Qualitative focus group interview study of communication between patients, dentists and physicians for efficient osteonecrosis of the jaw practices

Dentists' Intention to Use Teleconsultation for the Treatment of Patients With Osteoporosis: An Online Survey Study

Introduction: To properly combine osteoporosis treatment with dental treatment and to prevent medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJI), a system of communication between health providers can be smoothly made within a short time is required. With the recent increase in the possibility of telemedicine being introduced in Korea, it is expected that the introduction of teleconsultation between health providers treating osteoporosis will reduce the discomfort of patients and health providers and improve satisfaction. In this study, a survey was conducted on the knowledge and experience of MRONJ to find out the willingness of dentists treating osteoporosis patients for teleconsultation. Methods: An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted to investigate the intention for teleconsultation for MRONJ with a total of 516 dentists between September and October 2021. Results: Two-thirds of the respondents had experience of requesting consultation other dentists or doctors for the osteoporosis or MRONJ patients. They answered that the referral letter was the most used consultation request method and that it took a long time to get a reply. As for the intention of teleconsultation, 70% of the respondents answered that they were willing. The more experienced or the higher the educational level, the higher the intention for teleconsultation. Although the intention of dentists for teleconsultation was high, satisfaction with the cost of teleconsultation was low. Discussion: Although dentists' intention to use teleconsultation was high, satisfaction with the cost of medical care for teleconsultation was low, so it seems that this should be coordinated.

Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review

This systematic review aimed to explore healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences and perspectives of osteoporosis medication treatment through thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. We found themes about how osteoporosis is perceived as a disease, treatment decision-making and what empowers HCPs to provide the best possible care.

PURPOSE

The systematic review aimed to describe the perspectives and experiences of HCPs regarding osteoporosis medication treatment.

METHODS

We performed searches in four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) from database inception until May 2023 in any language. Data was analysed through inductive thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

We included 27 primary studies that incorporated the views of 495 different HCPs. The following themes were identified: low-priority disease, challenges in treatment decision-making, minimising drug burden, conscious of communication barriers, fragmented care and advice, confidence through experience and collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

HCPs were enthusiastic about optimising osteoporosis care through interprofessional collaboration and expertise, as well as educating and monitoring patients on treatment. They advocated for safety, comfort and reducing overall drug burden, especially in older patients with comorbidities. However, they had differences in opinions regarding who has responsibility for diagnosing and treating osteoporosis and struggled to provide the best possible care due to competing priorities, limited time and lack of adequate knowledge or evidence. The findings highlight the important and complementary role of different HCPs in osteoporosis treatment through a multidisciplinary model of care.