1
|
Crombag N, Sacco A, Stocks B, De Vloo P, van der Merwe J, Gallagher K, David A, Marlow N, Deprest J. 'We did everything we could'- a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida to parents. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:910-921. [PMID: 34228835 PMCID: PMC7613560 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the concepts and strategies parents employ when considering maternal-fetal surgery (MFS) as an option for the management of spina bifida (SB) in their fetus, and how this determines the acceptability of the intervention. Methods A two-centre interview study enrolling parents whose fetuses with SB were eligible for MFS. To assess differences in acceptability, parents opting for MFS (n = 24) were interviewed at three different moments in time: prior to the intervention, directly after the intervention and 3-6 months after birth. Parents opting for termination of pregnancy (n = 5) were interviewed only once. Themes were identified and organised in line with the framework of acceptability. Results To parents opting for MFS, the intervention was perceived as an opportunity that needed to be taken. Feelings of parental responsibility drove them to do anything in their power to improve their future child’s situation. Expectations seemed to be realistic yet were driven by hope for the best outcome. None expressed decisional regret at any stage, despite substantial impact and, at times, disappointing outcomes. For the small group of participants, who decided to opt for termination of pregnancy (TOP), MFS was not perceived as an intervention that substantially could improve the quality of their future child’s life. Conclusion Prospective parents opting for MFS were driven by their feelings of parental responsibility. They recognise the fetus as their future child and value information and care focusing on optimising the child’s future health. In the small group of parents opting for TOP, MFS was felt to offer insufficient certainty of substantial improvement in quality of life and the perceived severe impact of SB drove their decision to end the pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Development and Regeneration Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adalina Sacco
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Philippe De Vloo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johannes van der Merwe
- Department of Development and Regeneration Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division Woman and Child, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katie Gallagher
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,National Institutes for Health, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Anna David
- Department of Development and Regeneration Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,National Institutes for Health, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Neil Marlow
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,National Institutes for Health, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Jan Deprest
- Department of Development and Regeneration Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division Woman and Child, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|