1
|
Peterson CL. Inequality and health: Can medical practice address the consequences of inequalities? J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38975616 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which governments provide socioeconomic supports has been highlighted by their spending during the COVID-19 pandemic. This has implications for patterns of inequality, in particular on exacerbating unequal health and well-being. RESULTS Inequity has expanded due to neoliberalism, a market-based approach that has endured for more than four decades. Together with COVID-19, it has developed and exposed many structural governance differences. DISCUSSION There are a number of examples presented of the effects of inequalities on health and well-being. The role of general practice in addressing these is discussed and challenges are highlighted, especially those relating to payment systems and workforce constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris L Peterson
- Department of Social Inquiry, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gustafson P, Lambert M, Bartholomew K, Ratima M, Aziz YA, Kremer L, Fusheini A, Carswell P, Brown R, Priest P, Crengle S. Adapting an equity-focused implementation process framework with a focus on ethnic health inequities in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. Int J Equity Health 2024; 23:15. [PMID: 38280997 PMCID: PMC10822165 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02087-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health intervention implementation in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), as in many countries globally, usually varies by ethnicity. Māori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa) and Pacific peoples are less likely to receive interventions than other ethnic groups, despite experiencing persistent health inequities. This study aimed to develop an equity-focused implementation framework, appropriate for the Aotearoa NZ context, to support the planning and delivery of equitable implementation pathways for health interventions, with the intention of achieving equitable outcomes for Māori, as well as people originating from the Pacific Islands. METHODS A scoping review of the literature to identify existing equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks was undertaken. One of these, the Equity-based framework for Implementation Research (EquIR), was selected for adaptation. The adaptation process was undertaken in collaboration with the project's Māori and consumer advisory groups and informed by the expertise of local health equity researchers and stakeholders, as well as the international implementation science literature. RESULTS The adapted framework's foundation is the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the written agreement between Māori rangatira (chiefs) and the British Crown), and its focus is whānau (extended family)-centred implementation that meets the health and wellbeing aspirations, priorities and needs of whānau. The implementation pathway comprises four main steps: implementation planning, pathway design, monitoring, and outcomes and evaluation, all with an equity focus. The pathway is underpinned by the core constructs of equitable implementation in Aotearoa NZ: collaborative design, anti-racism, Māori and priority population expertise, cultural safety and values-based. Additionally, the contextual factors impacting implementation, i.e. the social, economic, commercial and political determinants of health, are included. CONCLUSIONS The framework presented in this study is the first equity-focused process-type implementation framework to be adapted for the Aotearoa NZ context. This framework is intended to support and facilitate equity-focused implementation research and health intervention implementation by mainstream health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Papillon Gustafson
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 9054
| | - Michelle Lambert
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 9054
| | - Karen Bartholomew
- Te Whatu Ora Waitematā and Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Mihi Ratima
- Taumata Associates, Hāwera, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Yasmin Abdul Aziz
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 9054
| | - Lisa Kremer
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 9054
| | - Adam Fusheini
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | | | - Rachel Brown
- National Hauora Coalition, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Patricia Priest
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Sue Crengle
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 9054.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gustafson P, Abdul Aziz Y, Lambert M, Bartholomew K, Rankin N, Fusheini A, Brown R, Carswell P, Ratima M, Priest P, Crengle S. A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities. Implement Sci 2023; 18:51. [PMID: 37845686 PMCID: PMC10578009 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequities in implementation contribute to the unequal benefit of health interventions between groups of people with differing levels of advantage in society. Implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) provide a theoretical basis for understanding the multi-level factors that influence implementation outcomes and are used to guide implementation processes. This study aimed to identify and analyse TMFs that have an equity focus or have been used to implement interventions in populations who experience ethnicity or 'race'-related health inequities. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to identify the relevant literature published from January 2011 to April 2022 by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and CINAHL), the Dissemination and Implementation model database, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that met the inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by at least two researchers. Data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria, including the study characteristics, TMF description and operationalisation. TMFs were categorised as determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories, process models and evaluation frameworks according to their overarching aim and described with respect to how equity and system-level factors influencing implementation were incorporated. RESULTS Database searches yielded 610 results, 70 of which were eligible for full-text review, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. A further eight publications were identified from additional sources. In total, 26 papers describing 15 TMFs and their operationalisation were included. Categorisation resulted in four determinant frameworks, one implementation theory, six process models and three evaluation frameworks. One framework included elements of determinant, process and evaluation TMFs and was therefore classified as a 'hybrid' framework. TMFs varied in their equity and systems focus. Twelve TMFs had an equity focus and three were established TMFs applied in an equity context. All TMFs at least partially considered systems-level factors, with five fully considering macro-, meso- and micro-level influences on equity and implementation. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review identifies and summarises the implementation science TMFs available to support equity-focused implementation. This review may be used as a resource to guide TMF selection and illustrate how TMFs have been utilised in equity-focused implementation activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Papillon Gustafson
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, PO Box 56, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Yasmin Abdul Aziz
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, PO Box 56, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Michelle Lambert
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, PO Box 56, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Karen Bartholomew
- Te Whatu Ora Waitematā and Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Evaluation and Implementation Science Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adam Fusheini
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Rachel Brown
- National Hauora Coalition, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | | | - Mihi Ratima
- Taumata Associates, Hāwera, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Patricia Priest
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Sue Crengle
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, Aotearoa, PO Box 56, 9054, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|