Emergency medical dispatch recognition, clinical intervention and outcome of patients in traumatic cardiac arrest from major trauma: an observational study

Emergency reflex action drill for traumatic cardiac arrest in a simulated pre-hospital setting; a one-group pre-post intervention study

BACKGROUND

Emergency Reflex Action Drills (ERADs) are meant to decrease stress-associated cognitive demand in high urgency situations. The aim of this study was to develop and test an ERAD for witnessed traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), an event in which potentially reversible causes need to be systematically addressed and treated in a short period of time. We hypothesize that this ERAD (the TCA-Drill) helps ground Emergency Medical Services (EMS) nurses in overcoming performance decline during this specific high-pressure situation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, experimental one-group pre-post intervention study. Ground EMS nurses participated in a session of four simulated scenarios, with an in-between educational session to teach the TCA-Drill. Scenarios were video recorded, after which adherence and time differences were analyzed. Self-confidence on clinical practice was measured before and after the scenarios.

RESULTS

Twelve ground EMS nurses participated in this study. Overall median time to address reversible causes of TCA decreased significantly using the TCA-Drill (132 vs. 110 s; p = 0.030) compared with the conventional ALS strategy. More specifically, participants adhering to the TCA-Drill showed a significantly lower time needed for hemorrhage control (58 vs. 37 s; p = 0.012). Eight of 12 (67 %) ground EMS nurses performed the ERAD without protocol deviations. Reported self-confidence significantly increased on 11 of the 13 surveyed items.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an ERAD for TCA (the TCA-Drill) significantly reduces the time to address reversible causes for TCA without delaying chest compressions in a simulated environment and can be easily taught to ground EMS nurses and increases self-confidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The use of an ERAD for TCA (the TCA-Drill can significantly reduce the time to address reversible causes for TCA without delaying chest compression. This drill can be easily taught to ground EMS nurses and increases their self-confidence in addressing TCA-patients.

Improving ambulance dispatch triage to trauma: A scoping review using the framework of development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules

OBJECTIVE

Ambulance dispatch algorithms should function as clinical prediction rules, identifying high acuity patients for advanced life support, and low acuity patients for non-urgent transport. Systematic reviews of dispatch algorithms are rare and focus on study types specific to the final phases of rule development, such as impact studies, and may miss the complete value-added evidence chain. We sought to summarise the literature for studies seeking to improve dispatch in trauma by performing a scoping review according to standard frameworks for developing and evaluating clinical prediction rules.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the CENTRAL trials registry, and grey literature from January 2005 to October 2021. We included all study types investigating dispatch triage to injured patients in the English language. We reported the clinical prediction rule phase (derivation, validation, impact analysis, or user acceptance) and the performance and outcomes measured for high and low acuity trauma patients.

RESULTS

Of 2067 papers screened, we identified 12 low and 30 high acuity studies. Derivation studies were most common (52%) and rule-based computer-aided dispatch was the most frequently investigated (23 studies). Impact studies rarely reported a prior validation phase, and few validation studies had their impact investigated. Common outcome measures in each phase were infrequent (0 to 27%), making a comparison between protocols difficult. A series of papers for low acuity patients and another for pediatric trauma followed clinical prediction rule development. Some low acuity Medical Priority Dispatch System codes are associated with the infrequent requirement for advanced life support and clinician review of computer-aided dispatch may enhance dispatch triage accuracy in studies of helicopter emergency medical services.

CONCLUSIONS

Few derivation and validation studies were followed by an impact study, indicating important gaps in the value-added evidence chain. While impact studies suggest clinician oversight may enhance dispatch, the opportunity exists to standardize outcomes, identify trauma-specific low acuity codes, and develop intelligent dispatch systems.

Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus

Introduction

Emergency medical regulation is a risky activity. In France, emergency medical societies have proposed activity and performance indicators, but their lists are non-exhaustive, unstructured and used heterogeneously among emergency medical call centres (Centres de Réception et de Régulation des Appels, CRRA). Our objective was to build by means of regional stakeholder consensus an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs.

Methods

We conducted an observational step in a French CRRA from June to September 2018 and at the same time listed existing activity and quality indicators through a rapid international literature review. We adapted and classified all indicators identified in a structured table. We prioritised them from April to September 2019 by seeking consensus with one regulator physician and one medical regulation assistant from the 13 CRRAs of the largest French region. We used an adapted Delphi method with a prioritisation scale from 1 to 9.

Results

The rapid review of literature included 33 studies among the 414 identified and, with the first observational step, resulted in a list of 360 quality indicators covering the following areas: material resources, human resources, quality approach, call handling and postcall support. 15 of the 26 members participated in the entire process. Seventy indicators were considered as priorities with strong agreement among participants. We built an operational dashboard of quality indicators deemed high priority and provided 70 descriptive indicator sheets.

Conclusion

Our study allowed to build an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs as a ready-to-use support for an internal audit, for prioritisation of quality approach actions and for national and international benchmarking.

Surviving traumatic cardiac arrest: Identification of factors associated with survival

INTRODUCTION

The endpoint of resuscitative interventions after traumatic injury resulting in cardiopulmonary arrest varies across institutions and even among providers. The purpose of this study was to examine survival characteristics in patients suffering torso trauma with no recorded vital signs (VS) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was analyzed from 2007 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were patients with blunt and penetrating torso trauma without VS in the ED. Patients with head injuries, transfers from other hospitals, or those with missing values were excluded. The characteristics of survivors were evaluated, and statistical analyses performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24,191 torso trauma patients without VS were evaluated in the ED and 96.6% were declared dead upon arrival. There were 246 survivors (1%), and 73 (0.3%) were eventually discharged home. Of patients who responded to resuscitation (812), the survival rate was 30.3%. Injury severity score (ISS), penetrating mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 1.99), definitive chest (OR 1.59) and abdominal surgery (OR 1.49) were associated with improved survival. Discharge to home (or police custody) was associated with lower ISS (OR 0.975) and shorter ED time (OR 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Over a recent nine-year period in the United States, nearly 25,000 trauma patients were treated at trauma centers despite lack of VS. Of these patients, only 73 were discharged home. A trauma center would have to attempt over one hundred resuscitations of traumatic arrests to save one patient, confirming previous reports that highlight a grave prognosis. This creates a dilemma in treatment for front line workers and physicians with resource utilization and consideration of safety of exposure, particularly in the face of COVID-19.