Off-label drug prescriptions in French general practice: a cross-sectional study

Unlicensed/Off-Label Drug Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge in Children: An Observational Study Using Routinely Collected Health Data

BACKGROUND

Unlicensed and off-label (UL/OL) prescriptions have been associated with an increased risk of drug-related problems. Data of their prevalence at hospital discharge remain insufficient. We aimed to describe the prevalence of UL/OL drugs in outpatient prescriptions at discharge in children.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the routinely collected health data of children at discharge from 2014 to 2016. The primary reference source for determining licensed labelling was the summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) in a French industry-independent formulary named Thériaque. We described the characteristics of UL/OL prescriptions at discharge and looked for predictors of UL/OL prescriptions.

RESULTS

We included 2536 prescriptions of 479 children. Licensed, OL, and UL prescriptions accounted for 58.6% (95% CI: 56.7-60.5), 39.2% (95% CI: 37.3-41.1), and 2.3% (95% CI: 1.7-2.9), respectively. A total of 323 (74%) children received at least one UL/OL drug. Among the licensed drugs, bronchodilators (8.8%) and analgesics (8.6%), and among the OL drugs, antibiotics (2.8%), were the most prescribed. The younger age of the children and higher number of drugs they received increased the probability of UL/OL prescriptions (unadjusted p-value of ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of UL/OL prescriptions is about 40% at discharge from a pediatric university hospital in France.

Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children

BACKGROUND

Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use.

AIM

To develop and test a tool to assess whether a dosage form (formulation) is appropriate for children and estimate the proportion of formulations considered 'inappropriate' in a cohort of hospitalised paediatric patients with a chronic illness.

METHOD

A multi-phase study: patient data collection, tool development, case assessments and tool validation. Inpatients aged 0-17 years at two UK paediatric/neonatal hospitals during data collection periods between January 2015 and March 2016. Written informed consent/assent was obtained. Medicines assessed were new or regularly prescribed to inpatients as part of their routine clinical care. All medicine administration episodes recorded were assessed using the Age-appropriate Formulation tool. The tool was developed by a consensus approach, as a one-page flowchart. Independent case assessments were evaluated in 2019.

RESULTS

In 427 eligible children; 2,199 medicine administration episodes were recorded. Two assessors reviewed 220 episodes in parallel: percentage exact agreement was found to be 91.7% (99/108) and 93.1% (95/102). In total, 259/2,199 (11.8%) medicine administration episodes involved a dosage form categorised as 'age-inappropriate'.

CONCLUSION

A novel tool has been developed and internally validated. The tool can identify which medicines would benefit from development of an improved paediatric formulation. It has shown high inter-rater reliability between users. External validation is needed to further assess the tool's utility in different settings.

Off-label drug use in neonates and infants in Spain: A five-year observational study

OBJECTIVES

To provide information about the off-label rate of all drug prescriptions in neonates and infants up to 1 year in Spain. Also, to analyse the off-label prescription of medicines under current practice in this age group according to different evidence sources.

STUDY DESIGN

A five-year (2015-2019) exploratory observational study about off-label prescription in neonates and infants (0 to 1 year) at primary health care in Spain. All drug prescriptions in this age group were analysed and classified according to their labelling in off-label or on-label. The drugs prescribed off-label were subsequently reviewed in national formularies and other databases to assess its evidence of use beyond what is recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

RESULTS

On average 34.50% of total prescriptions were prescribed off-label according to the SmPC. 17.93% of total prescriptions in neonates and infants up to 1 year old were not based on clinical evidence from SmPC, Pediamécum, BNF or DailyMed. In more than 88% of cases, off-label use was related to the posology section of the SmPC, followed by the therapeutic indications and contraindications sections, in 35.20% and 24.10% of cases, respectively. Almost 13% of off-label drugs were over-the-counter. Salbutamol followed by topical tobramycin and colecalciferol were the drugs most prescribed off-label.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of drugs remains as an important public health concern, especially for neonates and infants up to 1 year, who receive the greatest proportion of off-label prescriptions. The evidence-based off-label prescription is a widespread practice that has shown a stable trend during the 5-year study period providing also a certain extent of flexibility to paediatricians in some therapeutic decisions.