1
|
Dreischor F, Laan ETM, Peeters F, Peeraer K, Lambalk CB, Goddijn M, Custers IM, Dancet EAF. The needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception: in-depth interviews. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac037. [PMID: 36134038 PMCID: PMC9479888 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the experiences and the support and sexual advice needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception after the diagnostic fertility work-up? SUMMARY ANSWER Exploration of the experiences of couples showed that couples would have appreciated fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management into the fertility clinic trajectory, supportive staff with female and male patient interactions and advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and subfertility-related sexual challenges. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Dutch and British professional guidelines advise newly diagnosed subfertile couples with a ‘good prognosis’ to continue to attempt natural conception and do not require fertility clinic staff to interact with patients. Fertility clinic staff and subfertile couples struggle to follow these guidelines as they feel an urgent need for action. Subfertile couples might benefit from sexual advice, as subfertility is negatively associated with sexual functioning, which is important for natural conception. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Twelve one-time in-depth interviews (2015–2017) were conducted with 10 heterosexual couples and 2 women whose partners did not participate, then the interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, reaching inductive thematic saturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The 22 interviewees had experienced 3–18 months of expectant management after their diagnostic fertility work-up in a Belgian or a Dutch tertiary fertility clinic. The face-to-face in-depth interviews explored positive and negative experiences and unmet needs. The transcribed interviews were subjected to inductive content analysis, by two researchers discussing initial disagreements. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Couples would appreciate fertility clinic staff embedding expectant management in the fertility clinic trajectory, by starting off with reassuring couples that their very thorough diagnostic fertility work-up demonstrated their good chance of natural conception, and by involving couples in deciding on the duration of expectant management and by planning the follow-up appointment after expectant management up front. Couples had encountered sexual challenges during expectant management and had an interest in sexual advice, focused on increasing pleasure and partner bonding and preventing the rise of dysfunctions. The couples agreed that a (secured) website with evidence-based, non-patronizing text and mixed media would be an appropriate format for a novel support programme. Couples were keen for interactions with fertility clinic staff which addressed both partners of subfertile couples. Couples also valued advice on managing their lifestyle and distress and would have liked information on the experiences of their peers. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Recall bias is plausible given the retrospective nature of this study. This explorative interview study was not designed for examining country or gender differences in experiences and needs but it did generate new findings on inter-country differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Rather than simply advising expectant management, fertility clinics are encouraged to offer couples who continue to attempt natural conception after their diagnostic fertility work-up, supportive patient–staff interactions with advice on common experiences of peers and on managing their lifestyle, distress and sexual challenges related to subfertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funded by Flanders Research Foundation and the University of Amsterdam. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dreischor
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - E T M Laan
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - F Peeters
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Development and Regeneration, , Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - K Peeraer
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Development and Regeneration, , Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - C B Lambalk
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, , de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, , de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - I M Custers
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - E A F Dancet
- Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, , Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Department of Public Health and Primary Care, , Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohammadi M, Khani M. Comparing the effect of face-to-face education and using educational films on couples' sexual dysfunction during pregnancy. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2021; 10:335. [PMID: 34761021 PMCID: PMC8552277 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1535_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy is a special period in a woman's life during which physical, mental, social, and cultural changes would affect sexual desires during this period. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of face-to-face education and using educational films on the sexual dysfunction in couples. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study was a semi-experimental research. Study population contained pregnant women and their husbands. Samples were selected randomly. Data were gathered using demographic characteristic questionnaire and sexual dysfunction in men and women questionnaire. Sample size was 96 couples (32 couples in the face-to-face group, 32 in the educational films group, and 32 in the control group). Data were analyzed using SPSS20 software. RESULTS The mean total score of preintervention sexual function in face-to-face education group was 46.72 ± 9.79, in educational film group 47.82 ± 13.07, and in control group 43.84 ± 12.76. In the case of postintervention, it was, respectively, 60.62 ± 9.72, 57.37 ± 14.74, and 43.61 ± 14.21. Face-to-face education led to the treatment of sexual dysfunction during pregnancy (P < 0.001). In the educational film group (P = 0.40), sexual dysfunction during pregnancy was not treated, but there was an improvement in sexual function (P = 0.001). In the control group, there was a significant difference regarding the decrease in the score of sexual function and untreated sexual dysfunction during pregnancy (P = 0.001). Furthermore, no improvement was observed in the sexual dysfunction during pregnancy (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS According to the results, face-to-face and film education are effective in sexual function during pregnancy, but face-to-face education in pregnancy is more effective in the treatment of sexual dysfunction, and so this causes promoting sexual health during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Mohammadi
- Research Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Care, Faculty of Midwifery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - MohammadBagher Khani
- Research Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Care, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gianotten WL, Alley JC, Diamond LM. The Health Benefits of Sexual Expression. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR SEXUAL HEALTH 2021; 33:478-493. [PMID: 38595776 PMCID: PMC10903655 DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1966564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Objective Sexual activity is a fundamental human function with short-term and long-term emotional, social, and physical benefits. Yet within healthcare, sexuality has been marginalized and many HCPs are unaware of its beneficial implications for immediate and long-term health. Methods To challenge this assumption we combined the data that already had been collected by the authors with an extensive search of articles on the various health benefits of sexual activity. The results of this process are displayed according to short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term benefits with some explanation about potential causal relationships. Results For the time being, it cannot yet be proved that "good sex promotes good health" since good health also favors good sex. Conclusions Despite lacking such convincing evidence, the article concludes with recommendations for the relevant professions. The balance of research supports that sexuality anyhow deserves greater attention among HCPs and that sexuality research needs better integration within health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woet L. Gianotten
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bordewijk EM, Li W, van Eekelen R, Wang R, Showell M, Mol BW, van Wely M. Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 136:189-202. [PMID: 34033915 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To give an overview of the available methods to investigate research misconduct in health-related research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In this scoping review, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Studies Online (CRSO), and The Virtual Health Library portal up to July 2020. We included papers that mentioned and/or described methods for screening or assessing research misconduct in health-related research. We categorized identified methods into the following four groups according to their scopes: overall concern, textual concern, image concern, and data concern. RESULTS We included 57 papers reporting on 27 methods: two on overall concern, four on textual concern, three on image concern, and 18 on data concern. Apart from the methods to locate textual plagiarism and image manipulation, all other methods, be it theoretical or empirical, are based on examples, are not standardized, and lack formal validation. CONCLUSION Existing methods cover a wide range of issues regarding research misconduct. Although measures to counteract textual plagiarism are well implemented, tools to investigate other forms of research misconduct are rudimentary and labour-intensive. To cope with the rising challenge of research misconduct, further development of automatic tools and routine validation of these methods is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Center for Open Science (OSF) (https://osf.io/mq89w).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmee M Bordewijk
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Wentao Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Rik van Eekelen
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Marian Showell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Madelon van Wely
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boedt T, Vanhove AC, Vercoe MA, Matthys C, Dancet E, Lie Fong S. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 4:CD008189. [PMID: 33914901 PMCID: PMC8092458 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008189.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility is a prevalent problem that has significant consequences for individuals, families, and the community. Modifiable lifestyle factors may affect the chance of people with infertility having a baby. However, no guideline is available about what preconception advice should be offered. It is important to determine what preconception advice should be given to people with infertility and to evaluate whether this advice helps them make positive behavioural changes to improve their lifestyle and their chances of conceiving. OBJECTIVES To assess the safety and effectiveness of preconception lifestyle advice on fertility outcomes and lifestyle behavioural changes for people with infertility. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, trial registers, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos in January 2021; we checked references and contacted field experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), randomised cross-over studies, and cluster-randomised studies that compared at least one form of preconception lifestyle advice with routine care or attention control for people with infertility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Primary effectiveness outcomes were live birth and ongoing pregnancy. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events and miscarriage. Secondary outcomes included reported behavioural changes in lifestyle, birth weight, gestational age, clinical pregnancy, time to pregnancy, quality of life, and male factor infertility outcomes. We assessed the overall quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We included in the review seven RCTs involving 2130 participants. Only one RCT included male partners. Three studies compared preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics with routine care or attention control. Four studies compared preconception lifestyle advice on one topic (weight, alcohol intake, or smoking) with routine care for women with infertility and specific lifestyle characteristics. The evidence was of low to very low-quality. The main limitations of the included studies were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding, serious imprecision, and poor reporting of outcome measures. Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics versus routine care or attention control Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of live births (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.10; 1 RCT, 626 participants), but the quality of evidence was low. No studies reported on adverse events or miscarriage. Due to very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics affects lifestyle behavioural changes: body mass index (BMI) (mean difference (MD) -1.06 kg/m², 95% CI -2.33 to 0.21; 1 RCT, 180 participants), vegetable intake (MD 12.50 grams/d, 95% CI -8.43 to 33.43; 1 RCT, 264 participants), alcohol abstinence in men (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.58; 1 RCT, 210 participants), or smoking cessation in men (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.12; 1 RCT, 212 participants). Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of women with adequate folic acid supplement use (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; 2 RCTs, 850 participants; I² = 4%), alcohol abstinence (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.17; 1 RCT, 607 participants), and smoking cessation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; 1 RCT, 606 participants), on low quality evidence. No studies reported on other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on weight versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on weight were identified only in women with infertility and obesity. Compared to routine care, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on weight affects the number of live births (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.43; 2 RCTs, 707 participants; I² = 68%; very low-quality evidence), adverse events including gestational diabetes (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.26; 1 RCT, 317 participants; very low-quality evidence), hypertension (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.75; 1 RCT, 317 participants; very low-quality evidence), or miscarriage (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.37; 1 RCT, 577 participants; very low-quality evidence). Regarding lifestyle behavioural changes for women with infertility and obesity, preconception lifestyle advice on weight may slightly reduce BMI (MD -1.30 kg/m², 95% CI -1.58 to -1.02; 1 RCT, 574 participants; low-quality evidence). Due to very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice affects the percentage of weight loss, vegetable and fruit intake, alcohol abstinence, or physical activity. No studies reported on other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake were identified only in at-risk drinking women with infertility. We are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake affects the number of live births (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.50; 1 RCT, 37 participants; very low-quality evidence) or miscarriages (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 8.34; 1 RCT, 37 participants; very low-quality evidence). One study reported on behavioural changes for alcohol consumption but not as defined in the review methods. No studies reported on adverse events or other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on smoking versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on smoking were identified only in smoking women with infertility. No studies reported on live birth, ongoing pregnancy, adverse events, or miscarriage. One study reported on behavioural changes for smoking but not as defined in the review methods. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low-quality evidence suggests that preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of live births. Evidence was insufficient to allow conclusions on the effects of preconception lifestyle advice on adverse events and miscarriage and on safety, as no studies were found that looked at these outcomes, or the studies were of very low quality. This review does not provide clear guidance for clinical practice in this area. However, it does highlight the need for high-quality RCTs to investigate preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics and to assess relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes in men and women with infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessy Boedt
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne-Catherine Vanhove
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
- Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine - Cochrane Belgium, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa A Vercoe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christophe Matthys
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eline Dancet
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sharon Lie Fong
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dreischor F, Laan ETM, Apers S, Repping S, van Lunsen RHW, Lambalk CB, D' Hooghe TM, Goddijn M, Custers IM, Dancet EAF. The stepwise development of an interactive web-based sex education programme for subfertile couples: the Pleasure & Pregnancy programme. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:1839-1854. [PMID: 32649754 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can we develop a web-based sex education programme (programme running in a web browser) that addresses the needs of subfertile couples who are advised expectant management for at least 6 months? SUMMARY ANSWER The 'Pleasure & Pregnancy' programme addresses couples' needs, is likely to improve couples' sexual functioning, and is subsequently hypothesised to improve the chance of natural pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY According to professional guidelines (e.g. the Netherlands and UK) couples with unexplained subfertility and a good chance of natural pregnancy, should be advised at least 6 months of expectant management. Adherence to expectant management is challenging as couples and gynaecologist prefer a more active approach. Targeting sexuality may be useful as subfertility is a risk factor for decreased sexual functioning. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A novel programme was developed according to the three steps of the Medical Research Councils' (MRC) framework. First, relevant literature was explored. Second, an interdisciplinary expert panel developed a theory (based on a systematic literature review and patient interviews) on how the chance of natural conception can be improved. Third, the expected process and outcomes were modelled. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Two licenced clinical sexologists, two gynaecologists, a clinical embryologist and two midwife-researchers, all from Belgium and the Netherlands, proposed components for the sex education programme. PubMed was searched systematically for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the proposed components in different patient populations. The needs of 12 heterosexual Dutch or Belgian couples who were advised expectant management were explored with in-depth interviews. The content and delivery characteristics of the novel programme were described in detail with the aid of 'Intervention Taxonomy'. To model the outcomes, a protocol for an RCT was designed, registered and submitted for publication. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE To help maintain or improve sexual functioning, mainly pleasure, and hence increase pregnancy rates, the web-based Pleasure & Pregnancy programme contains a combination of psychosexual education and couple communication, mindfulness and sensate focus exercises. Information on the biology of conception and interaction with fertility clinic staff and peers were added based on couples' needs to increase potential acceptability. LIMITATIONS AND REASON FOR CAUTION This paper outlines the development phase of a sex education programme according to the MRC-framework. Whether the Pleasure & Pregnancy programme actually is acceptable, improves sexual functioning, increases pregnancy rates and is cost-effective remains to be determined. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS No previous interactive web-based sex education programme has aimed to increase the natural pregnancy rate of subfertile couples by targeting their sexual pleasure. The Pleasure & Pregnancy programme addresses couples' needs and its effect on sexual functioning and pregnancy rate is plausible but remains to be demonstrated by an RCT which is currently ongoing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funding was provided by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Flanders Research Foundation and the University of Amsterdam. C.B.L. is editor-in-chief of Human Reproductionbut was blinded to all parts of the peer review process. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dreischor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E T M Laan
- Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Apers
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Repping
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R H W van Lunsen
- Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C B Lambalk
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T M D' Hooghe
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Goddijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I M Custers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E A F Dancet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.,Research Foundation of Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Song Z, Li W, O'leary S, Roberts B, Alvino H, Tremellen K, Gadalla MA, Wang R, Mol BW. Can the use of diagnostic and prognostic categorisation tailor the need for assisted reproductive technology in infertile couples? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 61:297-303. [PMID: 33135775 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complications associated with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for both the offspring and mother, and its high cost make it essential to tailor the technology to those infertile couples who truly benefit from it. AIMS To determine whether a simple prognostic algorithm could discriminate between couples who require immediate fertility treatments and couples in whom less invasive strategies should be offered first. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, couples were classified into six groups based on the medical necessity of IVF and their prognosis for natural conception: (i) tubal/severe semen factor mandating immediate IVF due to the very low chance of natural conception; (ii) pure anovulation infertility; (iii) female age ≥39 years; and (iv) unexplained/mild male infertility (no indication for immediate treatment) with (4A) good, (4B) moderate or (4C) poor prognosis of natural conception, as per an existing, validated prognostic model. For each group, we constructed Kaplan-Meier curves to measure natural conception and the effect of fertility treatment. RESULTS The 12 months cumulative live birth rate for couples with unexplained or mild male infertility and poor prognosis increased from 1% without treatment to 35% after treatment (P < 0.001). In contrast, couples with good prognosis experienced a statistically insignificant increase in their cumulative live birth rate from 40% to 56% (P = 0.07). This demonstrates that a prognostic model could predict a couple's chances of natural conception and the benefit they derive from treatment. CONCLUSIONS This prognostic mode allows fertility treatment to be individually tailored to reduce unnecessary IVF without compromising fertility chances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Song
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wentao Li
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sean O'leary
- Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bronwen Roberts
- Repromed Fertility Specialists, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Alvino
- Repromed Fertility Specialists, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kelton Tremellen
- Department of Obstetrics Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Moustafa A Gadalla
- Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Health Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Rui Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ben W Mol
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abdallah KS, Hunt S, Abdullah SA, Mol BWJ, Youssef MA. How and Why to Define Unexplained Infertility? Semin Reprod Med 2020; 38:55-60. [PMID: 33058088 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Unexplained infertility represents up to 30% of all cases of infertility. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, where no cause for infertility may be identified in the investigation of the couple, be it anovulation, fallopian tube blockage, or severe male factor. Unexplained infertility therefore cannot be considered a diagnosis to which a specific treatment is directed, rather that it indicates a failure to reach a diagnosis of the true cause of infertility. In this review, we explore the evidence base and potential limitations of the current routine infertility assessment. We also aim to highlight the importance of considering the prognosis of each individual couple through the process of assessment and propose a reconsidered approach to treatment, targeted to the prognosis rather than the diagnosis. Ultimately, a better understanding of the mechanisms of infertility will reduce the number of couples diagnosed with "unexplained" infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim S Abdallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Sarah Hunt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.,Monash IVF, Richmond, Australia
| | - Sayed A Abdullah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Ben W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed A Youssef
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|