Nudge interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care: a systematic review

Dentists' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of antibiotic prescribing: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore dentists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding antibiotic use.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of dentists' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding antibiotic use, by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science for all original paper published from January 1990 to July 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines.

RESULTS

The review included 37 papers, (7 qualitative and 30 quantitative studies). Modifiable factors (knowledge, attitudes) were reported as being associated with antibiotic prescribing by dentists which were cited in 30 of the 37. These attitudes most frequently identified by dentists were: complacency (22/29); lack of trust (16/29); the need to postpone the dental procedure (17/29); and fear (8/29). Gaps in knowledge were also identified (15/29). Only one of the included articles quantified the influence between the reported modifiable factors and antibiotic prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

The review emphasizes that dentists' antibiotic prescribing is predominantly influenced by modifiable factors. This insight informs the potential for targeted interventions to curtail inappropriate antibiotic use, contributing to global efforts in reducing antibiotic resistance. The protocol of this systematic review can be found in PROSPERO under registration no. CRD42021253937.

Electronic health record-based behaviour change interventions aimed at general practitioners in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review using behaviour change theory

OBJECTIVES

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are used extensively in healthcare; their design can influence clinicians' behaviour. We conducted a systematic review of EHR-based interventions aimed at changing the clinical practice of general practitioners in the UK, assessed their effectiveness and applied behaviour change theory to identify lessons for other settings.

DESIGN

Mixed methods systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and APA PsycINFO were searched up to March 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Quantitative and qualitative findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series of EHR-based interventions in UK general practice were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Quantitative synthesis was based on Cochrane's Synthesis without Meta-analysis. Interventions were categorised using the Behaviour Change Wheel and MINDSPACE frameworks and effectiveness determined by vote-counting using direction of effect. Inductive thematic synthesis was used for qualitative studies.

RESULTS

Database searching identified 3824 unique articles; 10 were included (from 2002 to 2021), comprising eight RCTs and two associated qualitative studies. Four of seven quantitative studies showed a positive effect on clinician behaviour and three on patient-level outcomes. Behaviour change techniques that may trigger emotions and required less cognitive engagement appeared to have positive effects. Qualitative findings indicated that interventions reassured clinicians of their decisions but were sometimes ignored.

CONCLUSION

Despite widespread use, there is little high quality, up-to-date experimental evidence evaluating the effectiveness of EHR-based interventions in UK general practice. The evidence suggested EHR-based interventions may be effective at changing behaviour. Persistent, simple action-oriented prompts appeared more effective than complex interventions requiring greater cognitive engagement. However, studies lacked detail in intervention design and theory behind design choices. Future research should seek to optimise EHR-based behaviour change intervention design and delineate limitations, providing theory-based justification for interventions. This will be of increasing importance with the growing use of EHRs to influence clinicians' decisions.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022341009.

Physician antimicrobial prescribing and patient outcomes on general medical wards: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Variability in antimicrobial prescribing may indicate an opportunity for improvement in antimicrobial use. We sought to measure physician-level antimicrobial prescribing in adult general medical wards, assess the contribution of patient-level factors to antimicrobial prescribing and evaluate the association between antimicrobial prescribing and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Using the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of physician-level volume and spectrum of antimicrobial prescribing in adult general medical wards in 4 academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, between April 2010 and December 2019. We stratified physicians into quartiles by hospital site based on volume of antimicrobial prescribing (days of therapy per 100 patient-days and antimicrobial-free days) and antibacterial spectrum (modified spectrum score). The modified spectrum score assigns a value to each antibacterial agent based on the breadth of coverage. We assessed patient-level differences among physician quartiles using age, sex, Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score, discharge diagnosis and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We evaluated the association of clinical outcomes (in-hospital 30-day mortality, length of stay, intensive care unit [ICU] transfer and hospital readmission) with antimicrobial volume and spectrum using multilevel modelling.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 124 physicians responsible for 124 158 hospital admissions. The median physician-level volume of antimicrobial prescribing was 56.1 (interquartile range 51.7-67.5) days of therapy per 100 patient-days. We did not find any differences in baseline patient characteristics by physician prescribing quartile. The difference in mean prescribing between quartile 4 and quartile 1 was 15.8 days of therapy per 100 patient-days (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.6-22.0), representing 30% higher antimicrobial prescribing in the fourth quartile than the first quartile. Patient in-hospital deaths, length of stay, ICU transfer and hospital readmission did not differ by physician quartile. In-hospital mortality was higher among patients cared for by prescribers with higher modified spectrum scores (odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.24).

INTERPRETATION

We found that physician-level variability in antimicrobial prescribing was not associated with differences in patient characteristics or outcomes in academic general medicine wards. These findings provide support for considering the lowest quartile of physician antimicrobial prescribing within each hospital as a target for antimicrobial stewardship.

Clinician Job Satisfaction After Peer Comparison Feedback: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Interventions that improve clinician performance through feedback should not contribute to job dissatisfaction or staff turnover. Measurement of job satisfaction may help identify interventions that lead to this undesirable consequence.

Objective

To evaluate whether mean job satisfaction was less than the margin of clinical significance among clinicians who received social norm feedback (peer comparison) compared with clinicians who did not.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary, preregistered, noninferiority analysis of a cluster randomized trial compared 3 interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design from November 1, 2011, to April 1, 2014. A total of 248 clinicians were enrolled from 47 clinics. The sample size for this analysis was determined by the number of nonmissing job satisfaction scores from the original enrolled sample, which was 201 clinicians from 43 clinics. Data analysis was performed from October 12 to April 13, 2022.

Interventions

Feedback comparing individual clinician performance to top-performing peers, delivered in monthly emails (peer comparison).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a response to the following statement: "Overall, I am satisfied with my current job." Responses ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Results

A total of 201 clinicians (response rate, 81%) from 43 of the 47 clinics (91%) provided a survey response about job satisfaction. Clinicians were primarily female (n = 129 [64%]) and board certified in internal medicine (n = 126 [63%]), with a mean (SD) age of 48 (10) years. The clinic-clustered difference in mean job satisfaction was greater than -0.32 (β = 0.11; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.42; P = .46). Therefore, the preregistered null hypothesis that peer comparison is inferior by resulting in at least a 1-point decrease in job satisfaction by 1 in 3 clinicians was rejected. The secondary null hypothesis that job satisfaction was similar among clinicians randomized to social norm feedback was not able to be rejected. The effect size did not change when controlling for other trial interventions (t = 0.08; P = .94), and no interaction effects were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, peer comparison did not lead to lower job satisfaction. Features that may have protected against dissatisfaction include clinicians' agency over the performance measure, privacy of individual performance, and allowing all clinicians to achieve top performance.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05575115 and NCT01454947.

Effectiveness of non-interruptive nudge interventions in electronic health records to improve the delivery of care in hospitals: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To describe the application of nudges within electronic health records (EHRs) and their effects on inpatient care delivery, and identify design features that support effective decision-making without the use of interruptive alerts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo (in January 2022) for randomized controlled trials, interrupted time-series and before-after studies reporting effects of nudge interventions embedded in hospital EHRs to improve care. Nudge interventions were identified at full-text review, using a pre-existing classification. Interventions using interruptive alerts were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) for non-randomized studies or the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group methodology for randomized trials. Study results were summarized narratively.

RESULTS

We included 18 studies evaluating 24 EHR nudges. An improvement in care delivery was reported for 79.2% (n = 19; 95% CI, 59.5-90.8) of nudges. Nudges applied were from 5 of 9 possible nudge categories: change choice defaults (n = 9), make information visible (n = 6), change range or composition of options (n = 5), provide reminders (n = 2), and change option-related effort (n = 2). Only one study had a low risk of bias. Nudges targeted ordering of medications, laboratory tests, imaging, and appropriateness of care. Few studies evaluated long-term effects.

DISCUSSION

Nudges in EHRs can improve care delivery. Future work could explore a wider range of nudges and evaluate long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

Nudges can be implemented in EHRs to improve care delivery within current system capabilities; however, as with all digital interventions, careful consideration of the sociotechnical system is crucial to enhance their effectiveness.