Study protocol of a multicentre cohort pilot study implementing an expanded preconception carrier-screening programme in metropolitan and regional Western Australia

Attitudes of professional stakeholders towards implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: a systematic review

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) for hundreds of different genetic conditions is technically available for prospective parents, but these tests have not been integrated in a public health policy except for specific sub-groups. We aimed to provide an overview of the perspectives of multiple professional stakeholder groups in order to enhance a responsible implementation of population-based reproductive genetic carrier screening. We conducted a systematic literature search using eight online databases focussing on studies that were published from January 2009 to January 2021. We selected articles dealing with attitudes and opinions from different professional stakeholders, in particular healthcare professionals and policymakers, on how to implement a policy about carrier screening for a reproductive purpose. We identified 18 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Based on our inductive analysis, we identified ten themes categorized in both clinical and program management challenges: ensuring availability of RGCS to all couples who request the test, embedding RGCS as a test offer before pregnancy, providing clear and reliable information, ensuring voluntary participation, developing genetic counselling pre- and post-testing (after positive or negative result), avoiding psychological harm, ensuring equal access, avoiding social pressure, educating and involving a broad spectrum of non-genetic health care professionals, and promoting an independent non-commercial organisational structure. We highlight one major stumbling block on how to responsibly inform couples about hundreds different genetic conditions within constraints regarding time and ability of non-genetic professionals. We promote further research to tackle the issues brought up by this systematic review through pilot studies. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2021 # CRD42021233762; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=233762 .

Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review

Carrier screening aims to identify couples at risk of conceiving children with a recessive condition. Until recently, carrier screening was primarily offered ancestry-based. Technological advances now facilitate expanded universal carrier screening (EUCS). This scoping review aimed to map EUCS's potential societal implications based on both theoretical studies and empirical evidence. To this aim, we performed a CoCites search to find relevant articles, including articles describing carrier screening for at-risk populations, based on five selected query articles. Forty articles were included. Three main potential societal implications were identified: (1) unwanted medicalization, (2) stigmatization and discrimination of carriers and people affected with the conditions screened and (3) challenges in achieving equitable access. Within these themes, potential positive implications are reduction of ethnic stigmatization in ancestry-based offers and increased equity. Potential negative implications are reinforcement of disability-based stigmatization, less possibility for developing expertise in healthcare and societal pressure to partake in screening. Empirical evidence on all these implications is however scarce. In conclusion, both positive and negative potential societal implications of implementing EUCS, primarily theoretical, were identified, even in at-risk groups where evidence is mostly lacking. Empirical research in EUCS pilots is needed to identify which societal implications are likely to occur and therefore should be overcome when implementing EUCS.

Genetic neuromuscular disorders: what is the best that we can do?

The major advances in genetic neuromuscular disorders in the last 30 years have been: (a) identification of the genetic basis for hundreds of these disorders, (b) through knowing the genes, understanding their pathobiology and (c) subsequent implementation of evidence-based treatments for some of the disorders. New genomic technologies are providing precision diagnosis, mode of inheritance and likely prognosis for more patients than ever before. Parents of children with a genetic diagnosis can then use preimplantation or prenatal diagnosis to avoid having further affected children if they wish. But is this the best we can do for genetic neuromuscular disorders? Since the 1980s, it has been argued it would be better to identify Duchenne muscular dystrophy carrier mothers, rather than diagnose their affected sons. Carrier screening for recessive disorders can identify couples with a high chance of having affected children. It allows couples reproductive choice and can prevent infant morbidity and mortality and significant distress for families. Professional bodies in many countries now recommend prospective parents should be informed about carrier screening. Implementing and funding expensive therapies increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening, increasing its attractiveness to governments. Best practice for genetic neuromuscular disorders should include equitable access to carrier screening.