Young Survivors at KSA: registry for standardised assessment of long-term and late-onset health events in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer-a study protocol

Late effects of high-dose methotrexate in childhood cancer survivors: a Swiss single centre observational study

IMPORTANCE

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk for late effects of different organ systems. The currently available screening recommendations for those treated with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) are not uniform and the available literature is limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the prevalence and severity of late effects in CCS treated with HD-MTX at a single centre in Switzerland. We focus on organ systems defined at risk by the long-term follow-up care guidelines of the children's oncology group (COG), because this guideline has a holistic approach, is evidence based, and up to date.

METHODS

We used the modified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) to assess late effects in 15 different organ systems. Eligible were CCS diagnosed with cancer younger than 18 years and treated with HD-MTX, defined as at least 1 g per body surface area (≥ 1 g/m2).

RESULTS

We analysed 32 CCS with a median follow-up of 12.1 years. The endocrine system was most frequently affected by adverse events (69%), followed by the musculoskeletal (57%) and neuropsychological (38%) systems. The hepatobiliary (9%) and immunological (6%) systems were the least affected ones. Within the endocrine system, overweight/obesity was the most frequent and severe diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Late effects in CCS treated with HD-MTX are frequent. Our findings could add to the COG guidelines, where only screening for the musculoskeletal, neuropsychological, and hepatobiliary systems are recommended. More patient data need to be collected and analysed using the suggested standardised approach, to increase the quality of evidence for future screening recommendations.

Impact of Volumetric Dosimetry on the Projected Cost of Radiation-Related Late Effects Screening After Childhood Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Screening guidelines for childhood cancer survivors treated with radiation currently rely on broad anatomic irradiated regions (IR) to determine risk for late effects. However, contemporary radiotherapy techniques use volumetric dosimetry (VD) to define organ-specific exposure, which supports more specific screening recommendations that could be less costly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 132 patients treated with irradiation at Children's Hospital Los Angeles from 2000 to 2016. For 5 key organs (cochlea, breast, heart, lung, and colon), radiation exposure was determined retrospectively using both IR and VD methods. Under each method, Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines were used to identify organs flagged for screening and recommended screening tests. Projected screening costs incurred under each method were computed through age 65 using insurance claims data.

RESULTS

Median age at the end of treatment was 10.6 years (range, 1.4-20.4). Brain tumor was the most common diagnosis (45%) and head/brain the most common irradiated region (61%). For all 5 organs, use of VD rather than IR resulted in fewer recommended screening tests. This led to average cumulative estimated savings of $3769 (P = .099), with significant savings in patients with CNS tumors (P = .012). Among patients with savings, average savings were $9620 per patient (P = .016) and significantly more likely for females than males (P = .027).

CONCLUSION

Use of VD to enhance precision of guideline-based screening for radiation-related late effects permits fewer recommended screening tests and generates cost-savings.

Feasibility of a registry for standardized assessment of long-term and late-onset health events in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer

Childhood and adolescent cancer survivors are at risk for chronic medical conditions. Longitudinal studies help to understand their development and course. We hypothesize that collecting follow-up data according to the modified CTCAE criteria and embedded in regular care, is feasible and results in a rich database. We recruited 50 Swiss survivors treated at our institution between 1992 and 2015, who completed their treatment and are still alive. Information on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and medical conditions from follow-up visits, graded according to the modified CTCAE criteria, were added in the database. We described the cohort, assessed the prevalence of medical conditions at the most recent visits and the time needed for data entry. Survivors had a median age of 10 years at diagnosis with 16 years of follow-up. 94% of survivors suffered from at least one medical condition. We registered 25 grade 3 or 4 conditions in 18 survivors. The time needed for data entry at enrollment was < 60 min in most survivors and much less for follow-up visits. Standardized assessment of medical conditions is feasible during regular clinical care. The database provides longitudinal real-time data to be used for clinical care, survivor education and research.