Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/CT may result in stage migration in prostate cancer: performances, quantitative analysis, and potential criticism in the clinical practice

AIM

The early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) metastatic disease with PET imaging leads to stage migration and change of disease management. We aimed to assess the impact on clinical management deriving from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging with a digital PET/CT during the routine application in the staging and restaging process of PCa.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty consecutive PCa patients underwent 18F-PSMA-1007. Digital PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated and discussed with oncologists to evaluate the impact on clinical management. Performances analysis, correlation among variables also considering semiquantitative parameters have been conducted.

RESULTS

In the whole group of 80 patients at staging (N = 31) and restaging (N = 49), the detection rate of PSMA PET was 85% for all lesions. At staging, the performance analysis resulted in sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 89.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) 77.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89.5%, accuracy 85.7%, and area under curve (AUC) 0.87%. The performance of restaging PET in the group of patients with PSA values <1 ng/ml resulted in the following values: sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 92.9%, NPV 85.7%, PPV 81.3%, accuracy 82.6%, and AUC 0.79. Semiquantitative analysis revealed a mean value of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion PSMA expression with differences in patients with high risk compared to low intermediate. At restaging PET, semiquantitative values of patients with total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) ≤ 1 ng/ml were significantly less than those of the tPSA > 1 ng/ml. A significant impact on clinical management was reported in 46/80 patients (57.5%) based on PSMA PET findings at staging and restaging.

CONCLUSION

Although PSMA-PET provides optimal performances, its current role in redefining a better staging should be translated in the current clinical scenario about potential improvement in clinical/survival outcomes.

SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI for Response Assessment of Bone Metastases

Recent developments in hybrid SPECT/CT systems and the use of cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors have improved the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy. These advancements have paved the way for novel quantitative approaches to accurate and reproducible treatment monitoring of bone metastases. PET/CT imaging using [18F]F-FDG and [18F]F-NaF have shown promising clinical utility in bone metastases assessment and monitoring response to therapy and prediction of treatment response in a broad range of malignancies. Additionally, specific tumor-targeting tracers like [99mTc]Tc-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, or [11C]C- or [18F]F-Choline revealed high diagnostic performance for early assessment and prognostication of bone metastases, particularly in prostate cancer. PET/MRI appears highly accurate imaging modality, but has associated limitations notably, limited availability, more complex logistics and high installation costs. Advances in artificial intelligence (Al) seem to improve the accuracy of imaging modalities and provide an assistant role in the evaluation of treatment response of bone metastases.

A randomised trial of [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT versus NaF-PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol

Background

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA-PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA-PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)-PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa.

Study Design

This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures.

Patients and Methods

Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[18F]F-PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[18F]F-PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3-12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines.

Trial Registration

The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021-000123-12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469).

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Sodium Fluoride Na18F-PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the Bone Metastases of Prostate Cancer Using a Volumetric 3-D Radiomic Analysis

Bone is the most common metastatic site in prostate cancer (PCa). 68Ga-PSMA-11 (or gozetotide) and sodium fluoride-18 (Na18F) are rather new radiopharmaceuticals for assessing PCa-associated bone metastases. Gozetotide uptake reflects cell membrane enzyme activity and the sodium fluoride uptake measures bone mineralization in advanced PCa. Here, we aim to characterize this difference and possibly provide a new method for patient selection in targeted therapies. Methods: The study consisted of 14 patients with advanced PCa (M group > 5 lesions), who had had routine PET/CT both with PSMA and NaF over consecutive days, and 12 PCa patients with no skeletal metastases (N). The bone regions in CT were used to coregister the two PET/CT scans. The whole skeleton volume(s) of interest (VOIs) were defined using the CT component of PET (HU > 150); similarly, the sclerotic/dense bone was defined as HU > 600. Additional VOIs were defined for PET, with pathological threshold values for PSMA (SUV > 3.0) and NaF (SUV > 10). Besides the pathological bone volumes measured with each technique (CT, NaF, and PSMA-PET) and their contemporaneous combinations, overlapping VOIs with the CT-based skeletal and sclerotic volumes were also recorded. Additionally, thresholds of 4.0, 6.0, and 10.0 were tested for SUVPSMA. Results: In group M, the skeletal VOI volumes were 8.77 ± 1.80 L, and the sclerotic bone volumes were 1.32 ± 0.50 L; in contrast, in group N, they were 8.73 ± 1.43 L (skeletal) and 1.23 ± 0.28 L (sclerosis). The total enzyme activity for PSMA was 2.21 ± 5.15 in the M group and 0.078 ± 0.053 in the N group (p < 0.0002). The total bone demineralization activity for NaF varied from 4.31 ± 6.17 in the M group and 0.24 ± 0.56 in group N (p < 0.0002). The pathological PSMA volume represented 0.44−132% of the sclerotic bone volume in group M and 0.55−2.3% in group N. The pathological NaF volume in those patients with multiple metastases represented 0.27−68% of the sclerotic bone volume, and in the control group, only 0.00−6.5% of the sclerotic bone volume (p < 0.0003). Conclusions: These results confirm our earlier findings that CT alone does not suit the evaluation of the extent of active skeletal metastases in PCa. PSMA and NaF images give complementary information about the extent of the active skeletal disease, which has a clinical impact and may change its management. The PSMA and NaF absolute volumes could be used for planning targeted therapies. A cut-off value 3.0 for SUVPSMA given here is the best correlation in the presentation of active metastatic skeletal disease.