunostomy secures an enteral feeding route, facilitating discharge with home-tube feeding and long-term nutritional support. However, specific complications occur, and data are lacking that support its use over other enteral feeding routes. Therefore routine jejunostomy tube feeding and discharge with home-tube feeding was evaluated, with emphasis on weight loss, length of stay and re-admissions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, with gastric tube reconstruction and jejunostomy creation, were analyzed. Two different regimens were compared. Before January 07, 2011 patients were discharged when oral intake was sufficient, without tube feeding. After that discharge with home-tube feeding was routinely performed. Logistic regression analysis corrected for confounders.

RESULTS

Some 236 patients were included. The median duration of tube feeding was 35 days. Reoperation for a jejunostomy-related complication was needed in 2%. The median body mass index (BMI) remained stable during tube feeding. The BMI decreased significantly after stopping tube feeding: from 25.6 (1st-3rd quartile 23.0-28.6) kg/m² to 24.4 (22.0-27.1) kg/m² at 30 days later [median weight loss: 3.0 (1.0-5.3) kg; 3.9% (1.5-6.3%)]. Weight loss was not affected by the duration of tube feeding duration. Routine home-tube feeding did not affect weight loss, admission time or the readmission rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss following esophagectomy occurs once that tube feeding is stopped, independently from the time interval after esophagectomy. Moreover routine discharge with home-tube feeding does not reduce length of stay or readmissions. These findings question the value of routine jejunostomy placement and emphasize the need for further research.

Nutrition in peri-operative esophageal cancer management

Nutritional status and dietary intake are increasingly recognized as essential areas in esophageal cancer management. Nutritional management of esophageal cancer is a continuously evolving field and comprises an interesting area for scientific research. Areas covered: This review encompasses the current literature on nutrition in the pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative phases of esophageal cancer. Both established interventions and potential novel targets for nutritional management are discussed. Expert commentary: To ensure an optimal pre-operative status and to reduce peri-operative complications, it is key to assess nutritional status in all pre-operative esophageal cancer patients and to apply nutritional interventions accordingly. Since esophagectomy results in a permanent anatomical change, a special focus on nutritional strategies is needed in the post-operative phase, including early initiation of enteral feeding, nutritional interventions for post-operative complications, and attention to long-term nutritional intake and status. Nutritional aspects of pre-optimization and peri-operative management should be incorporated in novel Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs for esophageal cancer.

The feeding route after esophagectomy: a review of literature

Enhanced recovery programs effectively optimize perioperative care and reduce postoperative morbidity. In esophagectomy, several components of the ERAS program are successfully introduced. However, timing and type of postoperative feeding remain a matter of debate. Adequate nutritional support is essential in patients undergoing an esophagectomy. These patients often present with weight loss and their eating pattern is strongly altered by the procedure and reconstruction. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is associated with severe septic complications and enteral nutrition (EN) does not increase major complications. Therefore, early EN after esophagectomy is favored over TPN. However, with enteral feeding tubes minor complications occur frequently (13-38%) and in some cases this can hamper recovery. Based on experience in other types of upper gastro-intestinal surgery, early start of oral feeding could improve time to functional recovery after surgery. The total length of stay was significantly shorter in four prospective studies (6-12 vs. 8-13 days). However, large randomized controlled trials are lacking and the potential benefit of early oral feeding after esophageal surgery remains elusive. EN is nowadays the optimal feeding route after esophagectomy. TPN should only be used in specific cases in which EN is contraindicated. Early initiation of oral intake is promising and could improve postoperative recovery. However, further research is needed to substantiate these results.