From menu to mouth: the decay pathway of nutrient intake from planned menu to consumed and characteristics of residents in an aged care facility with greater nutrient decay rates: a cross-sectional study

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the dietary fiber menu provision and consumption for older adults living in residential care facilities

BACKGROUND

Older adults living in residential care facilities are commonly given laxatives to treat constipation; however, these may not always provide full relief, and side effects include diarrhea. Dietary fiber effectively prevents constipation, and international guidelines recommend 25 g/d for optimal laxation. Older adults in residential care rely on the facility menu to provide their nutritional requirements, including adequate dietary fiber. Little is known about how much dietary fiber is provided and consumed.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the provision and consumption of dietary fiber for older adults living in residential care facilities.

METHODS

We systematically searched available literature for studies reporting the analysis of residential care menus and meals consumed by residents aged over 65 y. A meta-analysis was performed on the studies that provided the mean amount of dietary fiber provided and consumed by residents. A random effect model was applied due to the heterogeneity of study methodologies.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 4406 publications, but only 28 studies were eligible for our meta-analysis. The study sample comprised 4817 residents. The mean amount of fiber provided to residents was 21.4 g/d [standard error (SE): 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 18.8, 24.2 g/d], the mean amount of fiber consumed by residents was 15.8 g/d (SE: 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 14.7, 16.9 g/d).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults living in care facilities are provided with dietary fiber below the recommended guidelines. Compounding this is that residents consume much less than what is provided and do not meet the recommendations for dietary fiber consumption. There is scope to improve dietary fiber provision, promote consumption to residents to aid laxation, and potentially reduce laxative use and the unwanted side effects of diarrhea. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42023427265.

Evolution, adaptation, and new applications of the FODMAP diet

The FODMAP diet has been a treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) for many years. Rigorous scientific evaluation and clinical application of the FODMAP diet have generated deep understanding regarding clinical efficacy, mechanisms of action, and potential adverse effects of this dietary approach. In turn, this knowledge has allowed fine-tuning of the diet to optimize treatment benefits and minimize risks, in the form of the traditional three-phase diet; the FODMAP-gentle approach, which is a less restrictive iteration; and a proposed FODMAP-modified, Mediterranean-style diet which endeavours to optimise both gastrointestinal symptoms and other health parameters. Furthermore, recognition that IBS-like symptoms feature in other conditions has seen the FODMAP diet tested in non-IBS populations, including in older adults with diarrhea and women with endometriosis. These areas represent new frontiers for the FODMAP diet and a space to watch as future research evaluates the validity of these novel clinical applications.

Can fortified, nutrient-dense and enriched foods and drink-based nutrition interventions increase energy and protein intake in residential aged care residents? A systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Food fortification as part of the food-first approach in nursing homes is a strategy that may increase energy and protein intake.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the effect of nutrition interventions using fortification, nutrient-dense or enriched food and/or drinks on energy and protein intake in residents living in nursing homes, compared to the standard menu with or without oral nutritional support products. The secondary aim was to identify and synthesise outcomes of these interventions on weight change, nutritional status, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit.

METHODS

A systematic search of seven databases was undertaken. After reviewing all titles/abstracts then full-text papers, key data were extracted and synthesised narratively and through meta-analysis. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research.

RESULTS

Of 3,098 articles retrieved, 16 were included, 13 in the meta-analysis. There were 891 participants, with the study duration ranging from four to 26 weeks. The groups receiving the fortified diet had a significantly higher energy intake (Hedges' g = 0.69 (CI 0.36-1.03), p < 0.0001) and protein intake (Hedges' g = 0.46 (CI 0.17-0.74), p = 0.003) compared with the groups receiving the standard menu +/- ONS. The meta-analysis revealed I² values of 77% for energy (p < 0.0001) and 60% for protein (p = 0.003), indicating considerable statistical heterogeneity across included studies. Benefits to weight and nutritional status of residents were recorded in some studies. Where reported, cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of menu fortification/supplementation were variable.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review with meta-analyses has shown that fortified menus may significantly increase energy and protein intakes compared with standard menus in nursing homes. As such, the findings of this review support further use of fortified diets in this setting. Further research is warranted comparing food fortification to standard menus, with a particular focus on evaluating the effect on weight, nutritional status and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO no. CRD42020162796.

An investigation of recommended serve food portions and attaining energy and protein requirements in older adults living in residential care

BACKGROUND

Ageing populations show a propensity for reduced food intake, which impacts nutritional adequacy. Nutrition guidelines for residential care homes (RCHs) are currently based on serve size of core food groups and do not consider nutrient density. The present study aimed to investigate the weight of foods served/consumed compared to recommended serve sizes and to compare energy and protein intake with individual requirements.

METHODS

This was an observational study of older adults living in four RCHs. Dietary intake was estimated through the difference between weighed reference meals and a single, double-weighed 24-h food plate waste collected from each participant. FoodWorks9^® (Xyris^® Software, Brisbane, Australia) was used to calculate energy, protein and serves of core food groups from food intake and the menu provided to recommended serve sizes. Individual intake was compared with nutrition guidelines and estimated energy and protein requirements.

RESULTS

Across 420 participants, 9.8% completed a main meal (lunch or dinner). The servings provided [248 g; interquartile range (IQR) = 206-290 g] were less than the recommended servings for a main meal (306 g = protein/starch/two vegetables), with 157 g (IQR = 109-221 g) consumed. The menu provided for minimum serves of all core food groups except for dairy. Median energy intake (n = 389) (5272 kJ day^-1 , IQR = 4229-6720 kJ) and protein intake (47.3 g day^-1 , IQR = 35.9-60.8 g) were less than estimated requirements (8181 kJ day^-1 , IQR = 7300-9338 kJ day^-1 ; 76.7 g day^-1 , IQR = 66.7-90.8 g).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional needs were not met in this cohort. The findings of the present study highlight the need for smaller, nutrient-dense meals and revised menu standards to ensure nutritional adequacy in this vulnerable population.