The effect of chronic, non-specific low back pain on superficial lumbar muscle activity: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

DOR LOMBAR E ALTERAÇÕES DO POSICIONAMENTO ARTICULAR EM CICLISTAS: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL

RESUMO Introdução: A dor lombar é uma das queixas mais comuns nos praticantes de ciclismo. Pode ter como fator predisponente a desarmonia do conjunto ciclista-bicicleta. O Bike Fit é uma técnica que visa ajustar a bicicleta às características individuais do ciclista. Objetivos: Investigar a relação entre o posicionamento do ciclista na bicicleta e a ocorrência de queixas de dor lombar. Métodos: Os dados obtidos durante o Bike Fit de 62 ciclistas amadores foram utilizados no estudo. Os ciclistas foram filmados durante a pedalada em um rolo estacionário e a análise das imagens foi realizada pelo software Kinovea®. Os dados relacionados com a queixa de dor lombar e ao posicionamento na bicicleta foram utilizados no teste do Qui-quadrado e de regressão logística binária. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 38,06 ± 8,82 anos, 87,7% da amostra foi composta por homens e a dor lombar foi constatada em 40,3% (25/62) dos participantes. A análise univariada mostrou correlação positiva entre a dor lombar e as seguintes variáveis: ângulo de dorsiflexão do tornozelo (X2 = 6,947, p = 0,014) e alcance dos membros superiores (X2 = 5,247; p = 0,032). A regressão logística binária mostrou uma associação positiva entre alcance dos membros superiores e dor lombar (r = 2,728; p = 0,002) e associação negativa para avanço dos joelhos e dor lombar (r = -2,281; p = 0,007). Conclusão: Os ciclistas com dor lombar apresentam alterações de posicionamento na bicicleta, o que reforça a importância da avaliação do conjunto ciclista-bicicleta. Entretanto, não é possível afirmar se as alterações de posicionamento observadas na amostra estudada são causas ou consequências da dor lombar. Nível de evidência: Nível III; Estudo observacional transversal.

LOW BACK PAIN AND JOINT POSITION CHANGES IN CYCLISTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

ABSTRACT Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common complaints among cyclists. The disharmony of the cyclist-bike combination may be a predisposing factor. Bike Fit is a technique that aims to adjust the bike to the individual characteristics of the cyclist. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between the cyclist’s position on the bicycle and the occurrence of complaints of low back pain. Methods: Data obtained during Bike Fit from 62 amateur cyclists were used in the study. Cyclists were filmed during the act of pedaling on a stationary roller and image analysis was performed using Kinovea® software. Data related to complaints of low back pain and positioning on the bicycle were used in the Chi-Square test and binary logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 38.06 ± 8.82 years, 87.7% of the sample was composed of men and low back pain was found in 40.3% (25/62) of the participants. Univariate analysis showed a positive correlation between low back pain and the following variables: ankle dorsiflexion angle (X2=6.947, p=0.014) and upper limb reach (X2=5.247; p=0.032). Binary logistic regression showed a positive association between reaching with the upper limbs and low back pain (r=2.728; p=0.002) and a negative association between knee advancement and low back pain (r= -2.281; p=0.007). Conclusion: Cyclists with low back pain present changes in their position on the bicycle, which reinforces the importance of evaluating the cyclist/bike combination. However, it is not possible to state whether the positional changes observed in the study sample are causes or consequences of low back pain. Level of evidence: Level III; Cross-sectional observational study.

Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common disorders presenting in primary healthcare. Kinematic studies of low lumbar pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyography (sEMG) may assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. However, the applicability in the use of sEMG in the clinical setting remains uncertain. In this protocol, we aim to review the clinical utility and reproducibility of the sEMG component of these kinematic studies in patients with CLBP.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and results will be reported in line with the PRISMA. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases, along with a comprehensive review of grey literature. Two reviewers will conduct the searches and independently screen them, according to title and abstract. Two independent reviewers will then assess the full-text versions of those selected articles and assess the risk of bias using the defined protocol inclusion criteria. The risk of bias within the studies included will be assessed via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, V.2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to assess certainty of evidence for recommendations based on the risk of bias findings. Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate on groups of studies with low heterogeneity. In instances of higher heterogeneity, meta-synthesis will instead be completed, comparing results in terms of increased or decreased clinical utility and/or reproducibility of sEMG.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was not required for this research. It is anticipated that the results will influence the use, interpretation and further development of sEMG in management and assessment of these patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021273936.

THE EFFECT OF PILATES EXERCISES ON MUSCLE ELECTRICAL ACTIVATION IN ADULTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

ABSTRACT Low back pain is one of the most prevalent orthopedic conditions, affecting around 70% to 80% of the world’s population at least once during their life times. Surface electromyography is an important tool for assessing the muscle function of the lumbar stabilizers. One of the best treatment options for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is physical exercise, particular lyaerobic exercise and Pilates, as these can reduce short-term pain and disability, and improve balance. This review aims to identify the state of art regarding the benefits of pilates on the population with CLBP, evaluating changes in the muscular activation of the muscles of the lumbar region. Searches were conducted on the following databases: PubMed (Medline), Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Ebsco and Scielo; including gray literature: Google Scholar, Grey Literature, Pro Quest Dissertations & Theses. The inclusion criteria were adults with low back pain for three months or more, with or without referred pain in the lower limbs; studies that used electromyographic variables; studies with a pain assessment measure at two different times; studies with physical exercise performed only using the Pilates method. Applying these criteria, the searches retrieved 439 abstracts. Of these, 44 articles were evaluated for eligibility, and three fulfilled the qualitative and quantitative synthesis criteria. The average methodological quality score on the Downs and Black checklist was 15 out of 28. It was therefore concluded that Pilates is an excellent option for the treatment of non-specific low back pain, promoting health and helping prevent low back pain among asymptomatic individuals. Level of evidence II; Systematic Review of Level II or Level I Studies with Discrepant Results.

Microscopic changes in the spinal extensor musculature in patients experiencing chronic spinal pain: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) is the most common musculoskeletal disorder and is a leading cause of disability as per the Global Burden of Diseases. Previous reviews of microscopic changes in the spinal extensor muscles of people with CSP have focused on the lumbar region only and the results have been inconclusive. Therefore, in this protocol, we aim to assess microscopic changes in the extensor muscles of all spinal regions, investigating regionally specific changes in muscle fibre types of the spinal extensor muscles in patients with non-specific CSP.

METHODS/ANALYSIS

This protocol was designed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches will use the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science along with relevant grey literature searches. Two reviewers will conduct the searches, perform data extraction, apply inclusion criteria and conduct risk of bias assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data will be synthesised and analysed independently. If there is sufficient homogeneity, then meta-analysis will be conducted by the reviewers jointly. If not, meta-synthesis or narrative reporting will be performed. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at conferences. Ethical approval for this systematic review was not required due to no patient data being collated.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020198087.

Does pain influence force steadiness? A protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Performing contractions with minimum force fluctuations is essential for everyday life as reduced force steadiness impacts on the precision of voluntary movements and functional ability. Several studies have investigated the effect of experimental or clinical musculoskeletal pain on force steadiness but with conflicting findings. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the current literature to determine whether pain, whether it be clinical or experimental, influences force steadiness.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol for a systematic review was informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Key databases will be searched from inception to 31 August 2020, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, ZETOC and Web of Science. Grey literature and key journals will be also reviewed. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa tool, and the quality of the cumulative evidence assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. If homogeneity exists between groups of studies, meta-analysis will be conducted. Otherwise, a narrative synthesis approach and a vote-counting method will be used, while the results will be presented as net increases or decreases of force steadiness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The findings will be presented at conferences and the review will be also submitted for publication in a refereed journal. No ethical approval was required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020196479.

Electromyographic activity in deadlift exercise and its variants. A systematic review

The main purpose of this review was to systematically analyze the literature concerning studies which have investigated muscle activation when performing the Deadlift exercise and its variants. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement (PRISMA). Original studies from inception until March 2019 were sourced from four electronic databases including PubMed, OVID, Scopus and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) a cross-sectional or longitudinal study design; (b) evaluation of neuromuscular activation during Deadlift exercise or variants; (c) inclusion of healthy and trained participants, with no injury issues at least for six months before measurements; and (d) analyzed "sEMG amplitude", "muscle activation" or "muscular activity" with surface electromyography (sEMG) devices. Major findings indicate that the biceps femoris is the most studied muscle, followed by gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis and erector spinae. Erector spinae and quadriceps muscles reported greater activation than gluteus maximus and biceps femoris muscles during Deadlift exercise and its variants. However, the Romanian Deadlift is associated with lower activation for erector spinae than for biceps femoris and semitendinosus. Deadlift also showed greater activation of the quadriceps muscles than the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles. In general, semitendinosus muscle activation predominates over that of biceps femoris within hamstring muscles complex. In conclusion 1) Biceps femoris is the most evaluated muscle, followed by gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis and erector spinae during Deadlift exercises; 2) Erector spinae and quadriceps muscles are more activated than gluteus maximus and biceps femoris muscles within Deadlift exercises; 3) Within the hamstring muscles complex, semitendinosus elicits slightly greater muscle activation than biceps femoris during Deadlift exercises; and 4) A unified criterion upon methodology is necessary in order to report reliable outcomes when using surface electromyography recordings.