Course of fear of falling after hip fracture: findings from a 12-month inception cohort

Fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours after upper limb fracture in older people: a systematic review and meta-ethnography

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to understand older people's perspectives of associated fear-avoidant beliefs following upper limb fracture.

METHODS

Published and unpublished literature databases were systematically searched from inception to 1st April 2023. Qualitative studies reporting the perspectives of fear-avoidant beliefs or behaviours in people who had sustained an upper limb fracture were eligible. Data extracted included characteristics of people interviewed, experiences and perceptions of fear, fear of falling, and fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours. Data were synthesised using a meta-ethnography approach and the GRADE-CERQUAL tool.

RESULTS

Eight studies were eligible (n = 150 participants; 109 distal radial/41 humeral fracture). Three overarching themes were identified: (1) type of fear-avoidant experiences, (2) drivers of fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours, and (3) consequences of fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours. The themes generated were based on moderate confidence evidence. In summary, whilst some patients initially consider upper limb fractures to be relatively minor injuries, over time, the realisation occurs that they have wide-ranging consequences with longer-term perspectives on recovery. This often occurs following an initial period of reduced fear. Providing education and support immediately post-fracture to prevent or challenge initial health beliefs around fear of falls and fear of movement is imperative to recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Fear-avoidant beliefs can impact heavily on certain older people's recovery, as well as their longer-term health and wellbeing. Consideration of fear avoidance and taking steps to mitigate against this in the acute upper limb trauma setting will better serve these patients in their ongoing recovery from injury.

The global prevalence of and risk factors for fear of falling among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As a common psychological problem among older adults, fear of falling was found to have a wide range prevalence in different studies. However, the global prevalence of it was unknown and a lack of the large sample confirmed its risk factors.

OBJECTIVES

To report the global prevalence of fear of falling and to explore its risk factors among older adults for further developing precise interventions to systematically manage FOF.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by PRISMA guidelines.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the manual search in August 20, 2022, updated to September 2, 2023. Observational studies published in English were included and two researchers independently screened and extracted the data. Fixed or random effects mode was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of and risk factors for fear of falling. Heterogeneity resources were analyzed by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots, Egger's test and Begg's test.

RESULTS

A total of the 153 studies with 200,033 participants from 38 countries worldwide were identified. The global prevalence of fear of falling was 49.60%, ranging from 6.96-90.34%. Subgroup analysis found the estimates pooled prevalence of it was higher in developing countries (53.40%) than in developed countries (46.7%), and higher in patients (52.20%) than in community residents (48.40%). In addition, twenty-eight risk factors were found a significant associations with fear of falling, mainly including demographic characteristics, physical function, chronic diseases and mental problems.

CONCLUSION

The global prevalence of FOF was high, especially in developing countries and in patients. Demographic characteristics, Physical function, chronic diseases and mental problems were a significant association with FOF. Policy-makers, health care providers and government officials should comprehensively evaluate these risk factors and formulate precise intervention measures to reduce FOF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the International Database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42022358031.