Effects of vitamin D insufficiency on sepsis severity and risk of hospitalisation in emergency department patients: a cross-sectional study

Analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum PAD2 in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a common disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). In recent years, the incidence rate and mortality rate remain high. Early diagnosis of sepsis is crucial for treatment and can effectively reduce mortality. So far, the ability of serum peptidylarginine deaminase 2 (PAD2) in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis patients is still unclear. We conducted this study to reveal the clinical value of PAD2 as a biomarker for sepsis patients.

METHODS

A prospective study method was used to select 207 patients in the ICU of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from May 2022 to May 2023. They were divided into the sepsis group (n = 135) and control group (n = 72), and data were collected within 24 h of hospitalization. Sepsis patients were divided into a survival group (n = 80) and a non-survival group (n = 55) based on their 28-day survival status. Using statistical methods to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of PAD2 in sepsis.

RESULTS

The serum PAD2 concentrations in the sepsis group were significantly higher than in the control group (median 16.70 vs 35.32 ng/ml, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and PAD2 were independent risk factors for sepsis. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the combined diagnostic value of qSOFA, CRP, PCT, and PAD2 was the highest. The serum PAD2 concentrations in the non-survival group of patients with sepsis were significantly higher than those in the survival group (median 29.26 vs 50.08 ng/ml, P < 0.05). The COX regression analysis showed that PAD2, sequential organ failure score Assessment (SOFA) score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score were independent factors affecting the prognosis of sepsis patients. The ROC analysis showed that the combined prognostic value of PAD2, SOFA, and APACHE II scores was significantly higher than any single indicator. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with PAD2 ≤ 48.62 ng/ml had a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The significant increase in serum PAD2 concentrations in patients is an independent risk factor affecting the occurrence of sepsis and 28-day mortality. The combination of PAD2 and other indicators can further improve the diagnostic and prognostic value for ICU sepsis patients.

Update on vitamin D role in severe infections and sepsis

Severe infections frequently require admission to the intensive care unit and cause life-threatening complications in critically ill patients. In this setting, severe infections are acknowledged as prerequisites for the development of sepsis, whose pathophysiology implies a dysregulated host response to pathogens, leading to disability and mortality worldwide.Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone that plays a pivotal role to maintain immune system homeostasis, which is of paramount importance to resolve infection and modulate the burden of sepsis. Specifically, vitamin D deficiency has been widely reported in critically ill patients and represents a risk factor for the development of severe infections, sepsis and worse clinical outcomes. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation strategies to improve vitamin D body content, but conflictual results support its benefit in general populations of critically ill patients. In contrast, small randomised clinical trials reported that vitamin D supplementation may improve host-defence to pathogen invasion via the production of cathelicidin and specific cytokines. Nonetheless, no large scale investigations have been designed to specifically assess the impact of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome of critically ill septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Causal effects of genetically vitamins and sepsis risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, observational studies have been conducted to investigate the potential impact of vitamins on sepsis. However, many of these studies have produced inconsistent results. Our Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to evaluate the causality between vitamins and sepsis from a genetic perspective.

METHODS

Our MR study was designed following the STROBE-MR guidelines. Genetic instrumental variables for vitamins including folate, vitamin B12, B6, A (Retinol), C, D, and K were obtained from previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and MR studies. Five different sepsis severity levels were included in the analysis. The genetic instrumental variables were screened for potential confounders using PhenoScanner V2. MR analysis was performed using MR-egger, inverse-variance weighted multiplicative random effects (IVW-RE), inverse-variance weighted multiplicative fixed-effects (IVW-FE), and wald ratio methods to assess the relationship between vitamins and sepsis. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the MR-egger_intercept method, and the MR-PRESSO package and Cochran's Q test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the instrumental variables.

RESULTS

Our MR study found no statistically significant association between vitamins and sepsis risk, regardless of the type of vitamin (P-value > 0.05). The odds ratios (ORs) for folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin K, and vitamin C were 1.164 (95% CI: 0.895-1.514), 0.987 (95% CI: 0.969-1.005), 0.975 (95% CI: 0.914-1.041), 0.993 (95% CI: 0.797-1.238), 0.861 (95% CI: 0.522-1.42), 0.955 (95% CI: 0.86-1.059), and 1.049 (95% CI: 0.911-1.208), respectively. Similar results were observed in subgroups of different sepsis severity levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our MR study found no evidence of a causal association between vitamins and sepsis risk from a genetic perspective. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these results.

Vitamin D Supplementation during Intensive Care Unit Stay Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D, as a common micronutrient, has been widely used in critically ill patients. However, whether supplementation of vitamin D in adult patients with sepsis can improve their prognosis remains controversial.

METHODS

Data from the Mart for Intensive Care IV database was used in this retrospective cohort study, and adult patients with sepsis were enrolled. Critically ill patients, admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) between 2008 and 2019 at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), were divided into the vitamin D supplementation group and non-vitamin D supplementation group. The primary outcomes were defined as all-cause in-hospital, 28-day, and 90-day mortality rates after admission to the ICU. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and overlap weighting (OW) analyses were used to minimize selection bias and balance the baseline demographic characteristics. Regression and survival analyses were performed to assess the association between vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

RESULTS

In total, 3539 patients with sepsis were enrolled as study participants; of these, 315 were supplemented with vitamin D during their ICU stay. In-hospital, 28-day, and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower in patients with sepsis supplemented with vitamin D. Multivariate regression analysis showed vitamin D supplementation as a potential protective factor for in-hospital mortality with an odds ratio (OR) = 0.70 (0.51-0.96) after adjusting for all confounders. The hazard ratios (HRs) for 28-day and 90-day mortality were 0.65 (0.50-0.85) and 0.70 (0.55-0.90), respectively. The survival analysis showed that the vitamin D supplementation group had a higher survival probability within 28 and 90 days (p-value < 0.05). These results remained relatively stable post PSM, IPTW, and OW. However, we found no evidence that vitamin D supplementation could shorten the length of stay in the ICU or hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D supplementation during an ICU stay was associated with improved prognosis in patients with sepsis, as evidenced by lower in-hospital, 28-day, and 90-day mortality rates and lower disease severity-related scores, but showed no influence on the length of stay in the hospital or ICU.