Protocol of the PLeural Effusion And Symptom Evaluation (PLEASE) study on the pathophysiology of breathlessness in patients with symptomatic pleural effusions

Lymph nodes rather than pleural metabolic activity in 18F-FDG PET/CT correlates with malignant pleural effusion recurrence in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Frequently recurrent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) significantly hampers the life quality of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We aimed to explore the effects of progression patterns and local intervention on MPE recurrence and apply fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to establish a predictive model for MPE recurrence in NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively recruited two cohorts of patients including treatment-naïve NSCLC diagnosed with MPE at the onset and receiving PET/CT scanning, as well as those with MPE and undergoing first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Pleural maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor burden (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and uptake patterns as well as SUVmax of lymph nodes (LN) were extracted. The primary outcome was MPE recurrence defined as re-accumulation of cytologically proven ipsilateral MPE. Step-wise multivariate Cox regression was used to identify candidate variables. Cox regression analysis and random survival forest were applied to establish models.

Results

A total of 148 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-TKI treatment and MPE were recruited during the median follow-up period of 683 days, with 69 (46.6%) and 35 (23.6%) witnessing MPE recurrence at least once and twice. Intrapleural perfusion therapy at first recurrence was a protective factor for the second MPE recurrence (P=0.006), while intrapleural perfusion therapy at baseline could not benefit the first MPE recurrence (P=0.14). Conversely, prior systemic progression indicative of the change of systemic treatment was a protective factor for time to the first MPE recurrence (P<0.001); instead, the change of systemic treatment at the first MPE recurrence was not associated with second MPE recurrence (P=0.53). In another cohort with treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with MPE and PET/CT scanning, 103 patients regardless of the actionable mutation status were recruited during the median follow-up period of 304 days. Multivariate analysis suggested that the LN SUVmax >4.50 g/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 2.54; P=0.01], female gender (HR, 0.40; P=0.01), bone metastases (HR, 3.16; P=0.001), and systemic treatment (targeted therapy vs. chemotherapy: HR, 0.32; P=0.002; immunotherapy therapy vs. chemotherapy: HR, 0.99; P=0.97) could collectively indicate MPE recurrence with an optimal 300-day area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83. For patients with actionable mutation, LN SUVmax >4.50 g/mL (P=0.02) could forecast MPE recurrence independently.

Conclusions

In summary, LN rather than pleural metabolic activity or uptake patterns could predict MPE recurrence for patients with or without targeted therapy. We should re-consider the application of intrapleural perfusion treatment for first-onset MPE and prompt it more at the moment of recurrent MPE. Promisingly, we could probably apply the non-invasive tool to identify the risk factors for MPE recurrence.

Pleural procedures: an audit of practice and complications in a regional Australian teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Pleural procedures are essential for the investigation and management of pleural disease and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of pleural procedure complication data in the Australian and New Zealand region.

AIMS

To review pleural procedure practices at Wollongong Hospital with an emphasis on the assessment of complications, use of thoracic ultrasound (TUS), pathology results and comparison of findings with international data.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on pleural procedures identified through respiratory specialist trainee logbooks at Wollongong Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021. Comparison of complication rates was made to the British Thoracic Society 2011 a national pleural audit.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one pleural procedures were identified. There were 71 chest drains, 49 thoracocentesis and one indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion. Ninety-seven per cent of procedures were performed for pleural effusions and 3% for pneumothorax. This audit demonstrated a complication rate (excluding pain) of 16.9% for chest drains and 4.1% for thoracocentesis. This gave an overall complication event rate of 10.8% (excluding pain) for pleural procedures. There was no major bleeding, organ puncture, pleural space infection or death. Bedside TUS was used in 99% of procedures.

CONCLUSION

Complication rates for pleural procedures performed by respiratory specialist trainees at Wollongong Hospital are comparable with international outcomes. This audit provides data for comparison on pleural procedure complication rates in Australia. Future studies are required to determine complication rates with IPCs.

Early outcomes following the implementation of a specialised pleural disease service

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusion is a common cause of hospitalisation and a poor prognostic marker that is associated with morbidity and mortality. The evaluation and management of pleural effusion may be performed more effectively by a specialised pleural disease service (SPDS).

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of a SPDS established in 2017 at a 400-bed metropolitan hospital in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was undertaken comparing outcomes of individuals with pleural effusions. People with pleural effusion were identified using administrative data. Two 12-month time periods were compared, 2016 (Period 1, before SPDS) and 2018 (Period 2, after SPDS).

RESULTS

Period 1 had n = 76 and Period 2 had n = 96 individuals with pleural effusion receiving intervention. Age (69.8 ± 17.6 vs 71.8 ± 15.8), gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.9 ± 2.8 vs 5.4 ± 3.0) were similar across both periods. Utilisation of point-of-care ultrasound for pleural procedures increased from Period 1 to 2, 57.3-85.7% (P < 0.001). There was a reduction in median days from admission to intervention (3.8-2.1 days, P = 0.048) and pleural-related re-intervention rate (32% vs 19%, P = 0.032). Pleural fluid testing was more consistent with recommendations (16.8% vs 43.2%, P < 0.001). Overall, there was no difference in the median length of stay (7.9 vs 6.4 days, P = 0.23), pleural-related readmissions (11% vs 16%, P = 0.69) or mortality (17.1% vs 15.6%, P = 0.79). Procedural complications were similar between the two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a SPDS was associated with increased point-of-care ultrasound utilisation for pleural procedures, shorter delays to intervention and improved standardisation of tests on pleural fluid.

Comparison of clinical manifestation among Australian Indigenous and non- Indigenous patients presenting with pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

There is sparse evidence in the literature in relation to the nature and causes of pleural effusion among Australian Indigenous population.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, Indigenous and non-Indigenous adults diagnosed to have pleural effusion over a two-year study period were included for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 314 patients, 205 (65%) were non-Indigenous and 52% were males. In comparison to non-Indigenous, the Indigenous patients were younger (50 years (IQR 39,60) vs 63 years (IQR 52,72), p<0.001), females (61% vs 41%, p=0.001), have higher prevalence of renal and cardiovascular disease and tend to have exudative effusion (93% vs 76%, p=0.032). Infections was judged to be the most common cause for effusion in both groups, more so among the Indigenous cohort. Effusion secondary to renal disease was higher (13% vs 1%, p<0.001) among Indigenous Australians, in contrast malignant effusions were higher (13% vs 4%, p=0.004) among non-Indigenous. Length of hospital stay was longer for Indigenous patients (p=0.001), and a greater proportion received renal dialysis (13% vs 1%, p<0.001). Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions rates were higher with infective etiology of pleural effusion (82% vs. 53% Indigenous & 44% vs. 39% non-Indigenous respectively). Re-presentations to hospital were higher among Indigenous patients (46% vs 33%, p=0.046) and were associated with renal and cardiac disease and malignancy in non-Indigenous.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the way pleural effusion manifests among Australian Indigenous patients. Understanding these differences may facilitate approaches to the management and to implement strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Pleural Effusion And Symptom Evaluation (PLEASE) study of breathlessness in patients with a symptomatic pleural effusion

INTRODUCTION

Pathophysiology changes associated with pleural effusion, its drainage and factors governing symptom response are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine: 1) the effect of pleural effusion (and its drainage) on cardiorespiratory, functional and diaphragmatic parameters; and 2) the proportion as well as characteristics of patients with breathlessness relief post-drainage.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled patients with symptomatic pleural effusions were assessed at both pre-therapeutic drainage and at 24-36 h post-therapeutic drainage.

RESULTS

145 participants completed pre-drainage and post-drainage tests; 93% had effusions ≥25% of hemithorax. The median volume drained was 1.68 L. Breathlessness scores improved post-drainage (mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score by 28.0±24 mm; dyspnoea-12 (D12) score by 10.5±8.8; resting Borg score before 6-min walk test (6-MWT) by 0.6±1.7; all p<0.0001). The 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) increased by 29.7±73.5 m, p<0.0001. Improvements in vital signs and spirometry were modest (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) by 0.22 L, 95% CI 0.18-0.27; forced vital capacity (FVC) by 0.30 L, 95% CI 0.24-0.37). The ipsilateral hemi-diaphragm was flattened/everted in 50% of participants pre-drainage and 48% of participants exhibited paradoxical or no diaphragmatic movement. Post-drainage, hemi-diaphragm shape and movement were normal in 94% and 73% of participants, respectively. Drainage provided meaningful breathlessness relief (VAS score improved ≥14 mm) in 73% of participants irrespective of whether the lung expanded (mean difference 0.14, 95% CI 10.02-0.29; p=0.13). Multivariate analyses found that breathlessness relief was associated with significant breathlessness pre-drainage (odds ratio (OR) 5.83 per standard deviation (sd) decrease), baseline abnormal/paralyzed/paradoxical diaphragm movement (OR 4.37), benign aetiology (OR 3.39), higher pleural pH (OR per sd increase 1.92) and higher serum albumin level (OR per sd increase 1.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Breathlessness and exercise tolerance improved in most patients with only a small mean improvement in spirometry and no change in oxygenation. Breathlessness improvement was similar in participants with and without trapped lung. Abnormal hemi-diaphragm shape and movement were independently associated with relief of breathlessness post-drainage.

Recent developments in pleurodesis for malignant pleural disease

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic pleural effusion (MPE) is one of the most frequent causes of pleural effusion. The aims of the therapeutic management are palliation of symptoms and improvement in patient's quality of life. The first step is a therapeutic thoracentesis. In case of a recurrent MPE, pleural maneuvers can be used to manage symptoms based on either ambulatory pleural drainage or pleurodesis to prevent fluid accumulation. The aim of this review is to describe recent advances, according to the best available evidence, in the field of pleurodesis for the management of MPE.

DATA SOURCE AND STUDY SELECTION

Three different searches of the most clinically relevant articles and up-to-date results in the field of pleurodesis for the management of MPE were performed using PubMed. Different indexing terms and time restriction were chosen. From these PubMed searches, 322 articles were respectively found. After cross-checking these three lists and the selection of articles published after January 2010 specially dedicated to the management of MPE by pleurodesis, the abstracts of 106 articles were extracted to feed the corpus of this review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Treatment approaches of recurrent MPE should take into account multiple factors in particular patient's life expectancy and preference. If talc is the best sclerosing agent alone or in combination with indwelling pleural catheter which is a promising strategy, the pathophysiology of MPE has to be revisited in order to propose a personalized management targeting intrapleural key molecules involved in the genesis of malignant process.

Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects more than 1 million people globally. There is a dearth of evidence on the therapeutic approach to MPE, and not surprisingly a high degree of variability in the management thereof. We aimed to provide practicing clinicians with an overview of the current evidence on the management of MPE, preferentially focusing on studies that report patient-related outcomes rather than pleurodesis alone, and to provide guidance on how to approach individual cases. A pleural intervention for MPE will perforce be palliative in nature. A therapeutic thoracentesis provides immediate relief for most. It can be repeated, especially in patients with a slow rate of recurrence and a short anticipated survival. Definitive interventions, individualized according the patient's wishes, performance status, prognosis and other considerations (including the ability of the lung to expand) should be offered to the remainder of patients. Chemical pleurodesis (achieved via intercostal drain or pleuroscopy) and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) have equal impact on patient-based outcomes, although patients treated with IPC spend less time in hospital and have less need for repeat pleural drainage interventions. Talc slurry via IPC is an attractive recently validated option for patients who do not have a nonexpandable lung.

Surgical and non-surgical management of malignant pleural effusions

INTRODUCTION

Optimal management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is important in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Surgical (especially video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)) and non-surgical strategies are available. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence supporting the use of different modalities to guide treatment choice. Areas covered: This review covers published evidence of the advantages and disadvantages of VATS and non-surgical alternatives for MPE management. Expert commentary: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to define the roles and benefits of VATS as existing literature is often flawed by selection bias. Three RCTs have failed to show benefits of VATS talc poudrage over bedside talc pleurodesis. VATS-pleurectomy offered no survival advantage in a RCT of mesothelioma patients. Modification of VATS techniques has reduced the invasiveness and associated risks. Future trials should compare VATS with contemporary, non-surgical approaches (especially combined Indwelling Pleural Catheter (IPC) and chemical pleurodesis therapy). Individualized management for different subgroups of MPE patients should be a long-term research goal. Studies are needed on better patient selection, and adjunct non-invasive, supportive (e.g. nutrition and exercise) therapies.

State of the art thoracic ultrasound: intervention and therapeutics

The use of thoracic ultrasound outside the radiology department and in everyday clinical practice is becoming increasingly common, having been incorporated into standards of care for many specialties. For the majority of practitioners, their experience of, and exposure to, thoracic ultrasound will be in its use as an adjunct to pleural and thoracic interventions, owing to the widely recognised benefits for patient safety and risk reduction. However, as clinicians become increasingly familiar with the capabilities of thoracic ultrasound, new directions for its use are being sought which might enhance practice and patient care. This article reviews the ways in which the advent of thoracic ultrasound is changing the approach to the investigation and treatment of respiratory disease from an interventional perspective. This will include the impact of thoracic ultrasound on areas including patient safety, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and outcome prediction; and will also consider potential future research and clinical directions.

Comparing approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusions

INTRODUCTION

Management of symptomatic malignant pleural effusions is becoming more complex due to the range of treatment options, which include therapeutic thoracenteses, thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis, bedside pleurodesis with talc or other sclerosing agents via small-bore chest catheters, indwelling pleural catheters, surgery, or a combination of some of these procedures. Areas covered: Recent advances for the expanding range of treatment options in malignant pleural effusions are summarized, according to the best available evidence. Expert commentary: Selection of a treatment approach in malignant pleural effusions should take into account patient preferences and performance status, tumor type, predicted prognosis, presence of a non-expandable lung, and local experience or availability. The role of pleurodesis has decreased with the advent of indwelling pleural catheters, which provide a high degree of symptomatic relief on an outpatient basis and, therefore, are being positioned as a first choice therapy in many centers. Talc poudrage pleurodesis should probably be reserved for those situations in which pleural tumor invasion is discovered during diagnostic thoracoscopy. Ongoing randomized controlled trials will offer solid evidence on which of the available palliative approaches should be selected for each particular patient.