Managing the transition (ManTra): a resource for persons with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and their health professionals: protocol for a mixed-methods study in Italy

Discussing the potential for progression with patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: When, how, and why?

Despite convergent evidence that upwards of 50% of patients with MS transition from a relapsing to progressive phase within 20 years of disease onset, and the recent acknowledgement of the commonality of progression independent of relapses, there remains no consensus regarding the nature and timing of a discussion about the possibility of a secondary progressive phase with relapsing-remitting MS patients. Some neurologists prefer to conduct this at the inaugural visit to provide more information about disease behaviour and potential planning that might entail, while others may defer any discussion about this phase, as there is no clear consensus for it and it can be a sensitive topic, with concern that too early a discussion could worsen anxiety and discourage or delay decisions regarding disease modifying treatments. Furthermore, it is unknown at onset which patients will transition to a progressive phenotype. This review and opinion paper will outline some of the opportunities and challenges associated with such a disclosure, and attempt to provide a balanced, patient-centred approach to address this delicate topic.

Patients' Experiences in Transitioning to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Qualitative Interviews

Introduction

Critical gaps exist in the understanding of the continuum of multiple sclerosis (MS) progression, particularly with regard to the patient experience prior to and during the transition from relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) to secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) stages. To date, there are no clear diagnostic criteria in the determination of the clinical transition. We report here the use of patient experience data to support the development of a qualitative conceptual model of MS that describes the patient journey of transition from active-relapsing disease to progressive MS.

Methods

The study used a single-encounter, multicenter, qualitative observational study design that included a targeted literature review and individual, in-depth interviews with adult patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of SPMS and their adult care partners. Descriptions of symptoms and impacts of RRMS and SPMS were extracted from the literature review and used to support development of the interview guide and conceptual model.

Results

Participants described a slow progression in terms of change in symptoms over time, including both the development of new symptoms and the worsening of existing symptoms.

Conclusions

The conceptual model of the transitionary period from RRMS to SPMS expands the current understanding of the progression of MS from the patient and care partner perspectives.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00265-0.

Construction of a User-Led Resource for People Transitioning to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Results of an International Nominal Group Study

Background: ManTra is a mixed-methods, co-production research project for developing an intervention (resource) for people with newly diagnosed secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS) in Italy and Germany. In previous project actions, six resources were outlined, meeting the needs prioritized by pwSPMS.

Aims: This study aims to achieve multiple-stakeholder consensus on the most suitable resource and to refine the consensus resource.

Methods: Two nominal group technique (NGT) meetings were held, one in Milan and one in Hamburg. Participants were pwSPMS (five in Italy/six in Germany), pwSPMS significant others (SOs, four/five), healthcare professionals (HPs, seven/four), and health service researchers/patient and citizen organizations representatives (HPCORs, five/five). Two of the four resources discussed in each meeting were the same in Italy and Germany: “Promoting the engagement of pwSPMS: a program for the patients and the HPs” and “Enriched physiotherapy program for pwSPMS.” The other two were “A personalized care plan for pwSPMS” and “Roadmap for social and economic benefits” in Italy and “Metacognitive and everyday life training for pwSPMS” and “Psychological support for pwSPMS” in Germany. Each meeting consisted of two plenary sessions and a parallel group session (four stakeholder groups: pwSPMS, SOs, HPs, and HPCORs) in between. Meetings' narratives were analyzed thematically.

Results: The two meetings were rich in participation and discussion. In Italy, the consensus resource was “A personalized care plan for pwSPMS.” Refinements included enrichment with pwSPMS engagement, inclusion of additional HPs, improved definition of the MS nurse's role within the interdisciplinary panel, and community care integration. In Germany, the consensus resource was “Psychological support for pwSPMS.” Refinements included reshaping this resource into a more comprehensive and adaptive rehabilitation intervention and training the psychologist in recognizing client's rehabilitative needs and enhancing his/her autonomy.

Conclusions: The NGT eased multiple-stakeholder deliberation and resource fine-tuning in both countries.

Conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Multistakeholder experiences and needs in Italy

BACKGROUND

Conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is associated with a relatively poor prognosis, and SPMS is responsible for the majority of the social and economic costs associated with MS. Managing the Transition to SPMS (ManTra) is a mixed methods project conducted in Italy and Germany aimed to set up a user-led resource to empower and improve the quality of life of newly diagnosed SPMS patients.

AIMS

To assess the experiences and the needs of Italian people who recently converted to SPMS, patient significant others (SOs), neurologists and other health professionals (HPs).

METHODS

We conducted 15 personal semistructured interviews (PSIs) with SPMS patients who transitioned up to five years, and three focus group meetings (FGMs), one of SPMS SOs, one of neurologists, and one of other HPs. Participants were purposely selected from the three geographic areas of Italy, and varied in terms of gender, education and (for patients) disease severity. PSIs and FGMs were audiorecorded, transcribed and analyzed by two researchers using the framework analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred sub-categories were identified, grouped into 13 categories and four themes: 'awareness of the transition', 'communication of the transition', 'dealing with symptoms worsening', and 'needs'. The major unmet needs were collected in four dimensions 'organization and management; 'empowerment training'; 'information'; and 'policies'.

CONCLUSIONS

Two are the main findings: first, the widespread lack of awareness around the transition; second, the need to improve the quality of the care pathway in the Italian context. It was particularly stressed the need for a holistic and multidisciplinary approach (with patients and SOs as members of the team), the development of an ad hoc plan of follow up visits with easy access to MS specialists' consultation/treatment; specialized training for each stakeholders; more information on SPMS, daily management and changes at policy level.

Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Patient Awareness and Needs. Results From an Online Survey in Italy and Germany

Background: Few studies have investigated the experiences of patients around the conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). ManTra is a mixed-method, co-production research project conducted in Italy and Germany to develop an intervention for newly-diagnosed SPMS patients. In previous project actions, we identified the needs and experiences of patients converting to SPMS via literature review and qualitative research which involved key stakeholders. Aims: The online patient survey aimed to assess, on a larger and independent sample of recently-diagnosed SPMS patients: (a) the characteristics associated to patient awareness of SPMS conversion; (b) the experience of conversion; (c) importance and prioritization of the needs previously identified. Methods: Participants were consenting adults with SPMS since ≤5 years. The survey consisted of three sections: on general and clinical characteristics; on experience of SPMS diagnosis disclosure (aware participants only); and on importance and prioritization of 33 pre-specified needs. Results: Of 215 participants, those aware of their SPMS diagnosis were 57% in Italy vs. 77% in Germany (p = 0.004). In both countries, over 80% of aware participants received a SPMS diagnosis from the neurologist; satisfaction with SPMS disclosure was moderate to high. Nevertheless, 28-35% obtained second opinions, and 48-56% reported they did not receive any information on SPMS. Participants actively seeking further information were 63% in Germany vs. 31% in Italy (p < 0.001). Variables independently associated to patient awareness were geographic area (odds ratio, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.78 for Central Italy; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.58 for Southern Italy [vs. Germany]) and activity limitations (OR 7.80, 95% CI 1.47-41.37 for dependent vs. autonomous patients). All pre-specified needs were scored a lot or extremely important, and two prioritized needs were shared by Italian and German patients: "physiotherapy" and "active patient care involvement." The other two differed across countries: "an individualized health care plan" and "information on social rights and policies" in Italy, and "psychological support" and "cognitive rehabilitation" in Germany. Conclusions: Around 40% of SPMS patients were not aware of their disease form indicating a need to improve patient-physician communication. Physiotherapy and active patient care involvement were prioritized in both countries.

A focus on secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS): challenges in diagnosis and definition

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is the second most common form of multiple sclerosis (MS). One in two relapse remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients will develop SPMS within 15 years and up to two-thirds after 30 years, leading to a progressive decrease of neurological function and limitation of daily activities. Nevertheless, the SPMS diagnosis is often established retrospectively and delayed up to 3 years due to several patient- and clinician-related factors. Definitive clinical diagnostic criteria are lacking and research is currently ongoing to identify imaging and biochemical biomarkers. As new therapies are introduced, early SPMS diagnosis may represent a window of opportunity for intervention. New approaches, endpoints or technologies could help physicians establishing a diagnosis. Here, we review SPMS in relation to its diagnostic and definition challenges and current screening techniques and tools.

A focus on secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS): challenges in diagnosis and definition

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is the second most common form of multiple sclerosis (MS). One in two relapse remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients will develop SPMS within 15 years and up to two-thirds after 30 years, leading to a progressive decrease of neurological function and limitation of daily activities. Nevertheless, the SPMS diagnosis is often established retrospectively and delayed up to 3 years due to several patient- and clinician-related factors. Definitive clinical diagnostic criteria are lacking and research is currently ongoing to identify imaging and biochemical biomarkers. As new therapies are introduced, early SPMS diagnosis may represent a window of opportunity for intervention. New approaches, endpoints or technologies could help physicians establishing a diagnosis. Here, we review SPMS in relation to its diagnostic and definition challenges and current screening techniques and tools.

Two Sides to Every Story: Perspectives from Four Patients and a Healthcare Professional on Multiple Sclerosis Disease Progression

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive disease and many patients transition from an initial relapsing–remitting course to a secondary progressive pattern. Accurate classification of disease status is critical to ensure that patients are treated appropriately and kept informed of their prognosis. Consensus terms defining the different forms of MS are available but were developed primarily for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and may be of limited value to patients. This article provides direct insights from four patients with MS, at different points in their disease trajectory, regarding their understanding of, and attitudes toward, MS progression. We also examine the utility of the current classification systems from the perspectives of patients and HCPs. Responses collected during in-depth, structured interviews and questionnaires portrayed the difficulties patients face accepting their MS diagnosis and treatment, revealed how understanding of the term “disease progression” varies considerably, and highlighted the challenges surrounding the period of transition to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The terms describing different MS types were considered confusing and can make patients feel “compartmentalized” or “labeled”. Patients also struggled to relate these terms to their reality of living with MS, were reluctant to discuss progression with their HCPs, and feared being diagnosed with SPMS owing to concerns about treatment access. These insights highlight the need to develop patient-friendly language to describe MS progression; it may also be preferable for HCPs to describe MS as a disease spectrum in discussions with their patients.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Plain Language Summary

Plain language summary available for this article.

Exploring Wellness Interventions in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: an Evidence-Based Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been recent interest in the role of lifestyle and wellness-based approaches in the treatment and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). These approaches may be particularly relevant for patients with progressive MS, considering limited therapeutic options currently available. The purpose of this review is to examine the role of wellness-based interventions including exercise training, emotional well-being therapies, and dietary modification in patients with progressive MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

We conducted a literature search on the efficacy of wellness-based interventions in patients with progressive MS published between 1985 and July 2017. The level of evidence for each trial was evaluated using the American Academy of Neurology criteria. Overall, 21 articles reporting on 16 wellness-based interventions were identified: ten trials involved exercise training, three involved emotional wellness therapies, two involved dietary modification, and one was a combined wellness intervention. There is level C evidence (possibly effective; one class II study) for the efficacy of aerobic exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with progressive MS. There is level B evidence (probably effective; one class I study) for the efficacy of mindfulness training on psychological distress, depression, anxiety, pain, and quality of life in patients with progressive MS. There is inadequate evidence (level U) for efficacy of dietary modification (one class III study and one class IV study) and combined wellness interventions involving exercise training, meditation, and dietary modification (one class IV study). High-quality research is needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for wellness behaviors and lifestyle change in patients with progressive MS.