European Qualitative research project on Patient-preferred outcomes in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (EQPERA): rationale, design and methods of a multinational, multicentre, multilingual, longitudinal qualitative study

"My role as a parent, to me, it has narrowed" the impact of early inflammatory arthritis on parenting roles: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of early inflammatory arthritis on participation in parenting roles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four individuals (20 female) aged between 32 and 62 years with early inflammatory arthritis (<2 years duration) and who were parents of dependent children (≤21 years) were interviewed. A qualitative description study design was used, and thematic analysis methodologies were employed in the data analysis.

RESULTS

Parenting roles were significantly impacted in early disease and extensive parenting restrictions were identified regardless of age and gender. Physical symptoms hampered "everyday mammy activities." Parent-child interactions were altered by the emotional impact of early arthritis including low mood and irritability. Participants emphasised remorse at the negative impact of their arthritis on their children's childhood. Parent-role identity and parents' perception of how they were viewed by their children were negatively impacted by early disease with considerable self-imposed pressure to shield children from the consequences of arthritis. A forced "role switch" requiring relinquishing of some parenting tasks was identified as an unwanted burden associated with inflammatory arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory arthritis has a negative impact on parenting which is present from disease onset. Understanding factors which influence parenting with arthritis is important to identify appropriate healthcare interventions.Implications for rehabilitationAn early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis is synonymous with considerable challenges in performing parenting tasks and activities which are present despite early medical management and drug therapy.Physical and psychosocial sequelae of early inflammatory arthritis result in restrictions in the execution of parenting activities and are accompanied by a forced "role switch".The disease impact on parenting differs in early and established inflammatory arthritis and requires distinct healthcare approaches and interventions to adequately address the needs.Parent role identity and perceived lack of control are intrinsically linked to the degree of perceived negative impact on parenting and these factors should be considered in the design and evaluation of appropriate healthcare interventions for this population.

It Is Like a Puppet Show-Experiences of Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Adult Chinese: A Qualitative Study

Rheumatoid arthritis results in progressive destruction of the joints. However, descriptions of patient's experiences with the disease are limited. This qualitative study aimed to explore patients' personal experiences with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 30 patients from January to May 2019; interview data were analyzed with content analysis. Most participants were female (90%); their mean age was 57 years. Three main categories emerged from analysis of the data: "physical suffering," "limitations of abilities," and "coexisting with the disease." Physical suffering was due to personal lifelong hardships from chronic pain and stiffness. Limitations of abilities occurred from loss of physical function and limited social life, due to participants discomfort with joint deformities and their appearance to others. Participants coexisted with the disease by making changes in their outlook and comparing their lives with others in order to gain a positive perspective.

What do patients prefer? A multinational, longitudinal, qualitative study on patient-preferred treatment outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To explore treatment outcomes preferred by patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and how these change throughout the early disease stage across three European countries.

METHODS

A longitudinal, qualitative, multicentre study was conducted in Belgium, the Netherlands and Sweden. 80 patients with early RA were individually interviewed 3-9 months after treatment initiation and 51 of them participated again in either a focus group or an individual interview 12-21 months after treatment initiation. Data were first analysed by country, following the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL). Thereafter, a meta-synthesis, inspired by the principles of meta-ethnography and the QUAGOL, was performed, involving the local research teams.

RESULTS

The meta-synthesis revealed 11 subthemes from which four main themes were identified: disease control, physical performance, self-accomplishment and well-being. 'A normal life despite RA' was an overarching patient-preferred outcome across countries. Belgian, Dutch and Swedish patients showed many similarities in terms of which outcomes they preferred throughout the early stage of RA. Some outcome preferences (eg, relief of fatigue and no side effects) developed differently over time across countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study on patient-preferred outcomes in early RA revealed that patients essentially want to live a normal life despite RA. Our findings help to understand what really matters to patients and provide specific insights into the early stage of RA, which should be addressed by clinicians of different disciplines from the start of treatment onwards.

Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity

BACKGROUND

With respect to patient-centered care, measuring care effects based on patient-relevant outcomes is becoming increasingly important. There is some uncertainty about what outcomes are particularly relevant to patients and who determines their relevance. To determine this, we conducted a scoping review of the international literature with the aim to improve the conceptual clarity regarding (1) the terminology used for supposedly patient-relevant outcomes, (2) the variety of outcomes considered patient-relevant, and (3) justifications for the choice of these specific outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in Embase, PubMed (including Medline), Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar with a special focus on article titles. Search terms included patient-relevant, patient-important, patient-preferred, and outcome(s), endpoint(s), parameter(s), indicator(s). We limited the search period from January 2000 to July 2019. Full-text articles reporting outcomes that were described as patient-relevant met the inclusion criteria. Two researchers independently analyzed all eligible articles applying quantitative and structuring content analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 155 articles, 44 of which met the inclusion criteria. A content analysis revealed 35 different terms used with regard to patient-relevant outcomes. However, authors predominantly referred to patient-important outcomes (23 articles, 52.3%) and patient-relevant outcomes (17 articles, 38.6%). A structuring content analysis of all extracted outcomes revealed a total of 281 codes, pooled in 32 inductive categories. Among these, the following categories dominated: symptoms, adverse events/complications, survival/mortality, pain. In just 16 of the articles (36.4%), authors provided justifications for the choice of the outcome being based either on patient and/or expert opinions. In another 13 articles (29.5%), no justification was provided.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review on patient-relevant outcomes was driven by the questions (1) what outcomes are particularly relevant to patients, and (2) who determines their relevance. We found a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes, with only one third of articles involving patients in the justification of the outcome selection. In view of this conceptual uncertainty it appears difficult to determine or even to compare a particular patient benefit of interventions. A set of generic outcomes relevant to patients would be helpful to contribute to a consistent understanding of patient relevance.

"Mastering a New Life Situation" - Patients' Preferences of Treatment Outcomes in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis - A Longitudinal Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

To explore patients' preferred treatment outcomes during their first two years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A qualitative, longitudinal, multicenter study with interviews at two time points was performed in Sweden. Individual interviews were conducted at time point 1 with 31 patients with RA, defined as disease duration of ≤1 year and treatment for 3-7 months. Seven focus group interviews and five individual interviews were conducted at time point 2 with 22 patients 12-20 months after treatment initiation. The interviews were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. A core category with four related concepts emerged.

RESULTS

The core finding of patient-preferred treatment outcomes was "mastering a new life situation". Patients preferred to experience control of the disease by controlling the symptoms and by experiencing absence of disease. To experience autonomy by regaining former activity level, experiencing independence, and being empowered was another preferred outcome. Patients preferred to regain identity through being able to participate, experience well-being, and regain former self-image. To experience joy in everyday life through vitality and believing in the future was another preferred outcome. Patients' preferences developed over time from the acute phase of controlling the symptoms and wanting to return to the life they lived prior to diagnosis, to a more preventive way of self-management and empowerment to master the new life situation.

CONCLUSION

The patients' preferred treatment outcomes during the first two years with RA were to master their new life situation and changed from a preference to return to a life lived prior disease onset, to a preference of living with quality of life, despite RA. This study increases the understanding of patients' preferred treatment outcomes in the early disease course and can be a foundation for tailoring interventions to be more person-centered and to improve long-term treatment outcomes.