Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) in preschool children with asthma: a prospective validation study

Correlation between impulse oscillometry parameters and test for respiratory and asthma control in kids (TRACK) in asthma control of preschoolers with asthma

BACKGROUND

Little research has been conducted to evaluate the correlation between impulse oscillometry (IOS), Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), and Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK).

METHODS

This study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021. Children aged 2-6 years who had been diagnosed with asthma with acute exacerbation were enrolled and followed-up until the end of the study. Correlations between the parameters of IOS, C-ACT and TRACK were assessed. The validity and reliability of TRACK were verified.

RESULTS

A total of 114 children with asthma and acute exacerbations were recruited. Their mean age was 4.1 ± 1.1 years, and 60.5% were males. After a year of treatment, the change of R5-R20 from baseline 0.64 ± 0.38 kPa/L/s to 12th month 0.48 ± 0.2 kPa/L/s (p = 0.022). TRACK and C-ACT scores were significantly correlated during the observation period. R5-R20 in IOS at baseline and at the 12th month of follow-up as well as the change in IOS parameters were significantly associated with C-ACT (p = 0.003, 0.015, and 0.001, respectively). R5% and R5-R20 changes in IOS were associated with TRACK (p = 0.04 and 0.025, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of TRACK were 80.8% (67.5-90.4) and 100% (94.1-100), respectively, with cut-off points >95 and AUC 93.8%.

CONCLUSION

TRACK score appears to have a stronger association with the IOS parameter than C-ACT score. Our findings indicate that TRACK is a valid tool for assessing asthma control in preschool children.

Contextualizing the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale in primary healthcare settings: a validity and reliability evaluation study

BACKGROUND

An English version of the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) scale was recently revised, and it is necessary to test this instrument in different primary care populations.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the PPPC scale.

DESIGN

A mixed method was used in this study. The Delphi method was used to collect qualitative and quantitative data to address the content validity of the PPPC scale by calculating the Content Validity Index, Content Validity Ratio, the adjusted Kappa, and the Item Impact Score. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to assess the construct validity of the PPPC scale through a cross-sectional survey. The internal consistency was also assessed.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

In the Delphi consultation, seven experts were consulted through a questionnaire sent by email. The cross-sectional survey interviewed 188 outpatients in Guangzhou city and 108 outpatients in Hohhot City from community health service centers or stations face-to-face.

RESULTS

The 21 items in the scale were relevant to their component. The Item-level Content Validity Index for each item was higher than 0.79, and the average Scale-level content validity index was 0.97 in each evaluation round. The initial proposed 4-factor CFA model did not fit adequately. Still, we found a 3-factor solution based on our EFA model and the validation via the CFA model (model fit: [Formula: see text], P < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.044, CFI = 0.981; factor loadings: 0.553 to 0.888). Cronbach's α also indicated good internal consistency reliability: The overall Cronbach's α was 0.922, and the Cronbach's α for each factor was 0.851, 0.872, and 0.717, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the PPPC scale provides a valuable tool for evaluating patient-centered medical service quality.

THE LEVEL OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES AS A MARKER OF ASTHMA SEVERITY IN CHILDREN

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the research was to assess the reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in granulocytes of patients with asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The study involved 35 children aged 5 to 17 years. 26 children with persistent asthma, partially controlled course in the period of exacerbation were divided into groups: 1 group - mild asthma (n = 12), group 2 - moderate asthma (n = 7) group 3 - severe asthma (n = 7) and control group included almost healthy children (n = 9). ROS levels in granulocytes were evaluated using BD FACSDiva™. The spirographic complex was used to assess the function of external respiration.

RESULTS

Results: The level of ROS in granulocytes of patients with severe asthma was significantly reduced compared with children in the control group and patients with mild and moderate asthma (p₁-₃ = 0.0003, p₂-₃ = 0.0017, p c-₃ = 0.0150). The concentration of ROS in granulocytes ≤ 285 a.u. was prognostically significant with high specificity and sensitivity with severe asthma.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The concentration of ROS levels in neutrophils in patients with severe asthma probably reflected the suppression of their products, which suggests the depletion of the reserve capacity of neutrophils. Decreased concentrations of reactive oxygen species in children with asthma can be considered as a possible marker of asthma severity.

The Relationship of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Initial Score on the Prognosis of Pre-school Children With Asthma: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: The test for respiratory and asthma control in kids (TRACK) is currently the only standard follow-up tool for children under 5 years of age with asthma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the TRACK initial score (Ti) and their prognosis after 6 months of follow-up in pre-schoolers with asthma. Design: A prospective cohort study. Methods: The study included pre-schoolers diagnosed with asthma at the Shanghai Children's Medical Center between January 2019 and June 2020, and follow-up for 6 months. TRACK scores, frequency of wheezing and respiratory infections, number of Emergency Department (ED) visits and treatment regimen were collected. According to the TRACK initial score, the children were divided into "Ti < 60 group" and "Ti ≥ 60 group," and the two groups were compared in terms of TRACK score related indicators, clinical manifestations and treatment. Results: There are 102 pre-schoolers included in the analysis [78 boys (76.5%) and 24 girls (23.5%); mean (SD) age, 28.05 (11.63) months]. After 6 months of follow-up, the TRACK score was improved in both groups, and the "Ti ≥ 60 group" had a higher score, lower rate of uncontrolled asthma and fewer reassessments were required. There was no difference in the number of wheezing attacks between the two groups in terms of clinical presentation, but the "Ti < 60 group" had more respiratory infections and ED visits. Regarding the use of ICSs, in the "Ti < 60 groups," the dose of ICSs was higher and reduced slowly, and the dose difference between the two groups began to appear after 5 months of follow-up. Conclusion: TRACK is essential for pre-schoolers with asthma at the time they are diagnosed. In addition, if the TRACK initial score is < 60, the probability of poor prognosis is higher.