1
|
Blanchette V, Maranda-Pelletier S, Bilodeau G, Giguere A. Factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders in the design of decision aids: A qualitative descriptive study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108061. [PMID: 38035412 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in the design of decision aids (DAs). METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 23 older adults with NCDs who were accompanied by 27 caregivers. This is a secondary analysis of a published study to identify the features of DAs designed for this population and their caregivers. RESULTS Several behaviours and attitudes of caregivers and researchers hindered the older adults' engagement in the DA design process. Specific communication strategies can be employed to support their engagement and overcome the communication challenges inherent to this population, such as memory, attention, hearing, or visual impairments. Adopting the appropriate attitude, taking the time, and providing guidance to the older person can help them focus on the topic, while developing trust between participants is a facilitator to obtain their feedback. CONCLUSION Findings from this project could serve to inform the communication and co-design of DAs with older people with NCDs and their caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Caregivers and researchers have key roles to play in facilitating communication with older persons with NCDs so they are empowered to help in co-designing DAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Human Kinetic and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Sarah Maranda-Pelletier
- University Laval, Quebec City, Canada; School of Psychology, University Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fanaki C, Fortin J, Sirois MJ, Kröger E, Elliott J, Stolee P, Gregg S, Sims-Gould J, Giguere A. Potential Factors Influencing Adoption of a Primary Care Pathway to Prevent Functional Decline in Older Adults. Can Geriatr J 2023; 26:227-238. [PMID: 37265986 PMCID: PMC10198677 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.26.646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction To help recognize and care for community-dwelling older adults living with frailty, we plan to implement a primary care pathway consisting of frailty screening, shared decision-making to select a preventive intervention, and facilitated referral to community-based services. In this study, we examined the potential factors influencing adoption of this pathway. Methods In this qualitative, descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients aged 70 years and older, health professionals (HPs), and managers from four primary care practices in the province of Quebec, representatives of community-based services and geriatric clinics located near the practices. Two researchers conducted an inductive/deductive thematic analysis, by first drawing on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and then adding emergent subthemes. Results We recruited 28 patients, 29 HPs, and 8 managers from four primary care practices, 16 representatives from community-based services, and 10 representatives from geriatric clinics. Participants identified several factors that could influence adoption of the pathway: the availability of electronic and printed versions of the decision aids; the complexity of including a screening form in the electronic health record; public policies that limit the capacity of community-based services; HPs' positive attitudes toward shared decision-making and their work overload; and lack of funding. Conclusions These findings will inform the implementation of the care pathway, so that it meets the needs of key stakeholders and can be scaled up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaimaa Fanaki
- VITAM—Research Centre On Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, QC
| | - Julie Fortin
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC
| | - Marie-Josée Sirois
- VITAM—Research Centre On Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, QC
- Research Centre of the CHU de Québec, Quebec, QC
- Department of Readaptation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- VITAM—Research Centre On Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, QC
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec, QC
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
| | - Susie Gregg
- Canadian Mental Health Association Waterloo Wellington Dufferin, Waterloo, ON
| | - Joanie Sims-Gould
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM—Research Centre On Sustainable Health, Quebec, QC
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, QC
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mattos MK, Gibson JS, Wilson D, Jepson L, Ahn S, Williams IC. Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review. DEMENTIA 2023; 22:875-909. [PMID: 36802973 PMCID: PMC10866150 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231156976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Evidence supports that older adults with cognitive impairment can reliably communicate their values and choices, even as cognition may decline. Shared decision-making, including the patient, family members, and healthcare providers, is critical to patient-centered care. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize what is known about shared decision-making in persons living with dementia. A scoping review was completed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Keywords included content areas of dementia and shared decision-making. Inclusion criteria were as follows: description of shared or cooperative decision making, cognitively impaired patient population, adult patient, and original research. Review articles were excluded, as well as those for which the formal healthcare provider was the only team member involved in the decision-making (e.g., physician), and/or the patient sample was not cognitively impaired. Systematically extracted data were organized in a table, compared, and synthesized. The search yielded 263 non-duplicate articles that were screened by title and abstract. Ninety-three articles remained, and the full text was reviewed; 32 articles were eligible for this review. Studies were from across Europe (n = 23), North America (n = 7), and Australia (n = 2). The majority of the articles used a qualitative study design, and 10 used a quantitative study design. Categories of similar shared decision-making topics emerged, including health promotion, end-of-life, advanced care planning, and housing decisions. The majority of articles focused on shared decision-making regarding health promotion for the patient (n = 16). Findings illustrate that shared decision-making requires deliberate effort and is preferred among family members, healthcare providers, and patients with dementia. Future research should include more robust efficacy testing of decision-making tools, incorporation of evidence-based shared decisionmaking approaches based on cognitive status/diagnosis, and consideration of geographical/cultural differences in healthcare delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dan Wilson
- Health Sciences Library, 2358University of Virginia, USA
| | - Laura Jepson
- School of Nursing, 2358University of Virginia, USA
| | - Soojung Ahn
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Making shared decisions with older men selecting treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): a pilot randomized trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:112. [PMID: 36242683 PMCID: PMC9569273 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00519-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Making high-quality decisions when selecting treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) requires a shared decision-making approach. However, older people with lower health literacy face barriers. The pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting participants and evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention on decision quality for the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Method In this 2-arm, randomized controlled trial, multi-ethnic Asian men aged ≥ 50 years with moderate or severe symptoms (IPSS ≥ 8 and/or QOL ≥ 3) and physicians were recruited at a Singapore public primary care clinic. Men were randomized to either physicians trained in shared decision-making and used a pictorial patient-reported symptom score (Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score) during the consultation or to physicians untrained in shared decision-making who did not use the score. Decision quality was measured using SDMQ-9 scores from men and their physicians after the consultation. Results 60 men (intervention [n = 30], control [n = 30]) receiving care from 22 physicians were recruited. Men’s mean age was 70 ± 9 years: 87% were Chinese, 40% had no formal education, and 32% were of lower socioeconomic status. No difference in decision quality from the men’s nor their physicians’ perspectives was noted [for men: mean score = 70.8 (SD 20.3) vs. 59.5 (SD 22.4); adjusted p = 0.352] [for physicians: mean score = 78.1 (SD 14.1) vs. 73.2 (SD 19.8); adjusted p > 0.999]. Conclusion It was feasible to recruit the intended participants. There was no difference in decision quality between men who used shared decision-making and usual care for the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00519-x.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lognon T, Plourde KV, Aubin E, Giguere AMC, Archambault PM, Stacey D, Légaré F. Decision aids for home and community care: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061215. [PMID: 36129731 PMCID: PMC9362828 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision aids (DAs) for clients in home and community care can support shared decision-making (SDM) with patients, healthcare teams and informal caregivers. We aimed to identify DAs developed for home and community care, verify their adherence to international DA criteria and explore the involvement of interprofessional teams in their development and use. DESIGN Systematic review reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES Six electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library) from inception to November 2019, social media and grey literature websites up to January 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA DAs designed for home and community care settings or including home care or community services as options. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently reviewed citations. Analysis consisted of a narrative synthesis of outcomes and a thematic analysis. DAs were appraised using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). We collected information on the involvement of interprofessional teams, including nurses, in their development and use. RESULTS After reviewing 10 337 database citations and 924 grey literature citations, we extracted characteristics of 33 included DAs. DAs addressed a variety of decision points. Nearly half (42%) were relevant to older adults. Several DAs did not meet IPDAS criteria. Involvement of nurses and interprofessional teams in the development and use of DAs was minimal (33.3% of DAs). CONCLUSION DAs concerned a variety of decisions, especially those related to older people. This reflects the complexity of decisions and need for better support in this sector. There is little evidence about the involvement of interprofessional teams in the development and use of DAs in home and community care settings. An interprofessional approach to designing DAs for home care could facilitate SDM with people being cared for by teams. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020169450.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Lognon
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine V Plourde
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Aubin
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Patient-partner, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Patient Decision Aids Research Group, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen AT, Teng AK, Zhao J, Asirot MG, Turner AM. The use of visual methods to support communication with older adults with cognitive impairment: A scoping review. Geriatr Nurs 2022; 46:52-60. [PMID: 35605551 PMCID: PMC10033830 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Older adults with cognitive impairment often face difficulties with comprehension and communication, which can impact other cognitive processes such as decision-making. This scoping review investigates how visual methods can support older adults with cognitive impairment. The review involved querying four databases. From these databases, eleven articles fit inclusion criteria. This paper examines the purposes, use contexts, types, and effectiveness of the visual methods described in each study. The two major use contexts were elicitation of thoughts, feelings, and preferences in everyday life and health/healthcare related uses. Studies that used visual methods for eliciting preferences generally employed static visualizations. Health-related contexts employed more complex and interactive visualizations. Three studies used visual tools to support older adults in understanding; six, communication; and three, decision-making. None addressed all three outcomes of interest. This study provides recommendations and future directions for visual communication research with older adults with cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie T Chen
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington School of Medicine, 850 Republican Street, Box 358047, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
| | - Andrew K Teng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington School of Medicine, 850 Republican Street, Box 358047, Seattle, WA 98109, United States
| | - Jillian Zhao
- Human-Centered Design and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, United States
| | - Mary Grace Asirot
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, United States
| | - Anne M Turner
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington School of Medicine, 850 Republican Street, Box 358047, Seattle, WA 98109, United States; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marques F, Josloff K, Hung K, Wakamatsu M, Sepucha KR. Decision aids and shared decision making in urogynecology. Menopause 2021; 29:178-183. [PMID: 34905749 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the efficacy and acceptability of decision aids (DAs) in counseling urogynecology patients with prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, or refractory overactive bladder. METHODS This pilot study enrolled 33 patients into a control group that underwent usual care without a DA, followed by 33 patients into an intervention group where providers utilized a DA for counseling. Postvisit patient surveys assessed differences in treatment preference, knowledge, and in patient-physician collaboration using SURE, CollaboRATE, and Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process scales. Postvisit provider surveys assessed their perception of the usefulness and the difficulty of using a DA and visit length. Independent t tests were used for continuous variables (Knowledge and SDM Process scores) and Chi-Square for categorical variables (treatment preference, SURE, and CollaboRATE). RESULTS The majority of eligible patients 66/71 (93%) completed the survey. The intervention group trended toward higher knowledge scores (72% vs 60%, P = 0.06), clearer treatment preferences (85% vs 67%, P = 0.08), higher rates of top SURE scale scores (91% vs 73%, P = 0.11), and top CollaboRATE scores (75% vs 52%, P = 0.07). SDM process scores were similar across groups (3.2 vs 3.2, P = 0.96). Providers used the DA in 73% of intervention group visits and rated the visit length as "normal" in both groups (70% vs 76%, P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS There were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the intervention group. The use of DAs was acceptable to providers and indicated a trend toward increased patient knowledge, treatment preference, and satisfaction. A larger study is warranted to examine the impact of DAs on decision making and patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felisha Marques
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kevan Josloff
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kristin Hung
- Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - May Wakamatsu
- Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Karen R Sepucha
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Umaefulam V, Fox TL, Hazlewood G, Bansback N, Barber CEH, Barnabe C. Adaptation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Decisions with Indigenous Patients. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 15:233-243. [PMID: 34486098 PMCID: PMC8866334 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00546-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Patient decision aids (PtDAs) enable shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers. Adaptations to PtDAs for use with populations facing inequities in healthcare can improve the relevancy of information presented, incorporate appropriate cultural context, and address health literacy concerns. Our objective was to adapt the Early RA (rheumatoid arthritis) PtDA for use with Canadian Indigenous patients. Methods The Early RA PtDA was modified through an iterative process using data obtained from semi-structured interviews of two sequential cohorts of Indigenous patients with RA. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Seven participants provided initial feedback on the existing PtDA. The modifications they suggested were made and shared with another nine participants to confirm acceptability and provide further feedback. The first cohort suggested revisions to clarify medical and cost coverage information, include Indigenous traditional healing practice options, simplify text, and include Indigenous images and colors aligned with Canadian Indigenous community representation. Additional revisions were suggested by the second cohort to increase the legibility of the text, insert more Indigenous imagery, address formulary coverage for non-status First Nations patients, and include information about lifestyle factors in managing RA. Conclusion Incorporating Indigenous-specific adaptations in the design of PtDAs may increase use and relevancy to support engagement in treatment decisions, thereby supporting health-equity oriented health service interventions. Indigenous patient-specific evidence and translation of key words into the end-users’ Indigenous languages should be included for implementation of the PtDA. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00546-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Umaefulam
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Glen Hazlewood
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences at St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng LF, Ngoh SHA, Ng JYX, Tan NC. Clinician perspectives on a culturally adapted patient decision aid concerning maintenance therapy for asthma. J Asthma 2021; 59:1463-1472. [PMID: 33926335 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1923736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patients with persistent asthma often show poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Shared decision-making can improve adherence rates in this population. Patient decision aids (PDAs) are tools to facilitate shared decision-making. To date, only one PDA, developed in a Canadian French-speaking population, exists for patients considering ICS maintenance therapy. This PDA has been culturally adapted in this study to contextualize to the needs of multi-ethnic Asian patients in Singapore. This study explored the views of local clinicians on the content, design and implementation of this newly-adapted PDA. METHODS 24 clinicians, who were purposively sampled from polyclinics and a tertiary institution, were interviewed on the content, design and implementation of the PDA. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed via thematic analysis. RESULTS Clinicians generally accepted the design of the PDA. They suggested for the target users to be patients on Step 2 of GINA guidelines and the number of options to be reduced from four to two (do nothing or start inhaled corticosteroids). Moreover, they supported including a list of values for patients to select from given that Asian patients often do not articulate their values readily. The addition of more visual aids, the production of multilingual Asian editions and the involvement of nurses to administer the PDA was also suggested. CONCLUSION The PDA was culturally-adapted with local clinicians' perspectives to target multi-ethnic Asian patients with persistent asthma (Step 2 GINA guidelines). The main changes include a list of values and addition of visual aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L F Zheng
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth-Duke NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S H A Ngoh
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J Y X Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - N C Tan
- SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth-Duke NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stolee P, Elliott J, Giguere AM, Mallinson S, Rockwood K, Sims Gould J, Baker R, Boscart V, Burns C, Byrne K, Carson J, Cook RJ, Costa AP, Giosa J, Grindrod K, Hajizadeh M, Hanson HM, Hastings S, Heckman G, Holroyd-Leduc J, Isaranuwatchai W, Kuspinar A, Meyer S, McMurray J, Puchyr P, Puchyr P, Theou O, Witteman H. Transforming primary care for older Canadians living with frailty: mixed methods study protocol for a complex primary care intervention. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042911. [PMID: 33986044 PMCID: PMC8126280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older Canadians living with frailty are high users of healthcare services; however, the healthcare system is not well designed to meet the complex needs of many older adults. Older persons look to their primary care practitioners to assess their needs and coordinate their care. They may need care from a variety of providers and services, but often this care is not well coordinated. Older adults and their family caregivers are the experts in their own needs and preferences, but often do not have a chance to participate fully in treatment decisions or care planning. As a result, older adults may have health problems that are not properly assessed, managed or treated, resulting in poorer health outcomes and higher economic and social costs. We will be implementing enhanced primary healthcare approaches for older patients, including risk screening, patient engagement and shared decision making and care coordination. These interventions will be tailored to the needs and circumstances of the primary care study sites. In this article, we describe our study protocol for implementing and testing these approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Nine primary care sites in three Canadian provinces will participate in a multi-phase mixed methods study. In phase 1, baseline information will be collected through questionnaires and interviews with patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). In phase 2, HCPs and patients will be consulted to tailor the evidence-based interventions to site-specific needs and circumstances. In phase 3, sites will implement the tailored care model. Evaluation of the care model will include measures of patient and provider experience, a quality of life measure, qualitative interviews and economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has received ethics clearance from the host academic institutions: University of Calgary (REB17-0617), University of Waterloo (ORE#22446) and Université Laval (#MP-13-2019-1500 and 2017-2018-12-MP). Results will be disseminated through traditional means, including peer-reviewed publications and conferences and through an extensive network of knowledge user partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03442426;Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anik Mc Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Mallinson
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Joanie Sims Gould
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Veronique Boscart
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Burns
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerry Byrne
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judith Carson
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard J Cook
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew P Costa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justine Giosa
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelly Grindrod
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad Hajizadeh
- School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Heather M Hanson
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephanie Hastings
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - George Heckman
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for exceLlence in Economic Analysis Research (CLEAR), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ayse Kuspinar
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Meyer
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josephine McMurray
- School of Business and Economics/Health Studies, Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phyllis Puchyr
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Puchyr
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olga Theou
- School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Z, Jin Y, Lu C, Luo R, Wang J, Liu Y. Effects of patient decision aids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Pract 2021; 27:e12914. [PMID: 33657667 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of patient decision aids on knowledge, decisional conflict and decisional self-efficacy outcomes in patients with diabetes. METHODS A comprehensive database search was performed using the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBASCO), CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang Database and the Ottawa Decision Aid Library Inventory (http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/index.html) from inception to 13 October 2019. Two reviewers independently searched databases, screened articles, extracted data and evaluated the risk bias of included studies. Then Rev Man 5.3 software was adopted for statistical analysis. RESULTS Ten articles containing 1,452 people with diabetes were selected. The results of meta-analysis showed that patient decision aids had a positive effect on reducing decisional conflict and improving decisional self-efficacy among patients with type 2 diabetes. Meanwhile, this article also revealed that patient decision aids have beneficial short-term effects on improving knowledge, but there was no significant long-term effect. CONCLUSION Patient decision aids are capable of becoming support tools to improve shared decision making. Further implementation studies are required to transform patient decision aids tools into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zimeng Li
- School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yinghui Jin
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan University, Hubei, China
| | - Cui Lu
- Emergency Department, Tianjin TEDA Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ruzhen Luo
- School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiayao Wang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanhui Liu
- School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawani MA, Turgeon Y, Côté L, Légaré F, Witteman HO, Morin M, Kroger E, Voyer P, Rodriguez C, Giguere A. User-centered and theory-based design of a professional training program on shared decision-making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:59. [PMID: 33596874 PMCID: PMC7888116 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01396-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We know little about the best approaches to design training for healthcare professionals. We thus studied how user-centered and theory-based design contribute to the development of a distance learning program for professionals, to increase their shared decision-making (SDM) with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, healthcare professionals who worked in family medicine clinics and homecare services evaluated a training program in a user-centered approach with several iterative phases of quantitative and qualitative evaluation, each followed by modifications. The program comprised an e-learning activity and five evidence summaries. A subsample assessed the e-learning activity during semi-structured think-aloud sessions. A second subsample assessed the evidence summaries they received by email. All participants completed a theory-based questionnaire to assess their intention to adopt SDM. Descriptive statistical analyses and qualitative thematic analyses were integrated at each round to prioritize training improvements with regard to the determinants most likely to influence participants' intention. RESULTS Of 106 participants, 98 completed their evaluations of either the e-learning activity or evidence summary (93%). The professions most represented were physicians (60%) and nurses (15%). Professionals valued the e-learning component to gain knowledge on the theory and practice of SDM, and the evidence summaries to apply the knowledge gained through the e-learning activity to diverse clinical contexts. The iterative design process allowed addressing most weaknesses reported. Participants' intentions to adopt SDM and to use the summaries were high at baseline and remained positive as the rounds progressed. Attitude and social influence significantly influenced participants' intention to use the evidence summaries (P < 0.0001). Despite strong intention and the tailoring of tools to users, certain factors external to the training program can still influence the effective use of these tools and the adoption of SDM in practice. CONCLUSIONS A theory-based and user-centered design approach for continuing professional development interventions on SDM with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers appeared useful to identify the most important determinants of learners' intentions to use SDM in their practice, and validate our initial interpretations of learners' assessments during the subsequent evaluation round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Yves Turgeon
- CISSS de la Gaspésie – Service externe de gériatrie ambulatoire, 455 rue Mgr Ross Est, Chandler, QC G0C 1K0 Canada
| | - Luc Côté
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 1323, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 4th floor, Room 4578, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 4211, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kroger
- Quebec Excellence Centre in Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 3445, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Departmentof Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmed M, Marín M, Bouça-Machado R, How D, Judica E, Tropea P, Bentlage E, Brach M. Investigating Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People with Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e22463. [PMID: 33433394 PMCID: PMC7837994 DOI: 10.2196/22463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Dementias—including Alzheimer disease—and Parkinson disease profoundly impact the quality of life of older population members and their families. PROCare4Life (Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older Adults) is a European project that recognizes the benefit of technology-based integrated care models in improving the care coordination and the quality of life of these target groups. This project proposes an integrated, scalable, and interactive care platform targeting older people suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, their caregivers, and socio-health professionals. PROCare4Life adopts a user-centered design approach from the early stage and throughout platform development and implementation, during which the platform is designed and adapted to the needs and requirements of all the involved users. Objective This paper presents the study protocol for investigating users’ needs and requirements regarding the design of the proposed PROCare4Life platform. Methods A mixed qualitative and quantitative study design is utilized, including online surveys, interviews, and workshops. The study aimed to recruit approximately 200 participants, including patients diagnosed with dementia or Parkinson disease, caregivers, socio-health professionals, and other stakeholders, from five different European countries: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain. Results The study took place between April and September 2020. Recruitment is now closed, and all the data have been collected and analyzed in order to be used in shaping the large-scale pilot phase of the PROCare4Life project. Results of the study are expected to be published in spring 2021. Conclusions This paper charts the protocol for a user-centered design approach at the early stage of the PROCare4Life project in order to shape and influence an integrated health platform suitable for its intended target group and purpose. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/22463
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Ahmed
- Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniella How
- Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| | - Elda Judica
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Peppino Tropea
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Ellen Bentlage
- Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Brach
- Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bogza LM, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman HO, Elliott J, Stolee P, Hudon C, Giguere AMC. User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17406. [PMID: 32442151 PMCID: PMC7468645 DOI: 10.2196/17406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a transitional state between normal and pathologic (eg, dementia) cognitive aging. Although its prognosis varies largely, the diagnosis carries the risk of causing uncertainty and overtreatment of older adults with MCI who may never progress to dementia. Decision aids help people become better informed and more involved in decision making by providing evidence-based information about options and possible outcomes and by assisting them in clarifying their personal values in relation to the decision to be made. Objective This study aimed to incorporate features that best support values clarification and adjust the level of detail of a web-based decision aid for individuals with MCI. Methods We conducted a rapid review to identify options to maintain or improve cognitive functions in individuals with MCI. The evidence was structured into a novel web-based decision aid designed in collaboration with digital specialists and graphic designers. Qualitative and user-centered evaluations were used to draw on users’ knowledge, clarify values, and inform potential adoption in routine clinical practice. We invited clinicians, older adults with MCI, and their caregivers to evaluate the decision aid in 6 consecutive rounds, with new participants in each round. Quantitative data were collected using the Values Clarity and Informed subscales of the Decisional Conflict Scale, the System Usability Scale, the Ottawa Acceptability questionnaire, and a 5-point satisfaction rating scale. We verified their comprehension using a teach-back method and recorded usability issues. We recorded the audio and computer screen during the session. An inductive thematic qualitative analysis approach was used to identify and describe the issues that arose. After each round, an expert panel met to prioritize and find solutions to mitigate the issues. An integrated analysis was conducted to confirm our choices. Results A total of 7 clinicians (social workers, nurses, family physicians, psychologists) and 12 older (≥60 years) community-dwelling individuals with MCI, half of them women, with education levels going from none to university diploma, were recruited and completed testing. The thematic analysis revealed 3 major issues. First, the user should be guided through the decision-making process by tailoring the presentation of options to users’ priorities using the values clarification exercise. Second, its content should be simple, but not simplistic, notably by using information layering, plain language, and pictograms. Third, the interface should be intuitive and user friendly, utilize pop-up windows and information tips, avoid drop-down menus, and limit the need to scroll down. The quantitative assessments corroborated the qualitative findings. Conclusions This project resulted in a promising web-based decision aid that can support decision making for MCI intervention, based on the personal values and preferences of the users. Further ongoing research will allow its implementation to be tested in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mihaela Bogza
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Cassandra Patry-Lebeau
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Elina Farmanova
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Carol Hudon
- School of Psychology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lawani MA, Côté L, Coudert L, Morin M, Witteman HO, Caron D, Kroger E, Voyer P, Rodriguez C, Légaré F, Giguere AMC. Professional training on shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods implementation study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:189. [PMID: 32787829 PMCID: PMC7424655 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01197-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders is challenging for primary healthcare professionals. We studied the implementation of a professional training program featuring an e-learning activity on shared decision making and five Decision Boxes on the care of people with neurocognitive disorders, and measured the program's effects. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, we recruited healthcare professionals in family medicine clinics and homecare settings in the Quebec City area (Canada). The professionals signed up for training as a continuing professional development activity and answered an online survey before and after training to assess their knowledge, and intention to adopt shared decision making. We recorded healthcare professionals' access to each training component, and conducted telephone interviews with a purposeful sample of extreme cases: half had completed training and the other half had not. We performed bivariate analyses with the survey data and a thematic qualitative analysis of the interviews, as per the theory of planned behaviour. RESULTS Of the 47 participating healthcare professionals, 31 (66%) completed at least one training component. Several factors restricted participation, including lack of time, training fragmentation into several components, poor adaptation of training to specific professions, and technical/logistical barriers. Ease of access, ease of use, the usefulness of training content and the availability of training credits fostered participation. Training allowed Healthcare professionals to improve their knowledge about risk communication (p = 0.02), and their awareness of the options (P = 0.011). Professionals' intention to adopt shared decision making was high before training (mean ± SD = 5.88 ± 0.99, scale from 1 to 7, with 7 high) and remained high thereafter (5.94 ± 0.9). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study will allow modifying the training program to improve participation rates and, ultimately, uptake of meaningful shared decision making with patients living with neurocognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Luc Côté
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 1323, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Laetitia Coudert
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 4211, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Danielle Caron
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kroger
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Office L-2, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 3445, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 4th floor, Room 4578, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Anik M. C. Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Office L-2, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pace A, Koekkoek JAF, van den Bent MJ, Bulbeck HJ, Fleming J, Grant R, Golla H, Henriksson R, Kerrigan S, Marosi C, Oberg I, Oberndorfer S, Oliver K, Pasman HRW, Le Rhun E, Rooney AG, Rudà R, Veronese S, Walbert T, Weller M, Wick W, Taphoorn MJB, Dirven L. Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how? Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:599-612. [PMID: 33312674 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain tumor patients are at high risk of impaired medical decision-making capacity (MDC), which can be ethically challenging because it limits their ability to give informed consent to medical treatments or participation in research. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Task Force performed a systematic review to identify relevant evidence with respect to MDC that could be used to give recommendations on how to cope with reduced MDC in brain tumor patients. Methods A literature search in several electronic databases was conducted up to September 2019, including studies with brain tumor and other neurological patients. Information related to the following topics was extracted: tools to measure MDC, consent to treatment or research, predictive patient- and treatment-related factors, surrogate decision making, and interventions to improve MDC. Results A total of 138 articles were deemed eligible. Several structured capacity-assessment instruments are available to aid clinical decision making. These instruments revealed a high incidence of impaired MDC both in brain tumors and other neurological diseases for treatment- and research-related decisions. Incapacity appeared to be mostly determined by the level of cognitive impairment. Surrogate decision making should be considered in case a patient lacks capacity, ensuring that the patient's "best interests" and wishes are guaranteed. Several methods are available that may help to enhance patients' consent capacity. Conclusions Clinical recommendations on how to detect and manage reduced MDC in brain tumor patients were formulated, reflecting among others the timing of MDC assessments, methods to enhance patients' consent capacity, and alternative procedures, including surrogate consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pace
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen J Bulbeck
- Brainstrust (The Brain Cancer People), Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - Jane Fleming
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Robin Grant
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Christine Marosi
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingela Oberg
- Department of Neuroscience, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Oberndorfer
- Department Neurology, University Clinic St Pölten, KLPU and KLI-Neurology and Neuropsychology, St Pölten, Austria
| | - Kathy Oliver
- International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Veronese
- Department of Palliative Care, Fondazione FARO, Turin, Italy
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, US
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Consortium of Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Elidor H, Ben Charif A, Djade CD, Adekpedjou R, Légaré F. Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Housing Decisions for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:416-427. [PMID: 32522090 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20925368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. Informal caregivers are regularly faced with difficult housing decisions for older adults with cognitive impairment. They often regret the decision they made. We aimed to identify factors associated with decision regret among informal caregivers engaging in housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults. Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected from a cluster-randomized trial. Eligible participants were informal caregivers involved in making housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults. Decision regret was assessed after caregivers' enrollment in the study using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100. We used a conceptual framework of potential predictors of regret to identify independent variables. We performed multilevel analyses using a mixed linear model by estimating fixed effects (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. The mean (SD) DRS score of 296 informal caregivers (mean [SD] age, 62 [12] years) was 12.4 (18.4). Factors associated with less decision regret were having a college degree compared to primary education (β [95% CI]: -11.14 [-18.36, -3.92]), being married compared to being single (-5.60 [-10.05, -1.15]), informal caregivers' perception that a joint process occurred (-0.14 [-0.25, -0.02]), and older adults' not having a specific housing preference compared to preferring to stay at home (-4.13 [-7.40, -0.86]). Factors associated with more decision regret were being retired compared to being a homemaker (7.74 [1.32, 14.16]), higher burden of care (0.14 [0.05, 0.22]), and higher decisional conflict (0.51 [0.34, 0.67]). Limitations. Our analysis may not illustrate all predictors of decision regret among informal caregivers. Conclusions. Our findings will allow risk-mitigation strategies for informal caregivers at risk of experiencing regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Elidor
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Ali Ben Charif
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Codjo Djignefa Djade
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Rhéda Adekpedjou
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hao Z, Ruggiano N. Family-centeredness in dementia care: what is the evidence? SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE 2020; 59:1-19. [PMID: 31900066 DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1690089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decade, person-centered practices in care for adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/RD) has received significant attention from the health care and social service literature, though less attention has been paid to family-centered care (FCC). Initially conceptualized for application in pediatric care, FCC is an approach where clinicians develop partnerships with care recipients' family members and views family members as having expertise to contribute to the clinical team. More recently, FCC has been extended to the literature on AD/RD care, though little is known about the extent to which family-centered interventions have been developed for use in AD/RD clinical practice, or the effectiveness of family-centered care for this population. To contribute to gaps in scholarship, this systematic review identified and evaluated intervention studies examining FCC in AD/RD clinical care. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Hao
- School of Social Work, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
| | - Nicole Ruggiano
- School of Social Work, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Navigating unknown terrain: decision aids in dementia care. Int Psychogeriatr 2019; 31:1383-1385. [PMID: 31657296 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610219001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|