1
|
Scarpetti G, Shadowen H, Williams GA, Winkelmann J, Kroneman M, Groenewegen PP, De Jong JD, Fronteira I, Augusto GF, Hsiung S, Slade S, Rojatz D, Kallayova D, Katreniakova Z, Nagyova I, Kylänen M, Vracko P, Jesurasa A, Wallace Z, Wallace C, Costongs C, Barnes AJ, van Ginneken E. A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries. Health Policy 2024; 142:104992. [PMID: 38368661 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. AIM This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. METHODS Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. RESULTS We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. CONCLUSIONS This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giada Scarpetti
- Technische Universität Berlin, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
| | | | - Gemma A Williams
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, World Health Organization
| | - Juliane Winkelmann
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, World Health Organization
| | - Madelon Kroneman
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D De Jong
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands and Maastricht University
| | - Inês Fronteira
- Global Health and Tropical, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Gonçalo Figueiredo Augusto
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (UNL), Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sonia Hsiung
- Canadian Institute for Social Prescribing, Canadian Red Cross
| | - Siân Slade
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniela Rojatz
- Austrian National Public Health Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Kallayova
- Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Zuzana Katreniakova
- Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University in Kosice and Slovak Public Health Association (SAVEZ), Kosice, Slovak Republic
| | - Iveta Nagyova
- Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University in Kosice and Slovak Public Health Association (SAVEZ), Kosice, Slovak Republic
| | - Marika Kylänen
- Finnish Best Practice Portal for Health and Wellbeing Promotion, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pia Vracko
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Carolyn Wallace
- University of South Wales, Wales School for Social Prescribing Research (WSSPR), UK
| | | | | | - Ewout van Ginneken
- Technische Universität Berlin, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Connolly H, Delimata N, Galway K, Kiely B, Lawler M, Mulholland J, O’Grady M, Connolly D. Exploration of Evaluation Practices in Social Prescribing Services in Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:219. [PMID: 38255106 PMCID: PMC10815325 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
National health services in Ireland and the UK fund the majority of social prescribing services and have issued recommendations for evaluation. However, it is not known what outcomes are prioritised for evaluation within individual services and what evaluation methods are used to capture recommended outcomes. A survey was carried out to examine evaluation practices of social prescribing services on the island of Ireland. This study used a cross-sectional observational design. The sample was all the staff involved in delivering and/or managing SP services on the island of Ireland. Questionnaires were distributed at a national SP conference and online. Closed-response questions were analysed using descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used for open-ended questions. Eighty-four usable surveys were returned (50% from the Republic of Ireland and 50% from Northern Ireland). All respondents (100%) agreed on the importance of measuring SP outcomes. The most frequently measured outcomes were health and well-being (89.2%) and loneliness (84%). The least frequently measured outcome was the satisfaction of healthcare professionals referring to SP: 78.4% of respondents never measured this outcome. The most frequently used measurement tool was the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, with 38/76 (50%) respondents using this measure. There was a lack of standardised measures identified for some outcomes. For example, 70% of respondents reported always measuring physical activity (PA), but only four respondents identified a specific PA measure. In open-ended questions, respondents recommended flexibility in evaluation methods to reflect the complexity and individualised focus of SP. They also identified the need for protected time to complete evaluations and recommended a national strategy to inform priorities in evaluations. This study demonstrates a wide variation on the island of Ireland on how SP services are measuring outcomes, with many outcomes rarely or never measured using standardised measures. Agreement is needed on a core outcome set for social prescribing in order to guide service delivery and evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Connolly
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland; (H.C.); (M.L.)
| | - Natalie Delimata
- Department of Social Sciences, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland;
| | - Karen Galway
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; (K.G.); (J.M.)
| | - Bridget Kiely
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Margaret Lawler
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland; (H.C.); (M.L.)
| | - Jill Mulholland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; (K.G.); (J.M.)
| | - Megan O’Grady
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James’ Hospital, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Deirdre Connolly
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland; (H.C.); (M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs AL, Masó Aguado M, Howarth M. Current Trends and Future Directions in Urban Social Prescribing. Curr Environ Health Rep 2023; 10:383-393. [PMID: 38087048 DOI: 10.1007/s40572-023-00419-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Social prescribing (SP) is defined as a non-medical community referral program to support well-being and health. This review explores the current evidence about the effectiveness of SP. RECENT FINDINGS This review examined existing SP models that have been or are being tested to connect people to these opportunities through direct and indirect referral schemes. The review identified a fifth model that facilitates a group-based approach used to mental well-being and resilience. While the development of SP largely originates from the UK, the global interest in SP has increased, with over 31 nations reporting elements of SP. The main goal of SP is to better integrate care between the traditional medical setting and resources available in the community and voluntary sectors. Although this review found widespread optimism around SP, there remain concerns about its effectiveness and demands for high-quality evaluations to strengthen the evidence base for SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Litt
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), Doctor Aiguader, 88 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
| | - L Coll-Planas
- Research Group On Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Carrer de La Sagrada Família, 7 Vic, 08500, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRIS-CC), Vic, Spain
| | - A L Sachs
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), Doctor Aiguader, 88 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Masó Aguado
- Research Group On Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Carrer de La Sagrada Família, 7 Vic, 08500, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRIS-CC), Vic, Spain
| | - M Howarth
- Edgehill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, Lancashire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McGrath C, Kennedy MR, Gibson A, Musse S, Kosar Z, Dawson S. World Cafés as a participatory approach to understanding research agendas in primary care with underserved communities: reflections, challenges and lessons learned. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:101. [PMID: 37898808 PMCID: PMC10613381 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00509-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Certain communities are underserved by research, resulting in lower inclusion rates, under researched health issues and a lack of attention to how different communities respond to health interventions. Minoritised ethnic groups are often underserved by research and services. They experience health inequalities and face significant barriers to accessing health services. It is recognised that new approaches are needed to reach underserved communities and make research more relevant. The purpose of this work was to utilise World Cafés, a participatory method, to explore research agendas with diverse communities. METHODS Two World Cafés were conducted as research agenda setting activities with individuals from minoritised ethnic communities in Bristol, UK. World Café 1 explored Black and Asian women's perspectives about supporting mental health. World Café 2 with men from the Somali community, focused on prostate cancer. Community members co-developed the focus and questions of each World Café and were also instrumental in recruiting individuals to the sessions and facilitating discussions, including translation. Audio and written records were made of the discussions and from these key issues about each topic were identified, and a visual representation of the discussion was also generated. These were shared with participants to check for accuracy. RESULTS Community members identified a range of issues that are important to them in relation to mental health and prostate cancer, including barriers to help seeking and accessing primary and secondary care, ideas for service improvements and a need for health information that is accessible and culturally relevant. CONCLUSIONS World Cafés are a flexible method that can be successfully adapted for research agenda setting with individuals from minoritised ethnic communities. The role of community members in co-developing the focus of sessions, recruiting community members and co-facilitating sessions is crucial to this success. The discussions at both World Cafés provided a rich insight into the experiences of participants in relation to the topics mental health and prostate cancer and identified issues that are important to these communities that will be followed-up with communities, researchers and clinicians to co-develop research and service improvement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel McGrath
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of West England, Bristol, UK
| | - Mari-Rose Kennedy
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Andy Gibson
- People in Health West of England, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Samira Musse
- Barton Hill Activity Club, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Zahra Kosar
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Somali Resource Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Shoba Dawson
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Htun HL, Teshale AB, Cumpston MS, Demos L, Ryan J, Owen A, Freak-Poli R. Effectiveness of social prescribing for chronic disease prevention in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Epidemiol Community Health 2023; 77:265-276. [PMID: 36813546 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2022-220247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social prescribing (SP) enables healthcare professionals to link patients with non-medical interventions available in the community to address underlying socioeconomic and behavioural determinants. We synthesised the evidence to understand the effectiveness of SP for chronic disease prevention. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using five databases and two registries. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials of SP among community-dwelling adults recruited from primary care or community setting, investigating any chronic disease risk factors defined by the WHO (behavioural factors: smoking, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and excessive alcohol consumption; metabolic factors: raised blood pressure, overweight/obesity, hyperlipidaemia and hyperglycaemia). Random effect meta-analyses were performed at two time points: completion of intervention and follow-up after trial. RESULTS We identified nine reports from eight trials totalling 4621 participants. All studies evaluated SP exercise interventions which were highly heterogeneous regarding the content, duration, frequency and length of follow-up. Majority of studies had some concerns for risk of bias. Meta-analysis revealed that SP likely increased physical activity (completion: mean difference (MD) 21 min/week, 95% CI 3 to 39, I2=0%; follow-up ≤12 months: MD 19 min/week, 95% CI 8 to 29, I2=0%). However, SP may not improve markers of adiposity, blood pressure, glucose and serum lipid. There were no eligible studies that primarily target unhealthy diet, smoking and excessive alcohol drinking behaviours. CONCLUSIONS SP exercise interventions probably increased physical activity slightly; however, no benefits were observed for metabolic factors. Determining whether SP is effective in modifying the determinants of chronic diseases and promotes sustainable healthy behaviours is limited by the current evidence of quantification and uncertainty, warranting further rigorous studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022346687.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Htet Lin Htun
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Miranda S Cumpston
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Demos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Disease Management Association (ADMA), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Ryan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Owen
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosanne Freak-Poli
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Developing a research agenda for social prescribing in the UK using lessons from the US. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:589-592. [DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22x721445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|