Using digital health tools for the Remote Assessment of Treatment Prognosis in Depression (RAPID): a study protocol for a feasibility study

Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry: A Review of Biological and Behavioral Data Analyses

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in psychiatry, improving diagnostic precision, treatment personalization, and early intervention through advanced data analysis techniques. This review explores recent advancements in AI applications within psychiatry, focusing on EEG and ECG data analysis, speech analysis, natural language processing (NLP), blood biomarker integration, and social media data utilization. EEG-based models have significantly enhanced the detection of disorders such as depression and schizophrenia through spectral and connectivity analyses. ECG-based approaches have provided insights into emotional regulation and stress-related conditions using heart rate variability. Speech analysis frameworks, leveraging large language models (LLMs), have improved the detection of cognitive impairments and psychiatric symptoms through nuanced linguistic feature extraction. Meanwhile, blood biomarker analyses have deepened our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of mental health disorders, and social media analytics have demonstrated the potential for real-time mental health surveillance. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data heterogeneity, interpretability, and ethical considerations remain barriers to widespread clinical adoption. Future research must prioritize the development of explainable AI models, regulatory compliance, and the integration of diverse datasets to maximize the impact of AI in psychiatric care.

Identifying depression-related topics in smartphone-collected free-response speech recordings using an automatic speech recognition system and a deep learning topic model

BACKGROUND

Prior research has associated spoken language use with depression, yet studies often involve small or non-clinical samples and face challenges in the manual transcription of speech. This paper aimed to automatically identify depression-related topics in speech recordings collected from clinical samples.

METHODS

The data included 3919 English free-response speech recordings collected via smartphones from 265 participants with a depression history. We transcribed speech recordings via automatic speech recognition (Whisper tool, OpenAI) and identified principal topics from transcriptions using a deep learning topic model (BERTopic). To identify depression risk topics and understand the context, we compared participants' depression severity and behavioral (extracted from wearable devices) and linguistic (extracted from transcribed texts) characteristics across identified topics.

RESULTS

From the 29 topics identified, we identified 6 risk topics for depression: 'No Expectations', 'Sleep', 'Mental Therapy', 'Haircut', 'Studying', and 'Coursework'. Participants mentioning depression risk topics exhibited higher sleep variability, later sleep onset, and fewer daily steps and used fewer words, more negative language, and fewer leisure-related words in their speech recordings.

LIMITATIONS

Our findings were derived from a depressed cohort with a specific speech task, potentially limiting the generalizability to non-clinical populations or other speech tasks. Additionally, some topics had small sample sizes, necessitating further validation in larger datasets.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that specific speech topics can indicate depression severity. The employed data-driven workflow provides a practical approach for analyzing large-scale speech data collected from real-world settings.

Biomarker Methodologies: A NIMH Perspective

Biomarkers are critically important in the development of drugs, biologics, medical devices, and psychosocial interventions for psychiatric disorders. As the lead federal agency charged with setting and supporting the national agenda for mental health research, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funds a broad portfolio of basic, translational, and clinical research focused on identifying, developing, and validating biomarkers for serious mental illnesses and neurodevelopmental conditions. In psychiatric research over the past 10 years, there has been an intensive effort to identify biomarkers as potential tools to improve treatment options for individuals with mental health concerns and increase success in the development of novel interventions. This chapter highlights examples of biomarker technologies that have been utilized to advance understanding of the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders and the development of novel therapeutics.

The Feasibility of Implementing Remote Measurement Technologies in Psychological Treatment for Depression: Mixed Methods Study on Engagement

BACKGROUND

Remote measurement technologies (RMTs) such as smartphones and wearables can help improve treatment for depression by providing objective, continuous, and ecologically valid insights into mood and behavior. Engagement with RMTs is varied and highly context dependent; however, few studies have investigated their feasibility in the context of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

A mixed methods design was used to evaluate engagement with active and passive data collection via RMT in people with depression undergoing psychotherapy. We evaluated the effects of treatment on 2 different types of engagement: study attrition (engagement with study protocol) and patterns of missing data (engagement with digital devices), which we termed data availability. Qualitative interviews were conducted to help interpret the differences in engagement.

METHODS

A total of 66 people undergoing psychological therapy for depression were followed up for 7 months. Active data were gathered from weekly questionnaires and speech and cognitive tasks, and passive data were gathered from smartphone sensors and a Fitbit (Fitbit Inc) wearable device.

RESULTS

The overall retention rate was 60%. Higher-intensity treatment (χ21=4.6; P=.03) and higher baseline anxiety (t56.28=-2.80, 2-tailed; P=.007) were associated with attrition, but depression severity was not (t50.4=-0.18; P=.86). A trend toward significance was found for the association between longer treatments and increased attrition (U=339.5; P=.05). Data availability was higher for active data than for passive data initially but declined at a sharper rate (90%-30% drop in 7 months). As for passive data, wearable data availability fell from a maximum of 80% to 45% at 7 months but showed higher overall data availability than smartphone-based data, which remained stable at the range of 20%-40% throughout. Missing data were more prevalent among GPS location data, followed by among Bluetooth data, then among accelerometry data. As for active data, speech and cognitive tasks had lower completion rates than clinical questionnaires. The participants in treatment provided less Fitbit data but more active data than those on the waiting list.

CONCLUSIONS

Different data streams showed varied patterns of missing data, despite being gathered from the same device. Longer and more complex treatments and clinical characteristics such as higher baseline anxiety may reduce long-term engagement with RMTs, and different devices may show opposite patterns of missingness during treatment. This has implications for the scalability and uptake of RMTs in health care settings, the generalizability and accuracy of the data collected by these methods, feature construction, and the appropriateness of RMT use in the long term.