1
|
Llanos Jiménez L, Alvarez-Alvarez B, Fonseca Aizpuru E, Peces-Barba G, Pindao Quesada G, Rodríguez Nieto MJ, Ruiz-Hornillos FJ, Seijo Maceiras L, Robles Barrena I, Mena-de-Cea A, Meijide-Míguez H, Sánchez-Pernaute O. Cyclosporin A as an Add-On Therapy to a Corticosteroid-Based Background Treatment in Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5242. [PMID: 39274454 PMCID: PMC11396137 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: In susceptible hosts, SARS-CoV2-induced hyperinflammation accounts for an increased mortality. The search of adjuvant immunomodulatory therapies has been ongoing ever since the pandemic outbreak. Aim: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA) as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (SoC) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in patients admitted to eight Spanish tertiary hospitals. Patients were stratified into two severity categories and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a corticosteroid-based standard therapy with or without CsA. The primary endpoint was FiO2 recovery by Day 12 without relapses. Results: 109 patients were included and randomized, and 98 of them considered for the mITT population (51 assigned to the CsA + SoC group and 47 to the SoC group). A total of 35 (68.6%) patients from the CsA + SoC group and 32 (71.1%) patients from the SoC group reached the primary endpoint in the mITT analysis. No differences were found after stratification into age groups, in the severity level at admission, or in a combination of both. Overall, the time to FiO2 normalization was 7.4 days vs. 7.9 days in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Global mortality was 8.2%. Severe adverse events were uncommon and equally distributed between arms. Conclusion: The addition of CsA did not show differences over a corticosteroid-based treatment in the clinical course of the included patients. A better identification of candidates who will benefit from receiving immunomodulatory drugs is necessary in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucía Llanos Jiménez
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alvarez-Alvarez
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Germán Peces-Barba
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Pindao Quesada
- Villalba General University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28400 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mª Jesús Rodríguez Nieto
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Villalba General University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28400 Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco J Ruiz-Hornillos
- Infanta Elena University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28342 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Robles Barrena
- Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital (HURJC), FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28933 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Mena-de-Cea
- Internal Medicine Department, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Olga Sánchez-Pernaute
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD) University Hospital, FJD Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janin YL. On the origins of SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. RSC Med Chem 2024; 15:81-118. [PMID: 38283212 PMCID: PMC10809347 DOI: 10.1039/d3md00493g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
In order to address the world-wide health challenge caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the 3CL protease/SARS-CoV-2 main protease (SARS-CoV-2-Mpro) coded by its nsp5 gene became one of the biochemical targets for the design of antiviral drugs. In less than 3 years of research, 4 inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2-Mpro have actually been authorized for COVID-19 treatment (nirmatrelvir, ensitrelvir, leritrelvir and simnotrelvir) and more such as EDP-235, FB-2001 and STI-1558/Olgotrelvir or five undisclosed compounds (CDI-988, ASC11, ALG-097558, QLS1128 and H-10517) are undergoing clinical trials. This review is an attempt to picture this quite unprecedented medicinal chemistry feat and provide insights on how these cysteine protease inhibitors were discovered. Since many series of covalent SARS-CoV-2-Mpro inhibitors owe some of their origins to previous work on other proteases, we first provided a description of various inhibitors of cysteine-bearing human caspase-1 or cathepsin K, as well as inhibitors of serine proteases such as human dipeptidyl peptidase-4 or the hepatitis C protein complex NS3/4A. This is then followed by a description of the results of the approaches adopted (repurposing, structure-based and high throughput screening) to discover coronavirus main protease inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves L Janin
- Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (StrInG), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, INSERM, CNRS, Alliance Sorbonne Université 75005 Paris France
| |
Collapse
|