Negotiating acceptable termination of pregnancy for non-lethal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study of professional perspectives

[Ethical Attitudes and Handling in Prenatal Conflict Situations - A Survey among Obstetricians and Prenatal Diagnosticians in Germany]

OBJECTIVE

Various studies have shown that belonging to a professional group has an influence on ethical attitudes. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the attitudes and approaches of obstetrical specialists and prenatal diagnosticians in prenatal conflict situations.

METHODS

Explorative cross-sectional online survey among tertiary perinatal care centers and prenatal diagnosticians with DEGUM Level II/III in Germany. The questionnaire included questions on ethical attitudes in the perinatal context and a case presentation of a fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

RESULTS

The response rate was 57.1% (310/543). 55.5% of the respondents practiced both obstetrics and prenatal diagnostics, 24.5% exclusively prenatal diagnostics, and 14.2% purely obstetrics. 27% agreed with the statement "An uncertain prognosis justifies pregnancy termination". For complex fetal malformations joint interdisciplinary counseling was advocated by 98.3%. Addressing the option of postnatal palliative treatment in a case of a hypoplastic left heart syndrome was accepted by 84.3% across all professional groups, while mentioning fetocide was more frequently cited as an option by prenatal diagnosticians than by obstetricians (57.7% vs. 34.1%).

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary prenatal parental counseling in complex fetal malformations is uniformly advocated by prenatal diagnosticians and obstetricians in Germany. However, different ethical attitudes appear among specialists groups with regard to the option of termination of pregnancy.

Attitudes of Chinese maternal and child health professionals toward termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a cross-sectional survey

Objectives

This study explores the attitudes of Chinese maternal and child health professionals toward the termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) based on four case scenarios and further identifies the factors that influence their attitudes.

Methods

This cross-sectional study, conducted from February 14-21, 2022, aimed to explore the attitudes of maternal and child health professionals toward TOPFA in Hunan Province. We targeted health service institutions across 14 prefecture-level cities and the autonomous prefecture. A questionnaire was made available online and shared via the instant communication platform, WeChat. Participants were recruited through the same platform and completed the survey online. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine factors affecting the health professionals' attitudes toward TOPFA, expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The study found that 63.5% of health professionals approved of the birth of a fetus with cleft lip and palate, while 36.5% opposed it. Similarly, 39.7% approved of the birth of a fetus with phenylketonuria, while 60.3% opposed it. The percentages of those in favor of and against the birth of a fetus with precocious heart disease were 45.5 and 54.5%, respectively, and those for and against the birth of a fetus with missing fingers were 50.8 and 49.2%, respectively. The top three factors considered by health professionals when agreeing on TOPFA were "the impact of fetal disease on fetal function and growth," "the severity of fetal disease," and "the assessment of indications for fetal disease by professionals and related professional advice." The majority of health professionals (75-78%) preferred joint decision-making by parents regarding the right to decide TOPFA.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that the attitudes of health professionals toward TOPFA can differ significantly depending on the specific birth defect under consideration. Notably, the majority of health professionals prioritized "the impact of fetal abnormalities on fetal function and development" when deciding their support for TOPFA, advocating for the decision to be a joint one between the parents. Additionally, factors such as religious beliefs, professional training, age, and job title appeared to influence these attitudes toward TOPFA. Our findings could serve as a reference point in the development of guidelines for the prevention and management of birth defects.

Perception of the Saudi Population on Abortion Decisions in Congenital Fetal Anomalies

Introduction Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies is well reported in the literature and accepted by the western and other non-Muslim communities, but Muslim communities' perception is poorly reported and rarely mentioned. This study aims to evaluate the perception of the Saudi community on abortion decisions as a management option in congenital fetal anomalies. Methods This is an observational, descriptive cross-sectional study, where participants of Saudi nationality, living in Jeddah, and consenting to participate in the research filled up a self-administrated, structured, close-ended, validated questionnaire. The level of agreement was measured on a Likert scale. Results A total of 574 participants were included in the study; 43.3% were female. The mean age of the participants was 30.3 years (SD = 10.6). Undergraduate students were 58.9%, single participants were 56.3%, and participants without children were 61.3%. The prevalence of abortion was 17.9%. The overall agreement on accepting abortion as an option was 61%. Gender (p<0.001), knowledge level (p=0.003), and religion (p=0.01) were the most important factors that influenced people's perception of abortion. Other factors like participants' age (p=0.09), level of education (p=0.48), marital status (p=0.16), having children (p=0.48), and gender of the fetus (p=0.2) were not significant factors in their decision to choose abortion. Conclusion Overall, Saudis were more inclined to accept abortion in case of a confirmed congenital anomaly, yet females were more accepting of the idea than males.

Identification by RNA-Seq of let-7 clusters as prenatal biomarkers for nonsyndromic cleft lip with palate

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with palate (nsCLP) is a common congenital malformation; however, early prenatal diagnosis is challenging and pathogenesis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic potential of miRNAs in plasma-derived exosomes and whole plasma of pregnant women to identify nsCLP and an underlying mechanism. Combined RNA sequencing analysis was performed on samples from plasma exosomes and whole plasma of pregnant women carrying normal fetuses or fetuses with nsCLP in an ongoing birth cohort, in addition to lip samples from nsCLP fetuses and healthy controls. Eight let-7 cluster miRNAs (hsa-let-7a-3p, hsa-let-7a-5p, hsa-let-7c-5p, hsa-let-7d-3p, hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-let-7f-5p, and hsa-miR-98-5p) in plasma exosomes from pregnant women provided higher sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing fetal nsCLP than those in plasma. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of the eight miRNAs from plasma exosomes was 0.992. Among them, hsa-let-7a-3p showed better diagnostic capability and was downregulated in nsCLP fetal lip tissues. Upstream and downstream target genes of hsa-let-7a-3p were screened and confirmed. Our work highlights the potential clinical application value of let-7 clusters in predicting nsCLP and associates as a new regulatory axis (EN2-LIN28A-hsa-let-7a-3p-HHIP-GLI2) with human nsCLP pathogenesis.

Fetal medicine specialist experiences of providing a new service of termination of pregnancy for fatal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore fetal medicine specialists' experiences of caring for parents following a diagnosis of fatal fetal anomaly (FFA) during the implementation of termination of pregnancy (TOP) for FFA for the first time.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Fetal medicine units in the Republic of Ireland.

POPULATION

Ten fetal medicine specialists from five of the six fetal medicine units.

METHODS

nvivo 12 assisted in the thematic analysis of semi-structured in-depth face-to-face interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fetal medicine specialists' experiences of prenatal diagnosis and holistic management of pregnancies complicated by FFA.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: 'not fatal enough', 'interactions with colleagues', 'supporting pregnant women' and 'internal conflict and emotional challenges'. Fetal medicine specialists feared getting an FFA diagnosis incorrect because of media scrutiny and criminal liability associated with the TOP for FFA legislation. Challenges with the ambiguous and 'restrictive' legislation were identified that 'ostracised' severe anomalies. Teamwork was essential to facilitate opportunities for learning and peer support; however, conflict with colleagues was experienced regarding the diagnosis of FFA, the provision of feticide and palliative care to infants born alive following TOP for FFA. Participants reported challenges implementing TOP for FFA, including the absence of institutional support and 'stretched' resources. Fetal medicine specialists experienced internal conflict and a psychological burden providing TOP for FFA, but did so to 'provide full care for women'.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified challenges regarding the suitability of the Irish legislation for TOP for FFA and its rapid introduction into clinical practice. It illustrates the importance of institutional and peer support, as well as the need for supportive management, in the provision of a new service.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The implementation of termination services for fatal fetal anomaly is complex and requires institutional support.

A survey of health professionals' views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly is legal in the UK with no upper limit, if two doctors, in good faith, agree "there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped". This is Clause E of the Human Fertlisation and Embryology Act. The most commonly sighted Clause is C, which states "the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman". This study aimed to investigate health professionals' views on gestational age and acceptable termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). We undertook a questionnaire survey of UK health professionals working in fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology and neonatology. A study pack consisting of a self-completion questionnaire, an invitation letter, participant information sheet, and a stamped addressed return envelope, were sent to health professionals. We used four fetal anomalies as case study examples in the questionnaire: isolated cleft lip, hypoplastic left heart, spina bifida and trisomy 21. These anomalies were chosen as they differed in terms of the type of anomaly, the type of impairment, and the perceived severity. Forty-one study packs were returned. For anomalies deemed less serious, later gestational ages were an important consideration when deciding acceptable TOPFA. The prognosis of an anomaly was considered an important factor in deciding whether a TOPFA was acceptable alongside gestational age. Clause C of the current UK legislation, which allows a legal termination prior to 24 weeks gestational age if continuing with the pregnancy would impact the mental health of the mother, was deemed a reasonable option for termination when parents are requesting a TOPFA. For each case study example, health professionals responded that TOPFA at '25 weeks and over' was acceptable (cleft lip n = 1; hypoplastic left heart n = 19; spina bifida n = 13 and Trisomy 21 n = 10). Professionals also distinguished between their personal and professional views. These findings offer new insight into how gestational age considerations influence professionals' conceptualisation of acceptable TOPFA.