1
|
Pattilachan TM, Christodoulou M, Ross S. Diagnosis to dissection: AI's role in early detection and surgical intervention for gastric cancer. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:259. [PMID: 38900376 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02005-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a formidable health challenge worldwide; early detection and effective surgical intervention are critical for improving patient outcomes. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of gastric cancer management, emphasizing the significant contributions of artificial intelligence (AI) in revolutionizing both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Despite advancements in the medical field, the subtle nature of early gastric cancer symptoms often leads to late-stage diagnoses, where survival rates are notably decreased. Historically, the treatment of gastric cancer has transitioned from palliative care to surgical resection, evolving further with the introduction of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques. In the current era, AI has emerged as a transformative force, enhancing the precision of early gastric cancer detection through sophisticated image analysis, and supporting surgical decision-making with predictive modeling and real-time preop-, intraop-, and postoperative guidance. However, the deployment of AI in healthcare raises significant ethical, legal, and practical challenges, including the necessity for ongoing professional education and the development of standardized protocols to ensure patient safety and the effective use of AI technologies. Future directions point toward a synergistic integration of AI with clinical best practices, promising a new era of personalized, efficient, and safer gastric cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Menon Pattilachan
- AdventHealth Tampa, Surgery College of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, University of Central Florida (UCF), 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Maria Christodoulou
- AdventHealth Tampa, Surgery College of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, University of Central Florida (UCF), 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- AdventHealth Tampa, Surgery College of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, University of Central Florida (UCF), 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng Y, Liu Y, Lai S, Li Y, Lin Z, Hao L, Dong J, Li X, Huang K. Global trends and prospects in health economics of robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3896-3904. [PMID: 37720937 PMCID: PMC10720792 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 10 million robotic surgeries have been performed. However, the cost and benefit of robotic surgery need to be evaluated to help hospitals, surgeons, patients, and payers make proper choices, making a health economic analysis necessary. The authors revealed the bibliometric profile in the field of health economics of robotic surgery to prompt research development and guide future studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Web of Science Core Collection scientific database was searched for documents indexed from 2003 to 31 December 2022. Document types, years, authors, countries, institutions, journal sources, references, and keywords were analyzed and visualized using the Bibliometrix package, WPS Office software, Microsoft PowerPoint 2019, VOSviewer software (version 1.6.18), ggplot2, and Scimago Graphica. RESULTS The development of the health economics of robotic surgery can be divided into three phases: slow-growing (2003-2009), developing (2010-2018), and fast-developing (2019-2022). J.C.H. and S.L.C. were the most active and influential authors, respectively. The USA produced the most documents, followed by China, and Italy. Korea had the highest number of citations per document. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques accepted most documents, whereas Annals of Surgery, European Urology, and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology had the highest number of citations per document. The Journal of Robotic Surgery is promising. The most-cited document in this field is New Technology and Health Care Costs - The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery in 2010. The proportion of documents on urology is decreasing, while documents in the field of arthrology are emerging and flourishing. CONCLUSION Research on the health economics of robotic surgery has been unbalanced. Areas awaiting exploration have been identified. Collaboration between scholars and coverage with provisions for evidence development by the government is needed to learn more comprehensively about the health economics of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihao Peng
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Yuancheng Liu
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Sicen Lai
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Yixin Li
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Zexu Lin
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Lingjia Hao
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Jingyi Dong
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Xu Li
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- XiangYa School of Medicine, Central South University
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital
- National Engineering Research Center of Personalized Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology
- Furong Laboratory, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadri H, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Shayegan B, Garneau PY, Pezeshki P. A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2671-2685. [PMID: 37843673 PMCID: PMC10678817 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a systematic review of full economic analyses of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in adults' thoracic and abdominopelvic indications. Authors used Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed to conduct a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fully published economic articles in English were included. Methodology and reporting quality were assessed using standardized tools. Majority of studies (28/33) were on oncology procedures. Radical prostatectomy was the most reported procedure (16/33). Twenty-eight studies used quality-adjusted life years, and five used complication rates as outcomes. Nine used primary and 24 studies used secondary data. All studies used modeling. In 81% of studies (27/33), RAS was cost-effective or potentially cost-effective compared to comparator procedures, including radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy. Societal perspective, longer-term time-horizon, and larger volumes favored RAS. Cost-drivers were length of stay and equipment cost. From societal and payer perspectives, robotic-assisted surgery is a cost-effective strategy for thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.Clinical trial registration This study is a systematic review with no intervention, not a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Sadri
- Department of Health Economic and Outcomes Research, Medtronic ULC, 99 Hereford St., Brampton, ON, L6Y 0R3, Canada.
| | - Michael Fung-Kee-Fung
- Champlain Regional Cancer Program Depts OB/GYN, Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave., Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Pierre Y Garneau
- Surgical Department, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Boul Gouin O, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Padina Pezeshki
- Department of Clinical Research, Medtronic ULC, 99 Hereford St., Brampton, ON, L6Y 0R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Broe M, Carbin Joseph DD, Casson H, Innes M, Adamou C, Fragkoulis G, Moschonas D, Kusuma VRM, Hicks J, Patil K, Perry MJA, Abou Chedid W. Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:2679-2684. [PMID: 37668719 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient. METHODS In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating. RESULTS Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient. CONCLUSION Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Broe
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | | | - Helen Casson
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Maria Innes
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Constantinos Adamou
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Gerasimos Fragkoulis
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Dimitrios Moschonas
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Venkata Ramana Murthy Kusuma
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - James Hicks
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Krishna Patil
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Matthew James Alexander Perry
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Wissam Abou Chedid
- Department of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olumba FC, Vachharajani N, Yu J, Scherer M, Matson S, Hill AL, Kiani A, Lin Y, Doyle MMB, Chapman WC, Wellen JR, Khan AS. Robotic donor nephrectomy: optimizing outcomes beyond the limitations of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7511-7519. [PMID: 37415014 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10246-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has emerged as a safe alternate to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), offering improved visualization, instrument dexterity and ergonomics. There is still concern about how to safely transition from LDN to RDN. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 150 consecutive living donor operations (75 LDN and 75 RDN) at our center, comparing the first 75 RDN's with the last 75 LDN's performed prior to the initiation of the robotic transplant program. Operative times and complications were used as surrogates of efficiency and safety, respectively, to estimate the learning curve with RDN. RESULTS RDN was associated with a longer total operative time (RDN 182 vs LDN 144 min; P < 0.0001) but a significantly shorter post-operative length of stay (RDN 1.8 vs LDN 2.1 days; P = 0.0213). Donor complications and recipient outcomes were the same between both groups. Learning curve of RDN was estimated to be about 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS RDN is a safe alternate to LDN with acceptable donor morbidity and no negative impact on recipient outcomes even during the early part of the RDN learning curve. Surgeon preferences for the robotic approach compared to traditional laparoscopy will require further scrutiny to improve ergonomics and operative efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franklin C Olumba
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jennifer Yu
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Meranda Scherer
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Sarah Matson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Angela L Hill
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Amen Kiani
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Yiing Lin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Majella M B Doyle
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jason R Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Adeel S Khan
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Availability, Cost, Limitations, Learning Curve and Future of Robotic Systems in Urology and Prostate Cancer Surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062268. [PMID: 36983269 PMCID: PMC10053304 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgical systems (RASS) have revolutionised the management of many urological conditions over the last two decades with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) now being considered by many to be the preferred surgical approach. Intuitive Surgical has dominated the market during this time period with successive iterations of the da Vinci model. The expiration of patents has opened the RASS market and several new contenders have become available or are currently in development. This comprehensive narrative review aims to explore the merits of each robotic system as well as the evidence and barriers to their use. The newly developed RASS have increased the versality of robotic surgical systems to a wider range of settings through advancement in technology. The increased competition may result in an overall reduction in cost, broadening the accessibility of RASS. Learning curves and training remain a barrier to their use, but the situation appears to be improving through dedicated training programmes. Outcomes for RARP have been well investigated and tend to support improved early functional outcomes. Overall, the rapid developments in the field of robot-assisted surgery indicate the beginning of a promising new era to further enhance urological surgery.
Collapse
|