Role of diffusional kurtosis imaging in grading of brain gliomas: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Perifocal Zone of Brain Gliomas: Application of Diffusion Kurtosis and Perfusion MRI Values for Tumor Invasion Border Determination

(1) Purpose: To determine the borders of malignant gliomas with diffusion kurtosis and perfusion MRI biomarkers. (2) Methods: In 50 high-grade glioma patients, diffusion kurtosis and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) values were determined in contrast-enhancing area, in perifocal infiltrative edema zone, in the normal-appearing peritumoral white matter of the affected cerebral hemisphere, and in the unaffected contralateral hemisphere. Neuronavigation-guided biopsy was performed from all affected hemisphere regions. (3) Results: We showed significant differences between the DKI values in normal-appearing peritumoral white matter and unaffected contralateral hemisphere white matter. We also established significant (p < 0.05) correlations of DKI with Ki-67 labeling index and Bcl-2 expression activity in highly perfused enhancing tumor core and in perifocal infiltrative edema zone. CBF correlated with Ki-67 LI in highly perfused enhancing tumor core. One hundred percent of perifocal infiltrative edema tissue samples contained tumor cells. All glioblastoma samples expressed CD133. In the glioblastoma group, several normal-appearing white matter specimens were infiltrated by tumor cells and expressed CD133. (4) Conclusions: DKI parameters reveal changes in brain microstructure invisible on conventional MRI, e.g., possible infiltration of normal-appearing peritumoral white matter by glioma cells. Our results may be useful for plotting individual tumor invasion maps for brain glioma surgery or radiotherapy planning.

Comparison of the Differential Diagnostic Performance of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules

Objective

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capacity between IVIM and DKI in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

Material and Methods

This study is based on magnetic resonance imaging data of the thyroid with histopathology as the reference standard. Spearman analysis was used to assess the relationship of IVIM-derived parameters D, f, D* and the DKI-derived parameters D_app and K_app. The parameters of IVIM and DKI were compared between the malignant and benign groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to establish the diagnostic model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was subsequently performed. The DeLong test was used to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of different prediction models. Spearman analysis was used to assess the relationship of Ki-67 expression and parameters of IVIM and DKI.

Results

Among the 93 nodules, 46 nodules were malignant, and 47 nodules were benign. The D_app of DKI-derived parameter was related to the D (P < 0.001, r = 0.863) of IVIM-derived parameter. The K_app of DKI-derived parameter was related to the D (P < 0.001, r = -0.831) of IVIM-derived parameters. The malignant group had a significantly lower D value (P < 0.001) and f value (P = 0.013) than the benign group. The malignant group had significantly higher K_app and lower D_app values (all P < 0.001). The D+f had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951. The D_app+K_app had an AUC of 0.943. The D+f+D_app+K_app had an AUC of 0.954. The DeLong test showed no statistical significance among there prediction models. The D (P = 0.007) of IVIM-derived parameters and D_app (P = 0.045) of DKI-derived parameter were correlated to the Ki-67 expression.

Conclusions

IVIM and DKI were alternative for each other in in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a high sensitivity for differentiating between malignant and non-malignant breast lesions but is sometimes limited due to its low specificity. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) values in magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for benign and malignant breast lesions.

Methods

Original articles on relevant topics, published from 2010 to 2019, in PubMed, EMBASE, and WanFang databases were systematically reviewed. According to the purpose of the study and the characteristics of DKI reported, the diagnostic performances of MK and MD were evaluated, and meta-regression was conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity.

Results

Fourteen studies involving 1,099 (451 benign and 648 malignant) lesions were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for MD were 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.87), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86), 4.44 (95% CI, 3.54-5.57), and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13-0.26), while those for MK were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89), 5.72 (95% CI, 4.26-7.69), and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.09-0.19), respectively. The overall area under the curve (AUC) was 0.91 for MD and 0.95 for MK.

Conclusions

Analysis of the data from 14 studies showed that MK had a higher pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic performance for differentiating between breast lesions, compared with MD.

Glioma-Specific Diffusion Signature in Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the relationship between mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) values from whole-brain diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) parametric maps in preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images from 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System integrated glioma groups. Methods: Seventy-seven patients with histopathologically confirmed treatment-naïve glioma were retrospectively assessed between 1 August 2013 and 30 October 2017. The area on scatter plots with a specific combination of MK and MD values, not occurring in the healthy brain, was labeled, and the corresponding voxels were visualized on the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Reversely, the labeled voxels were compared to those of the manually segmented tumor volume, and the Dice similarity coefficient was used to investigate their spatial overlap. Results: A specific combination of MK and MD values in whole-brain DKI maps, visualized on a two-dimensional scatter plot, exclusively occurs in glioma tissue including the perifocal infiltrative zone and is absent in tissue of the normal brain or from other intracranial compartments. Conclusions: A unique diffusion signature with a specific combination of MK and MD values from whole-brain DKI can identify diffuse glioma without any previous segmentation. This feature might influence artificial intelligence algorithms for automatic tumor segmentation and provide new aspects of tumor heterogeneity.

The Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Characterization of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Rationale and Objectives: Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is a promising imaging technique, but the results regarding the diagnostic performance of DKI in the characterization and classification of breast tumors are inconsistent among published studies. This study aimed to pool all published results to provide more robust evidence of the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast tumors using DKI. Methods: Studies on the differential diagnosis of breast tumors using DKI-derived parameters were systemically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science without a time limit. Review Manager 5.3 was used to calculate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals of the mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Stata 12.0 was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as well as the publication bias and heterogeneity of each parameter. Fagan's nomograms were plotted to predict the post-test probabilities. Results: Thirteen studies including 867 malignant and 460 benign breast lesions were analyzed. Most of the included studies showed a low to unclear risk of bias and low concerns regarding applicability. Breast cancer showed a higher MK (SMD = 1.23, P < 0.001) but a lower MD (SMD = -1.29, P < 0.001) and ADC (SMD = -1.21, P < 0.001) than benign tumors. The MK (SMD = -1.36, P = 0.006) rather than the MD (SMD = 0.29, P = 0.20) or ADC (SMD = 0.26, P = 0.24) can further differentiate invasive ductal carcinoma from ductal carcinoma in situ. The DKI-derived MK (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 88%, DOR = 66) and MD (sensitivity = 86% and specificity = 88%, DOR = 46) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance and post-test probability (65, 64, and 56% for MK, MD, and ADC) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions, with a higher sensitivity and specificity than the DWI-derived ADC (sensitivity = 85% and specificity = 83%, DOR = 29). Conclusion: The DKI-derived MK and MD demonstrate a comparable diagnostic performance in the discrimination of breast tumors based on their microstructures and non-Gaussian characteristics. The MK can further differentiate invasive ductal carcinoma from ductal carcinoma in situ.

The diagnostic role of diffusional kurtosis imaging in glioma grading and differentiation of gliomas from other intra-axial brain tumours: a systematic review with critical appraisal and meta-analysis

Purpose

We aim to illustrate the diagnostic performance of diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the diagnosis of gliomas.

Methods

A review protocol was developed according to the (PRISMA-P) checklist, registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and published. A literature search in 4 databases was performed using the keywords ‘glioma’ and ‘diffusional kurtosis’. After applying a robust inclusion/exclusion criteria, included articles were independently evaluated according to the QUADAS-2 tool and data extraction was done. Reported sensitivities and specificities were used to construct 2 × 2 tables and paired forest plots using the Review Manager (RevMan®) software. A random-effect model was pursued using the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristics.

Results

A total of 216 hits were retrieved. Considering duplicates and inclusion criteria, 23 articles were eligible for full-text reading. Ultimately, 19 studies were eligible for final inclusion. The quality assessment revealed 9 studies with low risk of bias in the 4 domains. Using a bivariate random-effect model for data synthesis, summary ROC curve showed a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 and estimated sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78–0.92) in high-/low-grade gliomas’ differentiation. A mean difference in mean kurtosis (MK) value between HGG and LGG of 0.22 (95% CI 0.25–0.19) was illustrated (p value = 0.0014) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 73.8%).

Conclusion

DKI shows good diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas further supporting its potential role in clinical practice. Further exploration of DKI in differentiating IDH status and in characterising non-glioma CNS tumours is however needed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02425-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.