Meanings of 'centredness' in long-term care facilities: a scoping review protocol

Elements of Long-Term Care That Promote Quality of Life for Indigenous and First Nations Peoples: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known about elements of long-term care (LTC) that promote quality of life (QoL) for older Indigenous and First Nations peoples. This systematic review aimed to extend understanding of those deemed most important.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, systematic database and hand-searching were used to find published and unpublished qualitative studies and textual reports. A convergent integrated approach was used to synthesize data, according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Included papers (11 qualitative; seven reports) explored views and experiences of Indigenous residents, families, and LTC staff from North America (8), South Africa (1), Norway (1), New Zealand (1), and Australia (7). Elements of care included: (a) codesigning and collaborating with Indigenous and First Nations communities and organizations to promote culturally safe care; (b) embedding trauma-informed care policies and practices, and staff training to deliver culturally safe services; (c) being respectful of individual needs, and upholding cultural, spiritual and religious beliefs, traditional activities and practices; (d) promoting connection to culture and sense of belonging through sustained connection with family, kin, and Indigenous and First Nations communities.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This review identifies elements or models of care that promote QoL for Indigenous and First Nations peoples in LTC. While included papers were mostly from the United States and Australia, the congruence of elements promoting QoL was evident across all population groups. Findings may be used to inform standards specific to the care of Indigenous and First Nations peoples.

Standards and quality of care for older persons in long term care facilities: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Caring for older persons has become a global necessity to ensure functional ability and healthy ageing. It is of paramount importance that standards of care are monitored, especially for older persons who live in long term care facilities (LTCF). We, therefore, scoped and summarised evidence relating to standards and the quality of care for older persons in LTCFs in gerontological literature globally.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using Askey and O'Malley's framework, including Levac et al. recommendations. PubMed, CINAHL, Health Sources, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched with no date limitation up to May 2020 using keywords, Boolean terms, and medical subject headings. We also consulted the World Health Organization website and the reference list of included articles for evidence sources. This review also included peer-reviewed publications and grey literature in English that focused on standards and quality of care for older residents in LTCFs. Two reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, and full-text of evidence sources screening stages and performed the data extraction. Thematic content analysis was used, and a summary of the findings are reported narratively.

RESULTS

Sixteen evidence sources published from 1989 to 2017 met this study's eligibility criteria out of 73,845 citations obtained from the broader search. The majority of the studies were conducted in the USA 56% (9/16), and others were from Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, Norway, Israel, Japan, and France. The included studies presented evidence on the effectiveness of prompted voiding intervention for urinary incontinence in LTCFs (37.5%), the efficacy of professional support to LTCF staff (18.8%), and the prevention-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer programme in LTCFs (6.3%). Others presented evidence on regulation and quality of care (12.5%); nursing documentation and quality of care (6.3%); medical, nursing, and psychosocial standards on the quality of care (6.3%); medication safety using the Beer criteria (6.3%); and the quality of morning care provision (6.3%).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests most studies relating to standards and quality of care in LTCFs focus on effectiveness of interventions, few on people-centredness and safety, and are mainly conducted in European countries and the United States of America. Future studies on people-centerdness, safety, and geographical settings with limited or no evidence are recommended.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Team Member Perspectives of Person-Centered Care (TM-PCC) in institutionalized older adults

Abstract Objective carry out the translation and back-translation into Brazilian Portuguese, and the cross-cultural adaptation of the instrument called Team Member Perspectives of Person-Centered Care (TM-PCC), as well as its construct validity. The objective of the TM-PCC is to assess the frequency of behaviors and care practices centered on the individual according to professionals who work in Long-Term Care Facilities for Older Adults (ILPIs). Method The process of translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation was followed through semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence carried out by five expert judges in the field of Geriatrics and Gerontology, with the pilot instrument being administered to 49 professionals from four ILPIs in three Brazilian states Results After the assessment was conducted by the expert judges, disagreement was found regarding the terms “previous associations,” “fulfilling relationships,” and “incorporate this caring into my daily routine,” which were replaced by“histórias pregressas” (past stories), “relações satisfatórias” (satisfactory relationships), and “incorporar esse cuidado na minha rotina diária” (incorporate this care into my daily routine). After these corrections and revisions, the questionnaire was sent back to the judges, who were in total agreement. Good understanding of the questions was observed during the pilot application and good internal consistency through Cronbach’s alpha (0.78 Conclusion The TM-PCC can be a useful tool for assessing individual-centered care in ILPIs in Brazil, according to the assessment of professionals. This will enable patient care managers or supervisors to plan and develop educational and management interventions aimed at promoting individual-centered care in ILPIs.

Adaptação transcultural do Team Member Perspectives of Person-centered Care (TM-PCC) em pessoas idosas institucionalizadas

Resumo Objetivo Realizar a tradução, retrotraduação para o português falado no Brasil e a adaptação transcultural do instrumento Team Member Perspectives of Person-Centered Care (TM-PCC) e ainda, a sua validade de constructo. O objetivo do TM-PCC é avaliar a frequência de comportamentos e de práticas de cuidados centrados no indivíduo segundo os profissionais que atuam nas Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos (ILPIs). Método Foram seguidos o processo de tradução, retrotraduação e adaptação transcultural por meio da equivalência semântica, idiomática, experiencial e conceitual realizado por cinco juízes especialistas da área de Geriatria e da Gerontologia e, por fim, aplicou-se o instrumento piloto em 49 profissionais de quatro ILPIs de três estados brasileiros. Resultados Após a avaliação realizada pelos juízes especialistas, obteve-se discordância quanto aos termos “previous associations”, “fufilling relationships” e “incorporate this caring into my daily routine”, os quais foram substituídos por “histórias pregressas”, “relações satisfatórias”, e “incorporar esse cuidado na minha rotina diária”. Após as correções e revisões, o questionário foi reenviado aos juízes, obtendo-se 100% de concordância. Observou-se boa compreensão das questões durante a aplicação piloto e boa consistência interna por meio do alfa de Cronbach= 0,78. Conclusão O TM-PCC pode ser ferramenta útil para avaliação dos cuidados centrados ao indivíduo em ILPIs, no Brasil, segundo a avaliação de profissionais. Isso possibilitará ao gestor ou profissional supervisor de cuidados, planejar e desenvolver intervenções educacionais e de gestão voltadas a promoção dos cuidados centrados ao indivíduo nas ILPI.

The Person-Centered Rehabilitation Model: Framing the concept and practice of person-centered adult physical rehabilitation based on a scoping review and thematic analysis of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To develop a cross-professional model framing the concept and practice of Person-Centered Rehabilitation (PCR) in adult populations, based on a scoping review and thematic analysis of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Key databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL), snowballing searches, and experts' consultation were the data sources for English-language empirical or conceptual papers, published from January 2007 to February 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers selected adult-based papers addressing at least one of the six categories of PCR-related content, a priori specified in the published review protocol. From 6527 unique references, 147 were finally included in the analysis. Of those, 26 were exclusively conceptual papers.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted textual data on what PCR entails conceptually or as a practice. No quality appraisals were performed as is typical in scoping reviews.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A thematic analysis produced thematic categories that were combined into an emergent model (the PCR Model), which was reviewed by five external experts. PCR was framed as a way of thinking about and providing rehabilitation services "with" the person. PCR is embedded in rehabilitation structures and practice across three levels: 1) the person-professional dyad, 2) the micro-system level (typically an interprofessional team, involving significant others) and 3) a macro-system level (organization within which rehabilitation is delivered). Thematic categories are articulated within each level, detailing both the conceptual and practice attributes of PCR.

CONCLUSION

The PCR model can inform both clinical and service organization practices. The PCR Model may benefit from further developments including obtaining wider stakeholders' input, determining relevance in different cultural and linguistic groups, and further operationalization and testing in implementation projects.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Colonization in Long-Term Care Facilities Around the World: A Review

Elderly people confined to chronic care facilities face an increased risk of acquiring infections by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This review presents the current knowledge of the prevalence and risk factors for colonization by MDROs in long-term care facilities (LTCF), thereby providing a useful reference to establish objectives for implementing successful antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). We searched in PubMed and Scopus for studies examining the prevalence of MDROs and/or risk factors for the acquisition of MDROs in LTCF. One hundred and thirty-four studies published from 1987 to 2020 were included. The prevalence of MDROs in LTCF varies between the different continents, where Asia reported the highest prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacterales (71.6%), carbapenem resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (6.9%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (25.6%) and North America the highest prevalence to MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.4%), MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (15.0%), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) (4.0%), and Clostridioides difficile (26.1%). Furthermore, MDRO prevalence has experienced changes over time, with increases in MDR P. aeruginosa and extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales observed starting in 2015 and decreases of CR Enterobacterales, MDR A. baumannii, VRE, MRSA and C. difficile. Several risk factors have been found, such as male sex, chronic wounds, the use of medical devices, and previous antibiotic use. The last of these aspects represents one of the most important modifiable factors for reducing colonization with MDROs through implementing ASPs in LTCF.

Structures, tensions, and processes shaping long-term care home staff's role in end of life decision-making for residents with dementia

Although long-term care (LTC) home staff of nurses and personal support workers spend the most time providing direct care, their role in end of life decision-making for residents with dementia has largely been unacknowledged. Staff's perceptions of their role play a significant part in how they support people with dementia and family care partners. The purpose of this study was to examine LTC home staff's perspectives of their role in end of life decision-making for LTC home residents with dementia. For this interpretive descriptive study, 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted in two urban LTC homes with nine personal support worker (PSWs), eight registered practical nurses (RPNs), and four registered nurses (RNs). Additionally, a focus group was conducted, consisting of each a PSW, RPN, and RN. A voice-centred relational analysis was used to situate LTC home staff's perspectives within broader social contexts. Findings suggest that little has changed in LTC homes in the last 50 years. Rooted in dichotomies between medical and social care paradigms, ideologies of rationality and professionalism created tensions, hierarchical roles, and staff's minimal involvement in decision-making. A relational approach is needed to account for the interdependency of care and the relationships that LTC home staff have with residents, family care partners, and the sociopolitical environment.