1
|
McNaughton DT, Hancock MJ, Bisby MA, Scott AJ, Jones MP, Dear BF. The association between physical intervention use and treatment outcomes in patients participating in an online and psychologically informed pain management program. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2024; 25:620-629. [PMID: 38870515 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnae044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of multidisciplinary care for the management of chronic pain is uncommon outside specialist clinics. The present study aims to determine the physical intervention use of patients participating in an online psychological pain management program and whether exposure to physical interventions in these patients alters treatment outcomes compared with patients who do not access physical interventions. METHODS Data were obtained from 2 previously published randomized controlled trials of an online psychological pain management program. Physical intervention exposure (categories: none, 1-3 sessions, 4+ sessions) was assessed at baseline, after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and pain-related disability. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare treatment outcomes among those with different physical intervention frequencies and periods of exposure. We assessed whether changes in primary outcomes differed (moderated) by the period and category of physical intervention exposure. RESULTS Of the patients (n = 1074) who completed the baseline questionnaire across both randomized controlled trials, 470 (44%) reported physical intervention use at baseline, 383 (38%) reported physical intervention use after treatment, and 363 (42%) reported physical intervention use at 3-month follow-up. On average, there were moderate-large reductions from baseline to after treatment with respect to all outcomes (Cohen's d = 0.36-0.82). For all outcomes, the interaction of time by physical intervention exposure was statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of patients who participated in a psychologically informed pain management program were establishing, continuing, or stopping additional physical interventions. The frequency of and period of exposure to physical interventions did not appear to moderate treatment outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000252718 and ACTRN12615001003561). The website for registration information is https://www.anzctr.org.au.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T McNaughton
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
- School of Medical, Health, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, 4000, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
| | - Madelyne A Bisby
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
| | - Amelia J Scott
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
| | - Michael P Jones
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
| | - Blake F Dear
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2112, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pocovi NC, Lin CWC, French SD, Graham PL, van Dongen JM, Latimer J, Merom D, Tiedemann A, Maher CG, Clavisi O, Tong SYK, Hancock MJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention for the prevention of low back pain recurrence in Australia (WalkBack): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2024; 404:134-144. [PMID: 38908392 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00755-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence of low back pain is common and a substantial contributor to the disease and economic burden of low back pain. Exercise is recommended to prevent recurrence, but the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an accessible and low-cost intervention, such as walking, is yet to be established. We aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention to prevent the recurrence of low back pain. METHODS WalkBack was a two-armed, randomised controlled trial, which recruited adults (aged 18 years or older) from across Australia who had recently recovered from an episode of non-specific low back pain that was not attributed to a specific diagnosis, and which lasted for at least 24 h. Participants were randomly assigned to an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention facilitated by six sessions with a physiotherapist across 6 months or to a no treatment control group (1:1). The randomisation schedule comprised randomly permuted blocks of 4, 6, and 8 and was stratified by history of more than two previous episodes of low back pain and referral method. Physiotherapists and participants were not masked to allocation. Participants were followed for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 36 months, depending on the date of enrolment. The primary outcome was days to the first recurrence of an activity-limiting episode of low back pain, collected in the intention-to-treat population via monthly self-report. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the societal perspective and expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001134112). FINDINGS Between Sept 23, 2019, and June 10, 2022, 3206 potential participants were screened for eligibility, 2505 (78%) were excluded, and 701 were randomly assigned (351 to the intervention group and 350 to the no treatment control group). Most participants were female (565 [81%] of 701) and the mean age of participants was 54 years (SD 12). The intervention was effective in preventing an episode of activity-limiting low back pain (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·85], p=0·0002). The median days to a recurrence was 208 days (95% CI 149-295) in the intervention group and 112 days (89-140) in the control group. The incremental cost per QALY gained was AU$7802, giving a 94% probability that the intervention was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $28 000. Although the total number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event over 12 months was similar between the intervention and control groups (183 [52%] of 351 and 190 [54%] of 350, respectively, p=0·60), there was a greater number of adverse events related to the lower extremities in the intervention group than in the control group (100 in the intervention group and 54 in the control group). INTERPRETATION An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention significantly reduced low back pain recurrence. This accessible, scalable, and safe intervention could affect how low back pain is managed. FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Pocovi
- Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- The Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Petra L Graham
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, and School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jane Latimer
- The Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dafna Merom
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Tiedemann
- The Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- The Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Shuk Yin Kate Tong
- Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pocovi NC, Ayre J, French SD, Lin CWC, Tiedemann A, Maher CG, Merom D, McCaffrey K, Hancock MJ. Physiotherapists should apply health coaching techniques and incorporate accountability to foster adherence to a walking program for low back pain: a qualitative study. J Physiother 2023; 69:182-188. [PMID: 37271689 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
QUESTIONS What motivates individuals to start a walking program for the prevention of low back pain? What strategies optimise short-term and long-term adherence to a walking program? What strategies can physiotherapists incorporate into clinical practice to facilitate commencement of and adherence to a walking program? DESIGN Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-two adults recently recovered from an episode of non-specific low back pain who participated in a 6-month, progressive and individualised walking program that was prescribed by a physiotherapist trained in health coaching. METHODS Semi-structured focus groups conducted online following completion of the walking program. Interview questions explored: primary motivations for starting a walking program, identification of which elements were useful in optimising adherence to the program, and identification of the barriers to and facilitators of engagement with the program. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Three major themes were identified. Theme one identified that strong motivators to start a walking program were anticipated improvements in low back pain management and the added general health benefits of a more active lifestyle. Theme two identified that fear of high-impact exercises led to avoidance; however, walking was considered a safe exercise option. Theme three identified accountability, enjoyment of exercise and health benefits were critical to adherence. CONCLUSION Participants recently recovered from low back pain reflected positively on a physiotherapist-prescribed walking program. Participants described what elements of the program were crucial to starting exercise and optimising adherence. These findings have informed a list of practical recommendations for physiotherapists to improve patient commencement and adherence to exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Pocovi
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne Tiedemann
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dafna Merom
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffrey
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pocovi NC, Graham PL, Lin CWC, French SD, Latimer J, Merom D, Tiedemann A, Maher CG, van Dongen JM, Clavisi O, Hancock MJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:197. [PMID: 36927497 PMCID: PMC10019396 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise for the prevention of low back pain recurrences is recommended, but under-researched. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking program for preventing low back pain recurrence remains unknown. This a priori statistical analysis plan describes the methods of analysis for the WalkBack trial. METHODS WalkBack is a prospectively registered, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. The aim is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month progressive and individualised walking and education program (intervention) for the prevention of low back pain recurrences, compared to a no-treatment control group. The primary outcome is days to the first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting low back pain. Key secondary outcomes include days to any recurrence of low back pain, days to a care-seeking recurrence of low back pain, disability level, health-related quality of life, costs associated with low back pain and adverse events. All participants will be followed for a minimum of 12 months. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Cox regression is planned to assess the effects for the outcomes of time to activity-limiting, minimal and care-seeking recurrence. Hazard ratios and median survival times with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. The effect of the intervention on continuous outcomes will be estimated with repeated-measure linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal perspective for recurrence prevented (yes/no) and quality-adjusted life years. The proportion of adverse events between groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test. DISCUSSION The WalkBack trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking intervention to prevent low back pain recurrences. This statistical analysis plan provides transparency on the analysis of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION WalkBack - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive individualised walking and education program for the prevention of a recurrence of low back pain. ACTRN12619001134112 . Date Registered: 14/08/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Pocovi
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Petra L Graham
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane Latimer
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Gadigal Country, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dafna Merom
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne Tiedemann
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Gadigal Country, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Gadigal Country, Sydney, Australia
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ayre J, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. Unique considerations for exercise programs to prevent future low back pain: the patient perspective. Pain 2022; 163:e953-e962. [PMID: 34799535 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is moderate quality evidence that exercise can help to prevent future low back pain (LBP). This study aimed to explore patient needs and preferences for exercise programs to prevent LBP and the outcomes of these programs that would be most important to a patient. Researchers conducted 26 semistructured interviews with people with LBP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework thematic analysis. Three themes were developed. Theme 1 emphasised that everyone's LBP was different, translating to preferences for tailored prevention programs with a high level of initial supervision and individualised biomedical explanations for the program. Theme 2 highlighted important outcomes. Pain was considered not only for intensity but also for the duration, frequency, and severity of flare-ups or episodes. Other important outcomes were general fitness and capacity to engage in everyday activities, social interactions, and work. Theme 3 outlined aspects of exercise programs that were considered important for people with fluctuating pain, including how to foster a sense of "progress," set realistic expectations, and support patients to establish exercise routines that can adapt to fluctuating pain. Theme 4 discussed participants' desire for social connection. Patients want exercise programs for LBP prevention, which are highly individualised, provide meaningful explanations of exercises, and help them maintain exercise in the long-term. Clinicians should discuss with patients the transition from a focus on treatment to the prevention of LBP. This provides greater opportunity to adjust goals and expectations and provide relevant education. Balancing the need for individualised care against affordability presents an ongoing challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|