Frailty-adjusted therapy in Transplant Non-Eligible patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (FiTNEss (UK-MRA Myeloma XIV Trial)): a study protocol for a randomised phase III trial

Treatment of elderly and frail myeloma patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of older adults. Given the aging population, the prevalence of older adults with MM is expected to further increase over the next decade. Challenges in treating older adults result from the heterogeneity of both aging itself and the disease. Over the past two decades, tremendous progress has been made in improving the outcome in this age group with novel therapeutics, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and more recently anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, becoming an integral part of initial treatment. Further improvements are expected over the next decade with novel immunotherapy, including T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor therapies. With additional novel treatments, assessment of patient frailty will become increasingly important in balancing the optimal treatment of patients. In this review, we focus on the treatment of elderly and frail older adults with MM. The first part of our review will focus on pertinent investigations, considerations for treatment initiation and initial risk stratification, including frailty assessment prior to treatment initiation. In the second part, we will focus on the overall goals of treatment and therapeutic options for newly diagnosed and those with relapsed/refractory MM, including novel immunotherapy and supportive care. Lastly, we will end this review by highlighting current knowledge gaps and providing suggestions for future directions to further improve outcomes among older adults with MM.

Beyond static measurements: dynamic frailty improves survival prediction in multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

The level of frailty, according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index, is highly dynamic during antimyeloma treatment. Dynamic frailty assessment improved the prediction of survival and early mortality compared with the prognostic value of static frailty level at baseline.

Optimizing multiple Myeloma clinical trials: research direction, addressing limitations, and strategies for improvement

Despite significant advancements in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, including novel therapies and combination strategies, the translation of findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) into real-world clinical practice has been associated with several challenges. Specifically, the principles and criterion that shape the current design of MM RCTs have left out a sizable portion of patients that would particularly benefit from trial inclusion. In addition, RCTs may use primary outcomes which only partially cover patient-relevant endpoints important for evaluating treatment efficacy and quality of life. In this review, we explore the current MM RCT landscape and suggest possible solutions to improve generalizability of trial results, mitigate logistical pitfalls, and integrate real-world evidence into trials. Together, these strategies are designed to refine MM treatment guidelines and improve outcomes for all patient populations.

What is the ideal approach-doublet, triplet, or quadruplet(s)?

Significant progress has been made in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), with the introduction of several new drugs with different mechanisms of action. The treatment of newly diagnosed MM has evolved dramatically with the development of highly effective combinations that include 1 or more of the new drugs. Despite the continuing improvement in the overall survival of patients with MM, nearly a quarter of the patients have significantly inferior survival, often driven by a combination of factors, including tumor genetics and host frailty. The focus of initial therapy remains rapid control of the disease with reversal of the symptoms and complications related to the disease with minimal toxicity and a reduction in early mortality. The selection of the specific regimen, to some extent, depends on the ability of the patient to tolerate the treatment and the underlying disease risk. It is typically guided by results of randomized clinical trials demonstrating improvements in progression-free and/or overall survival. While increasing risk calls for escalating the intensity of therapy by using quadruplet combinations that can provide the deepest possible response and the use of autologous stem cell transplant, increasing frailty calls for a reduction in the intensity and selective use of triplet or doublet regimens. The choice of subsequent consolidation treatments and maintenance approaches, including duration of treatment, also depends on these factors, particularly the underlying disease risk. The treatment approaches for newly diagnosed myeloma continue to evolve, with ongoing trials exploring bispecific antibodies as part of initial therapy and CAR T cells for consolidation.

Evaluating concordance between International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score and simplified frailty scale among older adults with multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Several frailty assessment tools exist for classifying older adults with multiple myeloma (MM) by their frailty status, such as the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score and the simplified frailty scale. The level of agreement between the IMWG frailty score and the simplified frailty scale remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study, we identified adults ≥50y initiating a new treatment regimen for MM who underwent a baseline geriatric assessment (GA). Using data from the GA and electronic health records, we measured IMWG frailty score and the simplified frailty scale, and classified patients by frailty status. We merged the fit and intermediate-fit categories of IMWG frailty score to create a binary category (frail, non-frail) for comparison with simplified frailty scale and measured their agreement using Cohen's Kappa statistic. We tested the diagnostic utility of simplified frailty scale as a screening tool using IMWG frailty score as the gold standard, using sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Three hundred older adults were included with a median age at diagnosis of 64y; 56 % were male and 63 % were non-Hispanic White. By IMWG frailty score, 41 % were fit, 38 % intermediate-fit, and 21 % frail, while simplified frailty scale indicated 22 % frail and 78 % non-frail patients. The agreement between IMWG frailty score and simplified frailty scale was moderate (κ = 0.43); 19 % of the patients were misclassified. Despite discordance, when testing simplified frailty scale as a screening tool, we found a sensitivity of 56 % and specificity of 87 % to diagnose frailty. Substituting patient-reported performance status (PS) instead of physician reported ECOG PS led to a sensitivity of 91 % and specificity of 61 %. DCA showed that using simplified frailty scale (with patient reported PS) as a screening tool led to a 43-44 % reduction in the number of unnecessary GAs across reasonable threshold probabilities.

DISCUSSION

IMWG frailty score and simplified frailty scale have limited agreement with each other. This creates a possibility of misclassification bias and poses difficulty in comparing existing literature on frail patients with MM. Despite discordance, simplified frailty scale may have a potential role as a screening tool, when using patient-reported PS.

Selection determines therapeutic effects: a retrospective analysis of the application of different frailty tools in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to explore the effectiveness of the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI), Mayo Score, UK Myeloma Research Alliance Risk Profile (MRP), and Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) simplified frailty scale for classifying frailty in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients and compare the validity of different frailty tools.

METHODS

Eighty-four newly diagnosed MM patients aged ≥ 60 years in HeBei University Hospital were evaluated by the IMWG-FI, Mayo score, MRP score and IFM scale, and consistency and survival analyses were performed using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the Kaplan‒Meier method, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients (76.2%) were identified as frail by at least one frailty tool; 14 (21.9%) were identified as frail by all four tools, and although moderate concordance was achieved between the IMWG-FI and MRP and the Mayo Score (0.432-0.474, P < 0.001), the concordance among the four assessment tools was relatively low (Cohen's kappa 0.218-0.474). The median overall survival (OS, P = 0.006, 0.025, and 0.028) and progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.002, 0.006, and 0.03) of patients in the frail group and the nonfrail group identified by the IMWG-FI, Mayo score, and MRP were significantly different, while the median OS (P = 0.139) and PFS (P = 0.167) were not significantly different for the frail patients identified by the different frailty assessment tools.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the consistency of the different frailty assessment tools was low, whereas that between the MRP and IMWG-FI was high. Therefore, combining IMWG-FI and MRP may reduce assessment subjectivity and improve frailty identification.

Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in myeloma clinical trials: an evolving paradigm

Measurement of overall survival (OS) remains the gold standard for interpreting the impact of new therapies for multiple myeloma in phase 3 trials. However, as outcomes have improved, it is increasingly challenging to use OS as the primary endpoint if timely approval of novel agents is to be ensured to enable maximum benefit for patients. Surrogate endpoints of OS, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and response to treatment, have contributed to approval decisions by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency as endpoints demonstrating clinical benefit, and the FDA has recently supported the use of minimal residual disease (MRD) as an accelerated approval endpoint in multiple myeloma. This review aims to address situations in which the use of PFS as a surrogate endpoint warrants careful interpretation especially for specific subgroups of patients and considers ways to ensure that studies can be designed to account for possible discordance between PFS and OS. The utility of subgroup analyses, including the potential for those not pre-specified, to identify target populations for new agents is also discussed.

Psychoneuroimmunology in multiple myeloma and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Opportunities for research among patients and caregivers

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer and is the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To be eligible for HSCT, a patient must have a caregiver, as caregivers play a central role in HSCT preparation and recovery. MM patients remain on treatment indefinitely, and thus patients and their caregivers face long-term challenges including the intensity of HSCT and perpetual therapy after transplant. Importantly, both patients and their caregivers show heightened depressive and anxiety symptoms, with dyadic correspondence evidenced and caregivers' distress often exceeding that of patients. An extensive psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) literature links distress with health via immune and neuroendocrine dysregulation as well as biological aging. However, data on PNI in the context of multiple myeloma - in patients or caregivers - are remarkably limited. Distress in MM patients has been associated with poorer outcomes including higher inflammation, greater one year post-HSCT hospital readmissions, and worse overall survival. Further, anxiety and depression are linked to biological aging and may contribute to the poor long-term health of both patients and caregivers. Because MM generally affects older adults, individual differences in biological aging may represent an important modifier of MM biology and HSCT treatment outcomes. There are a number of clinical scenarios in which biologically younger people could be prescribed more intensive therapies, with potential for greater benefit, by using a personalized cancer therapy approach based on the quantification of physiologic reserve. Further, despite considerable psychological demands, the effects of distress on health among MM caregivers is largely unexamined. Within this context, the current critical review highlights gaps in knowledge at the intersection of HSCT, inflammation, and biological aging in the context of MM. Research in this area hold promise for opportunities for novel and impactful psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) research to enhance health outcomes, quality of life, and longevity among both MM patients and their caregivers.

Tailoring Therapy in Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies

Hematologic malignancies most often present in the sixth or seventh decade of life. Even so, many older adults may be unable to tolerate standard chemotherapy or require supplementary care or dose adjustments to do so. Both in community and academic centers, geriatric assessment (GA) can be used to improve the care of older adults with blood cancers. For example, hematologic oncologists can use GA to guide treatment selection, adjusting for patient frailty and goals, as well as prompt initiation of enhanced supportive care. After initial therapy, GA can improve the identification of older adults with aggressive myeloid malignancies who would benefit from hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), inform shared decision making, as well as allow transplanters to tailor conditioning regimen, donor selection, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and pre- and post-HCT treatments. As in HCT, GA can improve the care of older patients with relapsed lymphoma or multiple myeloma eligible for chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy, identifying patients at higher risk for toxicity and providing a baseline for subsequent neurocognitive testing. Here, we review the data supporting GA for the care of older adults with blood cancers, from the community to the academic center. In addition, we explore future directions to optimize outcomes for older adults with hematologic malignancies.

Geriatric evaluation methods in oncology and their use in clinical studies: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic options in oncology keep on expanding. Nonetheless, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials and those enrolled often have a better health status than their average peers, resulting in a lack of representative evidence for this heterogenous population. The inclusion of older patients and a uniform categorization of "frailty" is becoming increasingly urgent. Standardized tools could contribute to the quality and comparability of clinical trials and facilitate clinical decisions. The aim of this literature review was to elaborate an overview of the use of geriatric evaluation (GE) methods in clinical cancer research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review of the PubMed database. Clinical pharmacotherapy studies that applied or evaluated a clearly defined system for the GE of oncological patients were included. Data retrieved encompassed the applied GE method(s), cancer type(s), and pharmacotherapy investigated, the number of included patients, study type, year of publication, as well as the primary purpose of the GE. The GEs used most frequently were depicted in more depth.

RESULTS

In this literature review, 103 publications were selected for inclusion. The biggest proportion of studies (36%, n = 34) used clearly defined, but not previously validated, GE methods (study-specific GE). Standardized GE methods encountered in at least five publications were the G8 screening test (applied in 18% of included studies, n = 17), the Balducci score (7%, n = 7), and a geriatric assessment based on Hurria (5%, n = 5). The primary purpose of GE was predominantly an appraisal of its potential role in pharmacotherapy optimization. The GE also served as baseline and outcome measure, inclusion/exclusion criterion, factor for stratified randomization, and to determine treatment allocation.

DISCUSSION

The wide range of GE methods used across studies make direct comparisons difficult, and many methods are poorly characterized and/or not previously validated. The further inclusion of representative older patients in clinical trials combined with the use of a standardized GE could help clinicians in the decision-making process.

Comorbidity indices for prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive evaluation of the Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index and other comorbidity indices with pro- and retrospective applications

Not available.

Ixazomib-based frontline therapy followed by ixazomib maintenance in frail elderly newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma: a prospective multicenter study

Background

Frail elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) have inferior survival and less benefit from high-dose therapies. This prospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of induction treatment of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRd) and ixazomib/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/dexamethasone (IDd) followed by ixazomib/dexamethasone (Id) maintenance therapy in frail, elderly patients with NDMM.

Methods

From July 2019 to December 2021, this non-randomized concurrent controlled clinical study enrolled 120 NDMM patients aged ≥65 years with frailty defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score or Mayo geriatric scoring system. The enrolled patients received 6-8 cycles of IRd or IDd followed by Id maintenance therapy for a minimum of 2 years at the discretion of physicians based on patient's clinical characteristics (chiCTR1900024917).

Findings

The median age was 71 years and 55% of the patients were males. The overall response rate (ORR) was 82% and 77%, complete response (CR) rate was 25% and 12% for IRd and IDd groups, respectively. The difference in ORR of the Idd group minus the IRd group was -5.36% (95% CI: -18.9% to 8.19%), indicating that the ORR of the IDd group was neither inferior nor non-inferior to the IRd group. After a median follow-up of 34.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6 and 13.9 months, OS was not reached and 29.2 months in IRd and IDd groups, respectively. 28 and 33 patients discontinued induction therapy, 20 and 19 discontinued maintenance therapy in IRd and IDd groups, respectively. Cumulative Grade 3 or higher hematological adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10 of the 60 patients (17%) and non-hematological AEs occurred in 15 of the 60 patients (25%) in the IRd group, while 13 of the 60 patients (22%) and 21 of the 60 patients (35%) in the IDd group. Patients were observed with clinically significant improvement in QoL when compared with that at baseline in both IRd and IDd groups by evaluation per cycle (P < 0.0001).

Interpretation

The results demonstrated that compared with IRd regimen, IDd regimen showed no significant advantage, but the survival of the IDd group was shorter than that of the IRd group, indicating an all-oral outpatient triplet regimen with IRd, which has low toxicity and has improved QoL, could be the viable first-line treatment option for frail NDMM patients.

Funding

The Young Elite Scientist sponsorship program by bast of Beijing Association for Science and Technology (No. BYESS2023116) and Beijing Medical Award Foundation (No. YXJL-2018-0539-0073).

Ixazomib, daratumumab and low-dose dexamethasone in intermediate-fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 2 trial

Background

The outcome of non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is heterogeneous, partly depending on frailty level. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex) in NDMM intermediate-fit patients.

Methods

In this phase II multicenter HOVON-143 study, IMWG Frailty index based intermediate-fit patients, were treated with 9 induction cycles of Ixa-Dara-dex, followed by maintenance with ID for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate on induction treatment. Patients were included from October 2017 until May 2019. Trial Registration Number: NTR6297.

Findings

Sixty-five patients were included. Induction therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 71%. Early mortality was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 41.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 months and 3-year overall survival 83%. Discontinuation of therapy occurred in 77% of patients, 49% due to progression, 9% due to toxicity, 8% due to incompliance, 3% due to sudden death and 8% due to other reasons. Dose modifications of ixazomib were required frequently (37% and 53% of patients during induction and maintenance, respectively), mainly due to, often low grade, polyneuropathy. During maintenance 23% of patients received daratumumab alone. Global quality of life (QoL) improved significantly and was clinically relevant, which persisted during maintenance treatment.

Interpretation

Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone as first line treatment in intermediate-fit NDMM patients is safe and improves global QoL. However, efficacy was limited, partly explained by ixazomib-induced toxicity, hampering long term tolerability of this 3-drug regimen. This highlights the need for more efficacious and tolerable regimens improving the outcome in vulnerable intermediate-fit patients.

Funding

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

New Strategies for the Treatment of Older Myeloma Patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) mostly affects older patients, who represent a highly heterogeneous population. In the last few years, the introduction of novel agents led to a significant improvement in the outcome of MM patients. Nonetheless, this positive trend is less likely to occur in all older patients due to comorbidities/disabilities and major susceptibility to toxic events. Furthermore, older patients with major comorbidities are usually excluded or underrepresented in most registrational clinical trials. In this context, physicians have called for greater caution in the management of the disease. Several scores allow for the identification of frail and unfit patients and establish the possibility of tailoring therapy, reducing toxicity. This review explores the available tools for the assessment of frailty and what has been done to improve the discriminative power of the available scores. Thereafter, it describes the main therapeutic strategies for the management of transplant-ineligible (NTE) newly diagnosed (ND) MM patients and relapsed/refractory (RR) MM patients, in order to better guide physicians in choosing treatment options and to suggest possible strategies for more frail patients.

Dynamic frailty risk assessment among older adults with multiple myeloma: A population-based cohort study

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of older adults and those who are more frail are at high risk of poor outcomes. Current tools for identifying and categorizing frail patients are often static and measured only at the time of diagnosis. The concept of dynamic frailty (i.e. frailty changing over time) is largely unexplored in MM. In our study, adults with newly-diagnosed MM who received novel drugs between the years 2007-2014 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases. Using a previously published cumulative deficit approach, a frailty index score was calculated at diagnosis and each landmark interval (1-yr, 2-yr, 3-yr post diagnosis). The association of frailty with overall survival (OS) both at baseline and at each landmark interval as well as factors associated with worsening frailty status over time were evaluated. Overall, 4617 patients were included. At baseline, 39% of the patients were categorized as moderately frail or severely frail. Among those who had 3 years of follow-up, frailty categorization changed post diagnosis in 93% of the cohort (78% improved and 72% deteriorated at least at one time point during the follow up period). In a landmark analysis, the predictive ability of frailty at the time of diagnosis decreased over time for OS (Harrell's C Statistic 0.65 at diagnosis, 0.63 at 1-yr, 0.62 at 2-yr, and 0.60 at 3-yr) and was inferior compared to current frailty status at each landmark interval. Our study is one of the first to demonstrate the dynamic nature of frailty among older adults with MM. Frailty may improve or deteriorate over time. Current frailty status is a better predictor of outcomes than frailty status at time of diagnosis, indicating the need for re-measurement in this high-risk patient population.

Partnering With All Patients: Ensuring Shared Decision Making and Evidence-Based Management for Underrepresented Groups With Multiple Myeloma

Several landmark therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma (MM) have led to an unprecedented number of options available to patients and their physicians as shared decision making is attempted. A myriad of factors need to be considered to ensure that patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors are addressed to arrive at the most appropriate choice for patients at that time in their journey with myeloma. Some of these factors have traditionally remained underaddressed but have a clear association with patient outcomes, leading to underrepresented groups of patients with MM, including the elderly patients, racial-ethnic minorities, and those with specific advanced comorbidities, for example, renal insufficiency. Some of these factors may not be modifiable, but data suggest that they may give rise to implicit or explicit bias and affect treatment decisions. A growing body of literature is bringing these factors to light. However, their incorporation in day-to-day decision making for patients needs to be universal. It is imperative that prospective data are generated for all these and other underrepresented groups such that evidence-based medicine is applicable universally to all patients with MM, irrespective of clinical and sociodemographic factors.